Skip to content

Phase I/II Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of BIBF 1120 and Sorafenib in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

A Multicenter, Open Label, Phase I /Randomised Phase II Study to Evaluate Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of BIBF 1120 in Comparison With Oral Sorafenib for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01004003
Enrollment
125
Registered
2009-10-29
Start date
2009-10-22
Completion date
2016-10-12
Last updated
2017-10-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

Brief summary

The study aim is to determine maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of BIBF 1120 in HCC (hepatocellular cancer) and compare efficacy of BIBF 1120 to Sorafenib in HCC patients

Interventions

DRUGSorafenib
DRUGBIBF 1120

Dose escalated in phase I until MTD or adjusted by investigator, dose in phase II part based on phase I data

Sponsors

Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) not amenable to curative surgery or loco-regional therapy (RFA, percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), TACE) * Age 18 years or older * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 2 or less * Child-Pugh score A (score 5-6) * At least one measurable lesion according to RECIST 1.0 (this criterion is limited to phase II only) * In case a measurable lesion was previously treated by loco-regional therapy (RFA, PEI, TACE or RT) , this lesion must have to be documented as progression according to RECIST 1.0 by CT or MRI (this criterion is limited to phase II only). * Time interval from last local therapy (e.g. radiofrequency ablation, percutaneous ethanol injection, radiotherapy, transarterial chemoembolization) more than 4 weeks prior to start of study treatment * Written informed consent consistent with International Conference on Harmonisation/ Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) and local legislation

Exclusion criteria

* Prior systemic therapy for HCC * Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) * Bilirubin greater than 1.5 times ULN * AST or ALT greater than 2 times ULN * Uncontrolled or refractory ascites to adequate medical therapy * Hepatic encephalopathy more than grade 1 according to Child-Pugh criteria * Prothrombin time international normalized ratio greater than 2.3, or prothrombin time more than 6 seconds prolonged than control * Absolute neutrophil count less than 1000 /µL * Platelet count less than 60000 /µL * Hemoglobin less than 9 g/dL * Serum creatinine greater than 1.5 times Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) * Proteinuria of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 2 or greater * Variceal bleeding within last 6 months prior to start of study treatment * History of major thrombotic (except portal vein thrombosis) or clinically relevant major bleeding event in the past 6 months * Known inherited predisposition to bleeding or thrombosis * Significant cardiovascular diseases (i.e. hypertension not controlled by medical therapy, blood pressure \> 150/90 mmHg), unstable angina, history of myocardial infarction within the past 6 months, congestive heart failure \> class II according to New York Heart Association (NYHA), serious cardiac arrhythmia, pericardial effusion) * Therapeutic anticoagulation (except low dose heparin and/or heparin flush as needed for maintenance of an indwelling intravenous device) or antiplatelet therapy (except for chronic low-dose therapy with acetylsalicylic acid =\< 325mg per day) * Major surgery within 4 weeks prior to start of study treatment * Treatment with other investigational drugs or participation in another clinical trial within the past four weeks before start of therapy or concomitantly with this trial (except for present trial drug) * Known serious illness or concomitant non-oncological disease such as neurologic, psychiatric, infectious disease or active ulcers (gastro-intestinal tract, skin) or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation or study drug administration and in the judgment of the investigator would make the patient inappropriate for entry into the study * Patients who are sexually active and unwilling to use a medically acceptable method of contraception (e.g. such as implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, some intrauterine devices or vasectomized partner for participating females, condoms for participating males) during the trial and for at least twelve months after end of active therapy * Current alcohol abuse or drug abuse that would limit pt ability to comply with protocol * Symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) metastasis * Life expectancy less than 12 weeks * Patient unable to take oral medication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximum Tolerated Dose in Phase I4 weeksThe MTD was defined as the highest dose studied for which the incidence of dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) was 0/3 or less than 2/6 patients during the first treatment course.
Time to Progression (TTP) in Phase IIFrom randomization until data cut-off (15 July 2014); Up to 1031 daysTTP according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) 1.0 criteria based on central independent review. TTP RECIST 1.0 was defined as the time from randomisation to disease progression according to RECIST 1.0.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Dose Limiting Toxicity in Phase I4 weeksNumber of patients with dose limiting toxicity are presented
Objective Tumour Response by RECISTFrom randomization until data cut-off (15 July 2014); Up to 1031 daysObjective RECIST 1.0 tumour response was defined as Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) and was derived from the patient's best objective RECIST 1.0 response based on central independent review. 95% Confidence Interval presented below are computed by Clopper and Pearson method.
Progression Free Survival (PFS)From randomization until data cut-off (15 July 2014); Up to 1031 daysPFS by RECIST 1.0 was defined as the duration from date of randomisation to date of progression or death, whichever occurred earlier, based on central independent review.
Overall SurvivalFrom randomization until data cut-off (15 July 2014); Up to 1031 daysOverall survival was defined as the duration from date of randomisation to the date of death.

Countries

Austria, France, Germany, Hungary, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Phase 1 Group 1, 100mg Nintedanib Bid
Oral administration of Nintedanib (BIBF 1120) 100 mg soft gelatine capsules twice daily (bid). Phase I: A standard 3+3 dose escalation part to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD). Group 1 patients had a baseline Child-Pugh score of 5 or 6, and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) ≤2 times the upper limit of normal (ULN).
6
Phase I Group 1, 150mg Nintedanib Bid
Oral administration of Nintedanib (BIBF 1120) 150 mg soft gelatine capsules twice daily (bid). Phase I: A standard 3+3 dose escalation part to determine the MTD. Group 1 patients had a baseline Child-Pugh score of 5 or 6, and AST and ALT ≤2 times the upper limit of normal (ULN).
3
Phase I Group 1, 200mg Nintedanib Bid
Oral administration of Nintedanib (BIBF 1120) 200 mg soft gelatine capsules (two capsules of 100mg) twice daily (bid). Phase I: A standard 3+3 dose escalation part to determine the MTD. Group 1 patients had a baseline Child-Pugh score of 5 or 6, and AST and ALT ≤2 times the upper limit of normal (ULN).
4
Phase I Group 2, 50mg Nintedanib Bid
Oral administration of Nintedanib (BIBF 1120) 50 mg soft gelatine capsules twice daily (bid). Phase I: A standard 3+3 dose escalation part to determine the MTD. Group 2 patients had a baseline Child-Pugh score of 7, or AST or ALT \>2 to ≤5 times ULN.
3
Phase I Group 2, 100mg Nintedanib Bid
Oral administration of Nintedanib (BIBF 1120) 100 mg soft gelatine capsules twice daily (bid). Phase I: A standard 3+3 dose escalation part to determine the MTD. Group 2 patients had a baseline Child-Pugh score of 7, or AST or ALT \>2 to ≤5 times ULN.
4
Phase I Group 2, 150mg Nintedanib Bid
Oral administration of Nintedanib (BIBF 1120) 150 mg soft gelatine capsules twice daily (bid). Phase I: A standard 3+3 dose escalation part to determine the MTD. Group 2 patients had a baseline Child-Pugh score of 7, or AST or ALT \>2 to ≤5 times ULN.
4
Phase I Group 2, 200mg Nintedanib Bid
Oral administration of Nintedanib (BIBF 1120) 200 mg soft gelatine capsules (two capsules of 100mg) twice daily (bid). Phase I: A standard 3+3 dose escalation part to determine the MTD. Group 2 patients had a baseline Child-Pugh score of 7, or AST or ALT \>2 to ≤5 times ULN.
8
Phase II, 200 mg Nintedanib Bid
Oral administration of Nintedanib (BIBF 1120) 200 mg soft gelatine capsules (two capsules of 100mg) twice daily (bid). Phase II: Patients were randomly assigned to open-label treatment with nintedanib or sorafenib. Patients were stratified for macrovascular invasion (MVI) and/or extra-hepatic spread (EHS). Patients had a baseline Child-Pugh score of 5 or 6, and AST and ALT ≤2 times the upper limit of normal (ULN).
62
Phase II, 400 mg Sorafenib Bid
Oral administration of Sorafenib 400 mg film coated tablets twice daily (bid). Phase II: Patients were randomly assigned to open-label treatment with nintedanib or sorafenib. Patients were stratified for macrovascular invasion (MVI) and/or extra-hepatic spread (EHS). Patients had a baseline Child-Pugh score of 5 or 6, and AST and ALT ≤2 times the upper limit of normal (ULN).
31
Total125

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007FG008
Overall StudyAdverse Event4233227216
Overall StudyOther000001000
Overall StudyProgressive disease21102113922
Overall StudyRefused to continue taking trial med.000000002

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPhase 1 Group 1, 100mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 1, 150mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 1, 200mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 2, 50mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 2, 100mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 2, 150mg Nintedanib BidPhase I Group 2, 200mg Nintedanib BidPhase II, 200 mg Nintedanib BidPhase II, 400 mg Sorafenib BidTotal
Age, Continuous69.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8
65.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8
66.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
72.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
56.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4
59.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9
57.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
65.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
63.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
64.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants14 Participants5 Participants24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants2 Participants4 Participants3 Participants4 Participants3 Participants6 Participants48 Participants26 Participants101 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 63 / 34 / 43 / 34 / 44 / 47 / 861 / 6231 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 61 / 34 / 43 / 32 / 43 / 44 / 834 / 6214 / 31

Outcome results

Primary

Maximum Tolerated Dose in Phase I

The MTD was defined as the highest dose studied for which the incidence of dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) was 0/3 or less than 2/6 patients during the first treatment course.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Treated set which included all patients who received at least one single dose of trial medication, including phase I patients from the dose escalation part that were not replaced for MTD determination.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group 1Maximum Tolerated Dose in Phase I200 mg bid
Group 2Maximum Tolerated Dose in Phase I200 mg bid
Primary

Time to Progression (TTP) in Phase II

TTP according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) 1.0 criteria based on central independent review. TTP RECIST 1.0 was defined as the time from randomisation to disease progression according to RECIST 1.0.

Time frame: From randomization until data cut-off (15 July 2014); Up to 1031 days

Population: Treated set, only phase II participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Group 1Time to Progression (TTP) in Phase II5.45 months
Group 2Time to Progression (TTP) in Phase II4.63 months
95% CI: [0.805, 2.565]
Secondary

Incidence of Dose Limiting Toxicity in Phase I

Number of patients with dose limiting toxicity are presented

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Treated set (Phase I patients from the dose escalation part that were not replaced for MTD determination).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group 1Incidence of Dose Limiting Toxicity in Phase I0 participants
Group 2Incidence of Dose Limiting Toxicity in Phase I0 participants
Phase I Group 1, 200 mg Nintedanib BidIncidence of Dose Limiting Toxicity in Phase I0 participants
Phase I Group 2, 50 mg Nintedanib BidIncidence of Dose Limiting Toxicity in Phase I0 participants
Phase I Group 2, 100 mg Nintedanib BidIncidence of Dose Limiting Toxicity in Phase I0 participants
Phase I Group 2, 150 mg Nintedanib BidIncidence of Dose Limiting Toxicity in Phase I0 participants
Phase I Group 2, 200 mg Nintedanib BidIncidence of Dose Limiting Toxicity in Phase I0 participants
Secondary

Objective Tumour Response by RECIST

Objective RECIST 1.0 tumour response was defined as Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) and was derived from the patient's best objective RECIST 1.0 response based on central independent review. 95% Confidence Interval presented below are computed by Clopper and Pearson method.

Time frame: From randomization until data cut-off (15 July 2014); Up to 1031 days

Population: Treated set, phase II participants only

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group 1Objective Tumour Response by RECIST1.6 percentage of participants
Group 2Objective Tumour Response by RECIST6.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the duration from date of randomisation to the date of death.

Time frame: From randomization until data cut-off (15 July 2014); Up to 1031 days

Population: Treated set, only phase II participants

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Group 1Overall Survival11.86 months
Group 2Overall Survival11.40 months
95% CI: [0.522, 1.473]
Secondary

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS by RECIST 1.0 was defined as the duration from date of randomisation to date of progression or death, whichever occurred earlier, based on central independent review.

Time frame: From randomization until data cut-off (15 July 2014); Up to 1031 days

Population: Treated set, only phase II participants

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Group 1Progression Free Survival (PFS)5.32 months
Group 2Progression Free Survival (PFS)3.94 months
95% CI: [0.779, 2.343]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026