Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Aclidinium Bromide at Two Dose Levels Versus Placebo Administered in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Patients

Efficacy and Safety of Aclidinium Bromide at Two Dose Levels vs Placebo When Administered to Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01001494
Enrollment
828
Registered
2009-10-26
Start date
2009-10-31
Completion date
2010-11-30
Last updated
2017-01-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Keywords

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, antimuscarinic, COPD

Brief summary

The main purpose of this study is to assess the long term bronchodilator efficacy, safety and tolerability of inhaled aclidinium bromide at two dose levels compared to placebo in COPD patients and the benefits of the product in disease-related health status, COPD symptoms and COPD exacerbations.

Interventions

Aclidinium bromide 200 μg twice-daily via inhalation by the Eklira Genuair® inhaler: 1 puff in the morning and evening for 24 weeks

Aclidinium bromide 400 μg twice-daily via inhalation by the Eklira Genuair® inhaler: 1 puff in the morning and evening for 24 weeks

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo twice-daily by inhalation for 24 weeks

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult male and female patients aged ≥40 with stable moderate to severe COPD (GOLD guidelines). * Post-salbutamol (FEV1) \< 80% and ≥30% of predicted normal value and Post-salbutamol FEV1/FVC \< 70%. * Current or ex-smokers of ≥10 pack-years.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with no history or current diagnosis of asthma. * No evidence of an exacerbation within 6 weeks prior to the screening visit. * No evidence of clinically significant respiratory and/or cardiovascular conditions or laboratory abnormalities. * No contraindication to use of anticholinergic drugs such as known symptomatic prostatic hypertrophy, bladder neck obstruction or narrow-angle glaucoma.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change From Baseline in Morning Pre-dose (Trough) Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second (FEV1) at Week 24 on TreatmentBaseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Morning Pre-dose (Trough) Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second (FEV1) at Week 12 on TreatmentBaseline and Week 12

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second (FEV1) at Week 24 on TreatmentBaseline and Week 24
Percentage of Patients Who Achieved at Least a 1-unit Decrease From Baseline in TDI Focal Score at Week 24 on TreatmentWeek 24Number of patients achieving a clinically meaningful improvement (≥1-unit) in Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) focal score at Week 24 on Treatment
Percentage of Patients Who Achieved at Least a 4-unit Decrease From Baseline in the SGRQ Total Score at Week 24 on TreatmentWeek 24Number of patients who achieved a clinically meaningful improvement (≥4-units) in Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score at week 24 on treatment

Countries

Czechia, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Peru, Poland, Russia, South Africa, Spain, Ukraine

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 103 sites (100/103 randomised patients), 10 sites in the Czech Republic, 5 in France, 17 in Germany, 13 in Hungary, 3 in Italy, 1 in Peru, 21 in Poland, 10 in the Russian Federation, 5 in Spain, 13 in South Africa and 5 in the Ukraine. The first patient was screened in Oct 2009 and the last patient visit was in Nov 2010.

Pre-assignment details

Patients fulfilling inclusion/exclusion criteria at the time of the Screening Visit were entered into a run-in period of 14±3 days to assess patient's disease stability.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Aclidinium Bromide 200 μg Bid
Aclidinium bromide 200 μg twice-daily via inhalation
277
Aclidinium Bromide 400 μg Bid
Aclidinium bromide 400 μg twice-daily via inhalation
269
Placebo
Placebo via inhalation
273
Total819

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event846
Overall StudyCOPD exacerbation345
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy208
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up201
Overall StudyOther013
Overall StudyProtocol Violation011
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject9717

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAclidinium Bromide 200 μg BidAclidinium Bromide 400 μg BidPlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
108 Participants108 Participants94 Participants310 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
169 Participants161 Participants179 Participants509 Participants
Age, Continuous62.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8
62.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
62.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
62.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
Gender
Female
96 Participants87 Participants84 Participants267 Participants
Gender
Male
181 Participants182 Participants189 Participants552 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Czech Republic
22 participants20 participants19 participants61 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
8 participants8 participants8 participants24 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
55 participants57 participants56 participants168 participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
35 participants30 participants32 participants97 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
4 participants2 participants2 participants8 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
79 participants74 participants77 participants230 participants
Region of Enrollment
Russian Federation
14 participants16 participants15 participants45 participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
46 participants47 participants48 participants141 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
6 participants7 participants5 participants18 participants
Region of Enrollment
Ukraine
8 participants8 participants11 participants27 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
44 / 27738 / 26956 / 273
serious
Total, serious adverse events
12 / 27715 / 26915 / 273

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Morning Pre-dose (Trough) Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second (FEV1) at Week 12 on Treatment

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Intention-to-treat (ITT) population: all randomised patients who took at least one dose of Investigational Medicinal Product and who had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline FEV1 assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Aclidinium Bromide 200 μg BidChange From Baseline in Morning Pre-dose (Trough) Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second (FEV1) at Week 12 on Treatment0.030 LitersStandard Error 0.014
Aclidinium Bromide 400 μg BidChange From Baseline in Morning Pre-dose (Trough) Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second (FEV1) at Week 12 on Treatment0.058 LitersStandard Error 0.015
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Morning Pre-dose (Trough) Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second (FEV1) at Week 12 on Treatment-0.047 LitersStandard Error 0.015
Primary

Change From Baseline in Morning Pre-dose (Trough) Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second (FEV1) at Week 24 on Treatment

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

Population: Intention-to-treat (ITT) population: all randomised patients who took at least one dose of Investigational Medicinal Product and who had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline FEV1 assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Aclidinium Bromide 200 μg BidChange From Baseline in Morning Pre-dose (Trough) Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second (FEV1) at Week 24 on Treatment0.026 LitersStandard Error 0.016
Aclidinium Bromide 400 μg BidChange From Baseline in Morning Pre-dose (Trough) Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second (FEV1) at Week 24 on Treatment0.055 LitersStandard Error 0.016
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Morning Pre-dose (Trough) Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second (FEV1) at Week 24 on Treatment-0.073 LitersStandard Error 0.016
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second (FEV1) at Week 24 on Treatment

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

Population: Intention-to-treat (ITT) population: all randomised patients who took at least one dose of Investigational Medicinal Product and who had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline FEV1 assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Aclidinium Bromide 200 μg BidChange From Baseline in Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second (FEV1) at Week 24 on Treatment0.206 LitersStandard Error 0.017
Aclidinium Bromide 400 μg BidChange From Baseline in Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second (FEV1) at Week 24 on Treatment0.231 LitersStandard Error 0.017
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Peak Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second (FEV1) at Week 24 on Treatment0.022 LitersStandard Error 0.017
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Who Achieved at Least a 1-unit Decrease From Baseline in TDI Focal Score at Week 24 on Treatment

Number of patients achieving a clinically meaningful improvement (≥1-unit) in Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) focal score at Week 24 on Treatment

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Intention-to-treat (ITT) population: all randomised patients who took at least one dose of Investigational Medicinal Product and who had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline FEV1 assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Aclidinium Bromide 200 μg BidPercentage of Patients Who Achieved at Least a 1-unit Decrease From Baseline in TDI Focal Score at Week 24 on TreatmentYes (% Patients with a 1-unit decrease)53.3 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium Bromide 200 μg BidPercentage of Patients Who Achieved at Least a 1-unit Decrease From Baseline in TDI Focal Score at Week 24 on TreatmentNo (% Patients with a 1-unit decrease)46.7 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium Bromide 400 μg BidPercentage of Patients Who Achieved at Least a 1-unit Decrease From Baseline in TDI Focal Score at Week 24 on TreatmentYes (% Patients with a 1-unit decrease)56.9 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium Bromide 400 μg BidPercentage of Patients Who Achieved at Least a 1-unit Decrease From Baseline in TDI Focal Score at Week 24 on TreatmentNo (% Patients with a 1-unit decrease)43.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Patients Who Achieved at Least a 1-unit Decrease From Baseline in TDI Focal Score at Week 24 on TreatmentNo (% Patients with a 1-unit decrease)54.5 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Patients Who Achieved at Least a 1-unit Decrease From Baseline in TDI Focal Score at Week 24 on TreatmentYes (% Patients with a 1-unit decrease)45.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Who Achieved at Least a 4-unit Decrease From Baseline in the SGRQ Total Score at Week 24 on Treatment

Number of patients who achieved a clinically meaningful improvement (≥4-units) in Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score at week 24 on treatment

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Intention-to-treat (ITT) population: all randomised patients who took at least one dose of Investigational Medicinal Product and who had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline FEV1 assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Aclidinium Bromide 200 μg BidPercentage of Patients Who Achieved at Least a 4-unit Decrease From Baseline in the SGRQ Total Score at Week 24 on TreatmentYes (% Patients with 4-unit decrease)56.0 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium Bromide 200 μg BidPercentage of Patients Who Achieved at Least a 4-unit Decrease From Baseline in the SGRQ Total Score at Week 24 on TreatmentNo (% Patients with 4-unit decrease)44.0 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium Bromide 400 μg BidPercentage of Patients Who Achieved at Least a 4-unit Decrease From Baseline in the SGRQ Total Score at Week 24 on TreatmentYes (% Patients with 4-unit decrease)57.3 Percentage of participants
Aclidinium Bromide 400 μg BidPercentage of Patients Who Achieved at Least a 4-unit Decrease From Baseline in the SGRQ Total Score at Week 24 on TreatmentNo (% Patients with 4-unit decrease)42.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Patients Who Achieved at Least a 4-unit Decrease From Baseline in the SGRQ Total Score at Week 24 on TreatmentYes (% Patients with 4-unit decrease)41.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Patients Who Achieved at Least a 4-unit Decrease From Baseline in the SGRQ Total Score at Week 24 on TreatmentNo (% Patients with 4-unit decrease)59.0 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 13, 2026