Skip to content

High Dose of Erythropoietin Analogue After Cardiac Arrest

High Dose of Erythropoietin Analogue After Cardiac Arrest: a Multicentre, Randomised, Controlled Trial (Epo-ACR-02 Trial)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00999583
Acronym
Epo-ACR-02
Enrollment
500
Registered
2009-10-22
Start date
2009-10-31
Completion date
2014-05-31
Last updated
2025-11-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Comatose Survivors of Cardiac Arrest

Keywords

Cardiac arrest, erythropoietin, post-anoxic encephalopathy, neuroprotective drugs

Brief summary

The investigators hypothesised that the neuroprotective effects of erythropoietin and its analogues could lead to an improve outcome after cardiac arrest. To test this hypotheses, the investigators designed a randomized, multicentre, simple blind trial in which all participating patients will be receive usual treatments and 50% of them will also receive a high dose of epoetin alpha (an analogue of erythropoietin) in an add on fashion. The main end point will be the proportion of patients in each arm who will reach at day 60 the best level of recovery, using a 5 level score.

Detailed description

Rationale: A recent pilot study showed encouraging results regarding the potentially beneficial effects of high dose epoetin alpha (an analogue of erythropoietin) when administered early after cardiac arrest. In this open label and non randomized trial, a high proportion of patients survived without significant cerebral disability and without experiencing severe adverse events (CARIOU et al. Resuscitation 2008). Efficiency of this treatment should now be evaluated in a randomized trial. Hypotheses: An early administration of a high dose of epoetin alpha (Epo) after cardiac arrest resuscitation could improve the neurological outcome of these patients by comparison with standard treatment. The proportion of patients reaching the level 1 of the Pittsburgh CPC scale (i.e., no or minor cerebral disability) at day 60 could attain 45% in the interventional group versus 30% as expected in the control group. Design: Multicentre, randomised, controlled, simple blind trial (add on study). Main goal: To test the efficiency of a high dose of Epo administered at the early stage of the post-cardiac arrest period regarding its ability to improve the neurological outcome of these patients, when compared with standard care (including hypothermia when indicated).

Interventions

DRUGEPOETINE ALPHA

5 injections of 40000 UI of EPO

OTHERControl arm

Usual take care of cardiac arrest

Sponsors

URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
CollaboratorOTHER
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 18 and 80 * Witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, presumed of cardiac origin (non asphyxic) * Time from cardiac arrest and recovery of circulatory activity less than 60 minutes * Persistent coma after ROSC (Coma Glasgow Scale \< 7)

Exclusion criteria

* Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with evidence of extra-cardiac cause (trauma, sepsis, acute respiratory insufficiency, asphyxia) * Previous or chronic treatment with erythropoietin or analogues * Pregnancy * Rapidly fatal underlying disease (expected life duration \< 6 months) * No social security

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of patients reaching a CPC (cerebral performance category) level 1 in each groupat day 60

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Distribution of patients in CPC (cerebral performance category) scaleat day 30 and day 60
ICU, hospital D30 and D60 mortalityduring hospitalization and at day 30 and day 60
All adverse events (including thrombotic events)until day 60

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026