Skip to content

Actifuse ABX Versus INFUSE in Posterolateral Instrumented Lumbar Fusion (PLIF) With Interbody Fusion

A Prospective, Randomised Study Comparing the Use of Actifuse (Trademark)ABX Synthetic Bone Substitute With INFUSE (Registrered Trademark) in Patients Requiring Posterolateral Instrumented Lumbar Fusion With Interbody Fusion

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01013389
Acronym
APPRAISET1
Enrollment
20
Registered
2009-11-13
Start date
2007-06-30
Completion date
2012-12-31
Last updated
2017-04-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Degenerative Disc Disease

Keywords

actifuse, INFUSE, InductOs, DDD, degenerative disk disease, PLIF, PITF, PLF, poterolateral lumber fusion, Bone substitute, bone graft, synthetic bone substitute

Brief summary

The primary objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate the success rates of Actifuse ABX and INFUSE in achieving bone fusion. The secondary objective of this clinical trial is to assess clinical outcome measurements.

Interventions

PROCEDUREActifuse ABX

bone substitute used for posterolateral instrumented lumbar fusion with interbody fusion

PROCEDUREINFUSE, plus master granules (MGG)

bone substitute in posterolateral instrumented lumbar fusion with interbody fusion

Sponsors

Apatech, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Has degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine as indicated by back pain of discogenic/degenerative origin, with or without leg pain, and has one or more of the following conditions as documented by plain X-rays, CT scan or MRI scan: * Modic changes. * High intensity changes in the annulus. * Loss of disc height. * Decreased hydration of the disc. * Canal stenosis with or without spondylotic slip. * Gross facet joint changes requiring fusion for treatment. * Have documented annular pathology by other means. (e.g., with discography). * Has a preoperative Oswestry Back Disability Score of 30 or more. * Aged 18 to 75 years and skeletally mature at time of surgery. * Has not responded to non-operative treatment (e.g., bed rest, physical therapy, medications and/or spinal injections) for a period of six months. * If of childbearing potential, patient is non-pregnant, non-nursing and agrees not to become pregnant for one year following surgery. * Is willing to and able to comply with the study plan and able to understand and sign the Patient Informed Consent Form.

Exclusion criteria

* Has had previous failed attempts at fusion surgery at the involved level(s). * Has a diagnosis of spinal infection tumour or trauma. * Requires surgery at more than two (2) levels. * Has osteoporosis (excluding osteopenia) as evidenced on plain X-rays, CT scans (or DEXA scan in cases of doubt). * Is pregnant. * Is an alcohol and/or drug abuser as defined by currently undergoing treatment for alcohol and/or drug abuse. * Has received drugs that may interfere with bone metabolism within two weeks prior to the planned surgery date (e.g., steroids or methotrexate) excluding routine perioperative, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. * Has a history of autoimmune disease. * Has a history of exposure to injectable collagen implants. * Has a history of hypersensitivity to protein pharmaceuticals (monoclonal antibodies or gamma globulins) or collagen. * Has received treatment with an investigational therapy (device and/or pharmaceutical) within 30 days prior to surgery or such treatment is planned during the 24 months following surgery. * Has received any previous exposure to any/all BMPs of either human or animal extraction. * Has a history of allergy to bovine products or a history of general anaphylaxis. * Has a history of any endocrine or metabolic disorder known to affect osteogenesis (e.g., Paget's disease, renal oseodystrophy, Ehlos-Danlos syndrome or osteogenesis imperfecta). * Has any disease that would preclude accurate clinical evaluation (e.g., neuromuscular disease, etc.). * Has a primary diagnosis of a spinal disorder other than degenerative disc disease or other conditions as set out in inclusions above at the involved level(s). * Has a condition that requires postoperative medications that interfere with fusion, such as steroids or prolonged use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, excluding routine perioperative non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. This does not include low dose aspirin for prophylactic anticoagulation. * Has overt or active bacterial infection, local or systemic, and/or a potential for bacteremia. * Has presence of active malignancy or prior history of malignancy (except for basal cell carcinoma of the skin). * Has a documented metal allergy or intolerance to titanium alloy or cobalt-chrome-molybdenum alloy. * Is, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator or Co-Investigators, intellectually unable to co-operate with the study. * Has chronic or acute renal and/or hepatic failure or prior history of renal or hepatic disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Fusion, defined as evidence of bridging trabecular bone present at 1 year as assessed by CT scan as well as a determination of no motion as assessed by plain radiographs.1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Improvement clinical outcomes measurements compared to pre-opscores: pain/Disability as measured by Oswestry Lower Back Pain Questionnaire, quality of Life as measured by Short Form Health Survey (SF36), and neurological status1 year

Countries

Australia, Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026