Skip to content

Ranibizumab DosE Comparison and the Role of LAser in REtinal Vein Occlusions

RanibizumabDosE Comparison (0.5mg and 2.0mg) and the Role of LAser in the ManagemenT of REtinal Vein Occlusion - A Pharmacodynamic Approach(RELATE)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01003106
Acronym
RELATE
Enrollment
81
Registered
2009-10-28
Start date
2009-11-30
Completion date
2015-04-30
Last updated
2016-03-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Retinal Vein Occlusion

Keywords

RVO, BRVO, CRVO, Vein occlusion

Brief summary

The primary Objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of intraocular injections of 0.5mg or 2.0mg of ranibizumab in patients with macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion.

Detailed description

The secondary objectives are to assess the efficacy of 0.5mg versus 2.0mg of monthly ranibizumab injections in patients with macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion between baseline and month 6. At week 24, patients will be re-randomized to receive pro re nata (prn) ranibizumab+laser photocoagulation versus ranibizumab alone and the efficacy of both treatment options will be compared. Treatment efficacy will be assessed by comparing changes in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfiled thickness (CST) between the treatment groups.

Interventions

DRUGRanibizumab 0.5mg (monthly)

Branch retinal vein occlusion- Intravitreal injection of 0.5mg ranibizumab alone

DRUGRanibizumab 2.0mg (monthly)
DRUGPro re nata (prn) ranibizumab
PROCEDUREPro re nata (prn) Laser photocoagulation

Sponsors

Genentech, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Peter A Campochiaro, MD
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Signed informed consent and authorization of use and disclosure of protected health information * Age equal to or greater than 18 years * Diagnosis of macular edema due to central or branch retinal vein occlusion * Foveal thickness of equal to or greater than 250 mm, as assessed by OCT * Best corrected visual acuity score in the study eye of 20/40 to 20/400 inclusive (Snellen equivalents using the ETDRS protocol at a distance of 4 meters). Only one eye will be treated in the study. If both eyes are eligible, the investigator will select the eye to be enrolled. * In the opinion of the investigator, decreased vision in the study eye is due to foveal thickening from vein occlusion and not from other obvious causes of decreased vision

Exclusion criteria

* Scatter laser photocoagulation or macular photocoagulation within 3 months of study entry in the study eye * Intraocular surgery in the study eye within 3 months of study entry * Use of intraocular or periocular injection of steroids in the study eye (e.g., triamcinolone) within 4 months of study entry * Previous use of an anti-VEGF drug within 3 months of study entry * Cataract surgery in the study eye within 3 months of study entry; Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet (YAG) laser capsulotomy within 1 month of study entry; or any other intraocular surgery within 3 months preceding Day 0. * History of vitreoretinal surgery in the study eye within 3 months of study entry * Uncontrolled glaucoma (defined as intraocular pressure ³30 mm Hg despite treatment with anti-glaucoma medications) * History of cerebral vascular accident, myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attacks within 3 months of study enrollment. * Pregnancy (positive pregnancy test) or lactation * Premenopausal women not using adequate contraception. The following are considered effective means of contraception: surgical sterilization or use of oral contraceptives, barrier contraception with either a condom or diaphragm in conjunction with spermicidal gel, an IUD, or contraceptive hormone implant or patch. * Have the presence of active malignancy, including lymphoproliferative disorders. Subjects with a history of fully resolved basal or squamous cell skin cancer may be enrolled. * Any condition that the investigator believes would pose a significant hazard to the subject if investigational therapy were initiated. * History of allergy to humanized antibodies or any component of the ranibizumab formulation * Inability to comply with study or followup procedures * Participation in another simultaneous medical investigation or trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence and Severity of Ocular and Non-ocular Adverse Events.36 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Mean Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Best Corrected Visual Acuity in Patients Treated With 0.5mg Versus 2.0mg of RanibizumabBaseline to month 6
Mean Change From Month 6 to Month 36 in Best Corrected Visual Acuity in Patients Treated With Prn Ranibizumab+Laser Photocoagulation Versus Prn Ranibizumab Alone.Month 6- Month 36
Mean Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Central Subfield Thickness in Patients Treated With 0.5mg Versus 2.0mg of RanibizumabBaseline to month 6
Mean Change From Month 6 to Month 36 in Central Subfield Thickness in Patients Treated With Prn Ranibizumab+Laser Photocoagulation Versus Prn Ranibizumab Alone.Month 6- Month 36

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Eighty-one patients with retinal vein occlusion were enrolled at a single center (The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore,MD).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
BRVO- Ranibizumab 0.5mg Alone
Branch retinal vein occlusion patients randomized to this group will receive 0.5mg of ranibizumab alone as per protocol without laser photocoagulation. BRVO -Ranibizumab 0.5mg alone: Branch retinal vein occlusion- Intravitreal injection of 0.5mg ranibizumab alone
22
BRVO- Ranibizumab 2.0mg Alone
Branch retinal vein occlusion patients randomized to this group will receive 2.0mg of ranibizumab alone as per protocol without laser photocoagulation. BRVO- Ranibizumab 2.0 mg alone: Branch retinal vein occlusion- Intravitreal injection of 2.0mg ranibizumab alone
20
CRVO- Ranibizumab 0.5mg Alone
Central retinal vein occlusion patients randomized to this group will receive 0.5mg of ranibizumab alone as per protocol without laser photocoagulation CRVO -Ranibizumab 0.5mg alone: Central retinal vein occlusion- Intravitreal injection of 0.5mg ranibizumab alone
19
CRVO- Ranibizumab 2.0mg Alone
Central retinal vein occlusion patients randomized to this group will receive 2.0mg of ranibizumab alone as per protocol without laser photocoagulation. CRVO- Ranibizumab 2.0 mg alone: Central retinal vein occlusion- Intravitreal injection of 2.0mg ranibizumab alone
20
Total81

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBRVO- Ranibizumab 0.5mg AloneBRVO- Ranibizumab 2.0mg AloneCRVO- Ranibizumab 0.5mg AloneCRVO- Ranibizumab 2.0mg AloneTotal
Age, Continuous66.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
69.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
59.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9
64.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9
64.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants7 Participants9 Participants9 Participants38 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants13 Participants10 Participants11 Participants43 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
37 / 4235 / 39
serious
Total, serious adverse events
17 / 4212 / 39

Outcome results

Primary

Incidence and Severity of Ocular and Non-ocular Adverse Events.

Time frame: 36 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
BRVOIncidence and Severity of Ocular and Non-ocular Adverse Events.Patients with Serious Adverse Events17 participants
BRVOIncidence and Severity of Ocular and Non-ocular Adverse Events.Patient with (non serious) adverse events37 participants
CRVOIncidence and Severity of Ocular and Non-ocular Adverse Events.Patients with Serious Adverse Events12 participants
CRVOIncidence and Severity of Ocular and Non-ocular Adverse Events.Patient with (non serious) adverse events35 participants
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Best Corrected Visual Acuity in Patients Treated With 0.5mg Versus 2.0mg of Ranibizumab

Time frame: Baseline to month 6

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BRVOMean Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Best Corrected Visual Acuity in Patients Treated With 0.5mg Versus 2.0mg of Ranibizumab12.1 LettersStandard Error 2.9
CRVOMean Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Best Corrected Visual Acuity in Patients Treated With 0.5mg Versus 2.0mg of Ranibizumab14.6 LettersStandard Error 2.3
CRVO- Ranibizumab 0.5mg AloneMean Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Best Corrected Visual Acuity in Patients Treated With 0.5mg Versus 2.0mg of Ranibizumab15.5 LettersStandard Error 2.4
CRVO- Ranibizumab 2.0mg AloneMean Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Best Corrected Visual Acuity in Patients Treated With 0.5mg Versus 2.0mg of Ranibizumab15.8 LettersStandard Error 2.4
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Central Subfield Thickness in Patients Treated With 0.5mg Versus 2.0mg of Ranibizumab

Time frame: Baseline to month 6

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BRVOMean Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Central Subfield Thickness in Patients Treated With 0.5mg Versus 2.0mg of Ranibizumab-203.3 micronsStandard Error 41
CRVOMean Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Central Subfield Thickness in Patients Treated With 0.5mg Versus 2.0mg of Ranibizumab-292.1 micronsStandard Error 55
CRVO- Ranibizumab 0.5mg AloneMean Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Central Subfield Thickness in Patients Treated With 0.5mg Versus 2.0mg of Ranibizumab-253.5 micronsStandard Error 43
CRVO- Ranibizumab 2.0mg AloneMean Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Central Subfield Thickness in Patients Treated With 0.5mg Versus 2.0mg of Ranibizumab-396.1 micronsStandard Error 48.1
Secondary

Mean Change From Month 6 to Month 36 in Best Corrected Visual Acuity in Patients Treated With Prn Ranibizumab+Laser Photocoagulation Versus Prn Ranibizumab Alone.

Time frame: Month 6- Month 36

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BRVOMean Change From Month 6 to Month 36 in Best Corrected Visual Acuity in Patients Treated With Prn Ranibizumab+Laser Photocoagulation Versus Prn Ranibizumab Alone.3.1 LettersStandard Error 3.3
CRVOMean Change From Month 6 to Month 36 in Best Corrected Visual Acuity in Patients Treated With Prn Ranibizumab+Laser Photocoagulation Versus Prn Ranibizumab Alone.-2.6 LettersStandard Error 2.2
CRVO- Ranibizumab 0.5mg AloneMean Change From Month 6 to Month 36 in Best Corrected Visual Acuity in Patients Treated With Prn Ranibizumab+Laser Photocoagulation Versus Prn Ranibizumab Alone.-6.7 LettersStandard Error 3.7
CRVO- Ranibizumab 2.0mg AloneMean Change From Month 6 to Month 36 in Best Corrected Visual Acuity in Patients Treated With Prn Ranibizumab+Laser Photocoagulation Versus Prn Ranibizumab Alone.0.4 LettersStandard Error 4.3
Secondary

Mean Change From Month 6 to Month 36 in Central Subfield Thickness in Patients Treated With Prn Ranibizumab+Laser Photocoagulation Versus Prn Ranibizumab Alone.

Time frame: Month 6- Month 36

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BRVOMean Change From Month 6 to Month 36 in Central Subfield Thickness in Patients Treated With Prn Ranibizumab+Laser Photocoagulation Versus Prn Ranibizumab Alone.-3.2 micronsStandard Error 54.7
CRVOMean Change From Month 6 to Month 36 in Central Subfield Thickness in Patients Treated With Prn Ranibizumab+Laser Photocoagulation Versus Prn Ranibizumab Alone.36.6 micronsStandard Error 29.2
CRVO- Ranibizumab 0.5mg AloneMean Change From Month 6 to Month 36 in Central Subfield Thickness in Patients Treated With Prn Ranibizumab+Laser Photocoagulation Versus Prn Ranibizumab Alone.19.1 micronsStandard Error 50.3
CRVO- Ranibizumab 2.0mg AloneMean Change From Month 6 to Month 36 in Central Subfield Thickness in Patients Treated With Prn Ranibizumab+Laser Photocoagulation Versus Prn Ranibizumab Alone.58.8 micronsStandard Error 38.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026