Dental Health
Conditions
Keywords
Mouthwashes
Brief summary
This study is 8 weeks long. People participating in this study will be asked to brush their teeth two times a day. Some people will get a mouthwash. People with a mouthwash will rinse two times a day after brushing their teeth. The mouth, teeth, tongue and gums will be looked at by a dentist. The dentist will look at the mouth to make sure the mouthwash does not irritate the mouth. The dentist will also look at the color of the teeth and amount of stain on the front teeth.
Detailed description
This is an 8-week, randomized, observer-blind, controlled, parallel group clinical study design to assess the oral tissue tolerance of a potassium oxalate containing mouthrinse. Subjects will have their oral soft/hard tissues assessed and will be evaluated for stain levels and tooth color shades at Screening/Baseline (Visit 1), Week 4 (Visit 2), Week 6 (Visit 3) and Week 8 (Visit 4). Subjects will be instructed to brush their teeth two times daily in their usual manner using the provided sodium fluoride toothpaste. Subjects assigned to the mouthrinse group will be instructed to rinse twice daily after brushing.
Interventions
Rinse with 10 mL for 60 seconds, twice daily after brushing in usual manner with a sodium fluoride dentifrice
Brush in usual manner, twice daily, with a sodium fluoride dentifrice
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Males and females at least 18 years of age and in good general and oral health. * Volunteers must read, sign, and receive a signed copy of the Informed Consent Form after the nature of the study has been fully explained. * Willingness to use the assigned products according to instructions, availability for appointments and likelihood of completing the study. * Willingness to refrain from using any breath freshener products or unassigned oral care products (i.e., oral care strips, candy-type mints, sprays, chewing gums, throat lozenges, cough drops, mouthwashes or teeth whitening products) throughout the duration of the study. * Willingness to refrain from using any whitening products and smokeless tobacco products within one week prior to and for the duration of the study, in order to reduce alternate sources of potential irritation. * A minimum of 16 natural teeth, including at least 10 of the 12 anterior teeth (#6-11, #22-27, however, #7-10 must be present), with scorable facial and lingual surfaces. Teeth that are grossly carious, fully crowned or extensively restored on facial and/or lingual surfaces, orthodontically banded, abutments, or third molars will not be included in the tooth count. * Classic Vita® Shade minimum value of A2 or darker on at least 2 of the 4 maxillary anterior teeth (#7-10). * Absence of abnormal or severely fissured tongue, geographic tongue, tongue piercing or any obvious tongue abnormalities that may interfere with the assessment of oral irritation. * Adequate oral hygiene (i.e., brush teeth daily and exhibit no signs of oral neglect). * Absence of neglected dental health (i.e. gross calculus deposits or rampant caries based on visual examination), significant oral soft tissue pathology, systemically-related gingival enlargement, tissue damage due to ill-fitting appliances or restoration, or extreme crowding or overlapping of teeth
Exclusion criteria
* Physical limitations or restrictions that might preclude use of normal oral hygiene procedures (i.e., toothbrushing, etc.). * History of significant adverse effects following use of oral hygiene products such as toothpastes and mouthrinses. * History or current evidence of significant oral soft tissue pathology, excluding gingivitis, based on the dentist's visual examination and at the discretion of the investigator. * Prior participation in any oral hygiene or product clinical study within the previous 30 days. * Therapy with any medications, currently or within the last 30 days, which might interfere with the outcome of the study by affecting tooth color or stain formation (i.e., certain antimicrobial mouthrinses and antibiotics, such as chlorhexidine). * Restorations on 10% or more of the facial surfaces of the maxillary anterior incisor teeth. * Dental fluorosis, hypoplasia, restorations, tetracycline stains, or other enamel surface irregularities that may interfere with evaluation of the selected teeth. * Visual evidence of Moderate/advanced periodontitis (ADA Type III, IV). Orthodontic bands, appliances, bridges, numerous crowns, removable orthodontic appliances or partial dentures. * Self-reported pregnancy or lactation (this criterion is due to oral tissue changes related to pregnancy and nursing which can affect interpretation of study results). * Regular use of whitening products within 1 week prior to Screening/Baseline. Other severe, acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with trial participation or investigational product administration or may interfere with the interpretation of trial result and, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the subject inappropriate for the entry into this trial.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment | 8 weeks | The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The changes in the individual L\*, a\*, and b\* color parameters were calculated to determine quantitatively the improvements in tooth lightness, redness, and yellowness, respectively. An overall change in tooth color was calculated using the CIE color equation ΔE = \[(ΔL\*)\^2 + (Δa\*)\^2 + (Δb\*)\^2\]\^1/2. The ΔE was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant. |
| Oral Tissue Tolerance | through 8 weeks | Oral tissue tolerance was assessed by oral tissue adverse events for which the relationship to treatment was considered as possible, probable, or very likely. If the relationship to treatment was missing, the adverse event was categorized as a treatment-related adverse event. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment | 4 weeks | The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual L\* color parameter was calculated. The ΔL was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant. |
| Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment | 6 weeks | The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual L\* color parameter was calculated. The ΔL was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant. |
| Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment | 8 weeks | The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual L\* color parameter was calculated. The ΔL was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant. |
| Change in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment | 4 weeks | The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual b\* color parameter was calculated. The Δb was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant. |
| Change in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment | 6 weeks | The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual b\* color parameter was calculated. The Δb was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant. |
| Change in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment | 8 weeks | The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual b\* color parameter was calculated. The Δb was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant. |
| Mean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks | 4 weeks | The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain). |
| Mean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks | 6 weeks | The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain). |
| Mean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks | 8 weeks | The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain). |
| Mean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks | 4 weeks | The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable). |
| Mean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks | 6 weeks | The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable). |
| Mean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks | 8 weeks | The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable). |
| Mean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks | 4 weeks | The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected. |
| Mean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks | 6 weeks | The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected. |
| Mean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks | 8 weeks | The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected. |
| Mean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks | 4 weeks | The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain). |
| Mean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks | 6 weeks | The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain). |
| Mean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks | 8 weeks | The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain). |
| Mean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks | 4 weeks | The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable). |
| Mean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks | 6 weeks | The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable). |
| Mean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks | 8 weeks | The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable). |
| Mean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks | 4 weeks | The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area. |
| Mean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks | 6 weeks | The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area. |
| Mean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks | 8 weeks | The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area. |
| Mean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks | 4 weeks | The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for gingival regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain). |
| Mean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks | 6 weeks | The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for gingival regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain). |
| Mean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks | 8 weeks | The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for gingival regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain). |
| Mean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks | 4 weeks | The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The gingival regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable). |
| Mean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks | 6 weeks | The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The gingival regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable). |
| Mean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks | 8 weeks | The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The gingival regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable). |
| Mean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks | 4 weeks | The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for gingival regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area. |
| Mean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks | 6 weeks | The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for gingival regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area. |
| Mean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks | 8 weeks | The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for gingival regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area. |
| Mean Stain Score for Body Sites at 4 Weeks | 4 weeks | The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain). |
| Mean Stain Score for Body Sites at 6 Weeks | 6 weeks | The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain). |
| Mean Stain Score for Body Sites at 8 Weeks | 8 weeks | The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain). |
| Mean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 4 Weeks | 4 weeks | The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The body regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable). |
| Mean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 6 Weeks | 6 weeks | The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The body regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable). |
| Mean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 8 Weeks | 8 weeks | The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The body regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable). |
| Mean Stain Area for Body Sites at 4 Weeks | 4 weeks | The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected. |
| Mean Stain Area for Body Sites at 6 Weeks | 6 weeks | The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected. |
| Mean Stain Area for Body Sites at 8 Weeks | 8 weeks | The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected. |
| Mean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks | 4 weeks | The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain). |
| Mean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks | 6 weeks | The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain). |
| Mean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks | 8 weeks | The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain). |
| Mean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks | 4 weeks | The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable). |
| Mean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks | 6 weeks | The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable). |
| Mean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks | 8 weeks | The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable). |
| Mean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks | 4 weeks | The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected. |
| Mean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks | 6 weeks | The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected. |
| Mean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks | 8 weeks | The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected. |
| Mean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks | 4 weeks | The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain). |
| Mean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks | 6 weeks | The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain). |
| Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment | 4 weeks | The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The changes in the individual L\*, a\*, and b\* color parameters were calculated to determine quantitatively the improvements in tooth lightness, redness, and yellowness, respectively. An overall change in tooth color was calculated using the CIE color equation ΔE = \[(ΔL\*)\^2 + (Δa\*)\^2 + (Δb\*)\^2\]\^1/2. The ΔE was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant. |
| Mean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks | 4 weeks | The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable). |
| Mean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks | 6 weeks | The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable). |
| Mean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks | 8 weeks | The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable). |
| Mean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks | 4 weeks | The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected. |
| Mean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks | 6 weeks | The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected. |
| Mean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks | 8 weeks | The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected. |
| Mean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks | 8 weeks | The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain). |
| Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment | 6 weeks | The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The changes in the individual L\*, a\*, and b\* color parameters were calculated to determine quantitatively the improvements in tooth lightness, redness, and yellowness, respectively. An overall change in tooth color was calculated using the CIE color equation ΔE = \[(ΔL\*)\^2 + (Δa\*)\^2 + (Δb\*)\^2\]\^1/2. The ΔE was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste Crest® Cavity Protection Regular Toothpaste (Brushing Only) | 48 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) Crest® Cavity Protection followed by 1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse (Brushing followed by Mouth Rinse) | 48 |
| Total | 96 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 1 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Noncompliant with Study Product | 0 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 3 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Crest® Regular Toothpaste | 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 47.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.96 | 49.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.08 | 48.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.08 |
| Region of Enrollment USA | 48 participants | 48 participants | 96 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 40 Participants | 40 Participants | 80 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 8 Participants | 8 Participants | 16 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 3 / 48 | 2 / 48 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 48 | 0 / 48 |
Outcome results
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment
The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The changes in the individual L\*, a\*, and b\* color parameters were calculated to determine quantitatively the improvements in tooth lightness, redness, and yellowness, respectively. An overall change in tooth color was calculated using the CIE color equation ΔE = \[(ΔL\*)\^2 + (Δa\*)\^2 + (Δb\*)\^2\]\^1/2. The ΔE was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment | 0.909 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0612 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment | 1.035 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.065 |
Oral Tissue Tolerance
Oral tissue tolerance was assessed by oral tissue adverse events for which the relationship to treatment was considered as possible, probable, or very likely. If the relationship to treatment was missing, the adverse event was categorized as a treatment-related adverse event.
Time frame: through 8 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Safety Analysis Set, defined as all participants who used at least one dose of investigational product.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Oral Tissue Tolerance | Participants with ≥ one treatment-related AE | 2.1 percentage of participants |
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Oral Tissue Tolerance | Sensitivity of teeth | 2.1 percentage of participants |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Oral Tissue Tolerance | Participants with ≥ one treatment-related AE | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Oral Tissue Tolerance | Sensitivity of teeth | 0.0 percentage of participants |
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment
The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual b\* color parameter was calculated. The Δb was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Change in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment | 0.077 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0518 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Change in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment | -0.117 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0529 |
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment
The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual b\* color parameter was calculated. The Δb was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Change in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment | 0.123 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0487 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Change in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment | -0.212 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0498 |
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment
The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual b\* color parameter was calculated. The Δb was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Change in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment | 0.107 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0639 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Change in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment | -0.107 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0677 |
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment
The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The changes in the individual L\*, a\*, and b\* color parameters were calculated to determine quantitatively the improvements in tooth lightness, redness, and yellowness, respectively. An overall change in tooth color was calculated using the CIE color equation ΔE = \[(ΔL\*)\^2 + (Δa\*)\^2 + (Δb\*)\^2\]\^1/2. The ΔE was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment | 0.875 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0464 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment | 0.882 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0475 |
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment
The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The changes in the individual L\*, a\*, and b\* color parameters were calculated to determine quantitatively the improvements in tooth lightness, redness, and yellowness, respectively. An overall change in tooth color was calculated using the CIE color equation ΔE = \[(ΔL\*)\^2 + (Δa\*)\^2 + (Δb\*)\^2\]\^1/2. The ΔE was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment | 0.805 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0496 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment | 1.040 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0507 |
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment
The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual L\* color parameter was calculated. The ΔL was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment | 0.013 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0857 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment | 0.054 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0876 |
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment
The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual L\* color parameter was calculated. The ΔL was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment | 0.071 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0959 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment | -0.090 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0981 |
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment
The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual L\* color parameter was calculated. The ΔL was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment | 0.158 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0949 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment | -0.043 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.1006 |
Mean Stain Area for Body Sites at 4 Weeks
The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Area for Body Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.064 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0133 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Area for Body Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.056 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0145 |
Mean Stain Area for Body Sites at 6 Weeks
The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Area for Body Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.076 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0158 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Area for Body Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.100 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0169 |
Mean Stain Area for Body Sites at 8 Weeks
The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Area for Body Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.067 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.018 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Area for Body Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.124 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.02 |
Mean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks
The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.032 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0147 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.033 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.016 |
Mean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks
The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.059 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0188 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.075 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0201 |
Mean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks
The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.047 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0281 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.160 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0313 |
Mean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks
The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for gingival regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.186 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0292 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.263 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0319 |
Mean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks
The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for gingival regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.184 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0335 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.352 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0359 |
Mean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks
The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for gingival regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.250 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.043 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.444 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0481 |
Mean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks
The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.202 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0284 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.236 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0309 |
Mean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks
The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.206 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0348 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.383 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0373 |
Mean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks
The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.218 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0433 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.483 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0483 |
Mean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks
The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.293 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0409 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.359 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0448 |
Mean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks
The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.277 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.046 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.533 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0495 |
Mean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks
The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.325 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.056 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.598 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0628 |
Mean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks
The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.162 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0225 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.196 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0245 |
Mean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks
The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.166 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.027 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.303 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.029 |
Mean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks
The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.
Time frame: 8 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.188 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.034 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.383 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0379 |
Mean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 4 Weeks
The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The body regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Time frame: 4 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.058 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0121 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.045 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0132 |
Mean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 6 Weeks
The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The body regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Time frame: 6 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.075 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.016 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.100 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0171 |
Mean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 8 Weeks
The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The body regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Time frame: 8 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.063 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0166 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.112 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0184 |
Mean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks
The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Time frame: 4 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.027 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0153 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.025 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0167 |
Mean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks
The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Time frame: 6 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.054 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0192 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.065 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0206 |
Mean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks
The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Time frame: 8 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.042 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0257 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.144 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0286 |
Mean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks
The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The gingival regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Time frame: 4 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.180 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0292 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.252 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0318 |
Mean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks
The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The gingival regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Time frame: 6 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.180 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.035 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.358 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0375 |
Mean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks
The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The gingival regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Time frame: 8 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.241 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0434 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.438 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0485 |
Mean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks
The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Time frame: 4 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.192 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0284 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.224 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0309 |
Mean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks
The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Time frame: 6 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.205 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.035 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.379 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0374 |
Mean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks
The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Time frame: 8 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.210 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0422 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.475 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.047 |
Mean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks
The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Time frame: 4 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.282 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0406 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.344 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0444 |
Mean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks
The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Time frame: 6 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.279 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0467 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.541 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0501 |
Mean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks
The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Time frame: 8 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.314 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0549 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.596 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0614 |
Mean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks
The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Time frame: 4 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.154 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0224 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.184 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0243 |
Mean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks
The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Time frame: 6 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.164 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0274 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.302 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0293 |
Mean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks
The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Time frame: 8 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.181 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0334 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.375 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0372 |
Mean Stain Score for Body Sites at 4 Weeks
The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Time frame: 4 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Score for Body Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.132 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0258 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Score for Body Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.112 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0281 |
Mean Stain Score for Body Sites at 6 Weeks
The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Time frame: 6 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Score for Body Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.160 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0337 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Score for Body Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.215 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0361 |
Mean Stain Score for Body Sites at 8 Weeks
The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Time frame: 8 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Score for Body Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.143 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0371 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Score for Body Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.258 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0412 |
Mean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks
The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Time frame: 4 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.063 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0314 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.058 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0342 |
Mean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks
The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Time frame: 6 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.118 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0399 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.140 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0427 |
Mean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks
The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Time frame: 8 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.097 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0576 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.319 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0642 |
Mean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks
The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for gingival regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Time frame: 4 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.383 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0596 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.521 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0652 |
Mean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks
The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for gingival regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Time frame: 6 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.395 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0732 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.732 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0786 |
Mean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks
The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for gingival regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Time frame: 8 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.526 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0914 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.920 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.1023 |
Mean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks
The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Time frame: 4 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.408 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.059 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.463 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0643 |
Mean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks
The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Time frame: 6 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.427 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0712 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.776 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0762 |
Mean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks
The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Time frame: 8 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.451 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0889 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.994 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0991 |
Mean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks
The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Time frame: 4 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.596 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0831 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.716 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.091 |
Mean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks
The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Time frame: 6 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.586 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0949 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks | 1.106 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.102 |
Mean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks
The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Time frame: 8 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.677 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.1146 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks | 1.244 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.1283 |
Mean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks
The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Time frame: 4 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.329 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0464 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks | 0.386 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0505 |
Mean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks
The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Time frame: 6 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.349 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0565 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks | 0.621 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0605 |
Mean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks
The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Time frame: 8 weeks
Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crest® Regular Toothpaste | Mean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.394 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0703 |
| 11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse) | Mean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks | 0.791 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0785 |