Skip to content

Evaluating an Emergency Department Observation Syncope Protocol for Older Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01003262
Enrollment
123
Registered
2009-10-28
Start date
2010-03-31
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2023-02-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Syncope

Keywords

Observation Unit, Emergency Department

Brief summary

Syncope, defined as a transient loss of consciousness, accounts for over 700,000 annual U.S. emergency department visits and may herald a life-threatening condition in older adults (age≥60 years). Existing risk prediction instruments cannot reliably identify who among such older patients can safely be discharged home from an emergency department. As a result, the majority of older patients without a clear cause for syncope are hospitalized for diagnostic evaluation. However, current admission practices are characterized by low diagnostic yield, do not clearly improve outcomes, and account for over $2.4 billion in annual hospital costs. Most admitted patients are discharged within 48 hours, and approximately 50% of patients do not have an identified cause of syncope after their hospitalization. The implementation of an expedited and standardized Emergency Department Observation Syncope Protocol (EDOSP) may safely reduce hospitalization of older patients with syncope. The investigators propose a pilot randomized trial to implement and evaluate EDOSP at two emergency departments. This study has the following exploratory Specific Aims: 1. To compare admission rates and length-of-stay associated with EDOSP to standard care. 2. To compare serious outcomes rates associated with EDOSP to standard care. 3. To compare quality-of-life associated with EDOSP to standard care. 4. To compare the incremental costs and cost-effectiveness of EDOSP to standard care. Over a one-year period, 120 intermediate-risk older adults who present with syncope at the two study sites will be randomized to 1 of 2 arms: 1.) intervention arm: expedited and standardized EDOSP care; or 2.) control arm: routine care consisting of admission from the emergency department. If this pilot trial suggests that EDOSP can safely reduce admissions, then the investigators will plan a larger study powered to evaluate clinical, quality-of-life, and economic outcomes. A successful EDOSP intervention would have important clinical policy implications and improve the emergency department care of older adults with syncope.

Interventions

OTHEREmergency Department Observation Protocol

The EDOSP will consist of cardiac enzyme testing, 12-24 hours of cardiac monitoring, and echocardiogram testing by explicit criteria

OTHERUnstructured, inpatient evaluation

This is unstructured management by an inpatient medical team.

Sponsors

University of Southern California
CollaboratorOTHER
Brigham and Women's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Corewell Health East
CollaboratorOTHER
Duke University
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
University of California, Los Angeles
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age≥60 years * A complaint of syncope or near-syncope (Syncope is defined as a sudden, transient loss of consciousness. Near-syncope is defined as a sensation of imminent loss of consciousness, without actual syncope.) * Intermediate risk of adverse outcome (see Table) * Patient speaks either English or Spanish as a primary language.

Exclusion criteria

* Syncope mimics (intoxication, weakness or dizziness with syncope/ near-syncope, hypoglycemia, and cardiac arrest) * New or baseline cognitive impairment or dementia) * Inability to provide follow-up information (e.g. homeless or resides outside of U.S.) * Inability to speak Spanish or English * Low- and high-risk patients (see Table). Risk Stratification Guidelines: * High Risk * Serious condition identified in ED * History of ventricular arrhythmia * Cardiac Device with dysfunction * Presentation consistent with acute coronary ischemia Intermediate Risk * No High Risk features * Presentation not consistent with orthostatic or vasovagal syncope Low Risk * Presentation consistent with orthostatic or vasovagal syncope

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Admission RateEnrollment date

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
30 day clinical outcomes30 days
Quality of life30 days
Cost30 Days

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026