Skip to content

Arrested Versus Beating Heart Techniques in Coronary Revascularisation

Arrested Versus Beating Heart Techniques in Coronary Revascularisation: Randomized Clinical Trial in Unselected Patients

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00999089
Enrollment
616
Registered
2009-10-21
Start date
2003-01-31
Completion date
2010-09-30
Last updated
2009-10-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Keywords

Coronary disease, Coronary artery bypass grafting, Cardiopulmonary bypass, Extracorporeal circulation, Cardioplegia, Off pump

Brief summary

The individual contribution of the specific injuring mechanisms surgical trauma, extracorporeal circulation, and ischemia/reperfusion to clinical outcome in coronary revascularisation remains to be elucidated. The effect of these factors is analyzed in this randomized clinical trial by comparing the 3 surgical approaches: Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CCAB), with extracorporeal circulation and cardioplegic arrest; Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (OPCAB), avoids extracorporeal circulation and global myocardial ischemia; and Pump-Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (PACAB), with an unloaded and beating heart. The hypothesis addressed by the study is that the surgical invasiveness increases in the order: OPCAB, PACAB, CCAB.

Interventions

PROCEDUREConventional Coronary Artery Bypass

Coronary artery bypass grafting with extracorporeal circulation and cardioplegic arrest

Coronary artery bypass grafting without extracorporeal circulation or global myocardial ischemia

PROCEDUREPump-Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass

Coronary artery bypass grafting with a beating but unloaded heart by using extracorporeal circulation

Sponsors

Medtronic
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with double- or triple-vessel coronary artery disease * patients with left ventricular ejection fraction =\< 40% or \>= 60% * elective or urgent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting

Exclusion criteria

* previous cardiac surgery * emergency indications

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
New requirement of hemodialysisin hospital
Stroke1, 6, 12, 24, 48 month
Low-output syndromein hospital
duration of ventilation >= 24hin hospital
All cause mortality1, 6, 12, 24, 48 month
Myocardial infarction1, 6, 12, 24, 48 month

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Re-revascularization of the target vessel (PCI and/or CABG)1, 6, 12, 24, 48 month
Resource use (operative time, duration of stay in the intensive care unit, total hospital stay)in hospital
Completeness of revascularizationin hospital

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026