Skip to content

An Efficacy and Safety Study of Hydromorphone Hydrochloride (HCl) Oral Osmotic System (OROS) in the Reduction of Breakthrough Pain Medication Frequency in Participants With Cancer

Cancer Pain Management With Hydromorphone HCl ORal Osmotic System in Korean Cancer Patient: Evaluation of Its Clinical Usefulness in Reduction of Breakthrough Pain Medication Frequency

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01006356
Enrollment
141
Registered
2009-11-02
Start date
2008-10-31
Completion date
2009-08-31
Last updated
2013-08-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer, Pain

Keywords

Hydromorphone hydrochloride Oral Osmotic System, Jurnista

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of hydromorphone hydrochloride (HCl) Oral Osmotic System (OROS) by assessing the extent of reduction of medication frequency for the management of breakthrough pain after the administration of hydromorphone HCl OROS in Korean cancer participants.

Detailed description

This is an open-label (all people know the identity of the intervention), multi-center (conducted in more than 1 center), prospective (study following participants forward in time) study. The total duration of study will be 3 weeks. The study consists of 2 periods and 4 visits: screening period (1 week; Visit 1) and treatment period (2 weeks; Visit 2, 3 and 4). During screening period at Visit 1, potential participants will receive previously administered oral opioid analgesic until the second visit and with immediate-release opioid analgesic whenever breakthrough pain is present. During treatment period, from second visit to the fourth visit, participants will receive the hydromorphone HCl OROS once daily for 2 weeks. At Investigator's discretion, participants completing 2 weeks of treatment with study drug could be enrolled into the extension phase of 12-weeks. The dose of study drug is flexible and will be increased or decreased based on the frequency of immediate-release opioid analgesic doses needed to manage pain. At second visit, initial dose of hydromorphone will be determined according to the equivalent analgesic effect conversion tablet (oxycodone 10 milligram \[mg\] twice daily is equal to hydromorphone HCl 8 mg once daily). The Investigator will increase a participant's daily dose if more than 3 breakthrough pain episodes require rescue medication within a 24 hours period. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.

Interventions

DRUGHydromorphone HCl OROS

Hydromorphone HCl OROS 8 mg once daily for 2 weeks.

Sponsors

Janssen Korea, Ltd., Korea
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Cancer participants administering only strong oral opioid analgesic for cancer pain control * Participants administering short-acting narcotic analgesics at least twice daily due to breakthrough pain for 3 days just before Visit 2 (Day 1) * Participants sufficiently capable of complying overall study requirements including participant diary for pain at the discretion of the Investigators * Abstinent or surgically sterile female participants

Exclusion criteria

* Participants with cancer pain who are potentially unresponsive to narcotic analgesics * Participants with presence or history of drug or alcohol abuse within the past 6 months * Participants with hypersensitivity to hydromorphone HCl * Participants with history of colectomy (surgery to remove part or all of the colon) * Participants with severe digestive tract disease which might interfere with oral analgesic effects, such as dysphagia (trouble swallowing), vomiting, no bowel movement, ileus, and severe enterostenosis that can influence absorption and passing through of oral medication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Dosing Frequency of Analgesics for Treating Breakthrough PainDay 15Percentage of participants with decrease in dosing frequency by 33 percent or more in breakthrough pain (acute pain that comes on rapidly despite the use of pain medication) was determined at final visit (Day 15) compared to Baseline (Day 1 - when the administration of study drug was started).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Korean - Brief Pain Inventory (K-BPI) Score at Day 15Baseline and Day 15K-BPI is an inventory designed to measure the degree of pain severity and the impact of pain in performing daily routines. K-BPI comprises of total 9 items in total, and the ninth item consisting of 7 sub-items is a question asking the degree of disturbance due to pain. The score ranges from 0 to 10, where 0=no pain, 1 to 4=mild pain, 5 to 6=moderate pain and 7 to 10=severe pain.
Pain Intensity ScoreDay 3 and Day 13Average Pain intensity score experienced by Participant over the last 24 hours of Day 3 and Day 13 was recorded. Pain intensity was measured using numerical rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0=no pain to 10=most severe pain.
Global Assessment of Overall Efficacy of Study Drug by InvestigatorDay 15Investigator evaluated overall efficacy of study drug and the responses were categorized as: 'ineffective response', 'average response', 'effective response', 'very effectiveresponse', and 'highly effective response'.
Frequency of Experiencing Breakthrough PainDay 1 and Day 15Frequency of experiencing 3 types of breakthrough pain: Idiopathic pain (pain of unknown cause), incidental pain (pain that arises as a result of activity, such as movement of an arthritic joint, stretching a wound) and end-of-dose failure pain was reported.
Participant's Preferences Along With ReasonsDay 15The number of participants who preferred oral long-acting narcotic analgesics or previously administered oral opioid analgesic were reported along with detailed and specific reasons such as consistent analgesic effect during administration, sleep undisturbed by pain, reduced intake of medication frequency, reduce intake of immediate-release opioid analgesic for breakthrough pain treatment, other and no response, for their preferences. Same participant may have multiple reason for their preference.
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreDay 15Investigators evaluated the overall improvement of the participant's condition using CGI scale. The CGI-I is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the participant's patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention and rated as: 1=greatly improved; 2=somewhat improved; 3=slightly improved; 4=no change; 5=slightly aggravated ; 6=somewhat aggravated; 7=greatly aggarvated.
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 1 and Day 15EORTC QLQ-C30: included functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting) and single items (dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea and financial difficulties) which are based on 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much); and global health status and quality of life scale based on 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=Excellent). All scales and items are averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better level of functioning or greater degree of symptomatology or problems.
Global Assessment of Overall Efficacy of Study Drug by ParticipantDay 15Participants evaluated overall efficacy of study drug and the responses were categorized as: 'ineffective response', 'average response', 'effective response', 'very effectiveresponse', and 'highly effective response'.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Hydromorphone HCl OROS
Hydromorphone HCl OROS administered at a dose of 8 milligram once daily for 2 weeks.
106
Total106

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event6
Overall StudyChoice by participants2
Overall StudyOther23
Overall StudyPaticipants did not cooperate6
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1
Overall StudyProtocol Violation3
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHydromorphone HCl OROS
Age Continuous57.94 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.27
Sex: Female, Male
Female
37 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
69 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
95 / 107
serious
Total, serious adverse events
33 / 107

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Dosing Frequency of Analgesics for Treating Breakthrough Pain

Percentage of participants with decrease in dosing frequency by 33 percent or more in breakthrough pain (acute pain that comes on rapidly despite the use of pain medication) was determined at final visit (Day 15) compared to Baseline (Day 1 - when the administration of study drug was started).

Time frame: Day 15

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had available data in the dosing frequency of short-acting narcotic analgesics for treating breakthrough pain at Day 8. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Hydromorphone HCl OROSPercentage of Participants With Dosing Frequency of Analgesics for Treating Breakthrough Pain50.9 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Korean - Brief Pain Inventory (K-BPI) Score at Day 15

K-BPI is an inventory designed to measure the degree of pain severity and the impact of pain in performing daily routines. K-BPI comprises of total 9 items in total, and the ninth item consisting of 7 sub-items is a question asking the degree of disturbance due to pain. The score ranges from 0 to 10, where 0=no pain, 1 to 4=mild pain, 5 to 6=moderate pain and 7 to 10=severe pain.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 15

Population: The ITT analysis population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had available data in the dosing frequency of short-acting narcotic analgesics for treating breakthrough pain at Day 8. LOCF was used.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hydromorphone HCl OROSChange From Baseline in Korean - Brief Pain Inventory (K-BPI) Score at Day 15Baseline3.66 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.29
Hydromorphone HCl OROSChange From Baseline in Korean - Brief Pain Inventory (K-BPI) Score at Day 15Change at Day 150.359 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.191
Secondary

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) Score

EORTC QLQ-C30: included functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting) and single items (dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea and financial difficulties) which are based on 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much); and global health status and quality of life scale based on 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=Excellent). All scales and items are averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better level of functioning or greater degree of symptomatology or problems.

Time frame: Day 1 and Day 15

Population: The ITT analysis population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had available data in the dosing frequency of short-acting narcotic analgesics for treating breakthrough pain at Day 8. LOCF was used. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 1: Trouble in strenuous activities (n=106)3.00 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 15: Trouble in strenuous activities (n=106)3.07 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 1: Trouble in long walk (n=106)2.98 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 15: Trouble in long walk (n=106)3.18 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 1: Trouble in short walk outside house (n=106)1.98 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.93
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 15: Trouble in short walk outside house(n=106)2.22 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.99
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 1: Stay in bed/chair (n=106)2.64 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 15: Stay in bed/chair (n=106)2.71 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 1: Need help in usual activities (n=106)1.56 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 15: Need help in usual activities (n=106)1.72 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.95
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 1: Limitation in work/other activites (n=106)2.58 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.81
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 15: Limitation in work/other activites (n=106)2.66 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 1:Limitation-hobbies/leisure activites(n=106)2.56 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.85
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 15:Limitation-hobbies/leisure activites(n=106)2.61 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.85
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 1: Short of breath (n=106)2.02 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.86
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 15: Short of breath (n=106)2.04 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.87
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 1: Had pain (n=106)2.90 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.74
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 15: Had pain (n=106)2.66 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 1: Needs rest (n=105)2.74 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.81
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 15: Needs rest (n=105)2.78 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.75
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 1: Trouble in sleeping (n=106)2.18 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 15: Trouble in sleeping (n=106)2.13 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.87
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 1: Felt weak (n=106)2.50 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.77
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 15: Felt weak (n=106)2.52 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 1: Apetite loss (n=106)2.27 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.91
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 15: Apetite loss (n=106)2.41 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.94
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 1: Felt nauseated (n=106)1.75 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 15: Felt nauseated (n=106)1.85 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 1: Vomitting (n=106)1.29 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.53
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 15: Vomitting (n=106)1.24 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.51
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 1: Constipation (n=106)2.15 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.99
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 15: Constipation (n=106)2.08 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.96
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 1: Diarrhea (n=106)1.34 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.65
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 15: Diarrhea (n=106)1.18 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.47
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 1: Tired (n=106)2.62 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 15: Tired (n=106)2.51 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 1:Pain interference - daily activities(n=106)2.69 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.85
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 15:Pain interference - daily activities(n=106)2.60 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.81
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 1: Difficulty in concentrating (n=106)2.10 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 15: Difficulty in concentrating (n=106)2.13 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.85
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 1: Felt tensed (n=106)1.95 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.76
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 15: Felt tensed (n=106)2.01 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.77
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 1: Worried (n=106)2.12 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 15: Worried (n=106)2.16 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.81
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 1: Felt irritated (n=106)2.22 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 15: Felt irritated (n=106)2.20 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.86
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 1: Felt depressed (n=106)2.07 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.82
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 15: Felt depressed (n=106)1.94 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.88
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 1: Difficulty in remembering (n=104)2.02 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.87
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 15: Difficulty in remembering (n=104)1.95 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 1: Interference in family life (n=106)2.47 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.88
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 15: Interference in family life (n=106)2.59 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.87
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 1: Interference in social life (n=106)2.58 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.88
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 15: Interference in social life (n=106)2.60 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 1: Economical difficulties (n=106)2.58 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.82
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 15: Economical difficulties (n=106)2.51 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.81
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 1: Global health status (n=106)3.42 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.01
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 15: Global health status (n=106)3.42 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 1: Quality of life (n=106)3.47 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.04
Hydromorphone HCl OROSEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EQRTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDay 15: Quality of life (n=106)3.44 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.08
Secondary

Frequency of Experiencing Breakthrough Pain

Frequency of experiencing 3 types of breakthrough pain: Idiopathic pain (pain of unknown cause), incidental pain (pain that arises as a result of activity, such as movement of an arthritic joint, stretching a wound) and end-of-dose failure pain was reported.

Time frame: Day 1 and Day 15

Population: The ITT analysis population included all the as participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had available data in the dosing frequency of short-acting narcotic analgesics for treating breakthrough pain at Day 8. LOCF was used.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hydromorphone HCl OROSFrequency of Experiencing Breakthrough PainDay 1: Incidental Pain1.1 Pain episodes per dayStandard Deviation 1.4
Hydromorphone HCl OROSFrequency of Experiencing Breakthrough PainDay 15: Incidental Pain0.8 Pain episodes per dayStandard Deviation 1.1
Hydromorphone HCl OROSFrequency of Experiencing Breakthrough PainDay 1: Idiopathic Pain1.8 Pain episodes per dayStandard Deviation 1.6
Hydromorphone HCl OROSFrequency of Experiencing Breakthrough PainDay 15: Idiopathic Pain1.2 Pain episodes per dayStandard Deviation 1.3
Hydromorphone HCl OROSFrequency of Experiencing Breakthrough PainDay 1: End-of-dose failure1.0 Pain episodes per dayStandard Deviation 1.6
Hydromorphone HCl OROSFrequency of Experiencing Breakthrough PainDay 15: End-of-dose failure0.6 Pain episodes per dayStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Global Assessment of Overall Efficacy of Study Drug by Investigator

Investigator evaluated overall efficacy of study drug and the responses were categorized as: 'ineffective response', 'average response', 'effective response', 'very effectiveresponse', and 'highly effective response'.

Time frame: Day 15

Population: The ITT analysis population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had available data in the dosing frequency of short-acting narcotic analgesics for treating breakthrough pain at Day 8. LOCF was used. Here N signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Hydromorphone HCl OROSGlobal Assessment of Overall Efficacy of Study Drug by InvestigatorIneffective response4 Participants
Hydromorphone HCl OROSGlobal Assessment of Overall Efficacy of Study Drug by InvestigatorAverage response37 Participants
Hydromorphone HCl OROSGlobal Assessment of Overall Efficacy of Study Drug by InvestigatorEffective response48 Participants
Hydromorphone HCl OROSGlobal Assessment of Overall Efficacy of Study Drug by InvestigatorVery effective response12 Participants
Hydromorphone HCl OROSGlobal Assessment of Overall Efficacy of Study Drug by InvestigatorHighly effective response3 Participants
Secondary

Global Assessment of Overall Efficacy of Study Drug by Participant

Participants evaluated overall efficacy of study drug and the responses were categorized as: 'ineffective response', 'average response', 'effective response', 'very effectiveresponse', and 'highly effective response'.

Time frame: Day 15

Population: The ITT analysis population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had available data in the dosing frequency of short-acting narcotic analgesics for treating breakthrough pain at Day 8. LOCF was used. Here N signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Hydromorphone HCl OROSGlobal Assessment of Overall Efficacy of Study Drug by ParticipantIneffective9 Participants
Hydromorphone HCl OROSGlobal Assessment of Overall Efficacy of Study Drug by ParticipantAverage31 Participants
Hydromorphone HCl OROSGlobal Assessment of Overall Efficacy of Study Drug by ParticipantEffective49 Participants
Hydromorphone HCl OROSGlobal Assessment of Overall Efficacy of Study Drug by ParticipantVery effective12 Participants
Hydromorphone HCl OROSGlobal Assessment of Overall Efficacy of Study Drug by ParticipantHighly effective3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score

Investigators evaluated the overall improvement of the participant's condition using CGI scale. The CGI-I is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the participant's patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention and rated as: 1=greatly improved; 2=somewhat improved; 3=slightly improved; 4=no change; 5=slightly aggravated ; 6=somewhat aggravated; 7=greatly aggarvated.

Time frame: Day 15

Population: The ITT analysis population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had available data in the dosing frequency of short-acting narcotic analgesics for treating breakthrough pain at Day 8. LOCF was used. Here 'N'=participants evaluated for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Hydromorphone HCl OROSNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Scoregreatly improved3 Participants
Hydromorphone HCl OROSNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Scoresomewhat improved23 Participants
Hydromorphone HCl OROSNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Scoreslightly improved45 Participants
Hydromorphone HCl OROSNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Scoreno change30 Participants
Hydromorphone HCl OROSNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Scoreslightly aggravated1 Participants
Hydromorphone HCl OROSNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Scoresomewhat aggravated2 Participants
Secondary

Pain Intensity Score

Average Pain intensity score experienced by Participant over the last 24 hours of Day 3 and Day 13 was recorded. Pain intensity was measured using numerical rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0=no pain to 10=most severe pain.

Time frame: Day 3 and Day 13

Population: The ITT analysis population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had available data in the dosing frequency of short-acting narcotic analgesics for treating breakthrough pain at Day 8. LOCF was used. Here 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hydromorphone HCl OROSPain Intensity ScoreDay 3 (8 AM) (n=106)3.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Hydromorphone HCl OROSPain Intensity ScoreDay 3 (8 PM) (n=106)3.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Hydromorphone HCl OROSPain Intensity ScoreDay 13 (8 AM) (n=103)3.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Hydromorphone HCl OROSPain Intensity ScoreDay 13 (8 PM) (n=103)3.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Secondary

Participant's Preferences Along With Reasons

The number of participants who preferred oral long-acting narcotic analgesics or previously administered oral opioid analgesic were reported along with detailed and specific reasons such as consistent analgesic effect during administration, sleep undisturbed by pain, reduced intake of medication frequency, reduce intake of immediate-release opioid analgesic for breakthrough pain treatment, other and no response, for their preferences. Same participant may have multiple reason for their preference.

Time frame: Day 15

Population: The ITT analysis population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had available data in dosing frequency of short-acting narcotic analgesics for treating breakthrough pain at Day 8. LOCF was used. Here 'N'=participants evaluated for this outcome measure and 'n'=participants who took hydromorphone OROS/oral opioid.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Hydromorphone HCl OROSParticipant's Preferences Along With ReasonsHydromorphone OROS:Consistent effect(n=91)33 Participants
Hydromorphone HCl OROSParticipant's Preferences Along With ReasonsOral Opioid: Consistent effect(n=9)1 Participants
Hydromorphone HCl OROSParticipant's Preferences Along With ReasonsHydromorphone OROS: Sleep undisturbed(n=91)3 Participants
Hydromorphone HCl OROSParticipant's Preferences Along With ReasonsHydromorphone OROS:reduced intake frequency(n=91)74 Participants
Hydromorphone HCl OROSParticipant's Preferences Along With ReasonsHydromorphone OROS:reduced intake(n=91)29 Participants
Hydromorphone HCl OROSParticipant's Preferences Along With ReasonsHydromorphone OROS:Other(n=91)2 Participants
Hydromorphone HCl OROSParticipant's Preferences Along With ReasonsOral Opioid: Other(n=9)8 Participants
Hydromorphone HCl OROSParticipant's Preferences Along With ReasonsOral Opioid: No response(n=9)1 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026