Skip to content

Evaluation of Radiesse® Dermal Filler for Hand Rejuvenation

Phase 4, Evaluation of Radiesse® Dermal Filler for Hand Rejuvenation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01004107
Enrollment
101
Registered
2009-10-29
Start date
2008-10-31
Completion date
2010-04-30
Last updated
2018-07-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aging Hands

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of Radiesse® Injectable Dermal Filler for hand treatment.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, randomized, masked, controlled study to investigate the effectiveness of Radiesse® Dermal Filler for hand treatment. This is a prospective, randomized, masked, controlled study to investigate the effectiveness of Radiesse® Dermal Filler for hand treatment, comprised of a 3-month main study followed by an open-label extension (OLEX) study through 12 months. At 3 months, untreated controls received Radiesse Dermal Filler for hand treatment and were followed for the remainder of the study. All study subjects were eligible for retreatment 6 months after initial treatment, and all subjects were followed through 12 months from study enrollment in the OLEX.

Interventions

DEVICERadiesse Injectable Dermal Filler

Calcium hydroxylapatite particles suspended in an aqueous-based gel carrier

Sponsors

Merz North America, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Has right and left hands with a rating of 3 or 4 on the Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) as determined by the treating physician * Signs a written informed consent * Understands and accepts the obligation not to receive any other procedures in the dorsum of the hands through 12 month follow up * Understands and accepts the obligation and is logistically able to present for all scheduled follow-up visits

Exclusion criteria

* Has history of hypertropic scarring * Has a known bleeding disorder or receiving medication that will increase the risk of bleeding as the result of injection * Has a known hypersensitivity to any of the components of Radiesse or local anesthesia * Has used predefined products or treatments on the dorsum of the hand within last 4 weeks or intends to use during study * Has had any dermal fillers or surgery in the dorsum of the hand * Is a female of child bearing potential and not using medically effective birth control or is pregnant or lactating

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand3 months from baselineTo evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse for hand treatment as measured by mean change on the 5-point Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) between baseline and 3 months, by hand, among treated subjects and untreated controls. Ratings were completed by three, blinded evaluators. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect is demonstrated by a decrease in BHVSS score. Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) rating definitions are as follows: 4 = All 3 central tendons are fully exposed when hand is at rest; 3 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed with 1 to 2 tendons fully exposed when hand is at rest; 2 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed when hand is at rest; 1 = One or 2 central tendons are slightly exposed when hand is at rest; and 0 = No tendons exposed when hand is at rest.
≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand3 months from baselineTo evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse for hand treatment as measured by a ≥ 1-point change on the 5-point Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) between baseline and 3 months, by hand, among treated subjects and untreated controls. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect is demonstrated by a decrease in BHVSS score. Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) rating definitions are as follows: 4 = All 3 central tendons are fully exposed when hand is at rest; 3 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed with 1 to 2 tendons fully exposed when hand is at rest; 2 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed when hand is at rest; 1 = One or 2 central tendons are slightly exposed when hand is at rest; and 0 = No tendons exposed when hand is at rest.
≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Subject3 months from baselineTo evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse for hand treatment as measured by a ≥ 1-point change on the 5-point Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) between baseline and 3 months, by subject, among treated subjects and untreated controls. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect is demonstrated by a decrease in BHVSS score. Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) rating definitions are as follows: 4 = All 3 central tendons are fully exposed when hand is at rest; 3 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed with 1 to 2 tendons fully exposed when hand is at rest; 2 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed when hand is at rest; 1 = One or 2 central tendons are slightly exposed when hand is at rest; and 0 = No tendons exposed when hand is at rest.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baselineTo evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse for hand treatment as measured by mean change on the 5-point Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) between baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, by hand, among all treated subjects. Ratings were completed by three, blinded evaluators. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect is demonstrated by a decrease in BHVSS score. Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) rating definitions are as follows: 4 = All 3 central tendons are fully exposed when hand is at rest; 3 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed with 1 to 2 tendons fully exposed when hand is at rest; 2 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed when hand is at rest; 1 = One or 2 central tendons are slightly exposed when hand is at rest; and 0 = No tendons exposed when hand is at rest.
≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baselineTo evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse for hand treatment as measured by ≥ 1-point change on the 5-point Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) between baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, by hand, among treated subjects. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect is demonstrated by a decrease in BHVSS score. Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) rating definitions are as follows: 4 = All 3 central tendons are fully exposed when hand is at rest; 3 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed with 1 to 2 tendons fully exposed when hand is at rest; 2 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed when hand is at rest; 1 = One or 2 central tendons are slightly exposed when hand is at rest; and 0 = No tendons exposed when hand is at rest.
≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Subject3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baselineTo evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse for hand treatment as measured by ≥ 1-point change on the 5-point Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) between baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, by subject, among treated subjects. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect is demonstrated by a decrease in BHVSS score. Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) rating definitions are as follows: 4 = All 3 central tendons are fully exposed when hand is at rest; 3 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed with 1 to 2 tendons fully exposed when hand is at rest; 2 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed when hand is at rest; 1 = One or 2 central tendons are slightly exposed when hand is at rest; and 0 = No tendons exposed when hand is at rest.
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls Only3 months from baselineTo evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler for hand treatment as measured by a Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), by hand, as completed by three, blinded evaluators.
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings of at Least Improved Among the Original Treatment Group Only3 months from baselineEffectiveness was measured by evaluating changes in hand appearance, by subject, using the GAIS completed by three, blinded evaluators
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baselineTo evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse for hand treatment as measured by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) between baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, by hand, among all treated subjects. Ratings were completed by three, blinded evaluators.
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings of at Least Improved Over Study3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baselineEffectiveness was measured by evaluating changes in hand appearance, by subject, between baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, by subject, among treated subjects using the GAIS completed by three, blinded evaluators
Physician Satisfaction Evaluation3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baselineEffectiveness was measured by evaluating level of satisfaction in subject's hand appearance among physicians between baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, by subject
Patient Satisfaction Evaluation3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baselineEffectiveness was measured by evaluating level of satisfaction in subject's hand appearance among subjects between baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baselineEffectiveness was measured by evaluating subject's likelihood of return for additional Radiesse hand treatments at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekBaseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-treatmentEffectiveness was measured by evaluating subject's hand function during the prior week according to a 5-point Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHOQ) scale at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-baseline, by hand. Questions were as follows and were graded by subject as 1 = very good, 2 = good, 3 = fair, 4 = poor, and 5 = very poor: 1. Overall, how well did you hand work? 2. How well did your fingers move? 3. How well did your wrist move? 4. How was the strength in your hand? 5. How was the sensation (feeling) in your hand?
Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekBaseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-treatmentEffectiveness was measured by evaluating subject's difficulty in performing routine activities during the prior week according to a 5-point Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHOQ) scale at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-baseline, by hand. Activities were as follows and were graded by subject as 1 = not at all difficult, 2 = a little difficult, 3 = somewhat difficult, 4 = moderately difficult, and 5 = very difficult: 1. Turn a knob 2. Pick up a coin 3. Hold a glass of water 4. Turn a key in a lock 5. Hold a frying pan
Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsBaseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-treatmentEffectiveness was measured by evaluating subject's difficulty in performing routine activities, that require both hands, during the prior week according to a 5-point Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHOQ) scale at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-baseline. Activities were as follows and were graded by subject as 1 = not at all difficult, 2 = a little difficult, 3 = somewhat difficult, 4 = moderately difficult, and 5 = very difficult: 1. Open a jar 2. Button a shirt / blouse 3. Eat with a knife and fork 4. Carry a grocery bag 5. Wash dishes 6. Wash your hair 7. Tie shoelaces / knots
Normal Work During Prior Week EvaluationBaseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-treatmentEffectiveness was measured by evaluating subject's ability to work normally, during the prior week according to a 5-point Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHOQ) scale at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-baseline. Activities were as follows and were graded by subject as 1 = always, 2 = often, 3 = sometimes, 4 = rarely, and 5 = never: 1. How often were you unable to do your work because of problems with your hand(s) / wrist(s)? 2. How often did you have to shorten your work day because of problems with your hand(s) / wrist(s)? 3. How often did you have to take it easy at your work because of problems with your hand(s) / wrist(s)? 4. How often did you accomplish less in your work because of problems with your hand(s) / wrist(s)? 5. How often did you take longer to do tasks in your work because of problems with your hand(s) / wrist(s)?

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler
Device: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler: Calcium hydroxylapatite particles suspended in an aqueous-based gel carrier
76
Delayed Treatment
Cross over to treatment with Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler at 3 Months
25
Total101

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalRadiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDelayed Treatment
Age, Continuous57.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
57.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
56.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
I: burns easily, never tans
1 participants1 participants0 participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
II: burns easily, tans minimally with difficulty
97 participants73 participants24 participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
III: burns moderately, tans moderately & uniformly
3 participants2 participants1 participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
IV: burns minimally, tans moderately & easily
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
VI: never burns, tans profusely
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
V: rarely burns, tans profusely
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Hand Dominance
Left
9 participants8 participants1 participants
Hand Dominance
Right
92 participants68 participants24 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
101 participants76 participants25 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-Caucasian
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
96 Participants73 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants3 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 99
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 99

Outcome results

Primary

≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand

To evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse for hand treatment as measured by a ≥ 1-point change on the 5-point Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) between baseline and 3 months, by hand, among treated subjects and untreated controls. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect is demonstrated by a decrease in BHVSS score. Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) rating definitions are as follows: 4 = All 3 central tendons are fully exposed when hand is at rest; 3 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed with 1 to 2 tendons fully exposed when hand is at rest; 2 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed when hand is at rest; 1 = One or 2 central tendons are slightly exposed when hand is at rest; and 0 = No tendons exposed when hand is at rest.

Time frame: 3 months from baseline

Population: 3-month BHVSS: safety analysis set, which is the subset of subjects who have been exposed to the study medication at least once

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand65.8 percentage of hands
Delayed Treatment≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand20.0 percentage of hands
p-value: <0.0001Fisher Exact
Primary

≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Subject

To evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse for hand treatment as measured by a ≥ 1-point change on the 5-point Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) between baseline and 3 months, by subject, among treated subjects and untreated controls. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect is demonstrated by a decrease in BHVSS score. Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) rating definitions are as follows: 4 = All 3 central tendons are fully exposed when hand is at rest; 3 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed with 1 to 2 tendons fully exposed when hand is at rest; 2 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed when hand is at rest; 1 = One or 2 central tendons are slightly exposed when hand is at rest; and 0 = No tendons exposed when hand is at rest.

Time frame: 3 months from baseline

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Subject54.0 percentage of participants
Delayed Treatment≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Subject4.0 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.0001Fisher Exact
Primary

Mean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand

To evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse for hand treatment as measured by mean change on the 5-point Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) between baseline and 3 months, by hand, among treated subjects and untreated controls. Ratings were completed by three, blinded evaluators. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect is demonstrated by a decrease in BHVSS score. Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) rating definitions are as follows: 4 = All 3 central tendons are fully exposed when hand is at rest; 3 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed with 1 to 2 tendons fully exposed when hand is at rest; 2 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed when hand is at rest; 1 = One or 2 central tendons are slightly exposed when hand is at rest; and 0 = No tendons exposed when hand is at rest.

Time frame: 3 months from baseline

Population: 3-month BHVSS: safety analysis set, which is the subset of subjects who have been exposed to the study medication at least once. 2 subjects were enrolled \& withdrew prior to treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by HandBaseline2.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand3 Months1.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by HandChange from Baseline at 3 Months0.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.82
Delayed TreatmentMean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by HandBaseline2.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Delayed TreatmentMean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand3 Months2.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
Delayed TreatmentMean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by HandChange from Baseline at 3 Months0.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand

To evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse for hand treatment as measured by ≥ 1-point change on the 5-point Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) between baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, by hand, among treated subjects. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect is demonstrated by a decrease in BHVSS score. Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) rating definitions are as follows: 4 = All 3 central tendons are fully exposed when hand is at rest; 3 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed with 1 to 2 tendons fully exposed when hand is at rest; 2 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed when hand is at rest; 1 = One or 2 central tendons are slightly exposed when hand is at rest; and 0 = No tendons exposed when hand is at rest.

Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline

Population: BHVSS: safety analysis set, or subset of subjects exposed to study medication at least once. After 3 months, untreated controls were treated with Radiesse. All subjects (n=98) were followed to 9-months post-treatment; only the original treatment group (n=75) was followed to 12-months post-treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand66.2 percentage of hands
Delayed Treatment≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand56.2 percentage of hands
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand57.7 percentage of hands
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand57.3 percentage of hands
Secondary

≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Subject

To evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse for hand treatment as measured by ≥ 1-point change on the 5-point Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) between baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, by subject, among treated subjects. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect is demonstrated by a decrease in BHVSS score. Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) rating definitions are as follows: 4 = All 3 central tendons are fully exposed when hand is at rest; 3 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed with 1 to 2 tendons fully exposed when hand is at rest; 2 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed when hand is at rest; 1 = One or 2 central tendons are slightly exposed when hand is at rest; and 0 = No tendons exposed when hand is at rest.

Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline

Population: 3-,6-, 9-, and 12-month BHVSS: safety analysis set, which is the subset of subjects who have been exposed to the study medication at least once. After 3 months, the untreated controls were treated with Radiesse and were followed as per the original treatment group.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Subject51.5 percentage of participants
Delayed Treatment≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Subject35.7 percentage of participants
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Subject37.8 percentage of participants
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Subject34.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week

Effectiveness was measured by evaluating subject's difficulty in performing routine activities during the prior week according to a 5-point Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHOQ) scale at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-baseline, by hand. Activities were as follows and were graded by subject as 1 = not at all difficult, 2 = a little difficult, 3 = somewhat difficult, 4 = moderately difficult, and 5 = very difficult: 1. Turn a knob 2. Pick up a coin 3. Hold a glass of water 4. Turn a key in a lock 5. Hold a frying pan

Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-treatment

Population: Safety analysis set; see previously reported population description. 1 subject did not complete baseline, right hand questionnaire. 2 subjects did not complete baseline, left hand questionnaire.1 subject did not complete 6-month questionnaire for either hand.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekTurn a key in a lock1.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.17
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekHold a frying pan1.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekTurn a knob1.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekHold a glass of water1.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekPick up a coin1.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.33
Delayed TreatmentDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekHold a frying pan1.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.54
Delayed TreatmentDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekPick up a coin1.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.54
Delayed TreatmentDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekHold a glass of water1.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.33
Delayed TreatmentDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekTurn a knob1.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.33
Delayed TreatmentDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekTurn a key in a lock1.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekPick up a coin1.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.25
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekHold a frying pan1.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.27
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekTurn a knob1.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.14
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekTurn a key in a lock1.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.25
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekHold a glass of water1.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekTurn a key in a lock1.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.48
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekTurn a knob1.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.42
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekHold a frying pan1.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekPick up a coin1.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.43
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekHold a glass of water1.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekPick up a coin1.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.46
12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekHold a frying pan1.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.49
12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekTurn a key in a lock1.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.49
12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekTurn a knob1.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.46
12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekHold a glass of water1.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.46
Baseline, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekHold a glass of water1.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
Baseline, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekTurn a knob1.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.28
Baseline, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekPick up a coin1.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.39
Baseline, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekTurn a key in a lock1.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35
Baseline, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekHold a frying pan1.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35
3 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekPick up a coin1.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
3 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekTurn a key in a lock1.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41
3 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekHold a frying pan1.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41
3 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekTurn a knob1.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
3 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekHold a glass of water1.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.37
6 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekHold a glass of water1.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.14
6 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekPick up a coin1.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
6 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekTurn a key in a lock1.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.28
6 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekTurn a knob1.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
6 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekHold a frying pan1.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.28
9 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekTurn a knob1.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.17
9 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekHold a glass of water1.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.17
9 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekPick up a coin1.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
9 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekTurn a key in a lock1.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.28
9 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekHold a frying pan1.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.24
12 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekTurn a key in a lock1.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.25
12 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekTurn a knob1.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
12 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekHold a frying pan1.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
12 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekPick up a coin1.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.16
12 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior WeekHold a glass of water1.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.16
Secondary

Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands

Effectiveness was measured by evaluating subject's difficulty in performing routine activities, that require both hands, during the prior week according to a 5-point Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHOQ) scale at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-baseline. Activities were as follows and were graded by subject as 1 = not at all difficult, 2 = a little difficult, 3 = somewhat difficult, 4 = moderately difficult, and 5 = very difficult: 1. Open a jar 2. Button a shirt / blouse 3. Eat with a knife and fork 4. Carry a grocery bag 5. Wash dishes 6. Wash your hair 7. Tie shoelaces / knots

Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-treatment

Population: Safety analysis set; see previously reported population description. 1 subject did not complete baseline questionnaire; 1 subject did not complete 6-month questionnaire.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsCarry a grocery bag1.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsTie shoelaces / knots1.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsOpen a jar1.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsWash dishes1.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsEat with a knife and fork1.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.17
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsWash your hair1.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsButton a shirt / blouse1.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.45
Delayed TreatmentDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsTie shoelaces / knots1.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
Delayed TreatmentDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsWash dishes1.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.36
Delayed TreatmentDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsWash your hair1.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.32
Delayed TreatmentDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsButton a shirt / blouse1.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.34
Delayed TreatmentDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsOpen a jar1.18 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Delayed TreatmentDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsEat with a knife and fork1.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.32
Delayed TreatmentDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsCarry a grocery bag1.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsOpen a jar1.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.47
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsButton a shirt / blouse1.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.27
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsTie shoelaces / knots1.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.14
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsWash your hair1.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsCarry a grocery bag1.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.25
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsWash dishes1.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsEat with a knife and fork1.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsTie shoelaces / knots1.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.17
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsOpen a jar1.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsButton a shirt / blouse1.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.39
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsEat with a knife and fork1.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.14
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsCarry a grocery bag1.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsWash dishes1.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsWash your hair1.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsCarry a grocery bag1.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsTie shoelaces / knots1.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.23
12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsWash your hair1.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.12
12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsEat with a knife and fork1.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsButton a shirt / blouse1.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsOpen a jar1.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.37
12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerDifficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both HandsWash dishes1.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.12
Secondary

Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls Only

To evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler for hand treatment as measured by a Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), by hand, as completed by three, blinded evaluators.

Time frame: 3 months from baseline

Population: 3-month GAIS: safety analysis set, which is the subset of subjects who have been exposed to the study medication at least once. 2 subjects were enrolled \& withdrew prior to treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls OnlyVery Much Improved15.1 percentage of hands
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls OnlyMuch Improved45.4 percentage of hands
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls OnlyImproved30.3 percentage of hands
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls OnlyNo Change7.2 percentage of hands
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls OnlyWorse2.0 percentage of hands
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls OnlyMuch Worse0.0 percentage of hands
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls OnlyVery Much Worse0.0 percentage of hands
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls OnlyTotal Improved90.8 percentage of hands
Delayed TreatmentGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls OnlyTotal Improved38.0 percentage of hands
Delayed TreatmentGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls OnlyVery Much Improved4.0 percentage of hands
Delayed TreatmentGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls OnlyWorse10.0 percentage of hands
Delayed TreatmentGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls OnlyMuch Improved8.0 percentage of hands
Delayed TreatmentGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls OnlyVery Much Worse0.0 percentage of hands
Delayed TreatmentGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls OnlyImproved26.0 percentage of hands
Delayed TreatmentGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls OnlyMuch Worse0.0 percentage of hands
Delayed TreatmentGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls OnlyNo Change52.0 percentage of hands
p-value: <0.0001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand

To evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse for hand treatment as measured by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) between baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, by hand, among all treated subjects. Ratings were completed by three, blinded evaluators.

Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline

Population: GAIS: safety analysis set, or subset of subjects exposed to study medication at least once. After 3 months, untreated controls were treated with Radiesse. All subjects (n=98) were followed to 9-months post-treatment; only the original treatment group (n=75) was followed to 12-months post-treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandNo Change8.6 percentage of hands
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandImproved29.8 percentage of hands
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandWorse2.0 percentage of hands
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandVery Much Worse0.0 percentage of hands
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandTotal Improved88.9 percentage of hands
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandMuch Worse0.5 percentage of hands
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandMuch Improved43.9 percentage of hands
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandVery Much Improved15.2 percentage of hands
Delayed TreatmentGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandVery Much Improved8.7 percentage of hands
Delayed TreatmentGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandVery Much Worse0.0 percentage of hands
Delayed TreatmentGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandTotal Improved75.0 percentage of hands
Delayed TreatmentGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandImproved37.2 percentage of hands
Delayed TreatmentGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandNo Change17.9 percentage of hands
Delayed TreatmentGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandWorse5.6 percentage of hands
Delayed TreatmentGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandMuch Improved29.1 percentage of hands
Delayed TreatmentGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandMuch Worse1.5 percentage of hands
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandTotal Improved49.5 percentage of hands
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandMuch Improved7.1 percentage of hands
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandVery Much Worse0.0 percentage of hands
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandWorse10.7 percentage of hands
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandImproved41.8 percentage of hands
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandVery Much Improved0.5 percentage of hands
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandMuch Worse0.0 percentage of hands
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandNo Change39.8 percentage of hands
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandTotal Improved50.7 percentage of hands
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandVery Much Improved0.0 percentage of hands
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandMuch Improved7.3 percentage of hands
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandImproved43.3 percentage of hands
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandNo Change36.0 percentage of hands
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandWorse13.3 percentage of hands
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandMuch Worse0.0 percentage of hands
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by HandVery Much Worse0.0 percentage of hands
Secondary

Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings of at Least Improved Among the Original Treatment Group Only

Effectiveness was measured by evaluating changes in hand appearance, by subject, using the GAIS completed by three, blinded evaluators

Time frame: 3 months from baseline

Population: 3-month BHVSS: safety analysis set, which is the subset of subjects who have been exposed to the study medication at least once

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings of at Least Improved Among the Original Treatment Group Only84.2 percentage of participants
Delayed TreatmentGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings of at Least Improved Among the Original Treatment Group Only24.0 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.0001Fisher Exact
Secondary

Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings of at Least Improved Over Study

Effectiveness was measured by evaluating changes in hand appearance, by subject, between baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, by subject, among treated subjects using the GAIS completed by three, blinded evaluators

Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline

Population: GAIS: safety analysis set, or subset of subjects exposed to study medication at least once. After 3 months, untreated controls were treated with Radiesse. All subjects (n=98) were followed to 9-months post-treatment; only the original treatment group (n=75) was followed to 12-months post-treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings of at Least Improved Over Study78.8 percentage of participants
Delayed TreatmentGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings of at Least Improved Over Study62.2 percentage of participants
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings of at Least Improved Over Study29.6 percentage of participants
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerGlobal Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings of at Least Improved Over Study28.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Mean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand

To evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse for hand treatment as measured by mean change on the 5-point Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) between baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, by hand, among all treated subjects. Ratings were completed by three, blinded evaluators. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect is demonstrated by a decrease in BHVSS score. Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) rating definitions are as follows: 4 = All 3 central tendons are fully exposed when hand is at rest; 3 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed with 1 to 2 tendons fully exposed when hand is at rest; 2 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed when hand is at rest; 1 = One or 2 central tendons are slightly exposed when hand is at rest; and 0 = No tendons exposed when hand is at rest.

Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline

Population: BHVSS: safety analysis set or subset of subjects exposed to study medication at least once. After 3 months, untreated controls were treated with Radiesse. All subjects (n=98) followed to 9-months post-treatment; only the original treatment group (n=75) was followed to 12-months post-treatment. 2 subjects were enrolled \& withdrew prior to treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by HandBHVSS Rating2.51 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.88
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by HandChange since BaselineNA units on a scale
Delayed TreatmentMean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by HandBHVSS Rating1.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Delayed TreatmentMean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by HandChange since Baseline0.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by HandBHVSS Rating1.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.86
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by HandChange since Baseline0.59 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.82
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by HandChange since Baseline0.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.03
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by HandBHVSS Rating1.77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by HandBHVSS Rating1.91 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by HandChange since Baseline0.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.94
p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week

Effectiveness was measured by evaluating subject's hand function during the prior week according to a 5-point Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHOQ) scale at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-baseline, by hand. Questions were as follows and were graded by subject as 1 = very good, 2 = good, 3 = fair, 4 = poor, and 5 = very poor: 1. Overall, how well did you hand work? 2. How well did your fingers move? 3. How well did your wrist move? 4. How was the strength in your hand? 5. How was the sensation (feeling) in your hand?

Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-treatment

Population: Safety analysis set, or subset of subjects exposed to study medication at least once. After 3 months, untreated controls were treated with Radiesse. All subjects (n=98) were followed to 9-months post-treatment; only the original treatment group (n=75) was followed to 12-months post-treatment. 1 subject did not complete questionnaire at 6 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow was the sensation in your hand?1.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.47
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow well did your hand work?1.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.56
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow well did your fingers move?1.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.49
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow was the strength in your hand?1.28 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow well did your wrist move?1.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
Delayed TreatmentMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow well did your hand work?1.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.43
Delayed TreatmentMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow well did your wrist move?1.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Delayed TreatmentMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow was the strength in your hand?1.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.49
Delayed TreatmentMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow well did your fingers move?1.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.44
Delayed TreatmentMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow was the sensation in your hand?1.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.51
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow well did your wrist move?1.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow well did your hand work?1.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.29
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow well did your fingers move?1.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.29
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow was the sensation in your hand?1.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.34
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow was the strength in your hand?1.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.42
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow was the sensation in your hand?1.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.26
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow well did your fingers move?1.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow well did your hand work?1.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.28
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow well did your wrist move?1.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.36
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow was the strength in your hand?1.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.44
12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow well did your wrist move?1.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35
12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow well did your hand work?1.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.37
12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow was the sensation in your hand?1.18 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.42
12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow well did your fingers move?1.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.34
12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow was the strength in your hand?1.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.43
Baseline, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow was the strength in your hand?1.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
Baseline, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow well did your fingers move?1.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.56
Baseline, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow well did your wrist move?1.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35
Baseline, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow was the sensation in your hand?1.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
Baseline, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow well did your hand work?1.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
3 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow well did your wrist move?1.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.46
3 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow was the sensation in your hand?1.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.47
3 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow well did your hand work?1.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.47
3 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow well did your fingers move?1.18 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
3 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow was the strength in your hand?1.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.56
6 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow was the strength in your hand?1.18 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41
6 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow well did your wrist move?1.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41
6 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow was the sensation in your hand?1.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.36
6 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow well did your fingers move?1.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.28
6 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow well did your hand work?1.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.29
9 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow well did your fingers move?1.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
9 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow was the strength in your hand?1.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.36
9 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow well did your wrist move?1.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
9 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow was the sensation in your hand?1.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
9 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow well did your hand work?1.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
12 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow was the sensation in your hand?1.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.34
12 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow well did your fingers move?1.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.27
12 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow well did your hand work?1.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.34
12 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow well did your wrist move?1.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.33
12 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerMean Hand Function Rating During Prior WeekHow was the strength in your hand?1.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.44
Secondary

Normal Work During Prior Week Evaluation

Effectiveness was measured by evaluating subject's ability to work normally, during the prior week according to a 5-point Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHOQ) scale at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-baseline. Activities were as follows and were graded by subject as 1 = always, 2 = often, 3 = sometimes, 4 = rarely, and 5 = never: 1. How often were you unable to do your work because of problems with your hand(s) / wrist(s)? 2. How often did you have to shorten your work day because of problems with your hand(s) / wrist(s)? 3. How often did you have to take it easy at your work because of problems with your hand(s) / wrist(s)? 4. How often did you accomplish less in your work because of problems with your hand(s) / wrist(s)? 5. How often did you take longer to do tasks in your work because of problems with your hand(s) / wrist(s)?

Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-treatment

Population: Safety analysis set; see previously reported population description. 1 subject did not complete baseline questionnaire; 1 subject did not complete 6-month questionnaire.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerNormal Work During Prior Week EvaluationAccomplish less in your work?4.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerNormal Work During Prior Week EvaluationTake it easy at your work?4.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerNormal Work During Prior Week EvaluationUnable to do your work?4.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.81
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerNormal Work During Prior Week EvaluationTake longer to do tasks?4.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerNormal Work During Prior Week EvaluationShorten your work day?4.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.82
Delayed TreatmentNormal Work During Prior Week EvaluationShorten your work day?4.92 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.49
Delayed TreatmentNormal Work During Prior Week EvaluationTake it easy at your work?4.90 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Delayed TreatmentNormal Work During Prior Week EvaluationAccomplish less in your work?4.91 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Delayed TreatmentNormal Work During Prior Week EvaluationUnable to do your work?4.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.46
Delayed TreatmentNormal Work During Prior Week EvaluationTake longer to do tasks?4.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerNormal Work During Prior Week EvaluationTake longer to do tasks?4.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerNormal Work During Prior Week EvaluationUnable to do your work?4.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerNormal Work During Prior Week EvaluationShorten your work day?4.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerNormal Work During Prior Week EvaluationTake it easy at your work?4.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerNormal Work During Prior Week EvaluationAccomplish less in your work?4.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerNormal Work During Prior Week EvaluationTake longer to do tasks?4.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.26
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerNormal Work During Prior Week EvaluationShorten your work day?4.97 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.17
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerNormal Work During Prior Week EvaluationAccomplish less in your work?4.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerNormal Work During Prior Week EvaluationUnable to do your work?4.99 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerNormal Work During Prior Week EvaluationTake it easy at your work?4.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerNormal Work During Prior Week EvaluationShorten your work day?4.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerNormal Work During Prior Week EvaluationTake it easy at your work?4.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.42
12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerNormal Work During Prior Week EvaluationAccomplish less in your work?4.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerNormal Work During Prior Week EvaluationUnable to do your work?4.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerNormal Work During Prior Week EvaluationTake longer to do tasks?4.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.53
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction Evaluation

Effectiveness was measured by evaluating level of satisfaction in subject's hand appearance among subjects between baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months

Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline

Population: Safety analysis set, or subset of subjects exposed to study medication at least once. After 3 months, untreated controls were treated with Radiesse. All subjects (n=98) were followed to 9-months post-treatment; only the original treatment group (n=75) was followed to 12-months post-treatment. 2 subjects were enrolled \& withdrew prior to treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction EvaluationExtrememly Satisfied33.3 percentage of participants
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction EvaluationExtremely Dissatisfied1.0 percentage of participants
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction EvaluationDissatisfied1.0 percentage of participants
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction EvaluationSatisfied44.4 percentage of participants
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction EvaluationTotal Extremely Satisfied or Satisfied77.8 percentage of participants
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction EvaluationSlightly Satisfied14.1 percentage of participants
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction EvaluationSlightly Dissatisfied6.1 percentage of participants
Delayed TreatmentPatient Satisfaction EvaluationExtremely Dissatisfied0.0 percentage of participants
Delayed TreatmentPatient Satisfaction EvaluationSlightly Dissatisfied4.1 percentage of participants
Delayed TreatmentPatient Satisfaction EvaluationSlightly Satisfied15.3 percentage of participants
Delayed TreatmentPatient Satisfaction EvaluationDissatisfied5.1 percentage of participants
Delayed TreatmentPatient Satisfaction EvaluationTotal Extremely Satisfied or Satisfied75.5 percentage of participants
Delayed TreatmentPatient Satisfaction EvaluationSatisfied45.9 percentage of participants
Delayed TreatmentPatient Satisfaction EvaluationExtrememly Satisfied29.6 percentage of participants
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction EvaluationSlightly Dissatisfied2.0 percentage of participants
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction EvaluationExtrememly Satisfied25.5 percentage of participants
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction EvaluationSatisfied44.9 percentage of participants
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction EvaluationSlightly Satisfied21.4 percentage of participants
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction EvaluationDissatisfied3.1 percentage of participants
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction EvaluationExtremely Dissatisfied3.1 percentage of participants
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction EvaluationTotal Extremely Satisfied or Satisfied70.4 percentage of participants
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction EvaluationSlightly Satisfied17.3 percentage of participants
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction EvaluationTotal Extremely Satisfied or Satisfied70.6 percentage of participants
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction EvaluationExtremely Dissatisfied1.3 percentage of participants
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction EvaluationSatisfied40.0 percentage of participants
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction EvaluationExtrememly Satisfied30.7 percentage of participants
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction EvaluationDissatisfied6.7 percentage of participants
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction EvaluationSlightly Dissatisfied4.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments

Effectiveness was measured by evaluating subject's likelihood of return for additional Radiesse hand treatments at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months

Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline

Population: Safety analysis set, or subset of subjects exposed to study medication at least once. After 3 months, untreated controls were treated with Radiesse. All subjects (n=98) were followed to 9-months post-treatment; only the original treatment group (n=75) was followed to 12-months post-treatment. 2 subjects were enrolled \& withdrew prior to treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse TreatmentsExtrememly Likely29.3 percentage of participants
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse TreatmentsExtremely Unlikely2.0 percentage of participants
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse TreatmentsUnlikely5.1 percentage of participants
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse TreatmentsLikely36.4 percentage of participants
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse TreatmentsTotal Extremely Likely or Likely65.7 percentage of participants
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse TreatmentsSomewhat Likely14.1 percentage of participants
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse TreatmentsSomewhat Unlikely13.1 percentage of participants
Delayed TreatmentPatient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse TreatmentsExtremely Unlikely4.1 percentage of participants
Delayed TreatmentPatient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse TreatmentsSomewhat Unlikely7.1 percentage of participants
Delayed TreatmentPatient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse TreatmentsSomewhat Likely19.4 percentage of participants
Delayed TreatmentPatient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse TreatmentsUnlikely3.1 percentage of participants
Delayed TreatmentPatient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse TreatmentsTotal Extremely Likely or Likely66.3 percentage of participants
Delayed TreatmentPatient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse TreatmentsLikely31.6 percentage of participants
Delayed TreatmentPatient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse TreatmentsExtrememly Likely34.7 percentage of participants
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse TreatmentsSomewhat Unlikely7.1 percentage of participants
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse TreatmentsExtrememly Likely28.6 percentage of participants
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse TreatmentsLikely36.7 percentage of participants
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse TreatmentsSomewhat Likely17.4 percentage of participants
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse TreatmentsUnlikely7.1 percentage of participants
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse TreatmentsExtremely Unlikely3.1 percentage of participants
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse TreatmentsTotal Extremely Likely or Likely65.3 percentage of participants
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse TreatmentsSomewhat Likely16.0 percentage of participants
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse TreatmentsTotal Extremely Likely or Likely69.3 percentage of participants
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse TreatmentsExtremely Unlikely5.3 percentage of participants
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse TreatmentsLikely33.3 percentage of participants
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse TreatmentsExtrememly Likely36.0 percentage of participants
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse TreatmentsUnlikely5.3 percentage of participants
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPatient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse TreatmentsSomewhat Unlikely4.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Physician Satisfaction Evaluation

Effectiveness was measured by evaluating level of satisfaction in subject's hand appearance among physicians between baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, by subject

Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline

Population: Safety analysis set, or subset of subjects exposed to study medication at least once. After 3 months, untreated controls were treated with Radiesse. All subjects (n=98) were followed to 9-months post-treatment; only the original treatment group (n=75) was followed to 12-months post-treatment. 2 subjects were enrolled \& withdrew prior to treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPhysician Satisfaction EvaluationExtrememly Satisfied26.3 percentage of physicians
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPhysician Satisfaction EvaluationExtremely Dissatisfied0.0 percentage of physicians
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPhysician Satisfaction EvaluationDissatisfied1.0 percentage of physicians
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPhysician Satisfaction EvaluationSatisfied59.6 percentage of physicians
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPhysician Satisfaction EvaluationTotal Extremely Satisfied or Satisfied85.9 percentage of physicians
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPhysician Satisfaction EvaluationSlightly Satisfied13.1 percentage of physicians
Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPhysician Satisfaction EvaluationSlightly Dissatisfied0.0 percentage of physicians
Delayed TreatmentPhysician Satisfaction EvaluationExtremely Dissatisfied0.0 percentage of physicians
Delayed TreatmentPhysician Satisfaction EvaluationSlightly Dissatisfied2.0 percentage of physicians
Delayed TreatmentPhysician Satisfaction EvaluationSlightly Satisfied10.2 percentage of physicians
Delayed TreatmentPhysician Satisfaction EvaluationDissatisfied0.0 percentage of physicians
Delayed TreatmentPhysician Satisfaction EvaluationTotal Extremely Satisfied or Satisfied87.8 percentage of physicians
Delayed TreatmentPhysician Satisfaction EvaluationSatisfied57.1 percentage of physicians
Delayed TreatmentPhysician Satisfaction EvaluationExtrememly Satisfied30.6 percentage of physicians
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPhysician Satisfaction EvaluationSlightly Dissatisfied1.0 percentage of physicians
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPhysician Satisfaction EvaluationExtrememly Satisfied18.4 percentage of physicians
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPhysician Satisfaction EvaluationSatisfied61.2 percentage of physicians
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPhysician Satisfaction EvaluationSlightly Satisfied16.3 percentage of physicians
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPhysician Satisfaction EvaluationDissatisfied2.0 percentage of physicians
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPhysician Satisfaction EvaluationExtremely Dissatisfied1.0 percentage of physicians
6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPhysician Satisfaction EvaluationTotal Extremely Satisfied or Satisfied79.6 percentage of physicians
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPhysician Satisfaction EvaluationSlightly Satisfied14.7 percentage of physicians
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPhysician Satisfaction EvaluationTotal Extremely Satisfied or Satisfied80.0 percentage of physicians
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPhysician Satisfaction EvaluationExtremely Dissatisfied0.0 percentage of physicians
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPhysician Satisfaction EvaluationSatisfied48.0 percentage of physicians
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPhysician Satisfaction EvaluationExtrememly Satisfied32.0 percentage of physicians
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPhysician Satisfaction EvaluationDissatisfied0.0 percentage of physicians
9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal FillerPhysician Satisfaction EvaluationSlightly Dissatisfied5.3 percentage of physicians

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026