Skip to content

A Study of MabThera (Rituximab) in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate

An Open Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Rituximab in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to Prior Treatment With Methotrexate

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01000610
Enrollment
18
Registered
2009-10-23
Start date
2008-03-17
Completion date
2012-05-16
Last updated
2017-08-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

In this open-label single arm study the safety and efficacy of Mabthera will be evaluated in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response to methotrexate. Patients will receive MabThera (1000mg iv infusion) on days 1 and 15, and background methotrexate (10-25mg po or sc weekly). After the initial study period of 24 weeks, eligible patients may receive up to 3 re-treatments with MabThera. The anticipated time on study treatment is 1-2 years and target sample size is \<50

Interventions

DRUGrituximab [MabThera/Rituxan]

1000 mg iv infusion on days 1 and 15

DRUGmethotrexate

10-25 mg weekly (oral or parenteral)

DRUGmethylprednisolone

100 mg iv prior to each rituximab infusion

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult patients \>/= 18 years of age * rheumatoid arthritis DAS28 \>/= 3.2 * receiving treatment on an outpatient basis * experienced an inadequate response to previous or current treatment with methotrexate

Exclusion criteria

* rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA, or significant systemic involvement secondary to RA * history of or current inflammatory joint disease other than RA * previous treatment with any cell-depleting therapies

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events (AEs)Days 1 and 15, every 8 weeks up to Week 24 and and then every 3 months up to 18 months for a total of 104 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage Change in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) From Baseline to Week 24Baseline and Week 24The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) \[28 joints\], swollen joint count (SJC) \[28 joints\], participant's global assessment of disease activity \[visual analog scale: \[VAS\] 0 equals (=) no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to 10. Scores less than (\<) 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores greater than or equal to (≥) 5.1 indicate worse disease control. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score \< 2.6. The average improvement at each visit to the group score is equal to the formula (Previous DAS28 minus \[-\] current DAS 28)/ Previous DAS 28 x 100. Negative percentages indicate that the participant has worsened in comparison to last evaluation, and positive percentages indicate improvement of its DAS28 score and correlated with a bettering of clinical situation.
Percentage of Participants Whose DAS28 Improved by >1.2 at Week 24Baseline and Week 24The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the TJC \[28 joints\], SJC \[28 joints\], participant's global assessment of disease activity \[VAS: 0 = no disease activity to 100 = maximum disease activity\] and the ESR for a total possible score of 0 to 10. Scores \< 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores ≥ 5.1 indicate worse disease control. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score \< 2.6. An improvement of \>1.2 was considered to be clinically significant improvement.
Change in Bone Density (in Participants Untreated With Bisphosphonates)Screening and Week 84Bone mineral density test was performed using x-ray radiation and the values of bone density were provided directly by the apparatus as grams per square centimeter (g/cm\^2) . T-score is the number of standard deviations above or below the mean for a healthy 30 year old adult of the same sex and ethnicity as the participant. A T-score with above -1 is normal bone density level. A T-score between -1 and -2.5 means that the bone density is below normal and it might be a sign of an osteopenia and may also lead into osteoporosis. A T-score below -2.5 indicates osteoporosis.

Countries

Tunisia

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Rituximab
Participants received rituximab 1000 mg iv infusion on Days 1 and 15 along with methotrexate 10-25 mg weekly, orally or parenterally. Participants could receive concomitant treatment with corticosteroids (≤ 10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent) or intra-articular corticosteroids, NSAIDs and analgesics throughout the study period at the discretion of the investigator. All participants received methylprednisolone 100 mg iv prior to each rituximab infusion.
18
Total18

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up4
Overall StudyTreatment failure1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRituximab
Age, Continuous53.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.91
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events (AEs)

Time frame: Days 1 and 15, every 8 weeks up to Week 24 and and then every 3 months up to 18 months for a total of 104 weeks

Population: Safety Population: Included all participants who have received any part of an infusion of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
RituximabNumber of Participants Reporting Adverse Events (AEs)Participants who experienced an AE11 number of participants
RituximabNumber of Participants Reporting Adverse Events (AEs)Participants who experienced more than 1 AE7 number of participants
Secondary

Change in Bone Density (in Participants Untreated With Bisphosphonates)

Bone mineral density test was performed using x-ray radiation and the values of bone density were provided directly by the apparatus as grams per square centimeter (g/cm\^2) . T-score is the number of standard deviations above or below the mean for a healthy 30 year old adult of the same sex and ethnicity as the participant. A T-score with above -1 is normal bone density level. A T-score between -1 and -2.5 means that the bone density is below normal and it might be a sign of an osteopenia and may also lead into osteoporosis. A T-score below -2.5 indicates osteoporosis.

Time frame: Screening and Week 84

Population: ITT population; only participants with an assessment at both screening and Week 84 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
RituximabChange in Bone Density (in Participants Untreated With Bisphosphonates)Screening-1.82 t-score
RituximabChange in Bone Density (in Participants Untreated With Bisphosphonates)Week 84-1.6 t-score
Secondary

Percentage Change in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) From Baseline to Week 24

The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) \[28 joints\], swollen joint count (SJC) \[28 joints\], participant's global assessment of disease activity \[visual analog scale: \[VAS\] 0 equals (=) no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to 10. Scores less than (\<) 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores greater than or equal to (≥) 5.1 indicate worse disease control. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score \< 2.6. The average improvement at each visit to the group score is equal to the formula (Previous DAS28 minus \[-\] current DAS 28)/ Previous DAS 28 x 100. Negative percentages indicate that the participant has worsened in comparison to last evaluation, and positive percentages indicate improvement of its DAS28 score and correlated with a bettering of clinical situation.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

Population: ITT population; Only participants with DAS28 values at both Baseline and Week 24 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RituximabPercentage Change in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) From Baseline to Week 24-1.7 percentage change from baselineStandard Deviation 49.4
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Whose DAS28 Improved by >1.2 at Week 24

The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the TJC \[28 joints\], SJC \[28 joints\], participant's global assessment of disease activity \[VAS: 0 = no disease activity to 100 = maximum disease activity\] and the ESR for a total possible score of 0 to 10. Scores \< 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores ≥ 5.1 indicate worse disease control. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score \< 2.6. An improvement of \>1.2 was considered to be clinically significant improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

Population: ITT population; Only participants with DAS28 values at both Baseline and Week 24 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RituximabPercentage of Participants Whose DAS28 Improved by >1.2 at Week 2475.0 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026