Skip to content

A Confirmatory Study of Fentanyl in Participants With Post-herpetic Neuralgia, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome or Postoperative Pain Syndrome

A Verification Study of JNS020QD in Patients With Post-herpetic Neuralgia, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) or Postoperative Pain Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01008553
Enrollment
258
Registered
2009-11-06
Start date
2008-12-31
Completion date
2010-03-31
Last updated
2013-07-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complex Regional Pain Syndromes (CRPS), Postherpetic Neuralgia, Postoperative Pain

Keywords

Postherpetic Neuralgia, Complex Regional Pain Syndromes (CRPS), Postoperative Pain, Fentanyl, Patch, transdermal, Opioid analgesics

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fentanyl in opioid-naive participants with post-herpetic neuralgia, complex regional pain syndrome or post-operative pain syndrome who cannot obtain a sufficient analgesic effect by the treatment of non-opioid analgesics (drug used to control pain).

Detailed description

This is a multi-center (conducted in more than one center), double-blind (neither the participant nor the physician knows the assigned study drug), randomized (participants assigned study drug by chance), withdrawal study in opioid-naive participants with post-herpetic neuralgia (intense, typically intermittent pain along the course of a nerve caused by the varicella zoster virus), complex regional pain syndrome or post-operative pain syndrome. The study will consist of titration period (10-29 days) and double-blind period (12 weeks) and the visits will include Day 5-7, 8, 15, 22, 29 in titration period and Day 2-4, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 71 and 85 in double-blind period. All the eligible participants will receive one-day adhesive transdermal patch (patch containing a drug that is put on the skin so the drug will enter the body through the skin) of either fentanyl at the dose ranging from 12.5 to 50 microgram/hour or matching placebo. Efficacy will be evaluated primarily by time to withdrawal due to insufficient analgesic efficacy. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.

Interventions

DRUGFentanyl

One-day adhesive transdermal patch containing fentanyl 12.5 to 50 mcg/hr applied to chest, abdomen, upper arm and thigh and replaced every day.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo patch indistinguishable from one-day adhesive transdermal patch containing fentanyl 12.5 to 50 mcg/hr applied to chest, abdomen, upper arm and thigh and replaced every day.

Sponsors

Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants whose pain because of post-herpetic neuralgia, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) or post-operative pain syndrome is continuing for at least 12 weeks prior to informed consent * Participants who are continuously taking a non-opioid analgesic at the normal highest dose or more for at least 14 consecutive days prior to informed consent, or at a certain dose (except the use on an as-needed base) on consecutive days or participants who are continuously taking an analgesic adjuvant with a certain dosage and administration (except the use on an as-needed base) for at least 14 consecutive days prior to informed consent * Participants showing insufficient therapeutic efficacy of the non-opioid analgesic currently being used, and to requiring a continuous opioid analgesic as per the Investigator or Sub-investigator * Participants with an average pain intensity of 50 millimeter or more on the Visual Analog Scale in 24-hour daily living prior to informed consent * Participants who can be hospitalized to the 4th day after the initiation of titration period

Exclusion criteria

* Participants who had an operation that may affect the assessment within 30 days before informed consent * Participants whose main cause of the pain to be assessed is considered attributable to psychogenic pain (physical pain that is caused, increased, or prolonged by mental, emotional, or behavioral factors) * Participants with asthma, bradyarrhythmia (slow irregular heart beat) and severe respiratory function disorders * Participants complicated with hepatic dysfunction such as fulminant hepatitis (inflammation of the liver) and liver cirrhosis (serious liver disorder in which connective tissue replaces normal liver tissue, and liver failure often occurs), or renal impairment such as nephritic syndrome, acute renal failure, and chronic renal failure * Participants with a history of hypersensitivity to fentanyl and other opioid analgesics

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time From the Initial Day of Application in Double-Blind Period to Withdrawal Because of Insufficient Analgesic EfficacyDay 1 up to Day 85 (double-blind period) and Day 92 (discontinuation of the study)Time from start of double-blind (researchers and participants were unaware of the treatment) period to withdrawal because of insufficient analgesic efficacy based on any of the pre-defined discontinuation criteria was noted.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score - Titration PeriodDay 12-14 (Screening period) and Day 27-29 (Titration period)The intensity of average pain (degree of pain) felt by the participants in daily living throughout the day on a 100-millimeter (mm) VAS scale by drawing a slash. The left margin (0 mm) was considered No pain at all, and the right margin (100 mm) was considered Severer pain than this is inconceivable. The length (mm) from the left margin to the slash is measured. Mean VAS score during 3 days before the end of Screening period and during 3 days before the end of titration period was reported.
Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score - Double-Blind PeriodDay 27-29 (Titration period) and Day 83-85 (double-blind period)The intensity of average pain (degree of pain) felt by the participants in daily living throughout the day on a 100-millimeter (mm) VAS scale by drawing a slash. The left margin (0 mm) was considered No pain at all, and the right margin (100 mm) was considered Severer pain than this is inconceivable. The length (mm) from the left margin to the slash is measured. Mean VAS score during 3 days before the end of titration period and during 3 days before the end of double-blind period was reported.
Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Participant's Overall Assessment - Titration PeriodDay 1 and 29 or final evaluation (Titration period)The participant assessed his/her satisfaction with the therapeutic efficacy by the following 5 grades: Extremely satisfied, Satisfied, Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, Dissatisfied and Dissatisfied very much. The results were reported as Category 1 = At least Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, which included participants with general evaluation of Extremely satisfied to Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, and Category 2 = At least Satisfied, which included participants with general evaluation of Extremely satisfied to Satisfied.
Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Participant's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind PeriodDay 1 and 85 or final evaluation (double-blind period)The participant assessed his/her satisfaction with the therapeutic efficacy by the following 5 grades: Extremely satisfied, Satisfied, Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, Dissatisfied and Dissatisfied very much. The results were reported as Category 1 = At least Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, which included participants with general evaluation of Extremely satisfied to Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, and Category 2 = At least Satisfied, which included participants with general evaluation of Extremely satisfied to Satisfied.
Number of Doses of Rescue Treatment Per Day - Titration PeriodDay 1 and 29 or final evaluation (Titration period)If a breakthrough pain occurred or the analgesic efficacy became insufficient, a fast-acting oral morphine was administered. At such instances, one-time dose of the rescue treatment was administered as per the pre-defined criteria. During hospitalization, Investigator, Sub-investigator or Study Collaborator recorded in the medical record and during the out-patient period, the participants were instructed to describe the name of rescue treatment, date and time of treatment, and one-time dose in the participant's diary.
Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-sf) Score - Double-Blind PeriodDay 1 and 85 or final evaluation (double-blind period)The BPI-sf total score is an average of the pain interference score (mean value for the nine BPI-sf questions \[questions inquiring about the extent of interference with activities by pain, where the extent is ranked from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes)\]) and pain subscale score (mean value for the scores for BPI-sf questions 3, 4, 5 and 6 \[questions inquiring about the extent of pain, where the extent is ranked from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine)\]). Total score ranges from 0 to 10 with higher values indicating more pain.
Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-sf) Score - Titration PeriodDay 1 and 29 or final evaluation (Titration period)The BPI-sf total score is an average of the pain interference score (mean value for the nine BPI-sf questions \[questions inquiring about the extent of interference with activities by pain, where the extent is ranked from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes)\]) and pain subscale score (mean value for the scores for BPI-sf questions 3, 4, 5 and 6 \[questions inquiring about the extent of pain, where the extent is ranked from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine)\]). Total score ranges from 0 to 10 with higher values indicating more pain.
Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2) Score - Titration PeriodDay 1 and 29 or final evaluation (Titration period)The SF-36v2 is 36-item form related to 8 health concepts (physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, general health, social functioning, bodily pain, vitality, mental health) and 2 summary scores (physical and mental component summary). Physical functioning, role physical and bodily pain contribute to physical component; role emotional, social functioning and mental health contribute to mental component; and social functioning, vitality, and general health contribute to both. All scores are based on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores defining more favorable health state.
Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2) Score - Double-Blind PeriodDay 1 and 85 or final evaluation (double-blind period)The SF-36v2 is 36-item form related to 8 health concepts (physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, general health, social functioning, bodily pain, vitality, mental health) and 2 summary scores (physical and mental component summary). Physical functioning, role physical and bodily pain contribute to physical component; role emotional, social functioning and mental health contribute to mental component; and social functioning, vitality, and general health contribute to both. All scores are based on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores defining more favorable health state.
Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Physician's Overall Assessment - Titration PeriodDay 29 or final evaluation (Titration period)Physician's global assessment of therapeutic efficacy (effectiveness) of the study drug was measured on a 2-point scale where 1 = effective and 2 = not effective.
Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Physician's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind PeriodDay 1 and 85 or final evaluation (double-blind period)Physician's global assessment of therapeutic efficacy (effectiveness) of the study drug was measured on a 2-point scale where 1 = effective and 2 = not effective.
Number of Doses of Rescue Treatment Per Day - Double-Blind PeriodDay 1 and 85 or final evaluation (double-blind period)If a breakthrough pain occurred or the analgesic efficacy became insufficient, a fast-acting oral morphine was administered. At such instances, one-time dose of the rescue treatment was administered as per the pre-defined criteria. During hospitalization, Investigator, Sub-investigator or Study Collaborator recorded in the medical record and during the out-patient period, the participants were instructed to describe the name of rescue treatment, date and time of treatment, and one-time dose in the participant's diary.

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Fentanyl (Titration Period)
One-day adhesive transdermal patch (patch containing a drug that is put on the skin so the drug will enter the body through the skin) containing fentanyl (JNS020QD) applied to chest, abdomen, upper arm or thigh and replaced every day, starting at the dose of 12.5 microgram per hour (mcg/hr) for at least first 2 days, which was increased by 12.5 mcg/hr at one time based on the medical examination of number of rescue treatments and visual analog scale (VAS) of the participants. The dose was increased up to maximum of 50 mcg/hr. The treatment was continued for 10-29 days and then the eligible participants from this group were randomly assigned to either of the two groups in the double-blind period.
258
Total258

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Period 1 (Titration Period)Adverse Event3300
Period 1 (Titration Period)Determined to increase dosage300
Period 1 (Titration Period)Not appropriate for this study100
Period 1 (Titration Period)Not satisfied criteria to enter Period 25000
Period 1 (Titration Period)Physician Decision200
Period 1 (Titration Period)Withdrawal by Subject600
Period 2 (Double-Blind Period)Adverse Event0144
Period 2 (Double-Blind Period)Impossible to perform required tests010
Period 2 (Double-Blind Period)Insufficient analgesic efficacy014
Period 2 (Double-Blind Period)More than 15mm increase in Mean VAS01835
Period 2 (Double-Blind Period)More than 3 times a day rescue treatment001
Period 2 (Double-Blind Period)Physician Decision012
Period 2 (Double-Blind Period)Rescue drugs increased more than 1 times003
Period 2 (Double-Blind Period)Withdrawal by Subject022

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFentanyl (Titration Period)
Age Continuous66.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.89
Sex: Female, Male
Female
124 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
134 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
231 / 25871 / 8456 / 79
serious
Total, serious adverse events
13 / 2588 / 844 / 79

Outcome results

Primary

Time From the Initial Day of Application in Double-Blind Period to Withdrawal Because of Insufficient Analgesic Efficacy

Time from start of double-blind (researchers and participants were unaware of the treatment) period to withdrawal because of insufficient analgesic efficacy based on any of the pre-defined discontinuation criteria was noted.

Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 85 (double-blind period) and Day 92 (discontinuation of the study)

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) population included all the randomly assigned participants with the exception of participants with pre-defined criteria.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Time From the Initial Day of Application in Double-Blind Period to Withdrawal Because of Insufficient Analgesic EfficacyNA Days
Placebo (Double-blind Period)Time From the Initial Day of Application in Double-Blind Period to Withdrawal Because of Insufficient Analgesic Efficacy45.0 Days
p-value: 0.0003Log Rank
Secondary

Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-sf) Score - Double-Blind Period

The BPI-sf total score is an average of the pain interference score (mean value for the nine BPI-sf questions \[questions inquiring about the extent of interference with activities by pain, where the extent is ranked from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes)\]) and pain subscale score (mean value for the scores for BPI-sf questions 3, 4, 5 and 6 \[questions inquiring about the extent of pain, where the extent is ranked from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine)\]). Total score ranges from 0 to 10 with higher values indicating more pain.

Time frame: Day 1 and 85 or final evaluation (double-blind period)

Population: The FAS population included all the randomly assigned participants with the exception of participants with pre-defined criteria. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) = participants evaluable for this measure and 'n' = participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-sf) Score - Double-Blind PeriodDay 1 (n=84, 79)3.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.64
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-sf) Score - Double-Blind PeriodDay 85/Final evaluation (n=84, 79)3.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.27
Placebo (Double-blind Period)Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-sf) Score - Double-Blind PeriodDay 1 (n=84, 79)3.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.47
Placebo (Double-blind Period)Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-sf) Score - Double-Blind PeriodDay 85/Final evaluation (n=84, 79)3.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.98
Secondary

Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-sf) Score - Titration Period

The BPI-sf total score is an average of the pain interference score (mean value for the nine BPI-sf questions \[questions inquiring about the extent of interference with activities by pain, where the extent is ranked from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes)\]) and pain subscale score (mean value for the scores for BPI-sf questions 3, 4, 5 and 6 \[questions inquiring about the extent of pain, where the extent is ranked from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine)\]). Total score ranges from 0 to 10 with higher values indicating more pain.

Time frame: Day 1 and 29 or final evaluation (Titration period)

Population: The FAS1 population included all the randomly assigned participants with the exception of participants with pre-defined criteria. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) = participants evaluable for this measure and 'n' = participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-sf) Score - Titration PeriodDay 1 (n=258)5.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.66
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-sf) Score - Titration PeriodDay 29/Final evaluation (n=257)3.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.88
Secondary

Number of Doses of Rescue Treatment Per Day - Double-Blind Period

If a breakthrough pain occurred or the analgesic efficacy became insufficient, a fast-acting oral morphine was administered. At such instances, one-time dose of the rescue treatment was administered as per the pre-defined criteria. During hospitalization, Investigator, Sub-investigator or Study Collaborator recorded in the medical record and during the out-patient period, the participants were instructed to describe the name of rescue treatment, date and time of treatment, and one-time dose in the participant's diary.

Time frame: Day 1 and 85 or final evaluation (double-blind period)

Population: The FAS population included all the randomly assigned participants with the exception of participants with pre-defined criteria. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) = participants evaluable for this measure and 'n' = participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Number of Doses of Rescue Treatment Per Day - Double-Blind PeriodDay 1 (n=84, 79)0.1 Treatments per dayStandard Deviation 0.33
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Number of Doses of Rescue Treatment Per Day - Double-Blind PeriodDay 85/Final evaluation (n=84, 79)0.4 Treatments per dayStandard Deviation 0.68
Placebo (Double-blind Period)Number of Doses of Rescue Treatment Per Day - Double-Blind PeriodDay 1 (n=84, 79)0.1 Treatments per dayStandard Deviation 0.47
Placebo (Double-blind Period)Number of Doses of Rescue Treatment Per Day - Double-Blind PeriodDay 85/Final evaluation (n=84, 79)0.7 Treatments per dayStandard Deviation 0.86
Secondary

Number of Doses of Rescue Treatment Per Day - Titration Period

If a breakthrough pain occurred or the analgesic efficacy became insufficient, a fast-acting oral morphine was administered. At such instances, one-time dose of the rescue treatment was administered as per the pre-defined criteria. During hospitalization, Investigator, Sub-investigator or Study Collaborator recorded in the medical record and during the out-patient period, the participants were instructed to describe the name of rescue treatment, date and time of treatment, and one-time dose in the participant's diary.

Time frame: Day 1 and 29 or final evaluation (Titration period)

Population: The FAS1 population included all the randomly assigned participants with the exception of participants with pre-defined criteria. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) = participants evaluable for this measure and 'n' = participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Number of Doses of Rescue Treatment Per Day - Titration PeriodDay 1 (n=258)0.1 Treatments per dayStandard Deviation 0.41
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Number of Doses of Rescue Treatment Per Day - Titration PeriodDay 29/Final evaluation (n=258)0.5 Treatments per dayStandard Deviation 0.72
Secondary

Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Participant's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind Period

The participant assessed his/her satisfaction with the therapeutic efficacy by the following 5 grades: Extremely satisfied, Satisfied, Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, Dissatisfied and Dissatisfied very much. The results were reported as Category 1 = At least Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, which included participants with general evaluation of Extremely satisfied to Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, and Category 2 = At least Satisfied, which included participants with general evaluation of Extremely satisfied to Satisfied.

Time frame: Day 1 and 85 or final evaluation (double-blind period)

Population: The FAS population included all the randomly assigned participants with the exception of participants with pre-defined criteria. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) = participants evaluable for this measure and 'n' = participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Participant's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind PeriodDay 1, Category 1 (n=84, 79)82 Participants
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Participant's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind PeriodDay 1, Category 2 (n=84, 79)61 Participants
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Participant's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind PeriodDay 85/Final evaluation, Category 1 (n=84, 78)69 Participants
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Participant's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind PeriodDay 85/Final evaluation, Category 2 (n=84, 78)49 Participants
Placebo (Double-blind Period)Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Participant's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind PeriodDay 85/Final evaluation, Category 2 (n=84, 78)32 Participants
Placebo (Double-blind Period)Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Participant's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind PeriodDay 1, Category 1 (n=84, 79)79 Participants
Placebo (Double-blind Period)Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Participant's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind PeriodDay 85/Final evaluation, Category 1 (n=84, 78)56 Participants
Placebo (Double-blind Period)Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Participant's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind PeriodDay 1, Category 2 (n=84, 79)67 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Participant's Overall Assessment - Titration Period

The participant assessed his/her satisfaction with the therapeutic efficacy by the following 5 grades: Extremely satisfied, Satisfied, Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, Dissatisfied and Dissatisfied very much. The results were reported as Category 1 = At least Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, which included participants with general evaluation of Extremely satisfied to Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, and Category 2 = At least Satisfied, which included participants with general evaluation of Extremely satisfied to Satisfied.

Time frame: Day 1 and 29 or final evaluation (Titration period)

Population: The FAS1 population included all the randomly assigned participants with the exception of participants with pre-defined criteria. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) = participants evaluable for this measure and 'n' = participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Participant's Overall Assessment - Titration PeriodDay 1, Category 1 (n=258)85 Participants
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Participant's Overall Assessment - Titration PeriodDay 1, Category 2 (n=258)15 Participants
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Participant's Overall Assessment - Titration PeriodDay 29/Final evaluation, Category 1 (n=257)220 Participants
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Participant's Overall Assessment - Titration PeriodDay 29/ Final evaluation, Category 2 (n=257)146 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Physician's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind Period

Physician's global assessment of therapeutic efficacy (effectiveness) of the study drug was measured on a 2-point scale where 1 = effective and 2 = not effective.

Time frame: Day 1 and 85 or final evaluation (double-blind period)

Population: The FAS population included all the randomly assigned participants with the exception of participants with pre-defined criteria. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) = participants evaluable for this measure and 'n' = participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Physician's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind PeriodDay 1, Effective (n= 84, 79)84 Participants
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Physician's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind PeriodDay 1, Ineffective (n= 84, 79)0 Participants
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Physician's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind PeriodDay 85/Final evaluation, Effective (n= 84, 79)70 Participants
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Physician's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind PeriodDay 85/Final evaluation, Ineffective (n= 84, 79)14 Participants
Placebo (Double-blind Period)Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Physician's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind PeriodDay 85/Final evaluation, Ineffective (n= 84, 79)32 Participants
Placebo (Double-blind Period)Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Physician's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind PeriodDay 1, Effective (n= 84, 79)79 Participants
Placebo (Double-blind Period)Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Physician's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind PeriodDay 85/Final evaluation, Effective (n= 84, 79)47 Participants
Placebo (Double-blind Period)Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Physician's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind PeriodDay 1, Ineffective (n= 84, 79)0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Physician's Overall Assessment - Titration Period

Physician's global assessment of therapeutic efficacy (effectiveness) of the study drug was measured on a 2-point scale where 1 = effective and 2 = not effective.

Time frame: Day 29 or final evaluation (Titration period)

Population: The FAS1 population included all the randomly assigned participants with the exception of participants with pre-defined criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Physician's Overall Assessment - Titration PeriodEffective214 Participants
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Physician's Overall Assessment - Titration PeriodIneffective44 Participants
Secondary

Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score - Double-Blind Period

The intensity of average pain (degree of pain) felt by the participants in daily living throughout the day on a 100-millimeter (mm) VAS scale by drawing a slash. The left margin (0 mm) was considered No pain at all, and the right margin (100 mm) was considered Severer pain than this is inconceivable. The length (mm) from the left margin to the slash is measured. Mean VAS score during 3 days before the end of titration period and during 3 days before the end of double-blind period was reported.

Time frame: Day 27-29 (Titration period) and Day 83-85 (double-blind period)

Population: The FAS population included all the randomly assigned participants with the exception of participants with pre-defined criteria. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) = participants evaluable for this measure and 'n' = participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score - Double-Blind PeriodBaseline (n=84, 79)30.1 mmStandard Deviation 11.5
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score - Double-Blind PeriodLast 3 days in double-blind period (n=83, 79)29.6 mmStandard Deviation 21.71
Placebo (Double-blind Period)Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score - Double-Blind PeriodBaseline (n=84, 79)27.5 mmStandard Deviation 11.23
Placebo (Double-blind Period)Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score - Double-Blind PeriodLast 3 days in double-blind period (n=83, 79)37.1 mmStandard Deviation 20.19
Secondary

Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score - Titration Period

The intensity of average pain (degree of pain) felt by the participants in daily living throughout the day on a 100-millimeter (mm) VAS scale by drawing a slash. The left margin (0 mm) was considered No pain at all, and the right margin (100 mm) was considered Severer pain than this is inconceivable. The length (mm) from the left margin to the slash is measured. Mean VAS score during 3 days before the end of Screening period and during 3 days before the end of titration period was reported.

Time frame: Day 12-14 (Screening period) and Day 27-29 (Titration period)

Population: Full analysis set in Period 1 (FAS1) population included all the randomly assigned participants with the exception of participants with pre-defined criteria. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) = participants evaluable for this measure and 'n' = participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score - Titration PeriodBaseline (n=258)73.5 mmStandard Deviation 12.81
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score - Titration PeriodLast 3 days in titration period (n=257)39.5 mmStandard Deviation 20.02
Secondary

Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2) Score - Double-Blind Period

The SF-36v2 is 36-item form related to 8 health concepts (physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, general health, social functioning, bodily pain, vitality, mental health) and 2 summary scores (physical and mental component summary). Physical functioning, role physical and bodily pain contribute to physical component; role emotional, social functioning and mental health contribute to mental component; and social functioning, vitality, and general health contribute to both. All scores are based on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores defining more favorable health state.

Time frame: Day 1 and 85 or final evaluation (double-blind period)

Population: The FAS population included all the randomly assigned participants with the exception of participants with pre-defined criteria. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) = participants evaluable for this measure and 'n' = participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2) Score - Double-Blind PeriodDay 1, Mental Component Score (n=84, 79)47.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.22
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2) Score - Double-Blind PeriodDay 1, Physical Component Score (n=84, 79)28.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.97
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2) Score - Double-Blind PeriodDay 85/Final, Physical Component Score (n=84, 79)29.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.39
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2) Score - Double-Blind PeriodDay 85/Final, Mental Component Score (n=84, 79)47.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.07
Placebo (Double-blind Period)Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2) Score - Double-Blind PeriodDay 85/Final, Mental Component Score (n=84, 79)47.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.61
Placebo (Double-blind Period)Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2) Score - Double-Blind PeriodDay 85/Final, Physical Component Score (n=84, 79)27.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.24
Placebo (Double-blind Period)Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2) Score - Double-Blind PeriodDay 1, Physical Component Score (n=84, 79)29.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.98
Placebo (Double-blind Period)Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2) Score - Double-Blind PeriodDay 1, Mental Component Score (n=84, 79)47.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.89
Secondary

Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2) Score - Titration Period

The SF-36v2 is 36-item form related to 8 health concepts (physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, general health, social functioning, bodily pain, vitality, mental health) and 2 summary scores (physical and mental component summary). Physical functioning, role physical and bodily pain contribute to physical component; role emotional, social functioning and mental health contribute to mental component; and social functioning, vitality, and general health contribute to both. All scores are based on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores defining more favorable health state.

Time frame: Day 1 and 29 or final evaluation (Titration period)

Population: The FAS1 population included all the randomly assigned participants with the exception of participants with pre-defined criteria. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) = participants evaluable for this measure and 'n' = participants evaluable for this measure at given time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2) Score - Titration PeriodDay 29/Final, Physical Component Score (n=257)26.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.55
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2) Score - Titration PeriodDay 1, Physical Component Score (n=258)23.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.67
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2) Score - Titration PeriodDay 1, Mental Component Score (n=258)41.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.75
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2) Score - Titration PeriodDay 29/Final, Mental Component Score (n=257)45.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.77

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 15, 2026