Skip to content

Effect of Nafamostat on Postreperfusion Syndrome (PRS)

Effect of Nafamostat Mesilate on Hemodynamic Stability After Reperfusion of the Liver Graft

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01001403
Enrollment
62
Registered
2009-10-26
Start date
2009-03-31
Completion date
2010-04-30
Last updated
2010-05-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver Transplantation, Postreperfusion Syndrome

Brief summary

This study intends to see the effect of nafamostat on the attenuation of postreperfusion syndrome (PRS) that frequently occurs during liver transplantation.

Interventions

0.2 mg/kg as bolus 1 minute before reperfusion

DRUGNormal saline

10 ml of normal saline

Sponsors

Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* \>= 18 year old scheduled to undergo liver transplantation

Exclusion criteria

* Previous history of pulmonary, cardiovascular, or renal disease * Previous history of allergic reactions to nafamostat

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Moderate and Severe Postreperfusion Syndrome (PRS)during 5 min after reperfusion of liver graftBefore entering the study, we re-defined the criteria of PRS. From our clinical experiences, two types of PRS were observed according to its severity and treatment option. Moderate PRS was identical to previously defined PRS: more than 30% decrease of mean arterial pressure lasting over 1 min was observed within 5 min after reperfusion of the liver graft. However, we differentiated a severe form of PRS, in which MAP rapidly fell below 40 mmHg, from the moderate one, because severe PRS required prompt intervention to prevent a permanent damage of vital organs.

Countries

South Korea

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Nafamostat31
Control31
Total62

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControlNafamostatTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
28 Participants30 Participants58 Participants
Age Continuous52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
51 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Region of Enrollment
Korea, Republic of
31 participants31 participants62 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants3 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
25 Participants28 Participants53 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 310 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 310 / 31

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Moderate and Severe Postreperfusion Syndrome (PRS)

Before entering the study, we re-defined the criteria of PRS. From our clinical experiences, two types of PRS were observed according to its severity and treatment option. Moderate PRS was identical to previously defined PRS: more than 30% decrease of mean arterial pressure lasting over 1 min was observed within 5 min after reperfusion of the liver graft. However, we differentiated a severe form of PRS, in which MAP rapidly fell below 40 mmHg, from the moderate one, because severe PRS required prompt intervention to prevent a permanent damage of vital organs.

Time frame: during 5 min after reperfusion of liver graft

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
NafamostatNumber of Participants With Moderate and Severe Postreperfusion Syndrome (PRS)15 participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Moderate and Severe Postreperfusion Syndrome (PRS)25 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026