Skip to content

The Use of a High-frequency Ultrasonic Knife in Breast Cancer Surgery

Randomized Controlled Study of Benefits of Ultrasonic Knife in Breast Cancer Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00996632
Acronym
UKBC
Enrollment
94
Registered
2009-10-16
Start date
2000-09-30
Completion date
2004-11-30
Last updated
2009-11-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Keywords

breast cancer, ultrasonic knife, volume drainage

Brief summary

Background: Lymphatic stasis and seroma formation are common complications of axillary lymphadenectomy in breast cancer surgery. The investigators aim is to test the hypothesis that the use of an ultrasonic knife for axillary dissection reduces the total amount and duration of persistent drainage and length of hospital stay. Method: The investigators have conducted a randomized trial on 94 patients (1 male, 93 females, mean age 64.7 years) who presented to the investigators unit with operable breast carcinoma. Patients in group A (38 cases) were operated on using exclusively the ultrasonic knife. Patients in group B (56 cases) were operated on using the conventional diathermy knife.

Detailed description

The ultrasonic knife we have used in our study exploits the electrical impulses produced by a high-frequency ultrasound generator, transferred to a hand piece and converted into a mechanical movement at a frequency of 55.5 kHz (11,12) (Ultracision®, Ethicon Endo Surgery ). We have chosen this instrument because the relatively low temperatures generated in the process, ranging from 50 to 100 °C, result in a coagulative necrosis which allows both cutting and effective sealing of blood and lymphatic vessels, therefore preventing lymphatic leaks more effectively compared with conventional diathermy. The latter produces temperature up to 400 °C resulting in char formation and deleterious thermal effects to a distance of up to 1cm from the blade and extensive formation of necrotic tissue. We have estimated Using the data of a previous unpublished pilot study, the sample size required for our trial using the data of a previous unpublished pilot study, indicating that to detect a significant difference in length of stay (delta = 4of four days, with a mean standard deviationsdigma of = 4.5 days, between the two groups with a level of significance of alpha = 5% and a power of1 - beta = 90%), we needed to enroll was estimated in 28 patients in each group arm. As a precaution we decided to increase the sample size by 25% to 35 patients per group arm, in case we needed to use non-parametric tests in subsequent statistical analysis. A total of 94 patients with operable breast carcinoma were recruited between January 2000 and December 2004: 1 male and 93 females (min 34, q1 58, median 65, mean 64.7, q3 73, max 95). All patients underwent total mastectomy or quadrantectomy and 1st or 2nd level axillary lymphadenectomy. Patients were randomly allocated to two treatment groups: patients allocated to Group A were operated on using exclusively the ultrasonic knife (Ultracision®, Ethicon Endo Surgery) for both the mastectomy or quadrantectomy and axillary dissection (38 cases, mean age of 64.6 years, min 34, q1 58, median 66, q3 70, max 95); patients allocated to Group B (control group) were operated on using a conventional diarthermy knife was (56 cases, mean age of 65.0 years,min 37, q1 59, median 65, q3 74, max 89). In all cases the type of a redon n°14 suction drain was left in the axillary cavity and removed as soon as the amount of fluid dropped to 35 ml/24h or less. The patient was discharged home the same day the drain was removed. During the postoperative period the following data were collected: the total amount of fluid drained, the number of days the drain was leftof drainage, the length of post-operative stay, and early and late complications. Early complications were specifically recorded: wound seromas and hematomas, wound infections, necrosis of wound margins and period of time (in days) the seroma needed to be needle-aspirated following removal of the drain. Late complications recorded were lymphedema, strength and sensation deficits and chronic arm pain. A cost analysis was also done considering materials employed and length of hospital stay. Statistical analysis was done using open source R software, version 2.5.1 (18). The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to verify the normal distribution of data; heteroscedastic, normally distributed data were analysed using the F-test of variance; Student's t test was used for homoscedastic data. For non normally distributed data the non-parametric Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was used. Survival analysis was analysed using Cox's regression model, in the hypothesis of proportional risk.

Interventions

PROCEDUREultrasonic knife (Ultracision®, Ethicon Endo Surgery)

mastectomy or quadrantectomy and axillary dissection by an ultrasonic knife (Ultracision®, Ethicon Endo Surgery)

PROCEDUREconventional diarthermy knife

mastectomy or quadrantectomy and axillary dissection using conventional diarthermy knife

Sponsors

University of Trieste
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
36 Years to 95 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Operable breast cancer

Exclusion criteria

* Inoperable breast cancer * BMI \> 25 * Neoadiuvant radioterapy * Carcinomastitis * Previous phlebitis of omolateral arm * Collagen disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Drainage Volumedischarge dayvolume in milliliters of axillary drainage

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time of Dischargedaysevaluation about the time of discharge from hospital

Countries

Italy

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients affected by Breast Cancer

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ultrasonic
Patients were operated using an ultrasonic knife (Ultracision Ethicon TM)
38
Conventional
Patients were operated by a conventional diatherm knife
56
Total94

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyPhysician Decision00

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicConventionalUltrasonicTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
30 Participants19 Participants49 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
26 Participants19 Participants45 Participants
Age Continuous65.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
64.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
64.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
Region of Enrollment
Italy
56 participants38 participants94 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
56 Participants37 Participants93 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Drainage Volume

volume in milliliters of axillary drainage

Time frame: discharge day

Population: the number of participants for analysis was determined by mean of power sample size calculation

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
UltrasonicDrainage Volume182.6 millilitersStandard Deviation 267.1
ConventionalDrainage Volume525.2 millilitersStandard Deviation 629
Comparison: null hypothesis is that drainage volumes are not differentp-value: <0.05Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Time of Discharge

evaluation about the time of discharge from hospital

Time frame: days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
UltrasonicTime of Discharge4.5 DaysStandard Deviation 2.1
ConventionalTime of Discharge8.1 DaysStandard Deviation 5.1
Comparison: null hypothesis is that Stay in Hospital Days are not differentp-value: 0.05Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026