Skip to content

Nadolol for Proliferating Infantile Hemangiomas

Nadolol for Proliferating Infantile Hemangiomas: A Prospective Open Label Study With a Historical Control

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01010308
Enrollment
20
Registered
2009-11-10
Start date
2009-11-30
Completion date
2012-02-29
Last updated
2021-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infantile Hemangioma

Keywords

infantile hemangioma, nadolol

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to explore the efficacy and safety of Nadolol in hemangiomas of infancy. The secondary objective is to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial comparing nadolol with corticosteroids and propranolol.

Detailed description

Systemic corticosteroids are currently the most frequent used medication for treatment of problematic infantile hemangiomas (IH's). Since June 2008, systemic propranolol has been an important addition to the therapeutic options for problematic IH, allowing decreased dependence on the systemic corticosteroids. So far, we have found excellent response with propranolol with minimal short-term side effects. Studies, which compared nadolol and propranolol in children with other conditions, suggest that nadolol is safer and more efficacious than propranolol. In addition, it has better dosing schedules and less central nervous system (CNS) penetration, making it suitable even for patients with suspected or proven PHACES syndrome.

Interventions

Nadolol will be administered orally at home starting at 0.5 mg/kg/day divided into 2 doses. Weekly, if BP and heart rate are acceptable, the dose will be increased by 0.5 mg/kg/day up to 2 mg/kg/day.

Sponsors

The Hospital for Sick Children
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Months to 1 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Intervention Group * Infants aged 1 month to 1 year of age with head and neck hemangiomas currently causing /or with impending function loss (e.g. vision, airway obstruction, feeding, etc), or hemangiomas currently causing/or with potential for facial disfigurement. Historical Control Group * Infants aged 1 month to 1 year of age with head and neck hemangiomas that received treatment with systemic propranolol in the past 2 years Angiogenesis Marker Control Group * Infants aged 1 month to 1 year attending dermatology clinic

Exclusion criteria

Intervention Group * Patients with PHACES syndrome (proven) or suspected PHACES (plaque like hemangioma awaiting imaging). * Children with history of hypersensitivity to beta blockers * Children with personal history or family history of a first degree relative with asthma * Children with known renal impairment * Children with known cardiac conditions which may predispose to heart blocks * Personal history of hypoglycemia * Children on medications that may interact with beta blockers Historical Control Group: * No digital photography available documenting IHs progression Angiogenesis Marker Control Group: * Children with IH * Children on beta blocker or systemic corticosteroids

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of subjects with at least 75% improvement in the extent of the hemangiomaBaseline, 6months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The proportion of subjects with at least 50% improvement in the extent of the hemangiomasBaseline and 6 monthsThe proportion of subjects with at least 50% improvement in the extent of the hemangiomas
The percentage of patients with >75% improvement in the Nadolol group compared to a historical cohort of patients receiving propranolol.6 monthsThe percentage of patients with \>75% improvement in the Nadolol group compared to a historical cohort of patients receiving propranolol.
The correlation between the changes in the levels of angiogenesis markers and clinical response to treatment.6 monthsThe correlation between the changes in the levels of angiogenesis markers and clinical response to treatment.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026