Skip to content

Fluticasone Furoate Treatment of Daytime Somnolence and Cognitive Performance in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

A Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Randomized Trial Evaluating the Effects of Fluticasone Nasal Spray in Subjects With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis and a History of Sleep Disturbance on Cognitive Performance and Daytime Sleepiness

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00997620
Enrollment
40
Registered
2009-10-19
Start date
2010-03-31
Completion date
2010-10-31
Last updated
2018-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

Keywords

Hay Fever, Daytime somnolence, Cognition

Brief summary

The hypothesis is that treating hay fever patients who had daytime sleepiness and slowed thinking because of the hay fever will improve when treated with an effective anti-hay fever medication, an intranasal steroid, that is will have less daytime sleepiness and demonstrate better thinking.

Detailed description

In this study of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis we will monitor daytime sleepiness as measured by validated daytime sleep score (Eppworth Daytime Sleepiness Scale) and cognitive performance weekly as measured by a validated test of cognitive performance (TOVA). The treatment group with intervention of fluticasone furoate nasal spray 110 mcg two sprays in each nostril once daily will be compared to a placebo treated group of similar subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Interventions

DRUGFluticasone furoate Nasal Spray 110 mcg

Fluticasone fuorate nasal spray 110 mcg 2 sprays each nostril am will be compared to similar appearing placebo given 2 sprays each nostril am. The subjects will receive one week placebo nasal spray to establish a baseline then they will then be switched to a nasal spray of fluticasone furoate 110 mcg once daily and continue the evaluations.

DRUGPlacebo

Fluticasone nasal spray 2 sprays each nostril will be compared to similar appearing placebo. The subjects will receive one week placebo nasal spray to establish a baseline then they will then be switched to a nasal spray of Placebo once daily and continue the evaluations.

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Western Sky Medical Research
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Symptomatic seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms for at least 2 years at the time of study in the season of the study. * Allergy skin tests positive for the airborne allergens present at the study time within the past 12 months. * A score of 2 or more on the NRQLQ of the Rhinitis Quality of LIfe Questionnaire. * Active allergic rhinitis on 4 of 7 days during run-in week, and evidence on sleep scales of drowsiness on 3 of 7 days. * Ability to read, understand and give informed consent. * Ability to understand and carry out responsibilities of the study

Exclusion criteria

* Any chronic disease or other acute disease, which could influence central nervous system. * The use of any medication, which could affect central nervous system function. * Unwillingness to participate in the study. * Inability to understand testing procedures or use of medication. * Hypersensitivity to fluticasone or vehicle of nasal sprays. * Any sleep disorders including obstructive sleep apnea.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Performance on Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) - a Standardized Test of Cognitive Performanceover 2 weeksThe outcomes measures for TOVA are errors of omission. Targets which were not identified. Errors of commission are when targets are identified incorrectly. Reaction time is reported as the average time in milliseconds for the responses. The results are reported as mean and standard deviation as baseline and after 2 weeks of intervention. The difference between the means was evaluated by paired t testing.
Performance on Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) - a Standardized Test of Cognitive Performance, Errors of Commission.after 2 weeks interventionThe outcomes measures for TOVA are errors of commission. Targets which were identified incorrectly. Targets which are not identified, errors of omission and average time of each target viewing.
Performance on Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) - a Standardized Test of Cognitive Performance, Response Time for Targets.over 2 weeksThe outcomes measures for TOVA are the length of time to respond to targets. The time function represents the average time spent in milliseconds spent on each target.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Epworth Sleep ScaleBaseline and after 2 weeks interventionThe Epworth sleepiness scale measures is a validated test of daytime sleepiness which involved the subjects answering 8 questions. Each question is answered on a 0 - 3 scale with 3 being the most likely associated with drowsiness. The score is reported as a composite score of 8 questions, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 24. A higher composite score represents more likelihood of daytime sleepiness. It is administered between 1500 and 1700 daily.
Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionaire2 weeksIn nocturnal rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire instrument to measure the effects of nasal disorder on nighttime sleep and awakening. It consists of 16 questions. The scale is from 0-6, 0 being not troubled and 6 reflecting extreme trouble. This survey is interpreted as a minimal clinically important difference of each question. A change of +/- 0.5 is a threshold of minimally important clinical difference. Higher value mean more disturbance.
Nasal Symptom Scores2 weeksTotal nasal symptom score was measured AM and PM. The reflective scale measures subjective symptoms over the previous 12 hours. Instantaneous symptoms measure how subjects felt at the present time. The score consists of subjective perception of nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, nasal itching and sneezing. The scale for each symptom is 0 - not present, 1- mild (present but minimal), 2 - moderate (symptoms are bothersome but tolerable), 3 - severe (symptoms are not tolerable). The baseline value was the mean of the 7 day placebo run-in for the combined scores. This was calculated for the placebo group and the fluticasone group for both the instantaneous and the reflective scores. The intervention time utilized the same combined AM and PM reflective and instantaneous scoring. The data was analyzed using two sample t test comparison of the placebo vs fluticasone furoate group. Low value, less symptoms. High value, more symptoms. Minimum score is 0. Maximum score is 24.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo for comparison Placebo: Fluticasone nasal spray 2 sprays each nostril will be compared to similar appearing placebo
19
Fluticasone Furoate
Active treatment Fluticasone furoate Nasal Spray: Fluticasone nasal spray 2 sprays each nostril will be compared to similar appearing placebo
21
Total40

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboFluticasone FuroateTotal
Age, Continuous36 years38 years37 years
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants10 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants11 Participants20 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 190 / 21
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 190 / 21
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 190 / 21

Outcome results

Primary

Performance on Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) - a Standardized Test of Cognitive Performance

The outcomes measures for TOVA are errors of omission. Targets which were not identified. Errors of commission are when targets are identified incorrectly. Reaction time is reported as the average time in milliseconds for the responses. The results are reported as mean and standard deviation as baseline and after 2 weeks of intervention. The difference between the means was evaluated by paired t testing.

Time frame: over 2 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPerformance on Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) - a Standardized Test of Cognitive PerformanceBaseline2.63 number of errorsStandard Deviation 2.98
PlaceboPerformance on Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) - a Standardized Test of Cognitive PerformanceAfter 2 weeks intervention1.20 number of errorsStandard Deviation 1.24
Fluticasone FuroatePerformance on Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) - a Standardized Test of Cognitive PerformanceBaseline3.95 number of errorsStandard Deviation 3.18
Fluticasone FuroatePerformance on Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) - a Standardized Test of Cognitive PerformanceAfter 2 weeks intervention1.83 number of errorsStandard Deviation 1.9
Primary

Performance on Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) - a Standardized Test of Cognitive Performance, Errors of Commission.

The outcomes measures for TOVA are errors of commission. Targets which were identified incorrectly. Targets which are not identified, errors of omission and average time of each target viewing.

Time frame: after 2 weeks intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPerformance on Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) - a Standardized Test of Cognitive Performance, Errors of Commission.Baseline2.33 non identified targetsStandard Deviation 4.54
PlaceboPerformance on Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) - a Standardized Test of Cognitive Performance, Errors of Commission.After 2 weeks intervention5.75 non identified targetsStandard Deviation 14.1
Fluticasone FuroatePerformance on Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) - a Standardized Test of Cognitive Performance, Errors of Commission.Baseline1.54 non identified targetsStandard Deviation 3.72
Fluticasone FuroatePerformance on Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) - a Standardized Test of Cognitive Performance, Errors of Commission.After 2 weeks intervention1.58 non identified targetsStandard Deviation 4.11
Primary

Performance on Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) - a Standardized Test of Cognitive Performance, Response Time for Targets.

The outcomes measures for TOVA are the length of time to respond to targets. The time function represents the average time spent in milliseconds spent on each target.

Time frame: over 2 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPerformance on Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) - a Standardized Test of Cognitive Performance, Response Time for Targets.Baseline387.58 millisecondsStandard Deviation 77.03
PlaceboPerformance on Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) - a Standardized Test of Cognitive Performance, Response Time for Targets.After 2 weeks intervention412.47 millisecondsStandard Deviation 66.16
Fluticasone FuroatePerformance on Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) - a Standardized Test of Cognitive Performance, Response Time for Targets.Baseline363.38 millisecondsStandard Deviation 61.91
Fluticasone FuroatePerformance on Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) - a Standardized Test of Cognitive Performance, Response Time for Targets.After 2 weeks intervention391.81 millisecondsStandard Deviation 91.41
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionaire

In nocturnal rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire instrument to measure the effects of nasal disorder on nighttime sleep and awakening. It consists of 16 questions. The scale is from 0-6, 0 being not troubled and 6 reflecting extreme trouble. This survey is interpreted as a minimal clinically important difference of each question. A change of +/- 0.5 is a threshold of minimally important clinical difference. Higher value mean more disturbance.

Time frame: 2 weeks

Population: The NRQLQ values represent the average for each intervention.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life QuestionaireDifficulty getting to sleep-0.158 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.384
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life QuestionaireUnable to get a good nights sleep-0.579 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.369
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life QuestionaireRestless (tossing and turning)-0.789 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.329
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life QuestionaireHaving to get up because of stuffy nose.-0.632 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.298
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life QuestionaireNasal congestion-0.7894 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.329
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life QuestionaireSinus pressure or pain-0.738 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.389
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life QuestionaireRunny nose-0.895 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.252
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life QuestionairePost-nasal drip-1.2105 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.493
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life QuestionaireHeadache-1.105 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.431
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life QuestionaireFeel tired and unrefreshed-1.158 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.448
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life QuestionaireNasal congestion or stuffy nose-0.684 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life QuestionaireCongestion in sinuses0.05 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.354
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionairetime to clear nighttime drainage after waking-0.474 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.299
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life QuestionaireNeed to rub nose or eyes-0.053 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0291
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life QuestionaireHave to take medication-0.474 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.337
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life QuestionaireHaving to avoid symptom triggers-0.474 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.345
Fluticasone FuroateChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life QuestionaireHaving to avoid symptom triggers-1.190 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.541
Fluticasone FuroateChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life QuestionaireDifficulty getting to sleep-0.67 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.326
Fluticasone FuroateChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life QuestionaireHeadache-1.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.576
Fluticasone FuroateChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life QuestionaireUnable to get a good nights sleep-0.904 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.389
Fluticasone FuroateChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionairetime to clear nighttime drainage after waking-1.190 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.418
Fluticasone FuroateChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life QuestionaireRestless (tossing and turning)-0.90 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
Fluticasone FuroateChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life QuestionaireFeel tired and unrefreshed-0.286 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.962
Fluticasone FuroateChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life QuestionaireHaving to get up because of stuffy nose.1.49 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.01
Fluticasone FuroateChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life QuestionaireHave to take medication-1.429 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.434
Fluticasone FuroateChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life QuestionaireNasal congestion-0.76 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.44
Fluticasone FuroateChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life QuestionaireNasal congestion or stuffy nose-0.857 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Fluticasone FuroateChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life QuestionaireSinus pressure or pain1.569 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.2494
Fluticasone FuroateChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life QuestionaireNeed to rub nose or eyes-1.4286 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.369
Fluticasone FuroateChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life QuestionaireRunny nose-0.429 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.405
Fluticasone FuroateChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life QuestionaireCongestion in sinuses-1.048 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.297
Fluticasone FuroateChange From Baseline in Nocturnal Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life QuestionairePost-nasal drip-1.333 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
Secondary

Change in Epworth Sleep Scale

The Epworth sleepiness scale measures is a validated test of daytime sleepiness which involved the subjects answering 8 questions. Each question is answered on a 0 - 3 scale with 3 being the most likely associated with drowsiness. The score is reported as a composite score of 8 questions, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 24. A higher composite score represents more likelihood of daytime sleepiness. It is administered between 1500 and 1700 daily.

Time frame: Baseline and after 2 weeks intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in Epworth Sleep ScaleBaseline13.28 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.42
PlaceboChange in Epworth Sleep ScaleAfter 2 weeks intervention12.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
Fluticasone FuroateChange in Epworth Sleep ScaleBaseline13.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.82
Fluticasone FuroateChange in Epworth Sleep ScaleAfter 2 weeks intervention10.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.48
Comparison: The statistical analysis was of t testing of the difference of the mean between the baseline and after two weeks. The power analysis was prior to data collection was not performed for this test. The null hypothesis is no different, no difference between placebo and active treatment.p-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Nasal Symptom Scores

Total nasal symptom score was measured AM and PM. The reflective scale measures subjective symptoms over the previous 12 hours. Instantaneous symptoms measure how subjects felt at the present time. The score consists of subjective perception of nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, nasal itching and sneezing. The scale for each symptom is 0 - not present, 1- mild (present but minimal), 2 - moderate (symptoms are bothersome but tolerable), 3 - severe (symptoms are not tolerable). The baseline value was the mean of the 7 day placebo run-in for the combined scores. This was calculated for the placebo group and the fluticasone group for both the instantaneous and the reflective scores. The intervention time utilized the same combined AM and PM reflective and instantaneous scoring. The data was analyzed using two sample t test comparison of the placebo vs fluticasone furoate group. Low value, less symptoms. High value, more symptoms. Minimum score is 0. Maximum score is 24.

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboNasal Symptom ScoresReflective Post 2 Weeks Therapy14.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.65
PlaceboNasal Symptom ScoresReflective Baseline13.53 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
PlaceboNasal Symptom ScoresInstaneous Baseline12.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.9
PlaceboNasal Symptom ScoresInstaneous Post 2 Weeks Therapy13.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.52
Fluticasone FuroateNasal Symptom ScoresReflective Baseline12.99 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.73
Fluticasone FuroateNasal Symptom ScoresInstaneous Post 2 Weeks Therapy10.84 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.34
Fluticasone FuroateNasal Symptom ScoresReflective Post 2 Weeks Therapy11.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.05
Fluticasone FuroateNasal Symptom ScoresInstaneous Baseline12.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.26

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026