Skip to content

Phase 3 Study of Cysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-release (RP103) Compared to Cystagon® in Patients With Cystinosis

A Randomized, Crossover Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of Cysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-release Capsules (RP103), Compared to Cystagon® in Patients With Nephropathic Cystinosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01000961
Enrollment
43
Registered
2009-10-23
Start date
2010-06-30
Completion date
2011-08-31
Last updated
2024-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cystinosis

Keywords

cystinosis, cysteamine, inheritable disease, orphan disease, CTNS protein, human, metabolic disease, nephropathic cystinosis

Brief summary

Cystinosis is an inherited disease that if untreated, results in kidney failure as early as the first decade of life. The current marketed therapy is Cystagon® (cysteamine bitartrate) which must be taken every six hours for the rest of the patient's life to prevent complications of cystinosis. RP103 is a formulation of cysteamine bitartrate that is being studied to see if it may be able to be given less frequently, once every 12 hours, and have similar results to four times a day Cystagon®.

Detailed description

This is a multi-center, open-label, randomized, cross-over study to determine whether steady-state, twice a day treatment with Cysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-release Capsules(RP103) results in comparable depletion of white blood cell (WBC) cystine levels compared to the existing four times a day cysteamine treatment. It will involve up to 20 clinic visits plus intermittent home use of the RP103. Most of these clinic visits occur in clusters of 3-4 consecutive days. Eligible patients will be offered enrollment into a long-term follow up study. Study with completed results acquired from Horizon in 2024.

Interventions

DRUGCystagon® (Cysteamine Bitartrate)

Run-in Period (Weeks 1, 2, 3) and Period 1 (Weeks 4, 5, 6) or Period 2 (Weeks 7, 8, 9); Immediate crossover to opposite treatment than taken during Period 1: Every 6H, supplied in 150 and 50mg capsules/Duration of Treatment: 3 weeks each period used

DRUGCysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-release Capsules (RP103)

Period 1 (Weeks 4, 5, 6) or Period 2 (Weeks 7, 8, 9); Immediate crossover to opposite treatment than taken during Period 1: Every 12H, supplied in 75 and 25mg capsules/Duration of Treatment: 3 weeks

Sponsors

Amgen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male and female subjects must have nephropathic cystinosis. * Subjects must be on a stable dose of Cystagon® sufficient to maintain their white blood cell (WBC) cystine level at ≤ 1.0 nmol/half-cystine/mg protein. * Subjects must be able to swallow their typically administered Cystagon® capsule with the capsule intact. * Within the last 6 months, no clinically significant change in liver function \[i.e., ALT, AST, total bilirubin\] and renal function \[i.e., estimated GFR\] at Screening as determined by the Investigator. * Subjects with an estimated GFR (corrected for body surface area) \> 30 mL/min/1.73m2. * Sexually active female subjects of childbearing potential (i.e., not surgically sterile \[tubal ligation, hysterectomy, or bilateral oophorectomy\] or at least 2 years naturally postmenopausal) must agree to utilize the same acceptable form of contraception from Screening through completion of the study. * Subjects must be willing and able to comply with the study restrictions and requirements. * Subjects or their or their parent or guardian must provide written informed consent and assent (where applicable) prior to participation in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject's age \< 6 years old or subject's weight \< 21 kg. * Subjects with a known history, currently of the following conditions or other health issues that make it, in the opinion of the investigator, unsafe for them to participate: inflammatory bowel disease (if currently active) or have had prior resection of small intestine; Heart disease (e.g., myocardial infarction, heart failure, arrhythmias or poorly controlled hypertension) 90 days prior to Screening; Active bleeding disorder 90 days prior to Screening; Malignant disease within the last 2 years. * Patients with a hemoglobin level \< 10 g/dL at Screening or a level that, in the opinion of the investigator, makes it unsafe for the subject to participate. * Subjects receiving any form of cysteamine medication through a gastric tube. * Subjects who are receiving maintenance dialysis or who have had a kidney transplant. * Subjects who are on an active kidney transplant list or who are planning to receive a kidney transplant within 3 months of Screening. * Subjects with known hypersensitivity to cysteamine or penicillamine. * Female subjects who are nursing, planning a pregnancy, known or suspected to be pregnant, or have a positive serum pregnancy screen. * Subjects who have a made a blood donation within 30 days of Screening. * Subjects who, in the opinion of the Investigator, are not able or willing to comply with the protocol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The Steady-state White Blood Cell Cystine Levels of RP103 Compared to Cystagon®4 weeks after the last subject has completed the study

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison of Cysteamine PK Profiles, Steady State Cmax, Between RP103 and Cystagon®.4 weeks after the last subject has completed the study
Comparison of Cysteamine PK Profiles, Steady State Tmax, Between RP103 and Cystagon®.4 weeks after the last subject has completed the study
Comparison of Cysteamine PK Profiles, AUC(0-t), Between RP103 and Cystagon®.6 hours post dosing for Cystagon®; 12 hours post dosing for RP103.

Countries

France, Netherlands, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participants randomized to each per sequence Arm are expected to remain in the same Arm throughout all intervention periods.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
RP103 and Cystagon® Crossover
Per Protocol Population
39
Total39

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
First Intervention (3 Weeks)Infection after pre-planned surgery01
First Intervention (3 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRP103 and Cystagon® Crossover
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
36 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
3 Participants
Age, Continuous11.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.33
Region of Enrollment
France
13 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
4 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
22 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
16 / 435 / 41
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 431 / 41

Outcome results

Primary

The Steady-state White Blood Cell Cystine Levels of RP103 Compared to Cystagon®

Time frame: 4 weeks after the last subject has completed the study

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
RP103The Steady-state White Blood Cell Cystine Levels of RP103 Compared to Cystagon®0.5152 nmol ½ Cystine / mg proteinStandard Error 0.05555
Cystagon®The Steady-state White Blood Cell Cystine Levels of RP103 Compared to Cystagon®0.4367 nmol ½ Cystine / mg proteinStandard Error 0.05555
Comparison: 16-subject study will have 90% power to reject the null hypothesis of non-inferiority at the 0.025 level of significance with a non-inferiority margin of 0.3. Final analysis was performed at a nominal significance level of 0.02104.p-value: 0.000195.8% CI: [0.0107, 0.1464]t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Comparison of Cysteamine PK Profiles, AUC(0-t), Between RP103 and Cystagon®.

Time frame: 6 hours post dosing for Cystagon®; 12 hours post dosing for RP103.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
RP103Comparison of Cysteamine PK Profiles, AUC(0-t), Between RP103 and Cystagon®.357 AUC(0-t) (min*mg/L)Standard Deviation 150
Cystagon®Comparison of Cysteamine PK Profiles, AUC(0-t), Between RP103 and Cystagon®.739 AUC(0-t) (min*mg/L)Standard Deviation 334
95% CI: [1.75, 2.39]
Secondary

Comparison of Cysteamine PK Profiles, Steady State Cmax, Between RP103 and Cystagon®.

Time frame: 4 weeks after the last subject has completed the study

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
RP103Comparison of Cysteamine PK Profiles, Steady State Cmax, Between RP103 and Cystagon®.2.73 Cmax (mg/L)Standard Deviation 1.36
Cystagon®Comparison of Cysteamine PK Profiles, Steady State Cmax, Between RP103 and Cystagon®.3.70 Cmax (mg/L)Standard Deviation 1.72
95% CI: [1.17, 1.67]
Secondary

Comparison of Cysteamine PK Profiles, Steady State Tmax, Between RP103 and Cystagon®.

Time frame: 4 weeks after the last subject has completed the study

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
RP103Comparison of Cysteamine PK Profiles, Steady State Tmax, Between RP103 and Cystagon®.72 Tmax (minute)Standard Deviation 31
Cystagon®Comparison of Cysteamine PK Profiles, Steady State Tmax, Between RP103 and Cystagon®.187 Tmax (minute)Standard Deviation 89
95% CI: [90, 150]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026