Prostate Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Prostate Cancer, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Radiotherapy planning
Brief summary
To determine if functional MRI methods will aid planning of a radiation dose boost within the prostate in patients with prostate cancer potentially improving safety and efficacy.
Interventions
Pre-hormone therapy MRI scans will be performed as an adjunct to the patients' staging MRI scan; post hormone MRI will be done wholly for research purposes.
Insertion of gold seeds into prostate for image registration.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Hormone therapy naive patients planned to be treated by radical radiotherapy after 3-6 months of androgen suppression * Patients with low-high risk histologically confirmed localised disease are eligible, with WHO performance status 0-1.
Exclusion criteria
* Patients unsuitable for functional MRI of the prostate or gold seed fiducial marker insertion (e.g. patients unable to tolerate endorectal MRI examination). * No prior pelvic radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy, previous androgen therapy, patients unsuitable for radical radiotherapy, life expectancy \<10 years, previous active malignancy within last 5 years, co-morbid conditions likely to impact on the advisability of radical radiotherapy, full anticoagulation, other exclusions to MRI (e.g. hip prosthesis or fixation, claustrophobia, ferromagnetic implants).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Comparison of dose distributions produced by rival radiotherapy plans judged using radiobiological model predictions of Tumour Control Probability (TCP) and Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP). | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Comparison of reproducibility of registration algorithms for mapping functional MR data acquired before hormone therapy to MR anatomical data acquired after hormone therapy and prior to radiotherapy. | — |
| Comparison of reproducibility of registration of functional and MR data with computed tomography (CT) data using gold seed registration, assessing reproducibility and positioning issues. | — |
| Comparison of image quality, registration reproducibility and gland distortion of internal and external imaging coils for MRI image acquisition and registration of the prostate. | — |
| Comparison of dose distributions produced by rival radiotherapy plans judged using three standard dose-volume constraints for targets and normal tissues and careful examination of the 3D dose distribution. | — |
Countries
United Kingdom