Skip to content

Nebivolol Versus Metoprolol: Comparative Effects on Fatigue and Quality of Life

Nebivolol Vs. Metoprolol: Comparative Effects on Fatigue and Quality of Life

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00999102
Enrollment
37
Registered
2009-10-21
Start date
2009-10-31
Completion date
2011-01-31
Last updated
2018-10-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypertension

Keywords

hypertension, beta blockers, Metoprolol, blood pressure, high, antihypertensive agents, vascular resistance, adrenergic beta-receptor blockaders, beta-Adrenergic blockers, beta-Adrenergic Blocking Agents, beta-Adrenergic Receptor Blockaders, beta-Blockers, Adrenergic, Bystolic, Nebivolol, Nebivololum, Nebivololum [Latin], R65,824, Beloc- Zok, H 93/26 succinate, Metoprolol succinate, Seloken ZOC, Selozok, Spesicor Dos, Toprol XL, Toprol-XL, UNII-TH25PD4CCB

Brief summary

Beta-blockers are prescribed to millions of people for treatment of hypertension. Fatigue is a recognized and common side effect of beta-blockers that can have significant effects on quality of life. Worse, many people taking a beta-blocker for years are not even aware of the reduction of energy with which they are living. A new vasodilating beta-blocker, nebivolol, which is approved by the FDA for treatment of hypertension, appears to be far less associated with fatigue than are most currently available beta-blockers. The purpose of this study is to compare nebivolol with the current best-selling beta-blocker, metoprolol, and determine whether there is a significant difference in side effects including fatigue, reduced exertion tolerance, and reduced quality of life. In this study, 30 subjects will take each of the 2 study drugs for 8 weeks, consisting of 4 weeks at a lower dose, and 4 weeks at a higher dose. All dosages are FDA-approved for treatment of hypertension. Subjects and investigators will not know which drug is being administered until completion of the study. Subjects will undergo a treadmill stress test and will complete fatigue and quality of life questionnaires after each 4 weeks of treatment. An echocardiogram and non-invasive measurement of aortic blood pressure will be performed after 8 weeks on each drug. Also, blood will be drawn and stored for possible measurement of drug levels, after 4 and 8 weeks on each drug. Results on each drug will then be compared. If nebivolol is found to cause significantly less fatigue, it would be of substantial importance to the many millions of people who are on life-long beta-blocker therapy, and are living with reduced energy.

Detailed description

* Hypothesis: the beta-blocker nebivolol is associated with less fatigue than metoprolol, the most widely-prescribed beta-blocker * Methods: a double-blinded crossover trial comparing nebivolol with metoprolol. Experimental procedures: Subjects will undergo electrocardiogram and routine blood testing, unless such tests have been performed within 6 months and are available for review. Subjects entered into the study will receive each of the two study drugs for 8 weeks. Metoprolol succinate will be given at a dose of 50 mg daily for 4 weeks, then 100 mg daily for 4 weeks. For nebivolol, dosage will be 5 mg daily for 4 weeks and 10mg daily for 4 weeks. Identical-appearing pills will be given, and the drugs will be given in randomized order without a placebo run-in period. At the end of each 4-week treatment period on each drug, subjects will undergo a treadmill stress test (using the standard Cornell protocol), complete Quality of Life and fatigue questionnaires, and have blood drawn and frozen for later analysis for drug levels. At the end of 8 weeks of treatment on each drug, subjects will undergo echocardiography and applanation tonometry (non-invasive measurement of aortic blood pressure) to assess heart function. At the end of the study, the blinded subjects will be asked which of the two study drugs they preferred, and the extent to which their energy differed between the two drugs. -Rationale: Millions of hypertensive patients are on life-long beta-blocker therapy. In many, it reduces cardiac output and increases peripheral resistance to blood flow (1). It is well-established that beta-blockers cause fatigue in many patients and reduce exertion tolerance. Every physician knows this, and tacitly accepts that many patients are living with this unwelcome side effect. A new beta-blocker, nebivolol, has the standard beta-blocking effects, but also produces blood vessel relaxation (vasodilation), probably through increased secretion of the vasodilator nitric oxide. Studies indicate that nebivolol, unlike most beta-blockers, does not cause constriction of peripheral blood vessels, and is associated with improved heart function (2). Studies suggest that it is also less likely to cause fatigue (3). Personal experience is consistent with this, as I have observed marked improvement in energy in patients in whom I have prescribed nebivolol in place of a different beta-blocker. The possibility of placebo effect of course cannot be excluded. Nevertheless, the known hemodynamic differences between nebivolol and other beta-blockers, and the positive clinical experience, warrant formal study to determine whether nebivolol is kinder than other beta-blockers in terms of the important side effect of fatigue.

Interventions

DRUGMetoprolol

Metoprolol 50 mg, Metoprolol 100 mg,

DRUGNebivolol

Nebivolol 5 mg, Nebivolol 10 mg.

Sponsors

Forest Laboratories
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Individuals who are taking, or are about to begin taking, a beta-blocker, and who have the approved indication of hypertension

Exclusion criteria

* Orthopedic ailments that would interfere with performance of treadmill testing * Stroke or heart attack within the previous 1 year * Symptomatic coronary disease within the past year (angina, shortness of breath) * Clinically significant pulmonary disease (e.g. emphysema or asthma). * Poorly controlled hypertension (blood pressure above 160 systolic or 100 diastolic) * Patients with contra-indications to taking a beta-blocker (asthma or bradyarrhythmia) * History of tachyarrhythmia (abnormal rapid heart rate)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Questionnaire: Global Fatigue Score After 4 Weeks of Treatment on Each Drug/Dose Combination.After 4 weeks of treatment on each drug/dose combinationA 16 item scale that measures 4 dimensions of fatigue: severity, distress, timing, and degree of interference in activities of daily living. Range: 1 (no fatigue) to 50 (extreme fatigue).
Treadmill Exercise Time After 4 Weeks of Treatment on Each Drug/Dose Combination.After 4 weeks of treatment on each drug/dose combinationTreadmill Exercise Time After 4 Weeks of Treatment on Each Drug/Dose Combination (in minutes). The Treadmill Test was Performed at the 4-week Visit of Each Drug/Dose Combination.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited from the patient population of the Hypertension Center, and from an announcement at the medical center. Subjects were entered from 10/09 to 9/10, and the final subject completed the protocol in 1/11.

Pre-assignment details

Subjects who were on anti-hypertensives were instructed to continue their medications. Subjects taking a beta-blocker were instructed to stop them. There was no washout period. Individuals with a contraindication to beta-blockers were excluded. 4 subjects dropped out before starting medication for reasons unrelated to the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Study Participants
Participants who were randomized to receive either Nebivolol followed by Metoprolol or Metoprolol followed by Nebivolol.
33
Total33

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Study Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
12 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
21 Participants
Age, Continuous56.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
Region of Enrollment
United States
33 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 330 / 330 / 330 / 33
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 331 / 330 / 310 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 330 / 330 / 330 / 33

Outcome results

Primary

Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Questionnaire: Global Fatigue Score After 4 Weeks of Treatment on Each Drug/Dose Combination.

A 16 item scale that measures 4 dimensions of fatigue: severity, distress, timing, and degree of interference in activities of daily living. Range: 1 (no fatigue) to 50 (extreme fatigue).

Time frame: After 4 weeks of treatment on each drug/dose combination

Population: All participants who received both interventions and completed all study visits were included in the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Nebivolol 5 mg for 4 WeeksMultidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Questionnaire: Global Fatigue Score After 4 Weeks of Treatment on Each Drug/Dose Combination.18.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.2
Metoprolol 50 mg for 4 WeeksMultidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Questionnaire: Global Fatigue Score After 4 Weeks of Treatment on Each Drug/Dose Combination.18.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.2
Nebivolol 10 mg for 4 WeeksMultidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Questionnaire: Global Fatigue Score After 4 Weeks of Treatment on Each Drug/Dose Combination.21.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.8
Metoprolol 100 mg for 4 WeeksMultidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Questionnaire: Global Fatigue Score After 4 Weeks of Treatment on Each Drug/Dose Combination.20.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.9
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the Global Fatigue Score after 4 weeks of Nebivolol 5 mg (lower dose) vs. 4 weeks of Metoprolol 50 mg (lower dose).p-value: 0.6795% CI: [-1.86, 2.86]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the Global Fatigue Score after 4 weeks of Nebivolol 10 mg (higher dose) vs. 4 weeks of Metoprolol 100 mg (higher dose).p-value: 0.7295% CI: [-3.17, 4.55]t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Treadmill Exercise Time After 4 Weeks of Treatment on Each Drug/Dose Combination.

Treadmill Exercise Time After 4 Weeks of Treatment on Each Drug/Dose Combination (in minutes). The Treadmill Test was Performed at the 4-week Visit of Each Drug/Dose Combination.

Time frame: After 4 weeks of treatment on each drug/dose combination

Population: All participants who received both interventions and completed all study visits were included in the efficacy analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Nebivolol 5 mg for 4 WeeksTreadmill Exercise Time After 4 Weeks of Treatment on Each Drug/Dose Combination.833.9 minutesStandard Deviation 266.1
Metoprolol 50 mg for 4 WeeksTreadmill Exercise Time After 4 Weeks of Treatment on Each Drug/Dose Combination.840.9 minutesStandard Deviation 288.6
Nebivolol 10 mg for 4 WeeksTreadmill Exercise Time After 4 Weeks of Treatment on Each Drug/Dose Combination.841.2 minutesStandard Deviation 265.4
Metoprolol 100 mg for 4 WeeksTreadmill Exercise Time After 4 Weeks of Treatment on Each Drug/Dose Combination.867.1 minutesStandard Deviation 249.8
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in Treadmill Exercise Time after 4 weeks of Nebivolol 5 mg (lower dose) vs. 4 weeks of Metoprolol 50 mg (lower dose).p-value: 0.8995% CI: [-108.99, 94.92]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in Treadmill Exercise Time after 4 weeks of Nebivolol 10 mg (higher dose) vs. 4 weeks of Metoprolol 100 mg (higher dose).p-value: 0.4395% CI: [-91.55, 39.75]t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026