Skip to content

Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting Stent vs Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With DIABETES Mellitus

Randomized Comparison of Everolimus- Eluting Stent Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation for De Novo Coronary Artery DisEase in Patients With DIABETES Mellitus

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00997763
Acronym
ESSENCE-DM
Enrollment
300
Registered
2009-10-19
Start date
2008-07-31
Completion date
2015-08-31
Last updated
2016-12-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

stenting, XIENCE V, CYPHER

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to establish the safety and effectiveness of coronary stenting with the Everolimus- Eluting stent compared to the Sirolimus-Eluting stent in the treatment of de novo coronary stenosis in patients with diabetic patients.

Detailed description

Diabetic patients often present unfavorable coronary anatomy with small and diffusely diseased vessels (1) and exhibit exaggerated neointimal hyperplasia after bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation as compared with nondiabetics (2). Although drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation significantly reduced the neointimal hyperplasia and angiographic restenosis compared to BMS in diabetic patients (3), presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) have been still associated with an increased risk of restenosis and unfavorable clinical outcomes in the era of DES (4,5). Recently, the relative efficacies of sirolimua-eluting stent (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) in patients with DM have been evaluated in randomized and registry studies (6-10). The present study, ESSENCE-DIABETES Study, compare 8-month angiographic and 1-year clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with sirolimus-eluting stent (CYPHER) or everolimus-eluting stent (XIENCE V)

Interventions

DEVICEXIENCE V

everolimus-eluting stent

DEVICECYPHER

sirolimus-eluting stent

Sponsors

CardioVascular Research Foundation, Korea
CollaboratorOTHER
Seung-Jung Park
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diabetic patients with angina and documented ischemia or patients with documented silent ischemia * Patients who are eligible for intracoronary stenting * Age \>18 years, \<75 ages * De novo lesion * Percent diameter stenosis ≥50% * Reference vessel size ≥ 2.5 mm by visual estimation

Exclusion criteria

* History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy * Pregnant state * Known hypersensitivity or contra-indication to contrast agent and heparin * Limited life-expectancy (less than 1 year) * Acute ST elevation myocardial infarction on admission * Characteristics of lesion 1. Left main disease 2. In-stent restenosis 3. Graft vessels * Hematological disease (Neutropenia \<3000/mm3, Thrombocytopenia \<100,000/mm3) * Hepatic dysfunction, liver enzyme (ALT and AST) elevation ≥ 3 times normal * Renal dysfunction, creatinine ≥ 2.0mg/dL * Contraindication to aspirin, clopidogrel or cilostazol * Left ventricular ejection fraction \<30% * Patients who are actively participating in another drug or device investigational study, which have not completed the primary endpoint follow-up period. * Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with life expectancy \<1 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Angiographic in-segment late loss at angiography8-month

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Cardiac death12 months
Myocardial infarction12 months
Target vessel revascularization (all and ischemia-driven)12 months
All-cause Death12 month
Stent thrombosis by definition of Academic Research Consortium (ARC)12 months
Binary restenosis in both in-stent and in-segment8 months
Angiographic pattern of restenosis8 months
Target lesion revascularization (all and ischemia-driven)5 year

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026