Golimumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis Participants With an Inadequate Response to Etanercept (ENBREL) or Adalimumab (HUMIRA)

Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)-based ACR 20 response: greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent (%) improvement from Baseline in tender (68 joints assessed) and swollen (66 joints assessed) joint counts and \>=20% improvement from Baseline in 3 of the following 5 assessments: 1- Participant's assessment of pain using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (0 to 10 centimeters \[cm\]), 2- Participant's global assessment of disease activity using VAS (0 to 10 cm), 3- Physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS (0 to 10 cm), 4- Participant's assessment of physical function as measured by the Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI) (score of 0-3 in 8 functional areas), 5- ESR.

Time frame: Week 14

Population: Modified Intent To Treat (mITT) population included all enrolled participants who had Week 0 measurements and received at least 1 dose of study drug.

Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)-based disease activity score for 28-joints count (DAS28) was calculated from number of swollen joint counts (SJC) and tender joint counts (TJC) using 28 joints count, ESR, and patient global assessment of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater disease activity). Total ESR-based DAS28 score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score=more disease activity.

Time frame: Week 52, 76

Population: Study extension mITT population. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) = participants evaluable for this measure and 'n' = participants evaluable at specified time point for each arm, respectively. Participants reported in other groups are subgroups of 'Study Extension OL Group' by treatment received in the OL/DB phase (Weeks 16-52).

Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)-based ACR 20 response: greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent (%) improvement from Baseline in tender (68 joints assessed) and swollen (66 joints assessed) joint counts and \>=20% improvement from Baseline in 3 of the following 5 assessments: 1- Participant's assessment of pain using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (0 to 10 centimeters \[cm\]), 2- Participant's global assessment of disease activity using VAS (0 to 10 cm), 3- Physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS (0 to 10 cm), 4- Participant's assessment of physical function as measured by the Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI) (score of 0-3 in 8 functional areas), 5- ESR.

Time frame: Within 2 weeks of initiating therapy

Population: Modified Intent To Treat (mITT) population included all enrolled participants who had Week 0 measurements and received at least 1 dose of study drug.

Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)-based ACR 20 response: \>=20 % improvement from Week 16 in tender (68 joints assessed) and swollen (66 joints assessed) joint counts and \>=20% improvement from Week 16 in 3 of the following 5 assessments: 1- Participant's assessment of pain using VAS (0 to 10 cm), 2- Participant's global assessment of disease activity using VAS (0 to 10 cm), 3- Physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS (0 to 10 cm), 4- Participant's assessment of physical function as measured by the Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI) (score of 0-3 in 8 functional areas), 5- ESR. Percentage of participants, who achieved ESR-based ACR 20 responses at Week 52 relative to Week 16, is reported.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Double-blind modified Intent To Treat (mITT) population included participants who were randomized at Week 16 to SC or IV golimumab (Groups 2a and 2b) and received at least 1 dose of study drug after randomization.

Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)-based disease activity score for 28-joints count (DAS28) as defined by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), response criteria was used to assess individual response as none, moderate, or good, depending on the extent of change from Baseline and the level of disease activity reached. A participant was classified as having achieved a DAS28 good response if, DAS28 was less than or equal to (\<=) 3.2 at a given visit and improvement from Baseline was \>1.2. Percentage of participants, who achieved ESR-based DAS 28 good response at Week 16 and maintained that response through Week 52, is reported.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Open-label modified Intent To Treat (mITT) population included all participants, who received at least 1 open-label golimumab 50 mg SC injection during the continued open-label/ double-blind treatment period.

Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)-based/ C Reactive Protein (CRP)-based ACR 20 response: \>=20 % improvement from Week 16 in tender (68 joints assessed) and swollen (66 joints assessed) joint counts and \>=20% improvement from Week 16 in 3 of the following 5 assessments: 1- Participant's assessment of pain using VAS (0 to 10 cm), 2- Participant's global assessment of disease activity using VAS (0 to 10 cm), 3- Physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS (0 to 10 cm), 4- Participant's assessment of physical function as measured by the Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI) (score of 0-3 in 8 functional areas), 5- ESR or CRP. Percentage of participants, who achieved ESR/ CRP-based ACR 20 responses at Week 76 relative to Week 16, is reported.

Time frame: Week 76

Population: Study extension mITT population included all participants, who were enrolled into the 24-week study extension period at Week 52, and received at least 1 golimumab SC injection during the study extension period. Participants reported in other groups are subgroups of 'Study Extension OL Group' by treatment received in the OL/DB phase (Weeks 16-52).