Skip to content

Single-incision Laparoscopic (SILS) Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy for the Treatment of Acute Appendicitis

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Single-incision Laparoscopic (SILS) Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy for the Treatment of Acute Appendicitis

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00997516
Enrollment
75
Registered
2009-10-19
Start date
2010-05-31
Completion date
2014-01-31
Last updated
2014-08-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Appendicitis

Keywords

Laparoscopy, Appendicitis, Single-incision laparoscopic surgery, SILS

Brief summary

Recent advances in laparoscopic instrumentation have made it possible to perform intra-abdominal operations entirely through a small incision that can be hidden within the umbilicus. The goal is to perform surgery with fewer incisions and no visible scars. Other potential benefits are faster recovery, less pain, and fewer wound complications. The term SILS (Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery) is being used to describe such techniques, and many have touted SILS as a major breakthrough in minimally-invasive surgery, moving the field closer to surgery that is bloodless, incisionless, and painless. Despite the hype, prospective comparisons of SILS versus conventional laparoscopy are lacking. Results of SILS procedures have generally been limited to case reports and small case series that lack controls. The investigators propose to conduct a prospective, randomized, single-center trial of SILS appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy to treat acute appendicitis. Primary end-points are operative time, complication rate, postoperative pain, recovery time, and long-term cosmetic outcome. The investigators hypothesize SILS appendectomy is equivalent to laparoscopic appendectomy with respect to operative time, complication rate, postoperative pain, and recovery time while providing a better cosmetic outcome.

Detailed description

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AND METHODS Patient Enrollment: The study population will consist of patients who come to the emergency room with acute abdominal pain and are found to have acute appendicitis on the basis of clinical evaluation and CT of the abdomen/pelvis. At UCSF, such patients are first evaluated by a small group of general surgeons who provide emergency consultations. Once a decision to operate has been made on clinical grounds, the principal investigator (Dr. Carter) or his delegate will be contacted to approach the patient for enrollment and informed consent. All patients will receive standard care which consists of preoperative broad-spectrum antibiotics consisting of Zosyn, Ertapenem, or Cipro/Flagyl and intravenous fluids. Surgeon Enrollment: All surgeons at UCSF who take call in the Emergency Department routinely perform conventional laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Surgeons wishing to participate in the trial will perform 5 proctored SILS appendectomies outside of the trial before enrolling patients. We chose the number 5 because one study showed that SILS operative times (a surrogate for procedural mastery) leveled off by the 5th case for surgeons already proficient in laparoscopy. Randomization: After enrollment, patients will be assigned to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy versus SILS appendectomy in a 1:1 ratio by a computerized random number generator (http://www.random.org). Even-numbered patients will receive conventional laparoscopic appendectomy, odd-numbered will receive SILS appendectomy. Conventional laparoscopic appendectomy technique: Patients are placed in the supine position and given a general anesthetic. An orogastric tube is placed. Sequential compression devices are placed on the legs. Unless the patient has just voided, a Foley catheter is placed in the bladder. The left arm is tucked and the abdomen shaved as necessary. The umbilical skin is anesthetized with 5mL of 0.25% marcaine. A 1.5cm vertical or transverse skin incision is made within the umbilical stalk, the fascia is retracted, and a 1.5cm vertical fascial incision made with a scalpel. A 12mm Hasson port is placed through the fascia and the abdomen insufflated to 15mmHg with carbon dioxide gas. Alternatively, a small nick in the fascia can be made, a Veress needle used to achieve pneumoperitoneum, and a 12mm VersSTEP port placed through an introducer sheath. Diagnostic laparoscopy is then performed, with inspection of the stomach, liver, gallbladder, colon, small intestines, and pelvis. If a diagnosis other than acute appendicitis is made (such as pelvic inflammatory disease, sigmoid diverticulitis, cecal diverticulitis, Crohn's disease, perforated duodenal ulcer, etc.), the patient is excluded from the study and treated appropriately. If the appendix looks normal and no other pathology is found in the abdomen, the patient may stay enrolled in the study if the surgeon decides to remove the appendix. Additional 5mm ports are placed in the left lower quadrant and suprapubic midline after the skin and peritoneum are anesthetized with 0.25% marcaine. A 5mm camera is transferred to the left lower quadrant port site and the appendix is exposed and retracted anteriorly. The mesoappendix may be divided with EndoGIA staplers, Ligasure, cautery and clips, or Harmonic Scalpel. The base of the appendix may be ligated with EndoGIA staplers or Endoloop. The appendix is removed through the umbilical incision after first placing it into an EndoCatch bag. Minimal irrigation is used; perforated cases are treated with suctioning of intra-abdominal pus and postoperative antibiotics. Blood loss is estimated. Umbilical fascia length is measured in millimeters, then closed with 0-Maxon absorbable suture. The umbilical skin is anesthetized with 0.25% marcaine, and all skin edges re-approximated with 4-0 biosyn. Indermil glue is the only dressing. SILS Appendectomy Technique: Patients are placed in the supine position and given a general anesthetic. An orogastric tube is placed. Sequential compression devices are placed on the legs. Unless the patient has just voided, a Foley catheter is placed in the bladder. The left arm is tucked and the abdomen shaved as necessary. The base of the umbilical stalk is everted by two penetrating towel clamps placed either side of the midline. The skin is anesthetized with 5mL of 0.25% marcaine. A vertical skin incision is made within the umbilical stalk, the fascia is retracted, and a 3 cm vertical fascial incision made with a scalpel. The peritoneum is entered with either a gloved finger, Kelly clamp, or scissors. The incision is retracted anteriorly with an Army/Navy retractor, and the SILSPort inserted into the incision using a shoe-horn maneuver. 5mm trocars are placed in the SILSPort™, and the abdomen insufflated to 15mmHg with carbon dioxide gas, after which the trocars are repositioned into a staggered elevation. Diagnostic laparoscopy is then performed, with inspection of the stomach, liver, gallbladder, colon, small intestines, and pelvis. If a diagnosis other than acute appendicitis is made (such as pelvic inflammatory disease, sigmoid diverticulitis, cecal diverticulitis, Crohn's disease, perforated duodenal ulcer, etc.), the patient is excluded from the study and treated appropriately. If the appendix looks normal and no other pathology is found in the abdomen, the patient may stay enrolled in the study if the surgeon decides to remove the appendix. The appendix is exposed and retracted anteriorly. The mesoappendix may be divided with EndoGIA staplers, Ligasure, cautery and clips, or Harmonic Scalpel. The base of the appendix may be ligated with EndoGIA staplers or Endoloop. When staplers are used, one of the 5mm trocars is replaced with a 12mm trocar. The appendix is removed through the umbilical incision after first placing it into an EndoCatch bag. Minimal irrigation is used; perforated cases are treated with suctioning of intra-abdominal pus and postoperative antibiotics. Blood loss is estimated. Umbilical fascia length is measured in millimeters, then closed with 0-Maxon absorbable simple interrupted sutures. Skin edges re-approximated with 4-0 biosyn. Indermil glue is the primary dressing. Postoperative Care: Patients are given a full liquid diet immediately after surgery, and are advanced to an unrestricted diet as soon as the patient feels up to it. Pain is controlled by a hydromorphone PCA (patient-controlled analgesia) pump for at least 12 hours after surgery, after which oral pain medications are prescribed. If the patient is allergic to hydromorphone, morphine may be used. No supplemental pain medications (Motrin, Toradol, etc.) will be used for patients enrolled in the study. No steroids (e.g. Decadron) will be given. Antibiotics for appendicitis are given at the discretion of the attending surgeon. Patients are discharged at the discretion of the attending surgeon, generally when the patient can eat without vomiting, pain is controlled with oral medications, and the systemic inflammatory response to the appendicitis has subsided. After 2-3 weeks, follow-up occurs in Dr. Carter's clinic. The wounds are assessed for infection, seroma, or hernia. Date of return-to-work and date of last opiate pain medication are recorded. At 6 months, patients return to clinic and complete a survey. The survey includes a Body Image Questionnaire, a Cosmetic Appearance Scale, and a Photo Series Questionnaire, all of which have been validated.8-12 The Body Image Questionnaire measures patients' perception of and satisfaction with their own body and explores attitudes toward their bodily appearance. Five questions are asked, with up to four points assigned per question, totaling 20 possible points. The Cosmetic Appearance Scale assesses the degree of patient satisfaction about the physical appearance of the abdomen (and its scars) using 100-mm visual analogue scale. The patient is asked to make a mark along the horizontal scale that indicates the overall aesthetic appearance of the abdomen as a whole, and incisions separately. Numeric scores are then obtained by measuring the horizontal distance from the low end of the scale to the marking, rounded to the nearest millimeter. Finally, the Photo Series Questionnaire assesses whether knowledge of the cosmetic results of the alternative approach (SILS or conventional laparoscopic) influences the evaluation of the scar. It also measures the strength of the preference. Patients who do not return for follow-up will be mailed a survey and/or called for a telephone interview. Data management and interviews will be managed by a research assistant hired for the study. Definition of Study Variables and Outcome Measures Patient Characteristics: Age, height, weight, prior operations in the abdomen Intraoperative Variables: 1. Operative time - defined as the amount of time to perform the operation from skin-incision to application of the dressing. This time is routinely charted by the circulating nurse in the operating room. 2. Conversion - defined by the use of incisions and/or trocars in addition to the ones described in the Methods section, or the need to perform an open procedure. 3. Visceral or vascular injury - defined as injury to the intestines, colon, omentum, vasculature, or pelvic organs during the dissection requiring intervention (suture or stapled repair, use of hemostatic agents). 4. Umbilical fascia incision length (in millimeters). Postoperative Variables: 1. Mean pain score over 12 hours - Pain is assess by the ward nurse as needed, but at least every four hours, and documented in the patient's chart. Pain is scored on a scale of 0-10, 10 being the most severe pain imaginable. Average pain score for that patient is calculated over the first 12 hours (the time the patient is on a hydromorphone PCA) 2. Hydromorphone use over 12 hours - Total hydromorphone usage (in milligrams) is charted by the floor nurse. The amount used in the first 12 hours after surgery, starting from the time the patient is discharged from the recovery room, is recorded. 3. Length of stay - Number of calendar days the patient is hospitalized. 4. Wound infection - Defined as the need for additional antibiotics, prescribed beyond the perioperative antibiotics given for acute appendicitis, for the purpose or treating a wound cellulitis, or the need to open the wound to drain a wound abscess, within 6 months of surgery. 5. Deep space infection - Defined as the need for reoperation, readmission, or percutaneous drainage of a deep (organ space) infection within 6 months of surgery. All intra-abdominal abscesses are classified as deep space infections. 6. Wound seroma - Defined as an un-inflamed fluid collection under the skin incision \> 1cm in diameter identified within 6 months of surgery. 7. Time to return to work - Defined as the number of calendar days between discharge from the hospital and the first day back at work. 8. Date of last opiate pain medication use. 9. Readmission with 30 days. 10. Body Image Score at 6 months 11. Cosmetic Appearance Scale at 6 months. 12. Photo Series Questionnaire at 6 months.

Interventions

Use of SILSPort to perform laparoscopic appendectomy

conventional laparoscopic removal of the appendix

Sponsors

Medtronic - MITG
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of California, San Francisco
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1\. Suspected acute appendicitis on clinical and radiographic (CT) grounds

Exclusion criteria

1. Phlegmon, mass, peri-appendicecal abscess, or diffuse peritonitis 2. Prior open laparotomy with incision through the umbilicus 3. Body Mass Index \> 35 4. Age \<18 years 5. Mental illness, dementia, or inability to provide informed consent 6. Chronic pain requiring daily medication (including opiate and NSAIDs) 7. Pregnancy 8. Alternative diagnosis found by diagnostic laparoscopy (post-randomization)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain After Surgery12 hours post-surgeryMean pain score during 12 hours post-surgery, assessed by the ward nurse as needed, but at least every 4 hours, and documented in the patient's chart. Patients were asked to rate their pain on a scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being the most severe pain imaginable and 0 being no pain at all.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedures Requiring Conversion to Open or Additional Portduring surgery , up to 6 hoursPatients requiring use of additional incisions and/or trocars, or the need to perform an open procedure.
Visceral or Vascular Injuryduring surgery, up to 6 hoursNumber of participants who required intervention (suture or stapled repair, use of hemostatic agents) for injury to the intestines, colon, omentum, vasculature, or pelvic organs during the dissection.
Length of Stayup to 14 daysNumber of calendar days the participant was hospitalized.
Wound Infection6 monthsNumber of participants who required additional antibiotics, prescribed beyond the perioperative antibiotics given for acute appendicitis, for the purpose or treating a wound cellulitis.
Deep Space Infection6 monthsNumber of participants who required reoperation, readmission, or percutaneous drainage of a deep (organ space) infection within 6 months of surgery. All intra-abdominal abscesses were classified as deep space infections.
Operative Timeup to 6 hoursThe amount of time to perform the operation from skin-incision to application of the dressing. This time is routinely charted by the circulating nurse in the operating room.
Time to Return to Work30 daysNumber of calendar days between participants' discharge from the hospital and the first day back at work.
Readmission Within 30 Days.30 daysNumber of participants readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of surgery
Body Image Score at 6 Months6 monthsAfter a minimum of 6 months, a Body-Image Questionnaire was sent to participants. The questionnaire has 5 questions, with answers ranging from 1 (Extremely) to 4 (Not at all); lower scores indicate worse satisfaction with and perception of bodily appearance. Are you less satisfied with our body since the operation? Do you think the operation has damaged your body? Do you feel less attractive as a results of your operation? Do you feel less feminine or masculine as a result of your operation? Is it difficult to look at yourself naked?
Satisfaction With Physical Appearance of Abdomen and Scars at 6 Months.6 monthsThe Cosmetic Appearance Scale assessed the degree of satisfaction with the physical appearance of the abdomen (and its scars) using a visual analogue scale. Numeric scores were obtained by measuring the horizontal distance from the low end of the scale to the marking, and then normalized on a scale of 0-20 points. Higher scores indicate a higher degree of satisfaction. Since your operation, how would you describe the overall appearance of your abdomen? (Revolting; Beautiful) Since your operation, how would you describe your incisional scars? (Revolting; Beautiful) How satisfied are you with your incisional scars? (Very unsatisfied; Very satisfied) How much discomfort do your incisional scars cause? (Severe, daily pain; No pain at all) Can you score your own incisional scar? (Worst possible scar; Best possible scar)
Wound Seroma6 monthsNumber of participants who experienced un-inflamed fluid collection under the skin incision \> 1cm in diameter identified within 6 months of surgery.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study population consisted of all patients from May 2010 to November 2012 who presented to the emergency department and were diagnosed with acute appendicitis on the basis of clinical and radiographic evaluation.

Pre-assignment details

88 patients were assessed for eligibility. 5 patients were excluded because the study surgeon was unavailable to perform the procedure. 6 patients declined to participate.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
SILS Appendectomy
SILS appendectomy: Use of SILS Port to perform laparoscopic appendectomy
37
Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: conventional laparoscopic removal of the appendix
38
Total75

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSILS AppendectomyConventional Laparoscopic AppendectomyTotal
Age, Continuous34 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
35 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
34 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Region of Enrollment
United States
37 participants38 participants75 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants14 Participants32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants24 Participants43 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 374 / 38
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 370 / 38

Outcome results

Primary

Pain After Surgery

Mean pain score during 12 hours post-surgery, assessed by the ward nurse as needed, but at least every 4 hours, and documented in the patient's chart. Patients were asked to rate their pain on a scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being the most severe pain imaginable and 0 being no pain at all.

Time frame: 12 hours post-surgery

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SILS AppendectomyPain After Surgery4.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Conventional Laparoscopic AppendectomyPain After Surgery3.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
p-value: 0.01Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Body Image Score at 6 Months

After a minimum of 6 months, a Body-Image Questionnaire was sent to participants. The questionnaire has 5 questions, with answers ranging from 1 (Extremely) to 4 (Not at all); lower scores indicate worse satisfaction with and perception of bodily appearance. Are you less satisfied with our body since the operation? Do you think the operation has damaged your body? Do you feel less attractive as a results of your operation? Do you feel less feminine or masculine as a result of your operation? Is it difficult to look at yourself naked?

Time frame: 6 months

Population: 67 of 75 patients completed and returned follow-up surveys

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SILS AppendectomyBody Image Score at 6 MonthsDamage to body from operation3.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
SILS AppendectomyBody Image Score at 6 MonthsFemininity/masculinity affected by operation4.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
SILS AppendectomyBody Image Score at 6 MonthsPhysical attractiveness affected by operation3.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
SILS AppendectomyBody Image Score at 6 MonthsLooking at oneself naked3.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
SILS AppendectomyBody Image Score at 6 MonthsOverall body satisfaction3.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Conventional Laparoscopic AppendectomyBody Image Score at 6 MonthsLooking at oneself naked3.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Conventional Laparoscopic AppendectomyBody Image Score at 6 MonthsOverall body satisfaction3.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Conventional Laparoscopic AppendectomyBody Image Score at 6 MonthsDamage to body from operation3.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Conventional Laparoscopic AppendectomyBody Image Score at 6 MonthsPhysical attractiveness affected by operation4.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Conventional Laparoscopic AppendectomyBody Image Score at 6 MonthsFemininity/masculinity affected by operation4.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Comparison: Overall body satisfactionp-value: 0.86Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Damage to bodyp-value: 0.18Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Physical attractivenessp-value: 0.04Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Masculinity/femininityp-value: 0.34Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Looking at oneself nakedp-value: 0.63Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Deep Space Infection

Number of participants who required reoperation, readmission, or percutaneous drainage of a deep (organ space) infection within 6 months of surgery. All intra-abdominal abscesses were classified as deep space infections.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SILS AppendectomyDeep Space Infection1 participants
Conventional Laparoscopic AppendectomyDeep Space Infection0 participants
Secondary

Length of Stay

Number of calendar days the participant was hospitalized.

Time frame: up to 14 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SILS AppendectomyLength of Stay1.4 DaysStandard Deviation 0.8
Conventional Laparoscopic AppendectomyLength of Stay1.6 DaysStandard Deviation 1.8
Secondary

Operative Time

The amount of time to perform the operation from skin-incision to application of the dressing. This time is routinely charted by the circulating nurse in the operating room.

Time frame: up to 6 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SILS AppendectomyOperative Time54 minutesStandard Deviation 17
Conventional Laparoscopic AppendectomyOperative Time38 minutesStandard Deviation 12
p-value: <0.01t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Procedures Requiring Conversion to Open or Additional Port

Patients requiring use of additional incisions and/or trocars, or the need to perform an open procedure.

Time frame: during surgery , up to 6 hours

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SILS AppendectomyProcedures Requiring Conversion to Open or Additional Port1 participants
Conventional Laparoscopic AppendectomyProcedures Requiring Conversion to Open or Additional Port0 participants
Secondary

Readmission Within 30 Days.

Number of participants readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of surgery

Time frame: 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SILS AppendectomyReadmission Within 30 Days.2 participants
Conventional Laparoscopic AppendectomyReadmission Within 30 Days.1 participants
Secondary

Satisfaction With Physical Appearance of Abdomen and Scars at 6 Months.

The Cosmetic Appearance Scale assessed the degree of satisfaction with the physical appearance of the abdomen (and its scars) using a visual analogue scale. Numeric scores were obtained by measuring the horizontal distance from the low end of the scale to the marking, and then normalized on a scale of 0-20 points. Higher scores indicate a higher degree of satisfaction. Since your operation, how would you describe the overall appearance of your abdomen? (Revolting; Beautiful) Since your operation, how would you describe your incisional scars? (Revolting; Beautiful) How satisfied are you with your incisional scars? (Very unsatisfied; Very satisfied) How much discomfort do your incisional scars cause? (Severe, daily pain; No pain at all) Can you score your own incisional scar? (Worst possible scar; Best possible scar)

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Participants who returned surveys for long-term follow-up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SILS AppendectomySatisfaction With Physical Appearance of Abdomen and Scars at 6 Months.Appearance of scars16.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
SILS AppendectomySatisfaction With Physical Appearance of Abdomen and Scars at 6 Months.Discomfort of scars18.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
SILS AppendectomySatisfaction With Physical Appearance of Abdomen and Scars at 6 Months.Satisfaction with scars18.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
SILS AppendectomySatisfaction With Physical Appearance of Abdomen and Scars at 6 Months.Overall impression of scars18.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
SILS AppendectomySatisfaction With Physical Appearance of Abdomen and Scars at 6 Months.Appearance of abdomen16.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Conventional Laparoscopic AppendectomySatisfaction With Physical Appearance of Abdomen and Scars at 6 Months.Overall impression of scars16.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Conventional Laparoscopic AppendectomySatisfaction With Physical Appearance of Abdomen and Scars at 6 Months.Appearance of abdomen15.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
Conventional Laparoscopic AppendectomySatisfaction With Physical Appearance of Abdomen and Scars at 6 Months.Appearance of scars14.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
Conventional Laparoscopic AppendectomySatisfaction With Physical Appearance of Abdomen and Scars at 6 Months.Satisfaction with scars16.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
Conventional Laparoscopic AppendectomySatisfaction With Physical Appearance of Abdomen and Scars at 6 Months.Discomfort of scars18.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Comparison: Cosmetic appearance of abdomenp-value: 0.48t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Cosmetic appearance of scarsp-value: 0.09t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Satisfaction with scarsp-value: 0.25t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Discomfort of scarsp-value: 0.81t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Overall impression of scarsp-value: <0.01t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Time to Return to Work

Number of calendar days between participants' discharge from the hospital and the first day back at work.

Time frame: 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SILS AppendectomyTime to Return to Work8.1 DaysStandard Deviation 6.2
Conventional Laparoscopic AppendectomyTime to Return to Work6.9 DaysStandard Deviation 4.1
Secondary

Visceral or Vascular Injury

Number of participants who required intervention (suture or stapled repair, use of hemostatic agents) for injury to the intestines, colon, omentum, vasculature, or pelvic organs during the dissection.

Time frame: during surgery, up to 6 hours

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SILS AppendectomyVisceral or Vascular Injury0 participants
Conventional Laparoscopic AppendectomyVisceral or Vascular Injury0 participants
Secondary

Wound Infection

Number of participants who required additional antibiotics, prescribed beyond the perioperative antibiotics given for acute appendicitis, for the purpose or treating a wound cellulitis.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SILS AppendectomyWound Infection0 participants
Conventional Laparoscopic AppendectomyWound Infection0 participants
Secondary

Wound Seroma

Number of participants who experienced un-inflamed fluid collection under the skin incision \> 1cm in diameter identified within 6 months of surgery.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SILS AppendectomyWound Seroma1 participants
Conventional Laparoscopic AppendectomyWound Seroma0 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026