Skip to content

Fixed Versus Flexible Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) Antagonist Initiation

Fixed Versus Flexible GnRH Antagonist Initiation

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01005784
Enrollment
146
Registered
2009-11-02
Start date
2005-06-30
Completion date
2008-03-31
Last updated
2009-11-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Subfertility

Keywords

GnRH antagonists

Brief summary

This is a comparison of pregnancy achievement between two GnRH antagonist protocols which differ in the timing of GnRH antagonist initiation.

Interventions

flexible antagonist administration according to specified criteria

Sponsors

Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 39 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* \< 39 years of age * BMI 18.5-29.9 * \<= 3 previous IVF cycles

Exclusion criteria

* PCOS * Endometriosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Luteinizing hormone rise3-14 days (duration of ovarian stimulation)

Countries

Greece

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026