Skip to content

Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection Trial (PADIT Pilot)

Phase III Pilot Study - A Simple Randomized Trial of Conventional Versus Multimodal Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01002911
Acronym
PADIT
Enrollment
500
Registered
2009-10-28
Start date
2009-12-31
Completion date
2012-01-31
Last updated
2013-05-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arrythmias

Keywords

Device procedure, pacemaker, ICD, antibiotics

Brief summary

The goal of the pilot study is to compare conventional antibiotic therapy to an aggressive antibiotic therapy plan for the prevention of arrhythmia device infection in high-risk patients undergoing arrhythmia device procedures. All antibiotics are approved for use and readily available.

Detailed description

Infection can occur after surgery for either a pacemaker or an implantable defibrillation and can have very serious consequences. These infections are common and can be seen in as many as 2-3% of high-risk patients. Doctors use antibiotics to prevent these infections, but we do not know how much or how often to give the antibiotics to get the best effect. It is not known whether additional antibiotics during and after the operation would further reduce the risk of infection. This research study will compare two different ways of using common antibiotics to prevent infection during and following a device procedure. One way is the standard approach of a single dose before surgery and the other way uses more antibiotics. We do not know if either way is better. The purpose of this study therefore, is to compare two types of antibiotic therapy plans to better understand if one is most effective in preventing infection. This study will provide the ability to evaluate the feasibility (i.e. site activation, enrollment, compliance, drop-out) and generate proof of concept for the larger clinical trial of 12,000 patients in all 25 Canadian Hospitals implanting ICDs, which will be submitted to the CIHR. Additionally, the study supports the continued initiatives of the network of physician investigators (Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Advisory Committee - CHRS DAC) collaborating to address arrhythmia procedures related clinical trials that will answer simple clinical questions that will focus initially on safety issues.

Interventions

DRUGCefazolin, Bacitracin, Cefalexin

Single does of Cefazolin 1-2 g iv given over 60-120 minutes, 60-120 minutes prior to skin incision, Bacitracin wash, Cefalexin 250-500 mg TID

DRUGCefazolin

Cefazolin 1-2 g iv given over 60-120 minutes, 60-120 minutes prior to skin incision

Sponsors

Population Health Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* \> 18 years * One of the following planned device procedures: * ICD, pacemaker, CRT-P, CRT-D generator and/or lead replacement or * Pocket or lead revision or * System upgrade (insertion or attempted insertion of leads) or * New cardiac resynchronization therapy device implant (pacemaker or ICD)

Exclusion criteria

* Unable or unwilling to provide written informed consent * Unable or unwilling to complete the study follow-up schedule * Life expectancy \< 12 months as per the opinion if the local investigator * Allergy to or unable to tolerate cefazolin or clindamycin or vancomycin * Allergy to or unable to tolerate intracavitary bacitracin or gentamicin or cefazolin * Previously enrolled in this trial * In another study that would confound the results of this trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Hospitalization attributed to device infection.Patients will have one follow-up visit at 12 months or earlier should a primary outcome event occur.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Any treatment with antibiotics for suspected device infection.Patients will have one follow-up visit at 12 months
2. Antibiotic therapy related adverse event.Patients will have one follow-up visit at 12 months
3. Prolongation of hospitalization due to proven or suspected adverse events from the hospitalization.Patients will have one follow-up visit at 12 months

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026