Skip to content

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)-Enhanced Stroke Recovery

TDCS-enhanced Stroke Recovery and Cortical Reorganization

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01007136
Enrollment
62
Registered
2009-11-03
Start date
2009-03-31
Completion date
2014-03-31
Last updated
2020-09-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ischemic Stroke

Keywords

tDCS, stroke, functional MRI, TMS

Brief summary

The purpose is to determine whether application of a non-invasive battery powered device called transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can improve recovery of hand weakness after stroke beyond what is achievable with rehabilitative treatment alone.

Interventions

DEVICEtDCS

1 mA electric current will be delivered over the lesioned motor cortex for the first 20 minutes during the one hour physical therapy.

DEVICESham tDCS

Electric current will be ramped up and down over the lesioned motor cortex for the first seconds during the one hour physical therapy.

Sponsors

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* ischemic stroke causing arm weakness within 5-15 days * no other neurological or psychiatric disease, who are able to perform study tasks

Exclusion criteria

* patients younger than 18 or older than 80 years * patients with more than one disabling stroke * Patients with bilateral motor impairment * Patients with poor motivational capacity, history of severe alcohol or drug abuse * Patients with severe language disturbances, particularly of receptive nature * Patients with serious cognitive deficits (defined as equivalent to a MMS score of 23 or less) * Patients with severe uncontrolled medical problems (e.g., seizures, progressive stroke syndromes, severe rheumatoid arthritis, active joint deformity of arthritic origin, active cancer or renal disease, end-stage pulmonary or cardiovascular disease, or a deteriorated condition due to age or others), * Patients with unstable thyroid disease * Patients with increased intracranial pressure * Patients with unstable cardiac arrhythmia * Patients with contraindication to TMS or tDCS stimulation (pacemaker, an implanted medication pump, a metal plate in the skull, or metal objects inside the eye or skull, patients who had a craniotomy, skin lesions at the site of stimulation) * Patients who are not available for follow-up at 3 and 12 months * Pregnancy * Patients with contraindication to MRI will not participate in MRI

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer2 weeksMotor outcome measure for the upper extremity. Scores vary between 0-66, higher values mean better performance.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wolf Motor Function Test3 monthsThe Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) is a quantitative index of upper extremity motor ability determined through the use of timed and functional tasks. The score represents the average speed the subject could perform of the timed motor tasks. The score is the average of the scores calculated from how many times would a person have completed the task, had he or she been performing it continuously for 60 seconds. The score ranges from 0 to no theoretical maximum, with higher numbers meaning faster/ better performance. (See publication Dr. Hodics et al. 2012.)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
NIHSS3 monthsThe National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) provides a quantitative measure of stroke-related neurologic deficit. The NIHSS was originally designed as a research tool to measure baseline data on patients in acute stroke clinical trials. The score ranges 0-42, a score of 0 represents no deficit, lower score is better.
Beck Depression Inventory3 months21-item, self-rated scale that evaluates key symptoms of depression. The minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 63. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.
Ashworth Spasticity Scale3 months
Abilhand Questionnaire3 months
Visual Analog Pain Scaleduring therapy
fMRI Overactivation in Motor Cortex: Voxel Count and Intensity3 months
Barthel Index3 monthsThe Barthel Scale/Index (BI) is an ordinal scale used to measure performance in activities of daily living. Ten variables describing activities of daily living and mobility are scored. The total score ranges 0-100, a higher number being a reflection of greater ability to function independently following hospital discharge.
Medical Research Council (MRC) Scale3 monthsThe muscle scale grades muscle strength on a scale of 0 to 5 in relation to the maximum expected for that muscle. The patient's effort is graded on a scale of 0 (no movement) -5 (muscle contracts normally against full resistance).
Motor Activity Log3 months
Mini Mental Status Scale3 monthsMini Mental Status Scale is a test of cognitive function; it includes tests of orientation, attention, memory, language and visual-spatial skills, scored 0-30, the higher scores mean the better performance.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

UT SOuthwestern Hospitals, rehabilitation and stroke clinics were screened for eligible stroke patients from 2009 through 2014.

Pre-assignment details

Enrolled participants were assigned to groups unless they were found to meet one of the exclusion criteria, or withdrew their consent.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
tDCS and Occupational Therapy
1 mA electric current was delivered over the lesioned motor cortex for the first 20 minutes during the one hour physical therapy. tDCS: 1 mA electric current was delivered over the lesioned motor cortex for the first 20 minutes during the one hour physical therapy.
19
Sham and Occupational Therapy
Electric current was ramped up and down over the lesioned motor cortex for the first seconds during the one hour physical therapy. Sham tDCS: Electric current was ramped up and down over the lesioned motor cortex for the first seconds during the one hour physical therapy.
17
fMRI Control Group no Intervention
Healthy volunteers and chronic stroke volunteers were enrolled in the fMRI and TMS component of the study, no intervention was performed.
15
tDCS and no Arm Movement
1 mA electric current was delivered over the lesioned motor cortex for the first 20 minutes during the one hour physical therapy. Same inclusion criteria as the main group except for no UE movement at enrollment. tDCS: 1 mA electric current was delivered over the lesioned motor cortex for the first 20 minutes during the one hour physical therapy.
6
Sham and no Arm Movement
Electric current was ramped up and down over the lesioned motor cortex for the first seconds during the one hour physical therapy. Sham tDCS: Electric current was ramped up and down over the lesioned motor cortex for the first seconds during the one hour physical therapy.
4
Total61

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristictDCS and Occupational TherapySham and Occupational TherapyfMRI Control Group no InterventiontDCS and no Arm MovementSham and no Arm MovementTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
9 Participants5 Participants0 Participants4 Participants1 Participants19 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
10 Participants12 Participants15 Participants2 Participants3 Participants42 Participants
Age, Continuous62.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
60.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
49 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
63.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants11 Participants9 Participants3 Participants1 Participants32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants6 Participants6 Participants3 Participants3 Participants29 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 190 / 170 / 150 / 60 / 4
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 193 / 170 / 152 / 60 / 4
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 192 / 170 / 150 / 60 / 4

Outcome results

Primary

Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer

Motor outcome measure for the upper extremity. Scores vary between 0-66, higher values mean better performance.

Time frame: 2 weeks

Population: All subjects with outcome data at the prespecified follow-up timepoint were included.~fMRI Control Group no Intervention subgroup did not have clinical intervention or clinical outcome measures performed, their data was used for the fMRI and TMS component of the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
tDCS and Occupational TherapyUpper Extremity Fugl-Meyer30.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.2
Sham and Occupational TherapyUpper Extremity Fugl-Meyer36.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.4
tDCS and no Arm MovementUpper Extremity Fugl-Meyer8.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.2
Sham and no Arm MovementUpper Extremity Fugl-Meyer4.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Primary

Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer

Motor outcome measure for the upper extremity. Scores vary between 0-66, higher values mean better performance.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: All subjects with outcome data at the prespecified follow-up timepoint were included.~fMRI Control Group no Intervention subgroup did not have clinical intervention or clinical outcome measures performed, their data was used for the fMRI and TMS component of the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
tDCS and Occupational TherapyUpper Extremity Fugl-Meyer32.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.5
Sham and Occupational TherapyUpper Extremity Fugl-Meyer47.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.7
tDCS and no Arm MovementUpper Extremity Fugl-Meyer9.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8
Sham and no Arm MovementUpper Extremity Fugl-Meyer4.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Primary

Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer

Motor outcome measure for the upper extremity. Scores vary between 0-66, higher values mean better performance.

Time frame: 1 year after stroke

Population: All subjects with outcome data at the prespecified follow-up timepoint were included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
tDCS and Occupational TherapyUpper Extremity Fugl-Meyer32.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.2
Sham and Occupational TherapyUpper Extremity Fugl-Meyer56.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.8
Sham and no Arm MovementUpper Extremity Fugl-Meyer4.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Wolf Motor Function Test

The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) is a quantitative index of upper extremity motor ability determined through the use of timed and functional tasks. The score represents the average speed the subject could perform of the timed motor tasks. The score is the average of the scores calculated from how many times would a person have completed the task, had he or she been performing it continuously for 60 seconds. The score ranges from 0 to no theoretical maximum, with higher numbers meaning faster/ better performance. (See publication Dr. Hodics et al. 2012.)

Time frame: 3 months

Population: All subjects with outcome data at the prespecified follow-up timepoint were included.~fMRI Control Group no Intervention subgroup did not have clinical intervention or clinical outcome measures performed, their data was used for the fMRI and TMS component of the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
tDCS and Occupational TherapyWolf Motor Function Test19.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.6
Sham and Occupational TherapyWolf Motor Function Test30.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.7
tDCS and no Arm MovementWolf Motor Function Test0.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.12
Sham and no Arm MovementWolf Motor Function Test0.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Other Pre-specified

Abilhand Questionnaire

Time frame: 3 months

Other Pre-specified

Ashworth Spasticity Scale

Time frame: 3 months

Other Pre-specified

Barthel Index

The Barthel Scale/Index (BI) is an ordinal scale used to measure performance in activities of daily living. Ten variables describing activities of daily living and mobility are scored. The total score ranges 0-100, a higher number being a reflection of greater ability to function independently following hospital discharge.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: All participants with available data were included. fMRI Control Group no Intervention subgroup did not have clinical intervention or clinical outcome measures performed, their data was used for the fMRI and TMS component of the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
tDCS and Occupational TherapyBarthel Index66.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.1
Sham and Occupational TherapyBarthel Index82.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16
tDCS and no Arm MovementBarthel Index57.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.6
Sham and no Arm MovementBarthel Index50.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Other Pre-specified

Beck Depression Inventory

21-item, self-rated scale that evaluates key symptoms of depression. The minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 63. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: All participants with available measurement were included. fMRI Control Group no Intervention subgroup did not have clinical intervention or clinical outcome measures performed, their data was used for the fMRI and TMS component of the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
tDCS and Occupational TherapyBeck Depression Inventory3.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Sham and Occupational TherapyBeck Depression Inventory5.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.5
tDCS and no Arm MovementBeck Depression Inventory5.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.54
Sham and no Arm MovementBeck Depression Inventory3.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Other Pre-specified

fMRI Overactivation in Motor Cortex: Voxel Count and Intensity

Time frame: 3 months

Other Pre-specified

Medical Research Council (MRC) Scale

The muscle scale grades muscle strength on a scale of 0 to 5 in relation to the maximum expected for that muscle. The patient's effort is graded on a scale of 0 (no movement) -5 (muscle contracts normally against full resistance).

Time frame: 3 months

Other Pre-specified

Mini Mental Status Scale

Mini Mental Status Scale is a test of cognitive function; it includes tests of orientation, attention, memory, language and visual-spatial skills, scored 0-30, the higher scores mean the better performance.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: fMRI Control Group no Intervention subgroup did not have clinical intervention or clinical outcome measures performed, their data was used for the fMRI and TMS component of the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
tDCS and Occupational TherapyMini Mental Status Scale24.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.6
Sham and Occupational TherapyMini Mental Status Scale26.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.8
tDCS and no Arm MovementMini Mental Status Scale27.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
Sham and no Arm MovementMini Mental Status Scale30.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Other Pre-specified

Motor Activity Log

Time frame: 3 months

Other Pre-specified

NIHSS

The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) provides a quantitative measure of stroke-related neurologic deficit. The NIHSS was originally designed as a research tool to measure baseline data on patients in acute stroke clinical trials. The score ranges 0-42, a score of 0 represents no deficit, lower score is better.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: All available data from participants was included at the 3 months follow-up. fMRI Control Group no Intervention subgroup did not have clinical intervention or clinical outcome measures performed, their data was used for the fMRI and TMS component of the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
tDCS and Occupational TherapyNIHSS3.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.06
Sham and Occupational TherapyNIHSS1.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.57
tDCS and no Arm MovementNIHSS7.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Sham and no Arm MovementNIHSS6.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Other Pre-specified

Visual Analog Pain Scale

Time frame: during therapy

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026