Skip to content

Comparing Study Between Concurrent Chemoradiation and New Combination Treatment in Cervical Cancer Patients

Comparing Standard Concurrent Chemo-radiation to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Then Surgery or Radiation in Patients Stage Ib2-early IIb Cervical Carcinoma

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01000415
Acronym
TGOCphaseIII
Enrollment
824
Registered
2009-10-23
Start date
2009-06-30
Completion date
2018-06-30
Last updated
2010-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Cancer

Keywords

Stage Ib2-early IIb of cervical cancer, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Cisplatin plus gemcitabine, Radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy, Quality of life, Stage Ib2-IIb of cervical cancer patients

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is: * to compare the effectiveness between the new strategy of treatment (given cis-platinum plus gemcitabine-neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery),and standard treatment (given cis-platinum/carboplatin during radiation-concurrent chemoradiation)in specific group of cervical cancer patients (stage Ib2-early IIb) * to evaluate quality of life in both group of patients(standard treatment vs.experimental group)

Detailed description

According to FIGO classification of cervical cancer, stage Ib2 was classified as clinically visible lesion more than 4.0 cm in greatest dimension and stage IIb was classified tumor invades parametrium must not to pelvic wall. These were the common stages in Thai cervical cancer patients,and made a troublesome effect to Thai women. According to this study,stage early IIb with 1/3 of parametrium involvement. Mostly these two stage was treated with concurrent chemoradiation, challenging the possibility of late sequelae of radiation effect. This specific group of patients can be avoid the referred side effect by using neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy and para-aortic node sampling in operable cases (at least partial response- PR) and concurrent chemoradiation (CCR) in inoperable cases (less than PR). Due to high risk type of these subspecific group, combination chemotherapy instead of single chemotherapy was used as CCR. However in operable cases with identified poor prognostic factor should be receive post operative radiation as the usual manner.

Interventions

Cisplatin 50 mg/m2 (in the vein)on day 1 of each 23 day cycle plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 (in the vein) on day 1 and day 8, for 3 cycles: until progression or unacceptable toxicity develops.

Sponsors

National Research Council of Thailand
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Clinical Research Collaborative Network
CollaboratorNETWORK
Thai Gynecologic Oncology Collaborative Group
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Cervical cancer patients with FIGO stage Ib2-early IIb * Pathological proven squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous cell carcinoma * ECOG performance status 0-1 * No previous treatment for cervical cancer * Acceptable hematological,renal,liver function

Exclusion criteria

* Previous history of cancer * Underlying disease not fit for surgery * Psychological problem * Obvious pelvic/para-aortic node involvement * Pregnancy * HIV positive * History of bowel obstruction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Overall survival comparison between experimental treatment group and standard treatment group9 Years

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Comparing disease free survival between experimental treatment group and standard treatment group9 years

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

Primary ContactSaibua B. Chichareon, MD.
saibua.c@psu.ac.th66 74 451201
Backup ContactChutaporn - Dampan, BSc
djutapor@medicine.psu.ac.th66 74 451201

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026