Skip to content

Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Internal Disc Disruption (IDD) With the Biostat® System

A Multicenter, Randomized, Blinded, Saline-Controlled Trial of Resorbable Biologic Disc Augmentation for Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Internal Disc Disruption (IDD) With the Biostat® System

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01011816
Enrollment
220
Registered
2009-11-11
Start date
2010-03-31
Completion date
2013-05-31
Last updated
2014-05-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain, Degenerative Disc Disease, Internal Disc Disruption

Keywords

intervertebral disk

Brief summary

The purpose of this investigation is to establish the safety and efficacy of the Biostat System when used for treatment of chronic low back (lumbar) pain due to symptomatic internal disc disruptions (IDD) by comparing safety and efficacy outcome measures between one group receiving BIOSTAT BIOLOGX® Fibrin Sealant through the Biostat® Delivery Device and another group receiving a preservative-free normal saline control delivered with the Biostat Delivery Device.

Detailed description

The Biostat System is a combination product combining a resorbable biologic product with a delivery device system used to prepare and insert the biologic material into a lumbar intervertebral disc. Symptomatic IDD is defined as a painful disruption of the internal architecture of a lumbar intervertebral disc, which appears as fissures, cracks or tears within the internal structures of the disc. Pain arising from a lumbar disc may not only be perceived as pain located in the low back (axial pain) but also as somatic referred pain involving the posterior hips, buttocks, lateral hips, groin, or posterior thighs. The diagnosis of symptomatic IDD cannot currently be made on the basis of imaging studies, physical examination, or symptoms alone, and is best established with meticulously conducted disc provocation studies (provocation discography) that include pressure manometry and identification of an adjacent normal disc. This treatment and study are not designed for patients exhibiting other potential sources of chronic low back pain such as more advanced degenerative disc disease with significant loss of disc height (\>33%), spinal stenosis, or spondylolisthesis (see Eligibility Criteria).

Interventions

BIOLOGICALBIOSTAT BIOLOGX

One injection of up to 4 mL of BIOSTAT BIOLOGX Fibrin Sealant into a single lumbar intervertebral disc using the Biostat Delivery Device

DRUGSaline

One injection of up to 4 mL of saline using the Biostat Delivery Device

Sponsors

Spinal Restoration, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 or older and skeletally mature. * Voluntarily signs the subject informed consent form and agrees to the release of medical information for purposes of this study (HIPAA authorization). * Physically and mentally able to comply with the protocol, including ability to read and complete required forms, and willing and able to adhere to the follow-up requirements of the protocol. * Chronic low back pain for at least 6 months. * Pretreatment baseline low back pain of at least 40 mm on a 100 mm visual analog scale. * Pretreatment baseline Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire score of at least 9 on the 24-point questionnaire. * Leg pain, if present, is of nonradicular origin, i.e., not due to stimulation of nerve roots or dorsal root ganglion of a spinal nerve by compressive forces. * Leg pain, if present, does not extend below the knee and is no greater than 50% of low back pain as measured on a visual analog scale. If bilateral leg pain, the worst leg pain is no greater than 50% of low back pain. * Low back pain unresponsive to at least 3 months of nonoperative care, which may include bed rest, antiinflammatory and analgesic medications, chiropractic manipulations, acupuncture, massage, physical therapy or home-directed lumbar exercise program. * Diagnostic medial branch block or facet joint injection between 18 months and 2 weeks prior to the study procedure indicates no facet joint involvement. * Diagnosis of symptomatic lumbar (L1-L2 - L5-S1) internal disc disruption (IDD), which requires confirmation of discogenic pain at one or two contiguous levels through positive provocation discography performed between 18 months and 2 weeks prior to the study procedure using pressure manometry and identification of an adjacent nonpainful disc. The disc provocation studies must precisely demonstrate concordant pain (\<50 psi above opening pressure) and must demonstrate a fissure(s) in the outer one-third of the posterior or lateral anulus.

Exclusion criteria

* Cauda equina syndrome. * Active malignancy or tumor as source of symptoms. * Current infection or prior history of spinal infection (e.g., discitis, septic arthritis, epidural abscess) or an active systemic infection. * Previous lumbar spine surgery. * Evidence of prior lumbar vertebral body fracture. * Disc bulge/protrusion or focal herniation at the symptomatic level(s) \> 4 mm. * Presence of disc extrusion or sequestration. * Leg pain is greater than 50% of low back pain as measured on a visual analog scale. * Leg pain that extends below the knee. * Lumbar intervertebral foramen stenosis at the affected level(s) resulting in significant spinal nerve root compression (effacement of the majority of periganglion fat and loss of CSF signal around the nerve rootlets). * Symptomatic central vertebral canal stenosis or absolute sagittal vertebral canal diameter \< 9mm. * Loss of disc space height at the symptomatic level(s) greater than one-third of an adjacent normal disc (or of the expected height in the case of an L5-S1 disc). * Spondylolisthesis (\> Grade 1) with or without spondylolysis at the symptomatic level(s). * Lumbar spondylitis or other undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy. * Dynamic instability at the symptomatic level(s) on lumbar flexion-extension radiographs indicated by \>4.5 mm of translation or angular motion \>15° at L1-L2, L2-L3, or L3-L4; \>20° at L4-L5; or \>25° at L5-S1. * Diagnostic medial branch block or facet joint injection indicate facet joint involvement. * Diagnostic sacroiliac injection indicates sacroiliac joint involvement for those patients with pain in the sacral region. * Sustained relief (\>3 months) of low back pain obtained with epidural injection of corticosteroids. * Symptomatic involvement of more than two lumbar disc levels determined from discography. * Neurological examination shows findings of radiculopathy or a significant underlying neurological condition (motor strength \<4; sensory assessment abnormal; or reflexes absent or hyperactive with clonus). * Prior thermal intradiscal procedure (e.g., intradiscal electrothermal therapy, intradiscal radiofrequency thermocoagulation). * Any lumbar intradiscal injection procedure other than discography (e.g., injection of corticosteroids, methylene blue, dextrose, or glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate). * Significant systemic disease, including unstable angina, autoimmune disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and muscular dystrophy. * Congenital or acquired coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia; or currently taking anticoagulant, antineoplastic, antiplatelet, or thrombocytopenia-inducing medications; or undergoing radiation therapy. * History of unexplained, easy, or persistent bruising or bleeding, bleeding from the gums, or bleeding problems experienced in previous surgical procedures. * Aspirin or aspirin-containing medication taken ≤ 7 days prior to the procedure. * Known or suspected hypersensitivity or allergy to drugs or components of the fibrin sealant (fibrinogen, thrombin, aprotinin, CaCl2) used in the procedure. * History of, or current psychiatric or psychological condition, or substance or alcohol abuse that would potentially interfere with the subject's participation in the study. * Ongoing or previous participation in another drug or device clinical study within the previous 2 months. * Subject known to be pregnant or nursing at time of enrollment or with plans to become pregnant within the planned length of follow-up. * Body habitus precludes adequate fluoroscopic visualization for the procedure or the procedure is physically impossible using the device. * Concomitant conditions requiring daily oral steroid use for more than 30 days in the preceding 90 days. * Pending litigation against a health care professional, except where required by the insurer as a condition of coverage, personal injury compensation or litigation claims. * Prisoner or active military personnel who would not be available for follow-up. * Presence of ferromagnetic implants that would disallow MRI of the symptomatic disc(s). * Active or pending workers' compensation claims.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subject Composite Success26 weeksSubject success based on a composite of minimum 30% decrease in low back pain, 30% improvement in function, maintenance of neurological status, no secondary interventions, and no serious adverse events.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analog Scale for Low Back Pain26-weeksPercent of subjects achieving a minimum 30% decrease in pain from baseline. The visual analog scale is a horizontal 100 mm line anchored on the left with the words No Pain and on the right with the words Worst Possible Pain. Scores were obtained by measuring the distance in millimeters from the left origin of the line (0) to the point indicated with a slash placed by the subject to indicate the subject's level of low back pain experienced over the last week.
Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire Score26-weeksPercent of subjects achieving a minimum 30% decrease in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire score The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire is a widely studied and frequently used instrument for the assessment of function and disability related to low back pain. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements related to how a subject's back condition affects various activities of daily living. Subjects marked whether the statement either applied to them or did not apply at the time they responded to the statements. The score is the total number of questions with which the subject agreed. A higher score indicates less function and greater disability.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
BIOSTAT BIOLOGX
One injection of up to 4 mL of BIOSTAT BIOLOGX Fibrin Sealant into a single lumbar intervertebral disc using the Biostat Delivery Device
164
Saline
One injection of up to 4 mL of saline solution into a single lumbar intervertebral disc using the Biostat Delivery Device
56
Total220

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSalineBIOSTAT BIOLOGXTotal
Age, Continuous41.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
39.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
40.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
Age, Customized
≥18-≤29 years
11 participants30 participants41 participants
Age, Customized
≥30-≤39 years
12 participants50 participants62 participants
Age, Customized
≥40-≤49 years
20 participants51 participants71 participants
Age, Customized
≥50-≤59 years
9 participants28 participants37 participants
Age, Customized
≥60 years
4 participants5 participants9 participants
Baseline Opioid Medication for Back Pain
No
19 participants55 participants74 participants
Baseline Opioid Medication for Back Pain
Yes
37 participants109 participants146 participants
BMI27.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
28.0 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1
27.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9
Currently Employed
No
22 participants65 participants87 participants
Currently Employed
No Response
0 participants3 participants3 participants
Currently Employed
Yes
34 participants96 participants130 participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants8 Participants13 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
51 Participants156 Participants207 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
History Left Leg Pain
1 - <2 years
2 participants7 participants9 participants
History Left Leg Pain
<1 year
6 participants11 participants17 participants
History Left Leg Pain
2 - <3 years
7 participants14 participants21 participants
History Left Leg Pain
3 - <4 years
1 participants3 participants4 participants
History Left Leg Pain
>=4years
7 participants19 participants26 participants
History Left Leg Pain
None
33 participants110 participants143 participants
History Low Back Pain
0.5 - 1 year
3 participants7 participants10 participants
History Low Back Pain
10 - <20 years
12 participants32 participants44 participants
History Low Back Pain
1 - <5 years
24 participants76 participants100 participants
History Low Back Pain
>=20 years
8 participants8 participants16 participants
History Low Back Pain
5 - <10 years
9 participants41 participants50 participants
History Right Leg Pain
1 - <2 years
2 participants11 participants13 participants
History Right Leg Pain
<1 year
3 participants8 participants11 participants
History Right Leg Pain
2 - <3 years
5 participants11 participants16 participants
History Right Leg Pain
3 - <4 years
0 participants2 participants2 participants
History Right Leg Pain
>=4 years
6 participants14 participants20 participants
History Right Leg Pain
None
40 participants118 participants158 participants
Injection Volume3.3 ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
2.8 ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
2.9 ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
Lumbar Level Treated
L3/L4
8 participants12 participants20 participants
Lumbar Level Treated
L4/L5
11 participants48 participants59 participants
Lumbar Level Treated
L5/S1
37 participants104 participants141 participants
Maximum Injection Pressure49.7 psi
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.7
83.0 psi
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.3
74.6 psi
STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.9
Previous Back Surgery
Cervical
1 participants3 participants4 participants
Previous Back Surgery
None
55 participants161 participants216 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants15 Participants17 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
52 Participants147 Participants199 Participants
Reason for Stopping Injection
Maximum Pressure Reached
6 participants91 participants97 participants
Reason for Stopping Injection
Other [investigator discretion; saline backflow]
3 participants1 participants4 participants
Reason for Stopping Injection
Subject Discomfort
2 participants4 participants6 participants
Reason for Stopping Injection
Total Available Volume Delivered
45 participants68 participants113 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
32 Participants83 Participants115 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants81 Participants105 Participants
Smoking Status
Current
16 participants28 participants44 participants
Smoking Status
Never
21 participants90 participants111 participants
Smoking Status
Previous
19 participants46 participants65 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
49 / 16411 / 56
serious
Total, serious adverse events
22 / 1647 / 56

Outcome results

Primary

Subject Composite Success

Subject success based on a composite of minimum 30% decrease in low back pain, 30% improvement in function, maintenance of neurological status, no secondary interventions, and no serious adverse events.

Time frame: 26 weeks

Population: All subjects adjudicated as a success or failure. Missed 26-week visit counted as failure (7 BIOSTAT BIOLOGX; 2 Saline). Unblinded subjects counted as failures (2 BIOSTAT BIOLOGX).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BIOSTAT BIOLOGXSubject Composite Success33.5 percentage of subjects
SalineSubject Composite Success39.3 percentage of subjects
Comparison: Null: No differenc between the percent success of Saline and BIOSTAT BIOLOGXp-value: 0.52Fisher Exact
Secondary

Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire Score

Percent of subjects achieving a minimum 30% decrease in Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire score The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire is a widely studied and frequently used instrument for the assessment of function and disability related to low back pain. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements related to how a subject's back condition affects various activities of daily living. Subjects marked whether the statement either applied to them or did not apply at the time they responded to the statements. The score is the total number of questions with which the subject agreed. A higher score indicates less function and greater disability.

Time frame: 26-weeks

Population: All subjects assigned as success or failure. Missed 26-week visit counted as failure (7 BIOSTAT BIOLOGX; 2 Saline). Unblinded subjects counted as failures (2 BIOSTAT BIOLOGX).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BIOSTAT BIOLOGXRoland-Morris Disability Questionnaire Score52.4 percentage of subjects
SalineRoland-Morris Disability Questionnaire Score50.0 percentage of subjects
Secondary

Visual Analog Scale for Low Back Pain

Percent of subjects achieving a minimum 30% decrease in pain from baseline. The visual analog scale is a horizontal 100 mm line anchored on the left with the words No Pain and on the right with the words Worst Possible Pain. Scores were obtained by measuring the distance in millimeters from the left origin of the line (0) to the point indicated with a slash placed by the subject to indicate the subject's level of low back pain experienced over the last week.

Time frame: 26-weeks

Population: All subjects assigned success or failure. Missed 26-week visit counted as failure (7 BIOSTAT BIOLOGX; 2 Saline). Unblinded subjects counted as failures (2 BIOSTAT BIOLOGX).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BIOSTAT BIOLOGXVisual Analog Scale for Low Back Pain42.1 percentage of subjects
SalineVisual Analog Scale for Low Back Pain50.0 percentage of subjects

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026