Skip to content

Use of Tendon Vibration and Mirror for the Improvement of Upper Limb Function and Pain Reduction

Use of Tendon Vibration and Mirror for the Improvement of Upper Limb Function and Pain Reduction After Stroke

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01010607
Acronym
VibMirror
Enrollment
30
Registered
2009-11-10
Start date
2009-11-30
Completion date
2011-11-30
Last updated
2010-06-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemiplegia, Stroke

Brief summary

Upper limb paralysis following stroke is a very common problem. Only 30% of stroke patients who suffer from upper limb paresis experience a full recovery of function. There is a need for the development of more efficient rehabilitation methods for the improvement of the paralysed upper limb function. It has been shown that the use of mirror therapy after a stroke induces the activation of motor, sensory and associative regions in the affected hemisphere and is associated with an improvement in the function of the affected limb. Mirror therapy is a treatment modality in which the affected arm is hidden from the patient's sight; the patient is instructed to watch the reflection of his healthy hand on a mirror while he performs movements with his healthy hand and tries to move simultaneously his affected hand. This induces the illusion that his affected hand moves well. It has also been shown that applying vibration to a muscle tendon at frequencies between 50-100 Hz induces an illusion of elongation of the vibrated muscle, if visual feedback is prevented. For instance, vibrating the triceps will induce a strong illusion of elbow flexion. In the present study the investigators will couple the use of a mirror with the application of vibration to tendons, in order to obtain a multisensorial and strong illusion of movement in the paralyzed limb. The study hypothesis is that the administration of mirror therapy together with vibration will induce the activation of multiple motor, sensory and associative areas in the affected brain hemisphere, resulting in improvement of the affected upper limb function, compared to the administration of mirror therapy alone or sham therapy.

Interventions

DEVICEVibration and Mirror

10 treatments of 30 minutes in which vibration of 50-100 Hz will be administrated to the elbow and wrist muscles together with the use of a mirror. The patient moves his healthy hand in a certain repetitive pattern and watches its reflection on a mirror. Meanwhile he receives vibration in his affected hand in a timing that induces the illusion of movements similar to the movements of his healthy hand, thereby inducing a strong illusion of movement of his affected hand.

DEVICEMirror therapy

10 sessions of mirror therapy: moving the healthy hand while watching its reflection on a mirror. Meanwhile sham vibration over bone in the affected handwill be given to resemble the conditions of the experimental arm.

DEVICEno mirror, sham vibration

10 sessions in which patient moves his healthy hand and tries to move his affected hand, which is hidden by an opaque board instead of a mirror. Sham vibration is applied to bone instead of muscle, no illusion is generated.

Sponsors

Hadassah Medical Organization
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Stroke onset 1 month-1 year ago * NIH Stroke Scale 3-15 on admission to study * Affected Upper limb function 10-90% on Fugl-Meyer scale * Ability to understand instructions and to move freely the unaffected upper limb

Exclusion criteria

* Severe cognitive impairment- severe Aphasia or severe Neglect that impair ability to understand instructions or to execute tasks

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Upper Limb function according to Fugl-Meyer assessmentafter treatment, and 3 months after treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Activity of Daily living performance assessed by FIM (Functional Independence Measurement) scoreafter treatment and 3 months after treatment

Countries

Israel

Contacts

Primary ContactElior Moreh, MD
elior@hadassah.org.il97225844464

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026