Skip to content

ASPECCT: A Study of Panitumumab Efficacy and Safety Compared to Cetuximab in Patients With KRAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label, Phase 3 Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Panitumumab and Cetuximab in Subjects With Previously Treated, Wild-type KRAS, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01001377
Enrollment
1010
Registered
2009-10-26
Start date
2010-02-02
Completion date
2017-03-07
Last updated
2022-09-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Keywords

Panitumumab, Vectibix, Colon Cancer, Colorectal Cancer, Rectal Cancer, Cetuximab, Erbitux, Metastatic

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to compare the effect of panitumumab versus cetuximab on overall survival (OS) for chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) among patients with wild-type Kirsten rat Sarcoma-2 virus (KRAS) tumors.

Interventions

DRUGCetuximab

Administered by intravenous infusion

DRUGPanitumumab

Administered by intravenous infusion

Sponsors

Amgen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum, metastatic disease * Wild-type KRAS tumor status * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0, 1 or 2 * Must have failed a prior regimen containing irinotecan for metastatic disease and a prior regimen containing oxaliplatin for metastatic disease * Must have previously received a thymidylate synthase inhibitor (eg, fluorouracil, capecitabine, raltitrexed, or fluorouracil-uracil) at any point for treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) * Adequate hematologic, renal, hepatic and metabolic function

Exclusion criteria

* Symptomatic brain metastases requiring treatment * Prior anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) antibody therapy (eg, panitumumab or cetuximab) or treatment with small molecule EGFr inhibitors (eg, gefitinib, erlotinib, lapatinib) * Antitumor therapy (eg, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, immunotherapy, antibody therapy, radiotherapy), or investigational agent or therapy ≤ 30 days before randomization. * Clinically significant cardiovascular disease * Active infection requiring systemic treatment or any uncontrolled infection ≤14 days prior to randomization

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall SurvivalFrom randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.Overall survival is the time from the date of randomization until the date of death. Participants who had not died by the analysis data cut-off date were censored at their last contact date.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective ResponseFrom randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.Objective response is either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST version 1.1. All participants that did not meet the criteria for an objective response by the analysis cut-off date were considered non-responders. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions, any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm, and disappearance of all non-target lesions, and no new lesions. PR: Disappearance of all target lesions, persistence of one or more non-target lesions not qualifying for either CR or progressive disease, or, at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions with no unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and no new lesions.
Duration of ResponseFrom randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.Duration of response (DOR), calculated only for those participants with an objective response, is the time from first objective response to disease progression per the RECIST v1.1 or death. Participants not meeting criteria for progression or who died by the analysis data cutoff date were censored at their last evaluable disease assessment date.
Time to ResponseFrom randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.Time to response (TTR), calculated for those participants with an objective response, is defined as the time from the randomization date to the date of first objective response.
Time to Treatment FailureFrom randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.Time to treatment failure (TTF) is the time from randomization date to date that the decision was made to end the treatment period for any reason; participants who remained in the treatment period at the time of analysis were censored at the date of the last on-study assessment.
Change From Baseline in EuroQOL 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health State Index ScoreFrom Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.The EQ-5D is a standardized instrument for use as a generic measure of health outcome. The health state index measures the following 5 health dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension contains 3 levels of response to reflect degree of problems participants have experienced: no problem (1), some problem (2) and extreme problems (3). The health states for each respondent are converted into a single index number using a specified set of weights. Resulting scores can range from 1.0 and -0.594. A higher score indicates a more preferred health status with 1.0 representing perfect health and 0 representing death. Negative scores are possible and represent health states regarded as less preferable than death (0). Repeated measures mixed model includes treatment, geographic region, ECOG score, assessment week, and treatment by assessment week interaction as fixed effects, and participants a random effect.
Progression-free SurvivalFrom randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.Progression free survival (PFS) is the time from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression per the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 or death. Participants alive and not meeting criteria for progression by the analysis data cut-off date were censored at their last evaluable disease assessment date. Progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study based on all target lesions recorded since the treatment started (the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm), or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or any new lesions.
Change From Baseline in National Comprehensive Cancer Network Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Colorectal Symptom Index (NCCN FCSI ) Symptoms ScoreFrom Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.The FCSI consists of 9 questions comprising the most important symptoms associated with colorectal cancer, including energy, pain, weight, diarrhea, nausea, swelling or cramps in the stomach area, appetite, ability to enjoy life, and overall quality of life. The 9 questions are combined in three algorithms to provide information for 3 domains: colorectal cancer symptoms, physical well-being, and functional well-being. Each of the 9 items are scored from 0 to 4 representing Not at All through to Very Much True. The raw score for all items is transformed to a 0-100 scale, and the average for each of the 3 subscales is calculated; high scores illustrate an improved state (e.g. able to enjoy life more).
Change From Baseline in NCCN FCSI Physical Well-being Scale ScoreFrom Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.The FCSI consists of 9 questions comprising the most important symptoms associated with colorectal cancer, including energy, pain, weight, diarrhea, nausea, swelling or cramps in the stomach area, appetite, ability to enjoy life, and overall quality of life. The 9 questions are combined in three algorithms to provide information for 3 domains: colorectal cancer symptoms, physical well-being, and functional well-being. Each of the 9 items are scored from 0 to 4 representing Not at All through to Very Much True. The raw score for all items is transformed to a 0-100 scale, and the average for each of the 3 subscales is calculated; high scores illustrate an improved state (e.g. able to enjoy life more).
Change From Baseline in NCCN FCSI Functional Well-being Scale ScoreFrom Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.The FCSI consists of 9 questions comprising the most important symptoms associated with colorectal cancer, including energy, pain, weight, diarrhea, nausea, swelling or cramps in the stomach area, appetite, ability to enjoy life, and overall quality of life. The 9 questions are combined in three algorithms to provide information for 3 domains: colorectal cancer symptoms, physical well-being, and functional well-being. Each of the 9 items are scored from 0 to 4 representing Not at All through to Very Much True. The raw score for all items is transformed to a 0-100 scale, and the average for each of the 3 subscales is calculated; high scores illustrate an improved state (e.g. able to enjoy life more).
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)From the day of the first dose of study therapy through 30 days since the last dose. Maximum time on study treatment was 130 weeks.Serious adverse events include any event that is fatal, life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or other significant medical hazard. Treatment-related AEs are those the investigator considered as a reasonable possibility to have been caused by study drug.
Change From Baseline in EuroQOL 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)From Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.The EQ-5D is a standardized instrument for use as a generic measure of health outcome. The VAS asks respondents to rate their present health status on a 0 - 100 scale, with 0 labeled as Worst imaginable health state and 100 labeled as Best imaginable health state. The VAS score is determined by observing the point at which the participant's hand drawn line intersects the scale.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Czechia, France, Hong Kong, India, Israel, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Malaysia, Netherlands, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Singapore, Slovakia, South Africa, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

First patient enrolled on 2nd February 2010 and last patient enrolled 19 July 2012. Results are reported as of the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cetuximab
Cetuximab 400 mg/m\^2 as an initial dose, followed by 250 mg/m\^2 intravenously (IV) every 7 days.
504
Panitumumab
Panitumumab 6 mg/kg IV every 14 days.
506
Total1,010

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath391384
Overall StudyIneligibility determined20
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1417
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1920

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalCetuximabPanitumumab
Age, Continuous59.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
60.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
59.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status
Grade 0
320 participants165 participants155 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status
Grade 1
608 participants299 participants309 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status
Grade 2
82 participants40 participants42 participants
Geographic region
North America, Western Europe and Australia
316 participants158 participants158 participants
Geographic region
Rest of World
694 participants346 participants348 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
455 participants230 participants225 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
6 participants4 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
13 participants7 participants6 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Japanese
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
5 participants3 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White or Caucasian
530 participants260 participants270 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
370 Participants183 Participants187 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
640 Participants321 Participants319 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
474 / 503459 / 496
serious
Total, serious adverse events
169 / 503151 / 496

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival

Overall survival is the time from the date of randomization until the date of death. Participants who had not died by the analysis data cut-off date were censored at their last contact date.

Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.

Population: Primary Analysis Set: All participants who were randomized and who received at least 1 dose of panitumumab or cetuximab; analyzed according to randomized treatment arm.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
CetuximabOverall Survival10.0 months
PanitumumabOverall Survival10.4 months
Comparison: Cox proportional hazards model stratified by geographic region (North America, western Europe and Australia vs rest of world) and ECOG performance status (0 or 1 vs 2).95% CI: [0.839, 1.113]
Comparison: A synthesis approach with an asymptotic standard normal test statistic based on the logarithm of the hazard ratio was used to test the hypothesis that panitumumab is non-inferior to cetuximab for overall survival (ie, that panitumumab retains at least 50% of the overall survival benefit of cetuximab relative to best supportive care).p-value: 0.0007Asymptotic standard normal test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EuroQOL 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health State Index Score

The EQ-5D is a standardized instrument for use as a generic measure of health outcome. The health state index measures the following 5 health dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension contains 3 levels of response to reflect degree of problems participants have experienced: no problem (1), some problem (2) and extreme problems (3). The health states for each respondent are converted into a single index number using a specified set of weights. Resulting scores can range from 1.0 and -0.594. A higher score indicates a more preferred health status with 1.0 representing perfect health and 0 representing death. Negative scores are possible and represent health states regarded as less preferable than death (0). Repeated measures mixed model includes treatment, geographic region, ECOG score, assessment week, and treatment by assessment week interaction as fixed effects, and participants a random effect.

Time frame: From Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.

Population: Patient reported outcomes (PRO) analysis set: all participants in the primary analysis set who have a Baseline and at least one follow-up PRO assessment prior to clinical or objective disease progression per RECIST version 1.1. Participants with available data are included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
CetuximabChange From Baseline in EuroQOL 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health State Index Score-0.0341 scores on a scale
PanitumumabChange From Baseline in EuroQOL 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health State Index Score-0.0216 scores on a scale
Comparison: Repeated measures mixed model includes treatment, geographic region, ECOG score, assessment week, and treatment by assessment week interaction as fixed effects, and subjects a random effect. An unstructured covariance matrix is used in the mixed model.95% CI: [-0.0353, 0.0605]
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EuroQOL 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

The EQ-5D is a standardized instrument for use as a generic measure of health outcome. The VAS asks respondents to rate their present health status on a 0 - 100 scale, with 0 labeled as Worst imaginable health state and 100 labeled as Best imaginable health state. The VAS score is determined by observing the point at which the participant's hand drawn line intersects the scale.

Time frame: From Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.

Population: Patient reported outcomes (PRO) analysis set participants with available data

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
CetuximabChange From Baseline in EuroQOL 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)3.9782 scores on a scale
PanitumumabChange From Baseline in EuroQOL 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)2.3037 scores on a scale
Comparison: Repeated measures mixed model includes treatment, geographic region, ECOG score, assessment week, and treatment by assessment week interaction as fixed effects, and subjects a random effect. An unstructured covariance matrix is used in the mixed model.95% CI: [-4.9331, 1.5841]
Secondary

Change From Baseline in National Comprehensive Cancer Network Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Colorectal Symptom Index (NCCN FCSI ) Symptoms Score

The FCSI consists of 9 questions comprising the most important symptoms associated with colorectal cancer, including energy, pain, weight, diarrhea, nausea, swelling or cramps in the stomach area, appetite, ability to enjoy life, and overall quality of life. The 9 questions are combined in three algorithms to provide information for 3 domains: colorectal cancer symptoms, physical well-being, and functional well-being. Each of the 9 items are scored from 0 to 4 representing Not at All through to Very Much True. The raw score for all items is transformed to a 0-100 scale, and the average for each of the 3 subscales is calculated; high scores illustrate an improved state (e.g. able to enjoy life more).

Time frame: From Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.

Population: Patient reported outcomes (PRO) analysis set participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
CetuximabChange From Baseline in National Comprehensive Cancer Network Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Colorectal Symptom Index (NCCN FCSI ) Symptoms Score2.0101 scores on a scale
PanitumumabChange From Baseline in National Comprehensive Cancer Network Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Colorectal Symptom Index (NCCN FCSI ) Symptoms Score3.0473 scores on a scale
Comparison: Repeated measures mixed model includes treatment, geographic region, ECOG score, assessment week, and treatment by assessment week interaction as fixed effects, and subjects a random effect. An unstructured covariance matrix is used in the mixed model.95% CI: [-2.3267, 4.401]
Secondary

Change From Baseline in NCCN FCSI Functional Well-being Scale Score

The FCSI consists of 9 questions comprising the most important symptoms associated with colorectal cancer, including energy, pain, weight, diarrhea, nausea, swelling or cramps in the stomach area, appetite, ability to enjoy life, and overall quality of life. The 9 questions are combined in three algorithms to provide information for 3 domains: colorectal cancer symptoms, physical well-being, and functional well-being. Each of the 9 items are scored from 0 to 4 representing Not at All through to Very Much True. The raw score for all items is transformed to a 0-100 scale, and the average for each of the 3 subscales is calculated; high scores illustrate an improved state (e.g. able to enjoy life more).

Time frame: From Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.

Population: Patient reported outcomes (PRO) analysis set participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
CetuximabChange From Baseline in NCCN FCSI Functional Well-being Scale Score1.3567 scores on a scale
PanitumumabChange From Baseline in NCCN FCSI Functional Well-being Scale Score1.1569 scores on a scale
Comparison: Repeated measures mixed model includes treatment, geographic region, ECOG score, assessment week, and treatment by assessment week interaction as fixed effects, and subjects a random effect. An unstructured covariance matrix is used in the mixed model.95% CI: [-6.0093, 5.6098]
Secondary

Change From Baseline in NCCN FCSI Physical Well-being Scale Score

The FCSI consists of 9 questions comprising the most important symptoms associated with colorectal cancer, including energy, pain, weight, diarrhea, nausea, swelling or cramps in the stomach area, appetite, ability to enjoy life, and overall quality of life. The 9 questions are combined in three algorithms to provide information for 3 domains: colorectal cancer symptoms, physical well-being, and functional well-being. Each of the 9 items are scored from 0 to 4 representing Not at All through to Very Much True. The raw score for all items is transformed to a 0-100 scale, and the average for each of the 3 subscales is calculated; high scores illustrate an improved state (e.g. able to enjoy life more).

Time frame: From Study Day 1 through the last day of treatment or disease progression, up to Week 85.

Population: Patient reported outcomes (PRO) analysis set participants with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
CetuximabChange From Baseline in NCCN FCSI Physical Well-being Scale Score1.8778 scores on a scale
PanitumumabChange From Baseline in NCCN FCSI Physical Well-being Scale Score2.4614 scores on a scale
Comparison: Repeated measures mixed model includes treatment, geographic region, ECOG score, assessment week, and treatment by assessment week interaction as fixed effects, and subjects a random effect. An unstructured covariance matrix is used in the mixed model.95% CI: [-3.0269, 4.1941]
Secondary

Duration of Response

Duration of response (DOR), calculated only for those participants with an objective response, is the time from first objective response to disease progression per the RECIST v1.1 or death. Participants not meeting criteria for progression or who died by the analysis data cutoff date were censored at their last evaluable disease assessment date.

Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.

Population: Participants with an objective response

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
CetuximabDuration of Response5.4 months
PanitumumabDuration of Response3.8 months
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

Serious adverse events include any event that is fatal, life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or other significant medical hazard. Treatment-related AEs are those the investigator considered as a reasonable possibility to have been caused by study drug.

Time frame: From the day of the first dose of study therapy through 30 days since the last dose. Maximum time on study treatment was 130 weeks.

Population: Safety Analysis Set (randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication). Five participants who received the incorrect study medication (4 assigned to panitumumab but received cetuximab and 1 assigned to cetuximab but received panitumumab) were included in different treatment arms for safety analyses.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CetuximabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related serious adverse event22 participants
CetuximabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Serious adverse events169 participants
CetuximabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any treatment-related adverse event (TRAE)459 participants
CetuximabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Leading to discontinuation of study drug61 participants
CetuximabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any adverse event (AE)494 participants
CetuximabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)TRAE leading to discontinuation of study drug15 participants
PanitumumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any adverse event (AE)485 participants
PanitumumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any treatment-related adverse event (TRAE)437 participants
PanitumumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)TRAE leading to discontinuation of study drug14 participants
PanitumumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Leading to discontinuation of study drug69 participants
PanitumumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Serious adverse events151 participants
PanitumumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Treatment-related serious adverse event25 participants
Secondary

Objective Response

Objective response is either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST version 1.1. All participants that did not meet the criteria for an objective response by the analysis cut-off date were considered non-responders. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions, any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm, and disappearance of all non-target lesions, and no new lesions. PR: Disappearance of all target lesions, persistence of one or more non-target lesions not qualifying for either CR or progressive disease, or, at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions with no unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and no new lesions.

Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.

Population: Tumor Response Analysis Set: Participants in the primary analysis set with at least 1 Baseline unidimensionally measurable lesion per RECIST version 1.1.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CetuximabObjective Response19.79 percentage of participants
PanitumumabObjective Response22.02 percentage of participants
95% CI: [0.83, 1.58]
Secondary

Progression-free Survival

Progression free survival (PFS) is the time from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression per the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 or death. Participants alive and not meeting criteria for progression by the analysis data cut-off date were censored at their last evaluable disease assessment date. Progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study based on all target lesions recorded since the treatment started (the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm), or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or any new lesions.

Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.

Population: Primary analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
CetuximabProgression-free Survival4.4 months
PanitumumabProgression-free Survival4.1 months
Secondary

Time to Response

Time to response (TTR), calculated for those participants with an objective response, is defined as the time from the randomization date to the date of first objective response.

Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.

Population: Participants with an objective response

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
CetuximabTime to Response2.6 months
PanitumumabTime to Response1.5 months
Secondary

Time to Treatment Failure

Time to treatment failure (TTF) is the time from randomization date to date that the decision was made to end the treatment period for any reason; participants who remained in the treatment period at the time of analysis were censored at the date of the last on-study assessment.

Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 5 February 2013. Maximum time on study was 155 weeks.

Population: Primary analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
CetuximabTime to Treatment Failure3.3 months
PanitumumabTime to Treatment Failure3.4 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 20, 2026