Skip to content

A Study of Vemurafenib (RO5185426) in Comparison With Dacarbazine in Previously Untreated Patients With Metastatic Melanoma (BRIM 3)

BRIM 3: A Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled, Multicenter, Phase III Study in Previously Untreated Patients With Unresectable Stage IIIC or Stage IV Melanoma With V600E BRAF Mutation Receiving Vemurafenib (RO5185426) or Dacarbazine

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01006980
Enrollment
675
Registered
2009-11-03
Start date
2010-01-31
Completion date
2015-07-31
Last updated
2016-09-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malignant Melanoma

Brief summary

This randomized, open-label study evaluated the efficacy, safety and tolerability of vemurafenib (RO5185426) as compared to dacarbazine in previously untreated patients with metastatic melanoma. Patients were randomized to receive either vemurafenib 960 mg orally twice daily or dacarbazine 1000 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks. Study treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. The data and safety monitoring board recommended that patients in the dacarbazine group be allowed to cross over to receive vemurafenib, and the protocol was amended accordingly on January 14, 2011, as both overall survival and progression-free survival endpoints had met the prespecified criteria for statistical significance in favor of vemurafenib.

Interventions

DRUGVemurafenib

960 mg (as 240 mg tables) orally twice daily

DRUGDacarbazine

1000 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adults, \>/=18 years of age * metastatic melanoma, stage IIIC or IV (AJCC) * treatment-naïve (no prior systemic anticancer therapy) * positive for BRAF V600E mutation * measurable disease by RECIST criteria * negative pregnancy test and, for fertile men and women, effective contraception during treatment and for 6 months after completion

Exclusion criteria

* active central nervous system metastases * history of carcinomatous meningitis * severe cardiovascular disease within 6 months prior to study drug administration * previous malignancy within 5 years prior to study, except for basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, melanoma in-situ, or carcinoma in-situ of the cervix

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall SurvivalFrom randomization (initiated January 2010) to December 30 2010. Median follow-up time in the vemurafenib group was 3.75 months (range 0.3 to 10.8) and in the dacarbazine group was 2.33 months (range <0.1 to 10.3).An Overall survival event was defined as death due to any cause. The number of participants with overall survival events is reported.
Progression-free SurvivalFrom randomization (initiated January 2010) to December 30 2010.A progression-free survival (PFS) event was defined as disease progression or death due to any cause. Tumor response (progression) was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 criteria using computed tomography (CT) scans or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participants With a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response or Partial ResponseFrom randomization (initiated January 2010) until December 30, 2010BOR was defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) confirmed per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Participants who never received study treatment and treated participants without any post-baseline tumor assessments were considered as non-responders. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions, all non-target lesions and no new lesion. Any pathological lymph nodes must have had reduction in the short axis to \<10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, no progression in non-target lesion and no new lesion.
Duration of ResponseFrom randomization (initiated in January 2010) until December 30, 2010.Duration of response was defined as the time between the date of the earliest qualifying response and the date of disease progression or death due to any cause. Duration of response was calculated only for participants who had a best overall response of Complete Response or Partial Response and was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time to Confirmed ResponseFrom randomization (initiated January 2010) until December 30, 2010.Time to response was defined as the time from randomization to confirmed response (complete response or partial response).
Time to Treatment Failureapproximately 3 yearsTreatment failure was defined as a secondary endpoint in the protocol, defined as death, disease progression or premature withdrawal of study treatment. This endpoint was not included in the Statistical analysis plan; therefore no analyses of time to treatment failure were performed.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)From randomization (initiated January 2010) until December 30, 2010.The intensity of AEs was graded according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 4.0 (CTCAE) on a five-point scale (Grade 1 to 5: Mild, Moderate, Severe, Life-threatening and Death). A serious adverse event is any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution, for example is life-threatening, requires hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or requires intervention to prevent one or other of the outcomes listed above.
Pre and Post-dose Plasma Vemurafenib Concentration by Study DayPlasma samples were collected before the morning dose (troughs) and 2-4 hours after the morning dose at the beginning of each cycle (Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 106, 148 and 190).The pharmacokinetics of vemurafenib were assessed at the beginning of each 21-day cycle using pre-dose and 2-4 hours post-dose sampling.

Countries

Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

675 participants were randomized, 337 to vemurafenib and 338 to dacarbazine. One participant randomized to dacarbazine was treated in error with vemurafenib throughout the study and is included in the Vemurafenib arm in the table below and for exposure and safety analyses and is included in the dacarbazine arm for efficacy analyses.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Vemurafenib
Participants received continuous oral doses of vemurafenib (RO5185426) 960 mg twice a day. Participants took four 240 mg tablets in the morning and four 240 mg tablets in the evening (960 mg twice a day for a total daily dose of 1920 mg).
337
Dacarbazine
Dacarbazine was administered intravenously 1000 mg/m˄2 up to 60 minutes on Day 1 of every 3 weeks (3 weeks was one cycle length).
338
Total675

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Crossover: Dacarbazine to VemurafenibAdverse Event04
Crossover: Dacarbazine to VemurafenibDeath04
Crossover: Dacarbazine to VemurafenibProgression065
Crossover: Dacarbazine to VemurafenibReason Not Specified010
Crossover: Dacarbazine to VemurafenibWithdrawal of Consent01
Vemurafenib and DacarbazineAdverse Event255
Vemurafenib and DacarbazineDeath1312
Vemurafenib and DacarbazineProgression257218
Vemurafenib and DacarbazineProtocol Violation23
Vemurafenib and DacarbazineRandomized but Not Treated145
Vemurafenib and DacarbazineReason Not Specified2643
Vemurafenib and DacarbazineRefuse Treatment96
Vemurafenib and DacarbazineWithdrawal of Consent46

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVemurafenibDacarbazineTotal
Age, Customized
< 65 years
244 participants270 participants514 participants
Age, Customized
>=65 years
93 participants68 participants161 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
137 Participants157 Participants294 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
200 Participants181 Participants381 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
333 / 336247 / 29383 / 84
serious
Total, serious adverse events
165 / 33652 / 29344 / 84

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival

An Overall survival event was defined as death due to any cause. The number of participants with overall survival events is reported.

Time frame: From randomization (initiated January 2010) to December 30 2010. Median follow-up time in the vemurafenib group was 3.75 months (range 0.3 to 10.8) and in the dacarbazine group was 2.33 months (range <0.1 to 10.3).

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was defined as all randomized participants, whether or not study treatment was received. The ITT population was analyzed according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Overall survival was assessed on participants randomized at least 15 days prior to the clinical cutoff date of December 30, 2010.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
VemurafenibOverall SurvivalParticipants with events43 participants
VemurafenibOverall SurvivalParticipants without events293 participants
DacarbazineOverall SurvivalParticipants with events75 participants
DacarbazineOverall SurvivalParticipants without events261 participants
Comparison: The trial had a power of 80% to detect a hazard ratio of 0.65 for overall survival with an alpha level of 0.045 (an increase in median survival from 8 months for dacarbazine to 12.3 months for vemurafenib), one interim analysis for overall survival at 50% information.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.26, 0.55]Log Rank
Primary

Progression-free Survival

A progression-free survival (PFS) event was defined as disease progression or death due to any cause. Tumor response (progression) was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 criteria using computed tomography (CT) scans or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Time frame: From randomization (initiated January 2010) to December 30 2010.

Population: The analysis population for PFS consisted of all ITT participants randomized by October 27, 2010 (at least 9 weeks prior to the clinical cutoff date of December 30, 2010). The 9-week interval was chosen to allow time for participants to have had their first scheduled post baseline tumor assessment CT scan.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
VemurafenibProgression-free SurvivalParticipants with events104 participants
VemurafenibProgression-free SurvivalParticipants without events171 participants
DacarbazineProgression-free SurvivalParticipants with events182 participants
DacarbazineProgression-free SurvivalParticipants without events92 participants
Comparison: The trial had a power of 90% to detect a hazard ratio of 0.55 for progression-free survival with an alpha level of 0.005 (an increase in median survival from 2.5 months for dacarbazine to 4.5 months for vemurafenib).p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.2, 0.33]Log Rank
Secondary

Duration of Response

Duration of response was defined as the time between the date of the earliest qualifying response and the date of disease progression or death due to any cause. Duration of response was calculated only for participants who had a best overall response of Complete Response or Partial Response and was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: From randomization (initiated in January 2010) until December 30, 2010.

Population: The analysis population included all participants randomized by September 22, 2010 and with a best overall confirmed response of complete response or partial response.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
VemurafenibDuration of Response5.49 months
DacarbazineDuration of ResponseNA months
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

The intensity of AEs was graded according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 4.0 (CTCAE) on a five-point scale (Grade 1 to 5: Mild, Moderate, Severe, Life-threatening and Death). A serious adverse event is any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution, for example is life-threatening, requires hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or requires intervention to prevent one or other of the outcomes listed above.

Time frame: From randomization (initiated January 2010) until December 30, 2010.

Population: The safety population was defined as all treated participants who had at least one on-study assessment. The safety population was analyzed according to the treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
VemurafenibNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any adverse event326 participants
VemurafenibNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Serious adverse event110 participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any adverse event253 participants
DacarbazineNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Serious adverse event45 participants
Secondary

Participants With a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response or Partial Response

BOR was defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) confirmed per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Participants who never received study treatment and treated participants without any post-baseline tumor assessments were considered as non-responders. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions, all non-target lesions and no new lesion. Any pathological lymph nodes must have had reduction in the short axis to \<10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, no progression in non-target lesion and no new lesion.

Time frame: From randomization (initiated January 2010) until December 30, 2010

Population: The analysis population consisted of all ITT participants randomized by September 22, 2010 (at least 14 weeks prior to the clinical cutoff date of December 30, 2010). The 14-week interval was chosen as it was the minimum time needed to observe a confirmed overall response according to protocol-specified schedule for the first two tumor assessments.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
VemurafenibParticipants With a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response or Partial ResponseResponders106 participants
VemurafenibParticipants With a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response or Partial ResponseNon-responders113 participants
DacarbazineParticipants With a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response or Partial ResponseResponders12 participants
DacarbazineParticipants With a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response or Partial ResponseNon-responders208 participants
Secondary

Pre and Post-dose Plasma Vemurafenib Concentration by Study Day

The pharmacokinetics of vemurafenib were assessed at the beginning of each 21-day cycle using pre-dose and 2-4 hours post-dose sampling.

Time frame: Plasma samples were collected before the morning dose (troughs) and 2-4 hours after the morning dose at the beginning of each cycle (Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 106, 148 and 190).

Population: The pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis population included all participants who received vemurafenib and provided valid PK assessments. The PK population at specific time points varied depending on the availability of confirmed dosing and PK assessment times. n indicates the number of participants with available PK data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
VemurafenibPre and Post-dose Plasma Vemurafenib Concentration by Study DayPre-Dose Day 1 (n = 260)0 μg/mLStandard Deviation 0
VemurafenibPre and Post-dose Plasma Vemurafenib Concentration by Study DayPost-Dose Day 1 (n = 255)4.3 μg/mLStandard Deviation 4.35
VemurafenibPre and Post-dose Plasma Vemurafenib Concentration by Study DayPre-Dose Day 22 (n = 204)53.0 μg/mLStandard Deviation 26.66
VemurafenibPre and Post-dose Plasma Vemurafenib Concentration by Study DayPost-Dose Day 22 (n = 221)54.0 μg/mLStandard Deviation 25.67
VemurafenibPre and Post-dose Plasma Vemurafenib Concentration by Study DayPre-Dose Day 43 (n = 166)54.4 μg/mLStandard Deviation 24.13
VemurafenibPre and Post-dose Plasma Vemurafenib Concentration by Study DayPost-Dose Day 43 (n = 170)54.4 μg/mLStandard Deviation 23.28
VemurafenibPre and Post-dose Plasma Vemurafenib Concentration by Study DayPre-Dose Day 64 (n = 141)57.4 μg/mLStandard Deviation 23.79
VemurafenibPre and Post-dose Plasma Vemurafenib Concentration by Study DayPost-Dose Day 64 (n = 138)57.7 μg/mLStandard Deviation 22.29
VemurafenibPre and Post-dose Plasma Vemurafenib Concentration by Study DayPre-Dose Day 106 (n = 77)55.0 μg/mLStandard Deviation 17.62
VemurafenibPre and Post-dose Plasma Vemurafenib Concentration by Study DayPost-Dose Day 106 (n = 75)56.3 μg/mLStandard Deviation 20.36
VemurafenibPre and Post-dose Plasma Vemurafenib Concentration by Study DayPre-Dose Day 148 (n = 38)51.8 μg/mLStandard Deviation 24.13
VemurafenibPre and Post-dose Plasma Vemurafenib Concentration by Study DayPost-Dose Day 148 (n = 39)53.3 μg/mLStandard Deviation 21.55
VemurafenibPre and Post-dose Plasma Vemurafenib Concentration by Study DayPre-Dose Day 190 (n = 9)53.6 μg/mLStandard Deviation 12.6
VemurafenibPre and Post-dose Plasma Vemurafenib Concentration by Study DayPost-Dose Day 190 (n = 9)50.5 μg/mLStandard Deviation 20.16
Secondary

Time to Confirmed Response

Time to response was defined as the time from randomization to confirmed response (complete response or partial response).

Time frame: From randomization (initiated January 2010) until December 30, 2010.

Population: The analysis population included all participants randomized by September 22, 2010 and with a best overall confirmed response of complete response or partial response.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
VemurafenibTime to Confirmed Response1.45 months
DacarbazineTime to Confirmed Response2.72 months
Secondary

Time to Treatment Failure

Treatment failure was defined as a secondary endpoint in the protocol, defined as death, disease progression or premature withdrawal of study treatment. This endpoint was not included in the Statistical analysis plan; therefore no analyses of time to treatment failure were performed.

Time frame: approximately 3 years

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 28, 2026