Skip to content

Effects of GABA-a-Agonists on Pain Mechanisms: An Experimental Study in Healthy Volunteers

Effects of Gaba-a-Agonists on Pain Mechanisms: An Experimental Study in Healthy Volunteers

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01011036
Enrollment
17
Registered
2009-11-11
Start date
2009-12-31
Completion date
2010-06-30
Last updated
2010-08-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Keywords

healthy study subjects, no disease

Brief summary

The investigators will use an intradermal capsaicin injection in the forearm to induce a state of localized pain. This localized pain will be measured by different means, and analysed locally and distally by so called quantitative sensory testing. The primary endpoint of measure is the difference in pain perception with and without benzodiazepines/GABA-Agonists around the injection point of capsaicin. The secondary endpoints are to measure pain modulation locally and distally by different quantitative tests as electricity, pressure pain thresholds, and ice water tests. The investigators' hypothesis is that clobazam induces higher pain thresholds as placebo and less sedation than the control medication clonazepam.

Detailed description

Background Neuropathic and nociceptive pain are linked to plastic changes of the central nervous system. These lead to lower pain thresholds. An important component of this neuronal plasticity is a diminished inhibition-control of the neurons on the level of the spine, where an alpha-3 subunit of the glycine receptor plays an important role. Modulation of this receptor subunit with specific and non-specific GABA-Agonists produce antinociception. The new fact is, that a subunit specific medication does not induce sedation in animals. The relationship of pain modulation and Gaba-Agonists is not well studied in humans. The benzodiazepine used in pain therapy in humans is clonazepam, which induces a strong sedation, reason why it is not much used in a chronic pain setting. Clobazam is another GABA-Agonist, which is less sedative. To our knowledge its effects on pain modulation has never been studied in humans. Objective The aim is an analysis and description of clobazam on the central pain mechanisms. We will use well known quantitative sensory testing methods therefore. The primary objective is to gather data about potential clinical use of clobazam in pain therapy. The secondary aim would be to do the same tests on new specific alpha-3 agonists, which are being developed by pharmaceutical industry. Methods Quantitative sensory testing is being made after eliciting an area of hyperalgesia on the forearm by capsaicin. The area of hyperalgesia around the injection point will be the primary issue of this study. The medication given to our patients will be a cross-over, double blind randomized administration of clobazam, clonazepam (positive control) and tolterodine (active placebo). Quantitative sensory testing will be made before and after study medication administration. The quantitative sensory testing consists of the area of hyperalgesia around capsaicin injection point, pressure pain elicited with an electronic pressure algometer, ice-water testing of the hand, single and multiple electrical skin and muscle stimulation, pressure-cuff algometry and the side effects of the administered medication with psychomotor testing. Before we start the study protocol each patient will have a blood sample drawn for genetic testing of the different cytochrome subunits (CYP P450 2C19, 3A4).

Interventions

test substance

DRUGclonazepam

positive control

DRUGtolterodine

active placebo

Sponsors

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* European males * 18-55 years old * non smoking status or less than 10 cigarettes per day * no disease

Exclusion criteria

* any medication * any drug abuse * diseases of any type

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
area of hyperalgesia on the forearm11.2010

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Pressure cuff algometry11.2010
pressure pain11.2010
electrical stimulation-temporal summation11.2010
Diffuse noxious inhibition control11.2010
Pharmacokinetic study: plasmatic concentration measured in regular intervals with blood samples, starting at time zero and ending at time plus 24h after drug administration.11.2010
Pharmacodynamic study: Measurement of pharmacodynamic behaviour of our 3 tested substances in relation to sedation score.11.2010
Pharmacogenetic study: Measurement of subtype cytochrome P450 CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 by metabolites of midazolam and omeprazol. Genotyping of cytochrome P450 CYP3A4 and CYP 2C19.11.2010
psychomotor testing11.2010

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 24, 2026