Skip to content

Oral Tissue Tolerance of a Mouthrinse

Assessment of the Oral Tissue Tolerance of a Potassium Oxalate Containing Mouthrinse

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01009554
Enrollment
96
Registered
2009-11-06
Start date
2009-10-31
Completion date
2009-12-31
Last updated
2015-07-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Health

Keywords

Mouthwashes

Brief summary

This study is 8 weeks long. People participating in this study will be asked to brush their teeth two times a day. Some people will get a mouthwash. People with a mouthwash will rinse two times a day after brushing their teeth. The mouth, teeth, tongue and gums will be looked at by a dentist. The dentist will look at the mouth to make sure the mouthwash does not irritate the mouth. The dentist will also look at the color of the teeth and amount of stain on the front teeth.

Detailed description

This is an 8-week, randomized, observer-blind, controlled, parallel group clinical study design to assess the oral tissue tolerance of a potassium oxalate containing mouthrinse. Subjects will have their oral soft/hard tissues assessed and will be evaluated for stain levels and tooth color shades at Screening/Baseline (Visit 1), Week 4 (Visit 2), Week 6 (Visit 3) and Week 8 (Visit 4). Subjects will be instructed to brush their teeth two times daily in their usual manner using the provided sodium fluoride toothpaste. Subjects assigned to the mouthrinse group will be instructed to rinse twice daily after brushing.

Interventions

DEVICEPotassium Oxylate Mouthwash

Rinse with 10 mL for 60 seconds, twice daily after brushing in usual manner with a sodium fluoride dentifrice

Brush in usual manner, twice daily, with a sodium fluoride dentifrice

Sponsors

Johnson & Johnson Consumer and Personal Products Worldwide
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Males and females at least 18 years of age and in good general and oral health. * Volunteers must read, sign, and receive a signed copy of the Informed Consent Form after the nature of the study has been fully explained. * Willingness to use the assigned products according to instructions, availability for appointments and likelihood of completing the study. * Willingness to refrain from using any breath freshener products or unassigned oral care products (i.e., oral care strips, candy-type mints, sprays, chewing gums, throat lozenges, cough drops, mouthwashes or teeth whitening products) throughout the duration of the study. * Willingness to refrain from using any whitening products and smokeless tobacco products within one week prior to and for the duration of the study, in order to reduce alternate sources of potential irritation. * A minimum of 16 natural teeth, including at least 10 of the 12 anterior teeth (#6-11, #22-27, however, #7-10 must be present), with scorable facial and lingual surfaces. Teeth that are grossly carious, fully crowned or extensively restored on facial and/or lingual surfaces, orthodontically banded, abutments, or third molars will not be included in the tooth count. * Classic Vita® Shade minimum value of A2 or darker on at least 2 of the 4 maxillary anterior teeth (#7-10). * Absence of abnormal or severely fissured tongue, geographic tongue, tongue piercing or any obvious tongue abnormalities that may interfere with the assessment of oral irritation. * Adequate oral hygiene (i.e., brush teeth daily and exhibit no signs of oral neglect). * Absence of neglected dental health (i.e. gross calculus deposits or rampant caries based on visual examination), significant oral soft tissue pathology, systemically-related gingival enlargement, tissue damage due to ill-fitting appliances or restoration, or extreme crowding or overlapping of teeth

Exclusion criteria

* Physical limitations or restrictions that might preclude use of normal oral hygiene procedures (i.e., toothbrushing, etc.). * History of significant adverse effects following use of oral hygiene products such as toothpastes and mouthrinses. * History or current evidence of significant oral soft tissue pathology, excluding gingivitis, based on the dentist's visual examination and at the discretion of the investigator. * Prior participation in any oral hygiene or product clinical study within the previous 30 days. * Therapy with any medications, currently or within the last 30 days, which might interfere with the outcome of the study by affecting tooth color or stain formation (i.e., certain antimicrobial mouthrinses and antibiotics, such as chlorhexidine). * Restorations on 10% or more of the facial surfaces of the maxillary anterior incisor teeth. * Dental fluorosis, hypoplasia, restorations, tetracycline stains, or other enamel surface irregularities that may interfere with evaluation of the selected teeth. * Visual evidence of Moderate/advanced periodontitis (ADA Type III, IV). Orthodontic bands, appliances, bridges, numerous crowns, removable orthodontic appliances or partial dentures. * Self-reported pregnancy or lactation (this criterion is due to oral tissue changes related to pregnancy and nursing which can affect interpretation of study results). * Regular use of whitening products within 1 week prior to Screening/Baseline. Other severe, acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with trial participation or investigational product administration or may interfere with the interpretation of trial result and, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the subject inappropriate for the entry into this trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment8 weeksThe tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The changes in the individual L\*, a\*, and b\* color parameters were calculated to determine quantitatively the improvements in tooth lightness, redness, and yellowness, respectively. An overall change in tooth color was calculated using the CIE color equation ΔE = \[(ΔL\*)\^2 + (Δa\*)\^2 + (Δb\*)\^2\]\^1/2. The ΔE was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.
Oral Tissue Tolerancethrough 8 weeksOral tissue tolerance was assessed by oral tissue adverse events for which the relationship to treatment was considered as possible, probable, or very likely. If the relationship to treatment was missing, the adverse event was categorized as a treatment-related adverse event.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment4 weeksThe tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual L\* color parameter was calculated. The ΔL was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment6 weeksThe tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual L\* color parameter was calculated. The ΔL was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment8 weeksThe tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual L\* color parameter was calculated. The ΔL was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment4 weeksThe tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual b\* color parameter was calculated. The Δb was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment6 weeksThe tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual b\* color parameter was calculated. The Δb was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment8 weeksThe tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual b\* color parameter was calculated. The Δb was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.
Mean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks4 weeksThe mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Mean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks6 weeksThe mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Mean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks8 weeksThe mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Mean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks4 weeksThe facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Mean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks6 weeksThe facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Mean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks8 weeksThe facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Mean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks4 weeksThe facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.
Mean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks6 weeksThe facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.
Mean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks8 weeksThe facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.
Mean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks4 weeksThe mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Mean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks6 weeksThe mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Mean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks8 weeksThe mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Mean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks4 weeksThe facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Mean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks6 weeksThe facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Mean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks8 weeksThe facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Mean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks4 weeksThe facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area.
Mean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks6 weeksThe facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area.
Mean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks8 weeksThe facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area.
Mean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks4 weeksThe mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for gingival regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Mean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks6 weeksThe mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for gingival regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Mean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks8 weeksThe mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for gingival regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Mean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks4 weeksThe facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The gingival regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Mean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks6 weeksThe facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The gingival regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Mean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks8 weeksThe facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The gingival regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Mean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks4 weeksThe facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for gingival regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area.
Mean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks6 weeksThe facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for gingival regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area.
Mean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks8 weeksThe facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for gingival regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area.
Mean Stain Score for Body Sites at 4 Weeks4 weeksThe mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Mean Stain Score for Body Sites at 6 Weeks6 weeksThe mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Mean Stain Score for Body Sites at 8 Weeks8 weeksThe mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Mean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 4 Weeks4 weeksThe facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The body regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Mean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 6 Weeks6 weeksThe facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The body regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Mean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 8 Weeks8 weeksThe facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The body regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Mean Stain Area for Body Sites at 4 Weeks4 weeksThe facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.
Mean Stain Area for Body Sites at 6 Weeks6 weeksThe facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.
Mean Stain Area for Body Sites at 8 Weeks8 weeksThe facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.
Mean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks4 weeksThe mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Mean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks6 weeksThe mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Mean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks8 weeksThe mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Mean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks4 weeksThe facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Mean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks6 weeksThe facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Mean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks8 weeksThe facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Mean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks4 weeksThe facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.
Mean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks6 weeksThe facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.
Mean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks8 weeksThe facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.
Mean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks4 weeksThe mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Mean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks6 weeksThe mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment4 weeksThe tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The changes in the individual L\*, a\*, and b\* color parameters were calculated to determine quantitatively the improvements in tooth lightness, redness, and yellowness, respectively. An overall change in tooth color was calculated using the CIE color equation ΔE = \[(ΔL\*)\^2 + (Δa\*)\^2 + (Δb\*)\^2\]\^1/2. The ΔE was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.
Mean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks4 weeksThe lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Mean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks6 weeksThe lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Mean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks8 weeksThe lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).
Mean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks4 weeksThe lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.
Mean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks6 weeksThe lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.
Mean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks8 weeksThe lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.
Mean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks8 weeksThe mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).
Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment6 weeksThe tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The changes in the individual L\*, a\*, and b\* color parameters were calculated to determine quantitatively the improvements in tooth lightness, redness, and yellowness, respectively. An overall change in tooth color was calculated using the CIE color equation ΔE = \[(ΔL\*)\^2 + (Δa\*)\^2 + (Δb\*)\^2\]\^1/2. The ΔE was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Crest® Regular Toothpaste
Crest® Cavity Protection Regular Toothpaste (Brushing Only)
48
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)
Crest® Cavity Protection followed by 1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse (Brushing followed by Mouth Rinse)
48
Total96

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event11
Overall StudyNoncompliant with Study Product03
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject13

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCrest® Regular Toothpaste11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Total
Age, Continuous47.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.96
49.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.08
48.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.08
Region of Enrollment
USA
48 participants48 participants96 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
40 Participants40 Participants80 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants8 Participants16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 482 / 48
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 480 / 48

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment

The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The changes in the individual L\*, a\*, and b\* color parameters were calculated to determine quantitatively the improvements in tooth lightness, redness, and yellowness, respectively. An overall change in tooth color was calculated using the CIE color equation ΔE = \[(ΔL\*)\^2 + (Δa\*)\^2 + (Δb\*)\^2\]\^1/2. The ΔE was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteChange in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment0.909 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0612
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment1.035 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.065
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.16895% CI: [-0.054, 0.306]ANCOVA
Primary

Oral Tissue Tolerance

Oral tissue tolerance was assessed by oral tissue adverse events for which the relationship to treatment was considered as possible, probable, or very likely. If the relationship to treatment was missing, the adverse event was categorized as a treatment-related adverse event.

Time frame: through 8 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Safety Analysis Set, defined as all participants who used at least one dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Crest® Regular ToothpasteOral Tissue ToleranceParticipants with ≥ one treatment-related AE2.1 percentage of participants
Crest® Regular ToothpasteOral Tissue ToleranceSensitivity of teeth2.1 percentage of participants
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Oral Tissue ToleranceParticipants with ≥ one treatment-related AE0.0 percentage of participants
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Oral Tissue ToleranceSensitivity of teeth0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Change in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment

The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual b\* color parameter was calculated. The Δb was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteChange in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment0.077 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0518
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Change in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment-0.117 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0529
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.01195% CI: [-0.343, -0.047]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment

The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual b\* color parameter was calculated. The Δb was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteChange in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment0.123 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0487
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Change in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment-0.212 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0498
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.474, -0.195]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment

The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual b\* color parameter was calculated. The Δb was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteChange in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment0.107 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0639
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Change in Tooth Color as Represented by Δb at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment-0.107 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0677
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.02595% CI: [-0.401, -0.027]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment

The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The changes in the individual L\*, a\*, and b\* color parameters were calculated to determine quantitatively the improvements in tooth lightness, redness, and yellowness, respectively. An overall change in tooth color was calculated using the CIE color equation ΔE = \[(ΔL\*)\^2 + (Δa\*)\^2 + (Δb\*)\^2\]\^1/2. The ΔE was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteChange in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment0.875 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0464
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment0.882 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0475
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.92895% CI: [-0.127, 0.139]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment

The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The changes in the individual L\*, a\*, and b\* color parameters were calculated to determine quantitatively the improvements in tooth lightness, redness, and yellowness, respectively. An overall change in tooth color was calculated using the CIE color equation ΔE = \[(ΔL\*)\^2 + (Δa\*)\^2 + (Δb\*)\^2\]\^1/2. The ΔE was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteChange in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment0.805 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0496
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔE at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment1.040 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0507
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.00295% CI: [0.092, 0.378]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment

The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual L\* color parameter was calculated. The ΔL was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteChange in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment0.013 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0857
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 4 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment0.054 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0876
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.74195% CI: [-0.205, 0.286]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment

The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual L\* color parameter was calculated. The ΔL was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteChange in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment0.071 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0959
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 6 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment-0.090 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0981
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.24995% CI: [-0.437, 0.115]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment

The tooth color of the four maxillary incisor teeth (teeth #7-10, facial surface) was measured instrumentally using the MHT SpectroShade System. Assessments were made under standardized lighting conditions after participants brushed their teeth with water. The aperture tip was placed perpendicularly to the facial surface of the tooth and the color measured using the CIElab color system. The change in the individual L\* color parameter was calculated. The ΔL was calculated per tooth and then averaged over the teeth for a participant.

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteChange in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment0.158 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0949
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Change in Tooth Color as Represented by ΔL at 8 Weeks Post Baseline From the CIElab Assessment-0.043 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1006
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.15495% CI: [-0.479, 0.077]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Area for Body Sites at 4 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Area for Body Sites at 4 Weeks0.064 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0133
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Area for Body Sites at 4 Weeks0.056 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0145
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.62395% CI: [-0.04, 0.024]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Area for Body Sites at 6 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Area for Body Sites at 6 Weeks0.076 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0158
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Area for Body Sites at 6 Weeks0.100 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0169
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.19295% CI: [-0.013, 0.061]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Area for Body Sites at 8 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Area for Body Sites at 8 Weeks0.067 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.018
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Area for Body Sites at 8 Weeks0.124 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.02
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.00995% CI: [0.014, 0.099]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks

The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks0.032 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0147
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks0.033 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.016
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.9395% CI: [-0.034, 0.037]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks

The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks0.059 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0188
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks0.075 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0201
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.48695% CI: [-0.029, 0.06]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks

The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks0.047 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0281
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Area for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks0.160 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0313
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.00195% CI: [0.045, 0.18]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for gingival regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks0.186 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0292
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks0.263 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0319
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.03495% CI: [0.006, 0.147]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for gingival regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area.

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks0.184 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0335
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks0.352 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0359
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.089, 0.247]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for gingival regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area.

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks0.250 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.043
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Area for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks0.444 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0481
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.091, 0.296]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks0.202 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0284
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks0.236 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0309
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.33195% CI: [-0.035, 0.102]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area.

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks0.206 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0348
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks0.383 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0373
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.095, 0.259]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area.

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks0.218 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0433
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Area for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks0.483 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0483
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.162, 0.368]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks

The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks0.293 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0409
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks0.359 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0448
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.18795% CI: [-0.033, 0.165]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks

The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks0.277 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.046
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks0.533 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0495
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.148, 0.364]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks

The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks0.325 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.056
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Area for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks0.598 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0628
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.14, 0.406]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks0.162 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0225
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks0.196 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0245
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.21795% CI: [-0.02, 0.088]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks0.166 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.027
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks0.303 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.029
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.073, 0.2]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 1=thin line of stain, may be discontinuous; 2=thick line or band of stain; 3=stain covers entire area and for the body of tooth as 0=no stain present, natural tooth color, 1=stain limited to pits and grooves; 2=stain outside pits/grooves, up to 10% of surface affected; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected.

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks0.188 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.034
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Area Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks0.383 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0379
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.114, 0.276]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 4 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The body regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 4 Weeks0.058 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0121
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 4 Weeks0.045 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0132
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.34895% CI: [-0.043, 0.015]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 6 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The body regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 6 Weeks0.075 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.016
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 6 Weeks0.100 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0171
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.18595% CI: [-0.012, 0.062]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 8 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The body regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The body regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 8 Weeks0.063 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0166
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Intensity for Body Sites at 8 Weeks0.112 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0184
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.01495% CI: [0.01, 0.088]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks

The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks0.027 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0153
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks0.025 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0167
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.91495% CI: [-0.039, 0.035]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks

The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks0.054 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0192
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks0.065 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0206
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.64695% CI: [-0.035, 0.056]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks

The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks0.042 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0257
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Intensity for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks0.144 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0286
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.00195% CI: [0.04, 0.163]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The gingival regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks0.180 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0292
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks0.252 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0318
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.04595% CI: [0.002, 0.143]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The gingival regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks0.180 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.035
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks0.358 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0375
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.095, 0.26]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The gingival regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The gingival regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks0.241 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0434
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Intensity for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks0.438 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0485
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.094, 0.3]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks0.192 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0284
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks0.224 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0309
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.36195% CI: [-0.037, 0.1]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks0.205 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.035
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks0.379 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0374
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.092, 0.256]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). The interproximal (mesial and distal) regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. The regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks0.210 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0422
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Intensity For Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks0.475 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.047
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.164, 0.364]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks

The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks0.282 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0406
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks0.344 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0444
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.2195% CI: [-0.036, 0.16]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks

The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks0.279 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0467
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks0.541 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0501
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.153, 0.372]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks

The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks0.314 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0549
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Intensity for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks0.596 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0614
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.151, 0.411]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks0.154 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0224
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks0.184 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0243
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.2795% CI: [-0.024, 0.084]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks0.164 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0274
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks0.302 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0293
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.073, 0.202]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks

The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for intensity according to the following criteria. The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region is unrelated to the area covered with stained pellicle. All four regions were assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale as 0=no stain, 1=faint stain (can be seen with close examination), 2=moderate stain (clearly visible and aesthetically unacceptable), 3=heavy, dark stain (obvious and aesthetically unacceptable).

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks0.181 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0334
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Intensity Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks0.375 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0372
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.114, 0.273]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Score for Body Sites at 4 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Score for Body Sites at 4 Weeks0.132 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0258
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Score for Body Sites at 4 Weeks0.112 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0281
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.52495% CI: [-0.082, 0.042]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Score for Body Sites at 6 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Score for Body Sites at 6 Weeks0.160 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0337
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Score for Body Sites at 6 Weeks0.215 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0361
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.17295% CI: [-0.024, 0.133]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Score for Body Sites at 8 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for the body of the tooth was scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Score for Body Sites at 8 Weeks0.143 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0371
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Score for Body Sites at 8 Weeks0.258 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0412
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.0195% CI: [0.028, 0.203]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks0.063 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0314
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 4 Weeks0.058 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0342
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.89395% CI: [-0.081, 0.071]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks0.118 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0399
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 6 Weeks0.140 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0427
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.65595% CI: [-0.073, 0.116]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks0.097 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0576
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Score for Facial Sites at 8 Weeks0.319 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0642
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.00295% CI: [0.084, 0.359]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for gingival regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks0.383 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0596
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 4 Weeks0.521 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0652
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.0695% CI: [-0.006, 0.282]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for gingival regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks0.395 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0732
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 6 Weeks0.732 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0786
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.165, 0.51]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for gingival regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks0.526 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0914
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Score for Gingival Sites at 8 Weeks0.920 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1023
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.176, 0.612]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks0.408 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.059
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 4 Weeks0.463 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0643
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.44495% CI: [-0.087, 0.197]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks0.427 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0712
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 6 Weeks0.776 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0762
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.182, 0.517]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). Stain area for mesial and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks0.451 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0889
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Score for Interproximal (Mesial and Distal) Sites at 8 Weeks0.994 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0991
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.331, 0.754]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks0.596 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0831
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 4 Weeks0.716 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.091
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.23795% CI: [-0.08, 0.32]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks0.586 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0949
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 6 Weeks1.106 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.102
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.298, 0.743]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks0.677 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1146
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Score for Lingual Sites at 8 Weeks1.244 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1283
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.295, 0.839]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks0.329 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0464
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 4 Weeks0.386 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0505
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: 0.31995% CI: [-0.055, 0.168]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks0.349 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0565
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 6 Weeks0.621 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0605
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.139, 0.405]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks

The mean stain score (0-9) per participant was determined by multiplying the individual area and intensity scores from each region and summing them then dividing by the number of sites scored. The facial and lingual surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (teeth #6-11 and #22-27) were scored using the Macpherson Modification of the Lobene Stain Index. Each surface was divided into 4 regions (gingival, mesial, distal, and body). All four regions were scored for area and intensity according to the following criteria. Stain area for mesial, gingival, and distal regions were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain covers entire area) and for the body of tooth on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain present, natural tooth color; 3=stain outside pits/grooves, over 10% of surface affected). The intensity of yellow-brown stains occurring in each region was assessed on a 4-point ordinal scale (0=no stain; 3=heavy, dark stain).

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Analysis was based on the Full Analysis Set, defined as all randomized participants who used the investigational product and had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Crest® Regular ToothpasteMean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks0.394 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0703
11794-050 (1.5% Potassium Oxalate & pH 4.2 Mouth Rinse)Mean Stain Score Over All Tooth Sites at 8 Weeks0.791 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0785
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference in mean outcome between treatment groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference in mean outcome between treatment groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.231, 0.565]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026