Skip to content

Comparison of Continuous Non-invasive Arterial Pressure (CNAP) With Invasive Arterial Pressure Monitoring

Accuracy of the CNAP™ Monitor (Continuous Non-invasive Arterial Pressure) Versus Invasive Radial Arterial Monitoring in Surgical Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01003665
Enrollment
195
Registered
2009-10-29
Start date
2009-02-28
Completion date
2012-01-31
Last updated
2012-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Blood Pressure

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to compare the Continuous Non-invasive Arterial Pressure (CNAP) monitor with the gold standard of invasive arterial pressure monitoring during: 1. induction and maintenance of general anaesthesia 2. intensive care unit treatment of postoperative patients with an ASA 3 or 4 status

Detailed description

The CNAP monitor continuously measures blood pressure using a finger cuff. It showed a good agreement to invasive blood pressure measurements during anaesthesia induction and maintenance during surgery. In critical ill patients cardiac arrhythmia is probably a confounding factor affecting accuracy and interchangeability of CNAP. As systolic arterial CNAP pressure in comparison to mean pressure shows no statistical interchangeability with invasive measurements, mean pressure should be considered when making therapy decisions. A problem is the missing standard criterion for comparison of continuously devices with invasive pressure.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \>18 * BMI \< 35 kg.m² * Patients capable of giving informed consent * patients undergoing elective surgical procedures in supine position under general anesthesia * perfusion of the examined arm evidenced by a positive Allen's test

Exclusion criteria

* Patients not competent or unwilling to provide informed consent * Patients with history of neurological, neuromuscular seizure * Patients where IBP cannula, CNAP™ finger-cuff and CNAP™ upper arm cuff cannot be placed on the same arm

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Bias and percentage error of CNAP compared with invasive arterial pressure measurement1.) Induction of general anaesthesia. 2.) Maintanance of general anaesthesia. 3.) Intensive Care Treatement after surgery

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026