Aging Hands
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of Radiesse® Injectable Dermal Filler for hand treatment.
Detailed description
This is a prospective, randomized, masked, controlled study to investigate the effectiveness of Radiesse® Dermal Filler for hand treatment. This is a prospective, randomized, masked, controlled study to investigate the effectiveness of Radiesse® Dermal Filler for hand treatment, comprised of a 3-month main study followed by an open-label extension (OLEX) study through 12 months. At 3 months, untreated controls received Radiesse Dermal Filler for hand treatment and were followed for the remainder of the study. All study subjects were eligible for retreatment 6 months after initial treatment, and all subjects were followed through 12 months from study enrollment in the OLEX.
Interventions
Calcium hydroxylapatite particles suspended in an aqueous-based gel carrier
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Has right and left hands with a rating of 3 or 4 on the Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) as determined by the treating physician * Signs a written informed consent * Understands and accepts the obligation not to receive any other procedures in the dorsum of the hands through 12 month follow up * Understands and accepts the obligation and is logistically able to present for all scheduled follow-up visits
Exclusion criteria
* Has history of hypertropic scarring * Has a known bleeding disorder or receiving medication that will increase the risk of bleeding as the result of injection * Has a known hypersensitivity to any of the components of Radiesse or local anesthesia * Has used predefined products or treatments on the dorsum of the hand within last 4 weeks or intends to use during study * Has had any dermal fillers or surgery in the dorsum of the hand * Is a female of child bearing potential and not using medically effective birth control or is pregnant or lactating
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand | 3 months from baseline | To evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse for hand treatment as measured by mean change on the 5-point Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) between baseline and 3 months, by hand, among treated subjects and untreated controls. Ratings were completed by three, blinded evaluators. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect is demonstrated by a decrease in BHVSS score. Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) rating definitions are as follows: 4 = All 3 central tendons are fully exposed when hand is at rest; 3 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed with 1 to 2 tendons fully exposed when hand is at rest; 2 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed when hand is at rest; 1 = One or 2 central tendons are slightly exposed when hand is at rest; and 0 = No tendons exposed when hand is at rest. |
| ≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand | 3 months from baseline | To evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse for hand treatment as measured by a ≥ 1-point change on the 5-point Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) between baseline and 3 months, by hand, among treated subjects and untreated controls. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect is demonstrated by a decrease in BHVSS score. Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) rating definitions are as follows: 4 = All 3 central tendons are fully exposed when hand is at rest; 3 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed with 1 to 2 tendons fully exposed when hand is at rest; 2 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed when hand is at rest; 1 = One or 2 central tendons are slightly exposed when hand is at rest; and 0 = No tendons exposed when hand is at rest. |
| ≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Subject | 3 months from baseline | To evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse for hand treatment as measured by a ≥ 1-point change on the 5-point Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) between baseline and 3 months, by subject, among treated subjects and untreated controls. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect is demonstrated by a decrease in BHVSS score. Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) rating definitions are as follows: 4 = All 3 central tendons are fully exposed when hand is at rest; 3 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed with 1 to 2 tendons fully exposed when hand is at rest; 2 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed when hand is at rest; 1 = One or 2 central tendons are slightly exposed when hand is at rest; and 0 = No tendons exposed when hand is at rest. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand | 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline | To evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse for hand treatment as measured by mean change on the 5-point Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) between baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, by hand, among all treated subjects. Ratings were completed by three, blinded evaluators. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect is demonstrated by a decrease in BHVSS score. Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) rating definitions are as follows: 4 = All 3 central tendons are fully exposed when hand is at rest; 3 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed with 1 to 2 tendons fully exposed when hand is at rest; 2 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed when hand is at rest; 1 = One or 2 central tendons are slightly exposed when hand is at rest; and 0 = No tendons exposed when hand is at rest. |
| ≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand | 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline | To evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse for hand treatment as measured by ≥ 1-point change on the 5-point Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) between baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, by hand, among treated subjects. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect is demonstrated by a decrease in BHVSS score. Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) rating definitions are as follows: 4 = All 3 central tendons are fully exposed when hand is at rest; 3 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed with 1 to 2 tendons fully exposed when hand is at rest; 2 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed when hand is at rest; 1 = One or 2 central tendons are slightly exposed when hand is at rest; and 0 = No tendons exposed when hand is at rest. |
| ≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Subject | 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline | To evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse for hand treatment as measured by ≥ 1-point change on the 5-point Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) between baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, by subject, among treated subjects. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect is demonstrated by a decrease in BHVSS score. Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) rating definitions are as follows: 4 = All 3 central tendons are fully exposed when hand is at rest; 3 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed with 1 to 2 tendons fully exposed when hand is at rest; 2 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed when hand is at rest; 1 = One or 2 central tendons are slightly exposed when hand is at rest; and 0 = No tendons exposed when hand is at rest. |
| Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls Only | 3 months from baseline | To evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler for hand treatment as measured by a Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), by hand, as completed by three, blinded evaluators. |
| Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings of at Least Improved Among the Original Treatment Group Only | 3 months from baseline | Effectiveness was measured by evaluating changes in hand appearance, by subject, using the GAIS completed by three, blinded evaluators |
| Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline | To evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse for hand treatment as measured by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) between baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, by hand, among all treated subjects. Ratings were completed by three, blinded evaluators. |
| Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings of at Least Improved Over Study | 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline | Effectiveness was measured by evaluating changes in hand appearance, by subject, between baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, by subject, among treated subjects using the GAIS completed by three, blinded evaluators |
| Physician Satisfaction Evaluation | 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline | Effectiveness was measured by evaluating level of satisfaction in subject's hand appearance among physicians between baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, by subject |
| Patient Satisfaction Evaluation | 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline | Effectiveness was measured by evaluating level of satisfaction in subject's hand appearance among subjects between baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months |
| Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments | 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline | Effectiveness was measured by evaluating subject's likelihood of return for additional Radiesse hand treatments at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months |
| Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | Baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-treatment | Effectiveness was measured by evaluating subject's hand function during the prior week according to a 5-point Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHOQ) scale at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-baseline, by hand. Questions were as follows and were graded by subject as 1 = very good, 2 = good, 3 = fair, 4 = poor, and 5 = very poor: 1. Overall, how well did you hand work? 2. How well did your fingers move? 3. How well did your wrist move? 4. How was the strength in your hand? 5. How was the sensation (feeling) in your hand? |
| Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-treatment | Effectiveness was measured by evaluating subject's difficulty in performing routine activities during the prior week according to a 5-point Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHOQ) scale at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-baseline, by hand. Activities were as follows and were graded by subject as 1 = not at all difficult, 2 = a little difficult, 3 = somewhat difficult, 4 = moderately difficult, and 5 = very difficult: 1. Turn a knob 2. Pick up a coin 3. Hold a glass of water 4. Turn a key in a lock 5. Hold a frying pan |
| Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-treatment | Effectiveness was measured by evaluating subject's difficulty in performing routine activities, that require both hands, during the prior week according to a 5-point Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHOQ) scale at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-baseline. Activities were as follows and were graded by subject as 1 = not at all difficult, 2 = a little difficult, 3 = somewhat difficult, 4 = moderately difficult, and 5 = very difficult: 1. Open a jar 2. Button a shirt / blouse 3. Eat with a knife and fork 4. Carry a grocery bag 5. Wash dishes 6. Wash your hair 7. Tie shoelaces / knots |
| Normal Work During Prior Week Evaluation | Baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-treatment | Effectiveness was measured by evaluating subject's ability to work normally, during the prior week according to a 5-point Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHOQ) scale at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-baseline. Activities were as follows and were graded by subject as 1 = always, 2 = often, 3 = sometimes, 4 = rarely, and 5 = never: 1. How often were you unable to do your work because of problems with your hand(s) / wrist(s)? 2. How often did you have to shorten your work day because of problems with your hand(s) / wrist(s)? 3. How often did you have to take it easy at your work because of problems with your hand(s) / wrist(s)? 4. How often did you accomplish less in your work because of problems with your hand(s) / wrist(s)? 5. How often did you take longer to do tasks in your work because of problems with your hand(s) / wrist(s)? |
Countries
Germany
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler Device: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler
Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler: Calcium hydroxylapatite particles suspended in an aqueous-based gel carrier | 76 |
| Delayed Treatment Cross over to treatment with Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler at 3 Months | 25 |
| Total | 101 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Delayed Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 57.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6 | 57.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5 | 56.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 |
| Fitzpatrick Skin Type I: burns easily, never tans | 1 participants | 1 participants | 0 participants |
| Fitzpatrick Skin Type II: burns easily, tans minimally with difficulty | 97 participants | 73 participants | 24 participants |
| Fitzpatrick Skin Type III: burns moderately, tans moderately & uniformly | 3 participants | 2 participants | 1 participants |
| Fitzpatrick Skin Type IV: burns minimally, tans moderately & easily | 0 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants |
| Fitzpatrick Skin Type VI: never burns, tans profusely | 0 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants |
| Fitzpatrick Skin Type V: rarely burns, tans profusely | 0 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants |
| Hand Dominance Left | 9 participants | 8 participants | 1 participants |
| Hand Dominance Right | 92 participants | 68 participants | 24 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Caucasian | 101 participants | 76 participants | 25 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Non-Caucasian | 0 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 96 Participants | 73 Participants | 23 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 5 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 7 / 99 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 99 |
Outcome results
≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand
To evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse for hand treatment as measured by a ≥ 1-point change on the 5-point Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) between baseline and 3 months, by hand, among treated subjects and untreated controls. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect is demonstrated by a decrease in BHVSS score. Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) rating definitions are as follows: 4 = All 3 central tendons are fully exposed when hand is at rest; 3 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed with 1 to 2 tendons fully exposed when hand is at rest; 2 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed when hand is at rest; 1 = One or 2 central tendons are slightly exposed when hand is at rest; and 0 = No tendons exposed when hand is at rest.
Time frame: 3 months from baseline
Population: 3-month BHVSS: safety analysis set, which is the subset of subjects who have been exposed to the study medication at least once
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | ≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand | 65.8 percentage of hands |
| Delayed Treatment | ≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand | 20.0 percentage of hands |
≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Subject
To evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse for hand treatment as measured by a ≥ 1-point change on the 5-point Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) between baseline and 3 months, by subject, among treated subjects and untreated controls. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect is demonstrated by a decrease in BHVSS score. Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) rating definitions are as follows: 4 = All 3 central tendons are fully exposed when hand is at rest; 3 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed with 1 to 2 tendons fully exposed when hand is at rest; 2 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed when hand is at rest; 1 = One or 2 central tendons are slightly exposed when hand is at rest; and 0 = No tendons exposed when hand is at rest.
Time frame: 3 months from baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | ≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Subject | 54.0 percentage of participants |
| Delayed Treatment | ≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Subject | 4.0 percentage of participants |
Mean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand
To evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse for hand treatment as measured by mean change on the 5-point Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) between baseline and 3 months, by hand, among treated subjects and untreated controls. Ratings were completed by three, blinded evaluators. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect is demonstrated by a decrease in BHVSS score. Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) rating definitions are as follows: 4 = All 3 central tendons are fully exposed when hand is at rest; 3 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed with 1 to 2 tendons fully exposed when hand is at rest; 2 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed when hand is at rest; 1 = One or 2 central tendons are slightly exposed when hand is at rest; and 0 = No tendons exposed when hand is at rest.
Time frame: 3 months from baseline
Population: 3-month BHVSS: safety analysis set, which is the subset of subjects who have been exposed to the study medication at least once. 2 subjects were enrolled \& withdrew prior to treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand | Baseline | 2.54 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.84 |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand | 3 Months | 1.72 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.73 |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand | Change from Baseline at 3 Months | 0.82 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.82 |
| Delayed Treatment | Mean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand | Baseline | 2.44 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.15 |
| Delayed Treatment | Mean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand | 3 Months | 2.44 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.01 |
| Delayed Treatment | Mean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand | Change from Baseline at 3 Months | 0.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.97 |
≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand
To evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse for hand treatment as measured by ≥ 1-point change on the 5-point Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) between baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, by hand, among treated subjects. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect is demonstrated by a decrease in BHVSS score. Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) rating definitions are as follows: 4 = All 3 central tendons are fully exposed when hand is at rest; 3 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed with 1 to 2 tendons fully exposed when hand is at rest; 2 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed when hand is at rest; 1 = One or 2 central tendons are slightly exposed when hand is at rest; and 0 = No tendons exposed when hand is at rest.
Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline
Population: BHVSS: safety analysis set, or subset of subjects exposed to study medication at least once. After 3 months, untreated controls were treated with Radiesse. All subjects (n=98) were followed to 9-months post-treatment; only the original treatment group (n=75) was followed to 12-months post-treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | ≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand | 66.2 percentage of hands |
| Delayed Treatment | ≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand | 56.2 percentage of hands |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | ≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand | 57.7 percentage of hands |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | ≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand | 57.3 percentage of hands |
≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Subject
To evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse for hand treatment as measured by ≥ 1-point change on the 5-point Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) between baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, by subject, among treated subjects. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect is demonstrated by a decrease in BHVSS score. Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) rating definitions are as follows: 4 = All 3 central tendons are fully exposed when hand is at rest; 3 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed with 1 to 2 tendons fully exposed when hand is at rest; 2 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed when hand is at rest; 1 = One or 2 central tendons are slightly exposed when hand is at rest; and 0 = No tendons exposed when hand is at rest.
Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline
Population: 3-,6-, 9-, and 12-month BHVSS: safety analysis set, which is the subset of subjects who have been exposed to the study medication at least once. After 3 months, the untreated controls were treated with Radiesse and were followed as per the original treatment group.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | ≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Subject | 51.5 percentage of participants |
| Delayed Treatment | ≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Subject | 35.7 percentage of participants |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | ≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Subject | 37.8 percentage of participants |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | ≥ 1-point Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Subject | 34.7 percentage of participants |
Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week
Effectiveness was measured by evaluating subject's difficulty in performing routine activities during the prior week according to a 5-point Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHOQ) scale at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-baseline, by hand. Activities were as follows and were graded by subject as 1 = not at all difficult, 2 = a little difficult, 3 = somewhat difficult, 4 = moderately difficult, and 5 = very difficult: 1. Turn a knob 2. Pick up a coin 3. Hold a glass of water 4. Turn a key in a lock 5. Hold a frying pan
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-treatment
Population: Safety analysis set; see previously reported population description. 1 subject did not complete baseline, right hand questionnaire. 2 subjects did not complete baseline, left hand questionnaire.1 subject did not complete 6-month questionnaire for either hand.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Turn a key in a lock | 1.03 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.17 |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Hold a frying pan | 1.08 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.31 |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Turn a knob | 1.01 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1 |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Hold a glass of water | 1.03 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.22 |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Pick up a coin | 1.07 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.33 |
| Delayed Treatment | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Hold a frying pan | 1.12 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.54 |
| Delayed Treatment | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Pick up a coin | 1.12 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.54 |
| Delayed Treatment | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Hold a glass of water | 1.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.33 |
| Delayed Treatment | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Turn a knob | 1.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.33 |
| Delayed Treatment | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Turn a key in a lock | 1.09 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.52 |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Pick up a coin | 1.04 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.25 |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Hold a frying pan | 1.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.27 |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Turn a knob | 1.02 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.14 |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Turn a key in a lock | 1.04 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.25 |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Hold a glass of water | 1.01 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1 |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Turn a key in a lock | 1.09 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.48 |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Turn a knob | 1.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.42 |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Hold a frying pan | 1.12 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.52 |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Pick up a coin | 1.06 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.43 |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Hold a glass of water | 1.04 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| 12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Pick up a coin | 1.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.46 |
| 12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Hold a frying pan | 1.08 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.49 |
| 12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Turn a key in a lock | 1.08 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.49 |
| 12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Turn a knob | 1.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.46 |
| 12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Hold a glass of water | 1.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.46 |
| Baseline, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Hold a glass of water | 1.08 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.31 |
| Baseline, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Turn a knob | 1.08 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.28 |
| Baseline, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Pick up a coin | 1.12 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.39 |
| Baseline, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Turn a key in a lock | 1.11 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.35 |
| Baseline, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Hold a frying pan | 1.11 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.35 |
| 3 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Pick up a coin | 1.07 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.38 |
| 3 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Turn a key in a lock | 1.09 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.41 |
| 3 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Hold a frying pan | 1.09 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.41 |
| 3 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Turn a knob | 1.07 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.38 |
| 3 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Hold a glass of water | 1.06 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.37 |
| 6 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Hold a glass of water | 1.02 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.14 |
| 6 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Pick up a coin | 1.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| 6 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Turn a key in a lock | 1.06 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.28 |
| 6 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Turn a knob | 1.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| 6 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Hold a frying pan | 1.06 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.28 |
| 9 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Turn a knob | 1.03 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.17 |
| 9 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Hold a glass of water | 1.03 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.17 |
| 9 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Pick up a coin | 1.04 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| 9 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Turn a key in a lock | 1.08 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.28 |
| 9 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Hold a frying pan | 1.06 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.24 |
| 12 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Turn a key in a lock | 1.07 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.25 |
| 12 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Turn a knob | 1.04 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| 12 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Hold a frying pan | 1.07 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| 12 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Pick up a coin | 1.03 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.16 |
| 12 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week | Hold a glass of water | 1.03 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.16 |
Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands
Effectiveness was measured by evaluating subject's difficulty in performing routine activities, that require both hands, during the prior week according to a 5-point Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHOQ) scale at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-baseline. Activities were as follows and were graded by subject as 1 = not at all difficult, 2 = a little difficult, 3 = somewhat difficult, 4 = moderately difficult, and 5 = very difficult: 1. Open a jar 2. Button a shirt / blouse 3. Eat with a knife and fork 4. Carry a grocery bag 5. Wash dishes 6. Wash your hair 7. Tie shoelaces / knots
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-treatment
Population: Safety analysis set; see previously reported population description. 1 subject did not complete baseline questionnaire; 1 subject did not complete 6-month questionnaire.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Carry a grocery bag | 1.12 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.41 |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Tie shoelaces / knots | 1.08 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.31 |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Open a jar | 1.20 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.63 |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Wash dishes | 1.09 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.38 |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Eat with a knife and fork | 1.03 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.17 |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Wash your hair | 1.09 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.35 |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Button a shirt / blouse | 1.14 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.45 |
| Delayed Treatment | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Tie shoelaces / knots | 1.07 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.38 |
| Delayed Treatment | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Wash dishes | 1.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.36 |
| Delayed Treatment | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Wash your hair | 1.04 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.32 |
| Delayed Treatment | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Button a shirt / blouse | 1.06 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.34 |
| Delayed Treatment | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Open a jar | 1.18 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.58 |
| Delayed Treatment | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Eat with a knife and fork | 1.04 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.32 |
| Delayed Treatment | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Carry a grocery bag | 1.08 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Open a jar | 1.13 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.47 |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Button a shirt / blouse | 1.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.27 |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Tie shoelaces / knots | 1.02 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.14 |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Wash your hair | 1.01 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1 |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Carry a grocery bag | 1.04 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.25 |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Wash dishes | 1.01 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1 |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Eat with a knife and fork | 1.01 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1 |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Tie shoelaces / knots | 1.03 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.17 |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Open a jar | 1.11 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.35 |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Button a shirt / blouse | 1.12 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.39 |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Eat with a knife and fork | 1.02 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.14 |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Carry a grocery bag | 1.04 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Wash dishes | 1.01 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1 |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Wash your hair | 1.03 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.22 |
| 12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Carry a grocery bag | 1.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| 12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Tie shoelaces / knots | 1.03 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.23 |
| 12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Wash your hair | 1.01 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.12 |
| 12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Eat with a knife and fork | 1.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| 12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Button a shirt / blouse | 1.07 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| 12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Open a jar | 1.09 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.37 |
| 12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Difficulty Performing Activities During Prior Week, Both Hands | Wash dishes | 1.01 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.12 |
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls Only
To evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler for hand treatment as measured by a Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), by hand, as completed by three, blinded evaluators.
Time frame: 3 months from baseline
Population: 3-month GAIS: safety analysis set, which is the subset of subjects who have been exposed to the study medication at least once. 2 subjects were enrolled \& withdrew prior to treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls Only | Very Much Improved | 15.1 percentage of hands |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls Only | Much Improved | 45.4 percentage of hands |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls Only | Improved | 30.3 percentage of hands |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls Only | No Change | 7.2 percentage of hands |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls Only | Worse | 2.0 percentage of hands |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls Only | Much Worse | 0.0 percentage of hands |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls Only | Very Much Worse | 0.0 percentage of hands |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls Only | Total Improved | 90.8 percentage of hands |
| Delayed Treatment | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls Only | Total Improved | 38.0 percentage of hands |
| Delayed Treatment | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls Only | Very Much Improved | 4.0 percentage of hands |
| Delayed Treatment | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls Only | Worse | 10.0 percentage of hands |
| Delayed Treatment | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls Only | Much Improved | 8.0 percentage of hands |
| Delayed Treatment | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls Only | Very Much Worse | 0.0 percentage of hands |
| Delayed Treatment | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls Only | Improved | 26.0 percentage of hands |
| Delayed Treatment | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls Only | Much Worse | 0.0 percentage of hands |
| Delayed Treatment | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings Among the Original Treatment Group and Untreated Controls Only | No Change | 52.0 percentage of hands |
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand
To evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse for hand treatment as measured by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) between baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, by hand, among all treated subjects. Ratings were completed by three, blinded evaluators.
Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline
Population: GAIS: safety analysis set, or subset of subjects exposed to study medication at least once. After 3 months, untreated controls were treated with Radiesse. All subjects (n=98) were followed to 9-months post-treatment; only the original treatment group (n=75) was followed to 12-months post-treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | No Change | 8.6 percentage of hands |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | Improved | 29.8 percentage of hands |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | Worse | 2.0 percentage of hands |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | Very Much Worse | 0.0 percentage of hands |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | Total Improved | 88.9 percentage of hands |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | Much Worse | 0.5 percentage of hands |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | Much Improved | 43.9 percentage of hands |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | Very Much Improved | 15.2 percentage of hands |
| Delayed Treatment | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | Very Much Improved | 8.7 percentage of hands |
| Delayed Treatment | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | Very Much Worse | 0.0 percentage of hands |
| Delayed Treatment | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | Total Improved | 75.0 percentage of hands |
| Delayed Treatment | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | Improved | 37.2 percentage of hands |
| Delayed Treatment | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | No Change | 17.9 percentage of hands |
| Delayed Treatment | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | Worse | 5.6 percentage of hands |
| Delayed Treatment | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | Much Improved | 29.1 percentage of hands |
| Delayed Treatment | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | Much Worse | 1.5 percentage of hands |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | Total Improved | 49.5 percentage of hands |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | Much Improved | 7.1 percentage of hands |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | Very Much Worse | 0.0 percentage of hands |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | Worse | 10.7 percentage of hands |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | Improved | 41.8 percentage of hands |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | Very Much Improved | 0.5 percentage of hands |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | Much Worse | 0.0 percentage of hands |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | No Change | 39.8 percentage of hands |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | Total Improved | 50.7 percentage of hands |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | Very Much Improved | 0.0 percentage of hands |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | Much Improved | 7.3 percentage of hands |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | Improved | 43.3 percentage of hands |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | No Change | 36.0 percentage of hands |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | Worse | 13.3 percentage of hands |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | Much Worse | 0.0 percentage of hands |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings, by Hand | Very Much Worse | 0.0 percentage of hands |
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings of at Least Improved Among the Original Treatment Group Only
Effectiveness was measured by evaluating changes in hand appearance, by subject, using the GAIS completed by three, blinded evaluators
Time frame: 3 months from baseline
Population: 3-month BHVSS: safety analysis set, which is the subset of subjects who have been exposed to the study medication at least once
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings of at Least Improved Among the Original Treatment Group Only | 84.2 percentage of participants |
| Delayed Treatment | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings of at Least Improved Among the Original Treatment Group Only | 24.0 percentage of participants |
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings of at Least Improved Over Study
Effectiveness was measured by evaluating changes in hand appearance, by subject, between baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, by subject, among treated subjects using the GAIS completed by three, blinded evaluators
Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline
Population: GAIS: safety analysis set, or subset of subjects exposed to study medication at least once. After 3 months, untreated controls were treated with Radiesse. All subjects (n=98) were followed to 9-months post-treatment; only the original treatment group (n=75) was followed to 12-months post-treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings of at Least Improved Over Study | 78.8 percentage of participants |
| Delayed Treatment | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings of at Least Improved Over Study | 62.2 percentage of participants |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings of at Least Improved Over Study | 29.6 percentage of participants |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Ratings of at Least Improved Over Study | 28.0 percentage of participants |
Mean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand
To evaluate the efficacy of Radiesse for hand treatment as measured by mean change on the 5-point Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) between baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, by hand, among all treated subjects. Ratings were completed by three, blinded evaluators. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect is demonstrated by a decrease in BHVSS score. Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS) rating definitions are as follows: 4 = All 3 central tendons are fully exposed when hand is at rest; 3 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed with 1 to 2 tendons fully exposed when hand is at rest; 2 = All 3 central tendons are partially exposed when hand is at rest; 1 = One or 2 central tendons are slightly exposed when hand is at rest; and 0 = No tendons exposed when hand is at rest.
Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline
Population: BHVSS: safety analysis set or subset of subjects exposed to study medication at least once. After 3 months, untreated controls were treated with Radiesse. All subjects (n=98) followed to 9-months post-treatment; only the original treatment group (n=75) was followed to 12-months post-treatment. 2 subjects were enrolled \& withdrew prior to treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand | BHVSS Rating | 2.51 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.88 |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand | Change since Baseline | NA units on a scale | — |
| Delayed Treatment | Mean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand | BHVSS Rating | 1.71 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.78 |
| Delayed Treatment | Mean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand | Change since Baseline | 0.83 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.84 |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand | BHVSS Rating | 1.95 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.86 |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand | Change since Baseline | 0.59 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.82 |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand | Change since Baseline | 0.78 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.03 |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand | BHVSS Rating | 1.77 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.87 |
| 12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand | BHVSS Rating | 1.91 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.79 |
| 12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Change on Busso Hand Volume Severity Scale (BHVSS), by Hand | Change since Baseline | 0.64 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.94 |
Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week
Effectiveness was measured by evaluating subject's hand function during the prior week according to a 5-point Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHOQ) scale at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-baseline, by hand. Questions were as follows and were graded by subject as 1 = very good, 2 = good, 3 = fair, 4 = poor, and 5 = very poor: 1. Overall, how well did you hand work? 2. How well did your fingers move? 3. How well did your wrist move? 4. How was the strength in your hand? 5. How was the sensation (feeling) in your hand?
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-treatment
Population: Safety analysis set, or subset of subjects exposed to study medication at least once. After 3 months, untreated controls were treated with Radiesse. All subjects (n=98) were followed to 9-months post-treatment; only the original treatment group (n=75) was followed to 12-months post-treatment. 1 subject did not complete questionnaire at 6 months.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How was the sensation in your hand? | 1.19 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.47 |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How well did your hand work? | 1.21 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.56 |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How well did your fingers move? | 1.19 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.49 |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How was the strength in your hand? | 1.28 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.64 |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How well did your wrist move? | 1.14 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.38 |
| Delayed Treatment | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How well did your hand work? | 1.14 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.43 |
| Delayed Treatment | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How well did your wrist move? | 1.11 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Delayed Treatment | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How was the strength in your hand? | 1.20 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.49 |
| Delayed Treatment | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How well did your fingers move? | 1.13 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.44 |
| Delayed Treatment | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How was the sensation in your hand? | 1.20 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.51 |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How well did your wrist move? | 1.08 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.31 |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How well did your hand work? | 1.09 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.29 |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How well did your fingers move? | 1.09 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.29 |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How was the sensation in your hand? | 1.13 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.34 |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How was the strength in your hand? | 1.15 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.42 |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How was the sensation in your hand? | 1.07 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.26 |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How well did your fingers move? | 1.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.22 |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How well did your hand work? | 1.06 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.28 |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How well did your wrist move? | 1.07 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.36 |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How was the strength in your hand? | 1.15 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.44 |
| 12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How well did your wrist move? | 1.11 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.35 |
| 12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How well did your hand work? | 1.12 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.37 |
| 12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How was the sensation in your hand? | 1.18 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.42 |
| 12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How well did your fingers move? | 1.09 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.34 |
| 12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How was the strength in your hand? | 1.19 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.43 |
| Baseline, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How was the strength in your hand? | 1.43 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.73 |
| Baseline, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How well did your fingers move? | 1.21 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.56 |
| Baseline, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How well did your wrist move? | 1.14 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.35 |
| Baseline, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How was the sensation in your hand? | 1.26 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.63 |
| Baseline, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How well did your hand work? | 1.22 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.58 |
| 3 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How well did your wrist move? | 1.15 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.46 |
| 3 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How was the sensation in your hand? | 1.19 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.47 |
| 3 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How well did your hand work? | 1.17 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.47 |
| 3 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How well did your fingers move? | 1.18 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| 3 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How was the strength in your hand? | 1.26 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.56 |
| 6 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How was the strength in your hand? | 1.18 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.41 |
| 6 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How well did your wrist move? | 1.11 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.41 |
| 6 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How was the sensation in your hand? | 1.15 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.36 |
| 6 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How well did your fingers move? | 1.08 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.28 |
| 6 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How well did your hand work? | 1.09 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.29 |
| 9 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How well did your fingers move? | 1.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.22 |
| 9 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How was the strength in your hand? | 1.15 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.36 |
| 9 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How well did your wrist move? | 1.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.22 |
| 9 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How was the sensation in your hand? | 1.10 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| 9 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How well did your hand work? | 1.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.22 |
| 12 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How was the sensation in your hand? | 1.13 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.34 |
| 12 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How well did your fingers move? | 1.08 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.27 |
| 12 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How well did your hand work? | 1.13 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.34 |
| 12 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How well did your wrist move? | 1.12 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.33 |
| 12 Months, Left Hand: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Mean Hand Function Rating During Prior Week | How was the strength in your hand? | 1.21 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.44 |
Normal Work During Prior Week Evaluation
Effectiveness was measured by evaluating subject's ability to work normally, during the prior week according to a 5-point Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHOQ) scale at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-baseline. Activities were as follows and were graded by subject as 1 = always, 2 = often, 3 = sometimes, 4 = rarely, and 5 = never: 1. How often were you unable to do your work because of problems with your hand(s) / wrist(s)? 2. How often did you have to shorten your work day because of problems with your hand(s) / wrist(s)? 3. How often did you have to take it easy at your work because of problems with your hand(s) / wrist(s)? 4. How often did you accomplish less in your work because of problems with your hand(s) / wrist(s)? 5. How often did you take longer to do tasks in your work because of problems with your hand(s) / wrist(s)?
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-treatment
Population: Safety analysis set; see previously reported population description. 1 subject did not complete baseline questionnaire; 1 subject did not complete 6-month questionnaire.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Normal Work During Prior Week Evaluation | Accomplish less in your work? | 4.73 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.84 |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Normal Work During Prior Week Evaluation | Take it easy at your work? | 4.73 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.84 |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Normal Work During Prior Week Evaluation | Unable to do your work? | 4.80 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.81 |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Normal Work During Prior Week Evaluation | Take longer to do tasks? | 4.73 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.64 |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Normal Work During Prior Week Evaluation | Shorten your work day? | 4.79 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.82 |
| Delayed Treatment | Normal Work During Prior Week Evaluation | Shorten your work day? | 4.92 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.49 |
| Delayed Treatment | Normal Work During Prior Week Evaluation | Take it easy at your work? | 4.90 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Delayed Treatment | Normal Work During Prior Week Evaluation | Accomplish less in your work? | 4.91 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Delayed Treatment | Normal Work During Prior Week Evaluation | Unable to do your work? | 4.93 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.46 |
| Delayed Treatment | Normal Work During Prior Week Evaluation | Take longer to do tasks? | 4.88 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.58 |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Normal Work During Prior Week Evaluation | Take longer to do tasks? | 4.87 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.62 |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Normal Work During Prior Week Evaluation | Unable to do your work? | 4.88 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.62 |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Normal Work During Prior Week Evaluation | Shorten your work day? | 4.87 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.61 |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Normal Work During Prior Week Evaluation | Take it easy at your work? | 4.88 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Normal Work During Prior Week Evaluation | Accomplish less in your work? | 4.88 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.62 |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Normal Work During Prior Week Evaluation | Take longer to do tasks? | 4.93 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.26 |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Normal Work During Prior Week Evaluation | Shorten your work day? | 4.97 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.17 |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Normal Work During Prior Week Evaluation | Accomplish less in your work? | 4.96 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Normal Work During Prior Week Evaluation | Unable to do your work? | 4.99 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1 |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Normal Work During Prior Week Evaluation | Take it easy at your work? | 4.93 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| 12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Normal Work During Prior Week Evaluation | Shorten your work day? | 4.96 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| 12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Normal Work During Prior Week Evaluation | Take it easy at your work? | 4.89 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.42 |
| 12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Normal Work During Prior Week Evaluation | Accomplish less in your work? | 4.96 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| 12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Normal Work During Prior Week Evaluation | Unable to do your work? | 4.96 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| 12 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Normal Work During Prior Week Evaluation | Take longer to do tasks? | 4.89 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.53 |
Patient Satisfaction Evaluation
Effectiveness was measured by evaluating level of satisfaction in subject's hand appearance among subjects between baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline
Population: Safety analysis set, or subset of subjects exposed to study medication at least once. After 3 months, untreated controls were treated with Radiesse. All subjects (n=98) were followed to 9-months post-treatment; only the original treatment group (n=75) was followed to 12-months post-treatment. 2 subjects were enrolled \& withdrew prior to treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation | Extrememly Satisfied | 33.3 percentage of participants |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation | Extremely Dissatisfied | 1.0 percentage of participants |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation | Dissatisfied | 1.0 percentage of participants |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation | Satisfied | 44.4 percentage of participants |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation | Total Extremely Satisfied or Satisfied | 77.8 percentage of participants |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation | Slightly Satisfied | 14.1 percentage of participants |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation | Slightly Dissatisfied | 6.1 percentage of participants |
| Delayed Treatment | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation | Extremely Dissatisfied | 0.0 percentage of participants |
| Delayed Treatment | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation | Slightly Dissatisfied | 4.1 percentage of participants |
| Delayed Treatment | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation | Slightly Satisfied | 15.3 percentage of participants |
| Delayed Treatment | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation | Dissatisfied | 5.1 percentage of participants |
| Delayed Treatment | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation | Total Extremely Satisfied or Satisfied | 75.5 percentage of participants |
| Delayed Treatment | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation | Satisfied | 45.9 percentage of participants |
| Delayed Treatment | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation | Extrememly Satisfied | 29.6 percentage of participants |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation | Slightly Dissatisfied | 2.0 percentage of participants |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation | Extrememly Satisfied | 25.5 percentage of participants |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation | Satisfied | 44.9 percentage of participants |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation | Slightly Satisfied | 21.4 percentage of participants |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation | Dissatisfied | 3.1 percentage of participants |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation | Extremely Dissatisfied | 3.1 percentage of participants |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation | Total Extremely Satisfied or Satisfied | 70.4 percentage of participants |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation | Slightly Satisfied | 17.3 percentage of participants |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation | Total Extremely Satisfied or Satisfied | 70.6 percentage of participants |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation | Extremely Dissatisfied | 1.3 percentage of participants |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation | Satisfied | 40.0 percentage of participants |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation | Extrememly Satisfied | 30.7 percentage of participants |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation | Dissatisfied | 6.7 percentage of participants |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation | Slightly Dissatisfied | 4.0 percentage of participants |
Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments
Effectiveness was measured by evaluating subject's likelihood of return for additional Radiesse hand treatments at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline
Population: Safety analysis set, or subset of subjects exposed to study medication at least once. After 3 months, untreated controls were treated with Radiesse. All subjects (n=98) were followed to 9-months post-treatment; only the original treatment group (n=75) was followed to 12-months post-treatment. 2 subjects were enrolled \& withdrew prior to treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments | Extrememly Likely | 29.3 percentage of participants |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments | Extremely Unlikely | 2.0 percentage of participants |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments | Unlikely | 5.1 percentage of participants |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments | Likely | 36.4 percentage of participants |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments | Total Extremely Likely or Likely | 65.7 percentage of participants |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments | Somewhat Likely | 14.1 percentage of participants |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments | Somewhat Unlikely | 13.1 percentage of participants |
| Delayed Treatment | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments | Extremely Unlikely | 4.1 percentage of participants |
| Delayed Treatment | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments | Somewhat Unlikely | 7.1 percentage of participants |
| Delayed Treatment | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments | Somewhat Likely | 19.4 percentage of participants |
| Delayed Treatment | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments | Unlikely | 3.1 percentage of participants |
| Delayed Treatment | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments | Total Extremely Likely or Likely | 66.3 percentage of participants |
| Delayed Treatment | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments | Likely | 31.6 percentage of participants |
| Delayed Treatment | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments | Extrememly Likely | 34.7 percentage of participants |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments | Somewhat Unlikely | 7.1 percentage of participants |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments | Extrememly Likely | 28.6 percentage of participants |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments | Likely | 36.7 percentage of participants |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments | Somewhat Likely | 17.4 percentage of participants |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments | Unlikely | 7.1 percentage of participants |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments | Extremely Unlikely | 3.1 percentage of participants |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments | Total Extremely Likely or Likely | 65.3 percentage of participants |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments | Somewhat Likely | 16.0 percentage of participants |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments | Total Extremely Likely or Likely | 69.3 percentage of participants |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments | Extremely Unlikely | 5.3 percentage of participants |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments | Likely | 33.3 percentage of participants |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments | Extrememly Likely | 36.0 percentage of participants |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments | Unlikely | 5.3 percentage of participants |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Patient Satisfaction Evaluation: Likelihood to Return for Future Radiesse Treatments | Somewhat Unlikely | 4.0 percentage of participants |
Physician Satisfaction Evaluation
Effectiveness was measured by evaluating level of satisfaction in subject's hand appearance among physicians between baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, by subject
Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline
Population: Safety analysis set, or subset of subjects exposed to study medication at least once. After 3 months, untreated controls were treated with Radiesse. All subjects (n=98) were followed to 9-months post-treatment; only the original treatment group (n=75) was followed to 12-months post-treatment. 2 subjects were enrolled \& withdrew prior to treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Physician Satisfaction Evaluation | Extrememly Satisfied | 26.3 percentage of physicians |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Physician Satisfaction Evaluation | Extremely Dissatisfied | 0.0 percentage of physicians |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Physician Satisfaction Evaluation | Dissatisfied | 1.0 percentage of physicians |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Physician Satisfaction Evaluation | Satisfied | 59.6 percentage of physicians |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Physician Satisfaction Evaluation | Total Extremely Satisfied or Satisfied | 85.9 percentage of physicians |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Physician Satisfaction Evaluation | Slightly Satisfied | 13.1 percentage of physicians |
| Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Physician Satisfaction Evaluation | Slightly Dissatisfied | 0.0 percentage of physicians |
| Delayed Treatment | Physician Satisfaction Evaluation | Extremely Dissatisfied | 0.0 percentage of physicians |
| Delayed Treatment | Physician Satisfaction Evaluation | Slightly Dissatisfied | 2.0 percentage of physicians |
| Delayed Treatment | Physician Satisfaction Evaluation | Slightly Satisfied | 10.2 percentage of physicians |
| Delayed Treatment | Physician Satisfaction Evaluation | Dissatisfied | 0.0 percentage of physicians |
| Delayed Treatment | Physician Satisfaction Evaluation | Total Extremely Satisfied or Satisfied | 87.8 percentage of physicians |
| Delayed Treatment | Physician Satisfaction Evaluation | Satisfied | 57.1 percentage of physicians |
| Delayed Treatment | Physician Satisfaction Evaluation | Extrememly Satisfied | 30.6 percentage of physicians |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Physician Satisfaction Evaluation | Slightly Dissatisfied | 1.0 percentage of physicians |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Physician Satisfaction Evaluation | Extrememly Satisfied | 18.4 percentage of physicians |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Physician Satisfaction Evaluation | Satisfied | 61.2 percentage of physicians |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Physician Satisfaction Evaluation | Slightly Satisfied | 16.3 percentage of physicians |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Physician Satisfaction Evaluation | Dissatisfied | 2.0 percentage of physicians |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Physician Satisfaction Evaluation | Extremely Dissatisfied | 1.0 percentage of physicians |
| 6 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Physician Satisfaction Evaluation | Total Extremely Satisfied or Satisfied | 79.6 percentage of physicians |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Physician Satisfaction Evaluation | Slightly Satisfied | 14.7 percentage of physicians |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Physician Satisfaction Evaluation | Total Extremely Satisfied or Satisfied | 80.0 percentage of physicians |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Physician Satisfaction Evaluation | Extremely Dissatisfied | 0.0 percentage of physicians |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Physician Satisfaction Evaluation | Satisfied | 48.0 percentage of physicians |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Physician Satisfaction Evaluation | Extrememly Satisfied | 32.0 percentage of physicians |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Physician Satisfaction Evaluation | Dissatisfied | 0.0 percentage of physicians |
| 9 Months Post-treatment: Radiesse Injectable Dermal Filler | Physician Satisfaction Evaluation | Slightly Dissatisfied | 5.3 percentage of physicians |