Cancer, Pain
Conditions
Keywords
Hydromorphone hydrochloride Oral Osmotic System, Jurnista
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of hydromorphone hydrochloride (HCl) Oral Osmotic System (OROS) by assessing the extent of reduction of medication frequency for the management of breakthrough pain after the administration of hydromorphone HCl OROS in Korean cancer participants.
Detailed description
This is an open-label (all people know the identity of the intervention), multi-center (conducted in more than 1 center), prospective (study following participants forward in time) study. The total duration of study will be 3 weeks. The study consists of 2 periods and 4 visits: screening period (1 week; Visit 1) and treatment period (2 weeks; Visit 2, 3 and 4). During screening period at Visit 1, potential participants will receive previously administered oral opioid analgesic until the second visit and with immediate-release opioid analgesic whenever breakthrough pain is present. During treatment period, from second visit to the fourth visit, participants will receive the hydromorphone HCl OROS once daily for 2 weeks. At Investigator's discretion, participants completing 2 weeks of treatment with study drug could be enrolled into the extension phase of 12-weeks. The dose of study drug is flexible and will be increased or decreased based on the frequency of immediate-release opioid analgesic doses needed to manage pain. At second visit, initial dose of hydromorphone will be determined according to the equivalent analgesic effect conversion tablet (oxycodone 10 milligram \[mg\] twice daily is equal to hydromorphone HCl 8 mg once daily). The Investigator will increase a participant's daily dose if more than 3 breakthrough pain episodes require rescue medication within a 24 hours period. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.
Interventions
Hydromorphone HCl OROS 8 mg once daily for 2 weeks.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Cancer participants administering only strong oral opioid analgesic for cancer pain control * Participants administering short-acting narcotic analgesics at least twice daily due to breakthrough pain for 3 days just before Visit 2 (Day 1) * Participants sufficiently capable of complying overall study requirements including participant diary for pain at the discretion of the Investigators * Abstinent or surgically sterile female participants
Exclusion criteria
* Participants with cancer pain who are potentially unresponsive to narcotic analgesics * Participants with presence or history of drug or alcohol abuse within the past 6 months * Participants with hypersensitivity to hydromorphone HCl * Participants with history of colectomy (surgery to remove part or all of the colon) * Participants with severe digestive tract disease which might interfere with oral analgesic effects, such as dysphagia (trouble swallowing), vomiting, no bowel movement, ileus, and severe enterostenosis that can influence absorption and passing through of oral medication
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Dosing Frequency of Analgesics for Treating Breakthrough Pain | Day 15 | Percentage of participants with decrease in dosing frequency by 33 percent or more in breakthrough pain (acute pain that comes on rapidly despite the use of pain medication) was determined at final visit (Day 15) compared to Baseline (Day 1 - when the administration of study drug was started). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Korean - Brief Pain Inventory (K-BPI) Score at Day 15 | Baseline and Day 15 | K-BPI is an inventory designed to measure the degree of pain severity and the impact of pain in performing daily routines. K-BPI comprises of total 9 items in total, and the ninth item consisting of 7 sub-items is a question asking the degree of disturbance due to pain. The score ranges from 0 to 10, where 0=no pain, 1 to 4=mild pain, 5 to 6=moderate pain and 7 to 10=severe pain. |
| Pain Intensity Score | Day 3 and Day 13 | Average Pain intensity score experienced by Participant over the last 24 hours of Day 3 and Day 13 was recorded. Pain intensity was measured using numerical rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0=no pain to 10=most severe pain. |
| Global Assessment of Overall Efficacy of Study Drug by Investigator | Day 15 | Investigator evaluated overall efficacy of study drug and the responses were categorized as: 'ineffective response', 'average response', 'effective response', 'very effectiveresponse', and 'highly effective response'. |
| Frequency of Experiencing Breakthrough Pain | Day 1 and Day 15 | Frequency of experiencing 3 types of breakthrough pain: Idiopathic pain (pain of unknown cause), incidental pain (pain that arises as a result of activity, such as movement of an arthritic joint, stretching a wound) and end-of-dose failure pain was reported. |
| Participant's Preferences Along With Reasons | Day 15 | The number of participants who preferred oral long-acting narcotic analgesics or previously administered oral opioid analgesic were reported along with detailed and specific reasons such as consistent analgesic effect during administration, sleep undisturbed by pain, reduced intake of medication frequency, reduce intake of immediate-release opioid analgesic for breakthrough pain treatment, other and no response, for their preferences. Same participant may have multiple reason for their preference. |
| Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | Day 15 | Investigators evaluated the overall improvement of the participant's condition using CGI scale. The CGI-I is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the participant's patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention and rated as: 1=greatly improved; 2=somewhat improved; 3=slightly improved; 4=no change; 5=slightly aggravated ; 6=somewhat aggravated; 7=greatly aggarvated. |
| European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 1 and Day 15 | EORTC QLQ-C30: included functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting) and single items (dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea and financial difficulties) which are based on 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much); and global health status and quality of life scale based on 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=Excellent). All scales and items are averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better level of functioning or greater degree of symptomatology or problems. |
| Global Assessment of Overall Efficacy of Study Drug by Participant | Day 15 | Participants evaluated overall efficacy of study drug and the responses were categorized as: 'ineffective response', 'average response', 'effective response', 'very effectiveresponse', and 'highly effective response'. |
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS Hydromorphone HCl OROS administered at a dose of 8 milligram once daily for 2 weeks. | 106 |
| Total | 106 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 6 |
| Overall Study | Choice by participants | 2 |
| Overall Study | Other | 23 |
| Overall Study | Paticipants did not cooperate | 6 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 1 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 3 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Hydromorphone HCl OROS |
|---|---|
| Age Continuous | 57.94 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.27 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 37 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 69 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 95 / 107 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 33 / 107 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants With Dosing Frequency of Analgesics for Treating Breakthrough Pain
Percentage of participants with decrease in dosing frequency by 33 percent or more in breakthrough pain (acute pain that comes on rapidly despite the use of pain medication) was determined at final visit (Day 15) compared to Baseline (Day 1 - when the administration of study drug was started).
Time frame: Day 15
Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had available data in the dosing frequency of short-acting narcotic analgesics for treating breakthrough pain at Day 8. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Percentage of Participants With Dosing Frequency of Analgesics for Treating Breakthrough Pain | 50.9 Percentage of Participants |
Change From Baseline in Korean - Brief Pain Inventory (K-BPI) Score at Day 15
K-BPI is an inventory designed to measure the degree of pain severity and the impact of pain in performing daily routines. K-BPI comprises of total 9 items in total, and the ninth item consisting of 7 sub-items is a question asking the degree of disturbance due to pain. The score ranges from 0 to 10, where 0=no pain, 1 to 4=mild pain, 5 to 6=moderate pain and 7 to 10=severe pain.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 15
Population: The ITT analysis population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had available data in the dosing frequency of short-acting narcotic analgesics for treating breakthrough pain at Day 8. LOCF was used.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Change From Baseline in Korean - Brief Pain Inventory (K-BPI) Score at Day 15 | Baseline | 3.66 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.29 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Change From Baseline in Korean - Brief Pain Inventory (K-BPI) Score at Day 15 | Change at Day 15 | 0.359 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.191 |
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score
EORTC QLQ-C30: included functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting) and single items (dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea and financial difficulties) which are based on 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much); and global health status and quality of life scale based on 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=Excellent). All scales and items are averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better level of functioning or greater degree of symptomatology or problems.
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 15
Population: The ITT analysis population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had available data in the dosing frequency of short-acting narcotic analgesics for treating breakthrough pain at Day 8. LOCF was used. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 1: Trouble in strenuous activities (n=106) | 3.00 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.79 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 15: Trouble in strenuous activities (n=106) | 3.07 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.84 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 1: Trouble in long walk (n=106) | 2.98 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.78 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 15: Trouble in long walk (n=106) | 3.18 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.79 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 1: Trouble in short walk outside house (n=106) | 1.98 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.93 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 15: Trouble in short walk outside house(n=106) | 2.22 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.99 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 1: Stay in bed/chair (n=106) | 2.64 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.83 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 15: Stay in bed/chair (n=106) | 2.71 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.78 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 1: Need help in usual activities (n=106) | 1.56 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.84 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 15: Need help in usual activities (n=106) | 1.72 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.95 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 1: Limitation in work/other activites (n=106) | 2.58 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.81 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 15: Limitation in work/other activites (n=106) | 2.66 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.84 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 1:Limitation-hobbies/leisure activites(n=106) | 2.56 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.85 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 15:Limitation-hobbies/leisure activites(n=106) | 2.61 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.85 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 1: Short of breath (n=106) | 2.02 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.86 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 15: Short of breath (n=106) | 2.04 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.87 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 1: Had pain (n=106) | 2.90 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.74 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 15: Had pain (n=106) | 2.66 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.79 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 1: Needs rest (n=105) | 2.74 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.81 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 15: Needs rest (n=105) | 2.78 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.75 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 1: Trouble in sleeping (n=106) | 2.18 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 15: Trouble in sleeping (n=106) | 2.13 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.87 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 1: Felt weak (n=106) | 2.50 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.77 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 15: Felt weak (n=106) | 2.52 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.78 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 1: Apetite loss (n=106) | 2.27 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.91 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 15: Apetite loss (n=106) | 2.41 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.94 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 1: Felt nauseated (n=106) | 1.75 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.83 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 15: Felt nauseated (n=106) | 1.85 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 1: Vomitting (n=106) | 1.29 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.53 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 15: Vomitting (n=106) | 1.24 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.51 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 1: Constipation (n=106) | 2.15 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.99 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 15: Constipation (n=106) | 2.08 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.96 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 1: Diarrhea (n=106) | 1.34 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.65 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 15: Diarrhea (n=106) | 1.18 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.47 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 1: Tired (n=106) | 2.62 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.79 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 15: Tired (n=106) | 2.51 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.78 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 1:Pain interference - daily activities(n=106) | 2.69 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.85 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 15:Pain interference - daily activities(n=106) | 2.60 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.81 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 1: Difficulty in concentrating (n=106) | 2.10 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.84 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 15: Difficulty in concentrating (n=106) | 2.13 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.85 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 1: Felt tensed (n=106) | 1.95 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.76 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 15: Felt tensed (n=106) | 2.01 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.77 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 1: Worried (n=106) | 2.12 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.78 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 15: Worried (n=106) | 2.16 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.81 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 1: Felt irritated (n=106) | 2.22 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.83 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 15: Felt irritated (n=106) | 2.20 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.86 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 1: Felt depressed (n=106) | 2.07 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.82 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 15: Felt depressed (n=106) | 1.94 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.88 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 1: Difficulty in remembering (n=104) | 2.02 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.87 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 15: Difficulty in remembering (n=104) | 1.95 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.84 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 1: Interference in family life (n=106) | 2.47 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.88 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 15: Interference in family life (n=106) | 2.59 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.87 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 1: Interference in social life (n=106) | 2.58 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.88 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 15: Interference in social life (n=106) | 2.60 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 1: Economical difficulties (n=106) | 2.58 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.82 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 15: Economical difficulties (n=106) | 2.51 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 0.81 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 1: Global health status (n=106) | 3.42 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 1.01 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 15: Global health status (n=106) | 3.42 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 1.15 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 1: Quality of life (n=106) | 3.47 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 1.04 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score | Day 15: Quality of life (n=106) | 3.44 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 1.08 |
Frequency of Experiencing Breakthrough Pain
Frequency of experiencing 3 types of breakthrough pain: Idiopathic pain (pain of unknown cause), incidental pain (pain that arises as a result of activity, such as movement of an arthritic joint, stretching a wound) and end-of-dose failure pain was reported.
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 15
Population: The ITT analysis population included all the as participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had available data in the dosing frequency of short-acting narcotic analgesics for treating breakthrough pain at Day 8. LOCF was used.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Frequency of Experiencing Breakthrough Pain | Day 1: Incidental Pain | 1.1 Pain episodes per day | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Frequency of Experiencing Breakthrough Pain | Day 15: Incidental Pain | 0.8 Pain episodes per day | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Frequency of Experiencing Breakthrough Pain | Day 1: Idiopathic Pain | 1.8 Pain episodes per day | Standard Deviation 1.6 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Frequency of Experiencing Breakthrough Pain | Day 15: Idiopathic Pain | 1.2 Pain episodes per day | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Frequency of Experiencing Breakthrough Pain | Day 1: End-of-dose failure | 1.0 Pain episodes per day | Standard Deviation 1.6 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Frequency of Experiencing Breakthrough Pain | Day 15: End-of-dose failure | 0.6 Pain episodes per day | Standard Deviation 1 |
Global Assessment of Overall Efficacy of Study Drug by Investigator
Investigator evaluated overall efficacy of study drug and the responses were categorized as: 'ineffective response', 'average response', 'effective response', 'very effectiveresponse', and 'highly effective response'.
Time frame: Day 15
Population: The ITT analysis population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had available data in the dosing frequency of short-acting narcotic analgesics for treating breakthrough pain at Day 8. LOCF was used. Here N signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Global Assessment of Overall Efficacy of Study Drug by Investigator | Ineffective response | 4 Participants |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Global Assessment of Overall Efficacy of Study Drug by Investigator | Average response | 37 Participants |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Global Assessment of Overall Efficacy of Study Drug by Investigator | Effective response | 48 Participants |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Global Assessment of Overall Efficacy of Study Drug by Investigator | Very effective response | 12 Participants |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Global Assessment of Overall Efficacy of Study Drug by Investigator | Highly effective response | 3 Participants |
Global Assessment of Overall Efficacy of Study Drug by Participant
Participants evaluated overall efficacy of study drug and the responses were categorized as: 'ineffective response', 'average response', 'effective response', 'very effectiveresponse', and 'highly effective response'.
Time frame: Day 15
Population: The ITT analysis population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had available data in the dosing frequency of short-acting narcotic analgesics for treating breakthrough pain at Day 8. LOCF was used. Here N signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Global Assessment of Overall Efficacy of Study Drug by Participant | Ineffective | 9 Participants |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Global Assessment of Overall Efficacy of Study Drug by Participant | Average | 31 Participants |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Global Assessment of Overall Efficacy of Study Drug by Participant | Effective | 49 Participants |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Global Assessment of Overall Efficacy of Study Drug by Participant | Very effective | 12 Participants |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Global Assessment of Overall Efficacy of Study Drug by Participant | Highly effective | 3 Participants |
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score
Investigators evaluated the overall improvement of the participant's condition using CGI scale. The CGI-I is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the participant's patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention and rated as: 1=greatly improved; 2=somewhat improved; 3=slightly improved; 4=no change; 5=slightly aggravated ; 6=somewhat aggravated; 7=greatly aggarvated.
Time frame: Day 15
Population: The ITT analysis population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had available data in the dosing frequency of short-acting narcotic analgesics for treating breakthrough pain at Day 8. LOCF was used. Here 'N'=participants evaluated for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | greatly improved | 3 Participants |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | somewhat improved | 23 Participants |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | slightly improved | 45 Participants |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | no change | 30 Participants |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | slightly aggravated | 1 Participants |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score | somewhat aggravated | 2 Participants |
Pain Intensity Score
Average Pain intensity score experienced by Participant over the last 24 hours of Day 3 and Day 13 was recorded. Pain intensity was measured using numerical rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0=no pain to 10=most severe pain.
Time frame: Day 3 and Day 13
Population: The ITT analysis population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had available data in the dosing frequency of short-acting narcotic analgesics for treating breakthrough pain at Day 8. LOCF was used. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Pain Intensity Score | Day 3 (8 AM) (n=106) | 3.7 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Pain Intensity Score | Day 3 (8 PM) (n=106) | 3.6 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Pain Intensity Score | Day 13 (8 AM) (n=103) | 3.3 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Pain Intensity Score | Day 13 (8 PM) (n=103) | 3.3 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
Participant's Preferences Along With Reasons
The number of participants who preferred oral long-acting narcotic analgesics or previously administered oral opioid analgesic were reported along with detailed and specific reasons such as consistent analgesic effect during administration, sleep undisturbed by pain, reduced intake of medication frequency, reduce intake of immediate-release opioid analgesic for breakthrough pain treatment, other and no response, for their preferences. Same participant may have multiple reason for their preference.
Time frame: Day 15
Population: The ITT analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had available data in dosing frequency of short-acting narcotic analgesics for treating breakthrough pain at Day 8. LOCF was used. Here 'N'=participants evaluated for this outcome measure and 'n'=participants who took hydromorphone OROS/oral opioid.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Participant's Preferences Along With Reasons | Hydromorphone OROS:Consistent effect(n=91) | 33 Participants |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Participant's Preferences Along With Reasons | Oral Opioid: Consistent effect(n=9) | 1 Participants |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Participant's Preferences Along With Reasons | Hydromorphone OROS: Sleep undisturbed(n=91) | 3 Participants |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Participant's Preferences Along With Reasons | Hydromorphone OROS:reduced intake frequency(n=91) | 74 Participants |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Participant's Preferences Along With Reasons | Hydromorphone OROS:reduced intake(n=91) | 29 Participants |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Participant's Preferences Along With Reasons | Hydromorphone OROS:Other(n=91) | 2 Participants |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Participant's Preferences Along With Reasons | Oral Opioid: Other(n=9) | 8 Participants |
| Hydromorphone HCl OROS | Participant's Preferences Along With Reasons | Oral Opioid: No response(n=9) | 1 Participants |