Skip to content

Performance of Two Different ke0s in the Same Pharmacokinetic Propofol Model

Performance of Two Different Ke0s in the Same Pharmacokinetic Propofol Model. Study on Loss and Recovery of Consciousness

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01011192
Enrollment
20
Registered
2009-11-11
Start date
2009-09-30
Completion date
2009-11-30
Last updated
2009-11-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Unconsciousness

Keywords

Intravenous anesthesia, propofol, pharmacokinetic model, Monitoring, bispectral index.

Brief summary

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical performance of two different ke0s (fast and slow) in terms of propofol effect-site concentration (Ce) during the loss and recovery of consciousness, using Marsh's pharmacokinetic model.The hypothesis to be tested was that the Ce of propofol predicted by the slow ke0 in the loss and recovery of consciousness is similar, differently from the fast ke0.

Detailed description

Introduction: The ke0 can be defined as the proportional variation of the gradient of concentration between the plasma and the effect-site in relation to the unit of time. Theoretically, the higher the value of the ke0, the faster the drug enters the effect-site. Therefore, drugs with short T½ke0 have high ke0s and fast onset of action. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical performance of two different ke0s (fast and slow) in terms of propofol effect-site concentration (Ce) during the loss and recovery of consciousness, using Marsh's pharmacokinetic model. Method: Twenty healthy male adult volunteers participated in this study. Propofol was first administered to the individual volunteer using Marsh's pharmacokinetic target-controlled infusion model with ke0 of 1.21 min-1 and, on another opportunity, with the same pharmacokinetic model but ke0 of 0.26 min-1. Propofol was infused in plasma target-concentration of 3.0 µg.mL-1. Loss and recovery of consciousness was defined as response of the volunteer to verbal stimulus. The Ce was registered at the moments of loss and recovery of consciousness. Results: At loss and recovery of consciousness, propofol Ce means predicted by the fast ke0 were different (3.64 ± 0.78 and 1.47 ± 0.29 µg.mL-1, respectively, p \< 0.0001), whereas with the slow ke0 the predicted Ce means were similar (2.20 ± 0.70 and 2.13 ± 0.43 µg.mL-1, respectively, p = 0.5425). Conclusion: It can be concluded that slow ke0 (0.26 min-1) incorporated into Marsh's pharmacokinetic model showed better clinical performance than fast ke0 (1.21 min-1), since the predicted effect-site concentrations of propofol at loss and recovery of consciousness were similar.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Hospital Santa Sofia Ltda
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Centro Medico Campinas
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
20 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* healthy * male * adult between 20 and 45 years old

Exclusion criteria

* use of alcohol or illicit drugs * chronic use of H2 inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants of calcium channel blockers * hypersensitivity to the drugs used in the experimental protocol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Propofol effect-site concentration (Ce) during the loss and recovery of consciousness with fast and slow keo.20 minutes

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026