Skip to content

Clinical Trial for Non-responders Who Previously Participated in Eltrombopag Studies TPL 103922 or TPL 108390

An Open-label, Multi-centre Rollover Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Eltrombopag in Thrombocytopenic Subjects With Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection Who Are Otherwise Eligible to Initiate Antiviral Therapy (Peginterferon Alfa-2a or Peginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00996216
Acronym
ENABLE-ALL
Enrollment
27
Registered
2009-10-16
Start date
2009-09-30
Completion date
2013-02-28
Last updated
2013-12-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatitis C

Keywords

Peginterferon, Platelets, Ribavirin, Hepatitis C-related thrombocytopenia, Thrombocytopenia, Hepatitis C, Thrombopoietin

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to test the safety and tolerability of eltrombopag when used to increase and maintain platelet count. Platelet count to be maintained at a level sufficient to facilitate initiation of antiviral therapy, to minimize antiviral therapy dose reductions, and to avoid permanent discontinuation of antiviral therapy.

Interventions

DRUGEltrombopag

Eltrombopag starting at 25 mg dose and titrated in Part 1 of study to 50, 75, 100 mg. Platelet count must reach sufficient level to allow initiation of antiviral therapy. Eltrombopag dose may be adjusted during antiviral treatment phase of study to maintain platelet count to continue antiviral therapy without adjustment to antiviral dose.

Combination of either peginterferon alfa-2a or alfa-2b with ribavirin at investigator's discretion.

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Prior participation in protocol TPL103922 or TPL108390 and completed the Week 24 Follow Up Visit in TPL103922 or TPL108390 * Male or female ≥18 years old * Evidence of chronic HCV infection * While participating in TPL103922 or TPL108390, discontinued from study drug due to thrombocytopenia * Appropriate candidate for antiviral therapy with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin * Platelet count \<75,000 * Fertile males and females must use two forms of effective contraception during treatment and for 24 weeks after treatment * Ability to understand and comply with the protocol requirements and instructions * Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Decompensated liver disease * Known hypersensitivity, intolerance, or allergy to interferon, ribavirin, eltrombopag, or their ingredients * History of clinically significant bleeding from oesophageal or gastric varices * History of arterial or venous thrombosis and two or more of the following risk factors: hereditary thrombophilic disorders; hormone replacement therapy; systemic contraception (containing estrogen); smoking; diabetes; hypercholesterolemia; medication for hypertension or cancer * Pre-existing cardiac disease (congestive heart failure Grade III/IV) or arrhythmias known to involve the risk of thromboembolic events (e.g. atrial fibrillation) * Evidence of hepatocellular carcinoma * HIV or Hepatitis B infection * Therapy with anti-neoplastic or immunomodulatory treatment within six months prior to eltrombopag therapy * Malignancy diagnosed or treated within the past five years. Except for localized basal or squamous cell carcinoma treated by local excision or malignancies that were adequately treated and, in the opinion of the oncologist, have an excellent chance of cancer-free survival. * Pregnant or nursing women * Men with a female partner who is pregnant * History of alcohol/drug abuse or dependence within six months of the study start unless participating in a controlled rehabilitation programme. * Treatment with an investigational drug or interferon within 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) of the screening visit * History or platelet clumping that prevents reliable measurement of platelet counts * Evidence of portal vein thrombosis within three months of baseline visit

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With a logMAR Change >=0.15 During Parts 1 and 2From the start of investigational product up to the 24-week follow-up visit after the last dose in Part 2 or early withdrawal (up to 96 weeks)LogMAR (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) charts are used to measure an individual's visual acuity. LogMAR, expressed as the (decadic) logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (range from +1.00 to -0.30), converts the geometric sequence of a traditional chart to a linear scale. As there are 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the LogMAR chart represents a change of 0.1 log units.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 2From Day 0 of Part 2 (Antiviral Baseline Visit [between Study Day 14 and Study Day 65) to the completion of the follow-up period (up to Week 96/WD)Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hematology chemistry parameters. The DAIDS grades are utilized for measuring the severity of AEs. Grade 1, mild; Grade 2, moderate; Grade 3, severe; Grade 4, potentially life threatening.
Number of Participants With a Decrease in Visual Acuity During Parts 1 and 2From the start of investigational product up to the 24-week follow-up visit after the last dose in Part 2 or early withdrawal (up to 96 weeks)Visual acuity (VA) is defined as acuteness or clearness of vision.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change in logMAR Scale Values During Parts 1 and 2From the start of investigational product up to the 24-week follow-up visit after the last dose in Part 2 or early withdrawal (up to 96 weeks)LogMAR (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) charts are used to measure an individual's visual acuity. LogMAR, expressed as the (decadic) logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (range from +1.00 to -0.30), converts the geometric sequence of a traditional chart to a linear scale. As there are 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the LogMAR chart represents a change of 0.1 log units.
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) and Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE) in Part 1From the start of investigational product up to the start of antiviral therapy (up to 9 weeks; median of 21 days)An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, may jeopardize the participant or require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Refer to the general AE/SAE module for a list of AEs and SAEs.
Number of Participants With Any AE and Any SAE in Part 2From the date of initiation of antiviral therapy (Antiviral Baseline Visit [between Study Day 14 and Study Day 65]) to the completion of the follow-up period (up to Week 96/WD)An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, may jeopardize the participant or require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Refer to the general AE/SAE module for a list of AEs and SAEs.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1From Screening up to the start of antiviral therapy (up to 9 weeks; median of 21 days)Blood samples were collected for the measurement of clinical chemistry parameters. The DAIDS grades are utilized for measuring the severity of AEs. Grade 1, mild; Grade 2, moderate; Grade 3, severe; Grade 4, potentially life threatening.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2From Day 0 of Part 2 (Antiviral Baseline Visit [between Study Day 14 and Study Day 65) to the completion of the follow-up period (up to Week 96/WD)Blood samples were collected for the measurement of clinical chemistry parameters. The DAIDS grades are utilized for measuring the severity of AEs. Grade 1, mild; Grade 2, moderate; Grade 3, severe; Grade 4, potentially life threatening.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 1From Screening up to the start of antiviral therapy (up to 9 weeks; median of 21 days)Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hematology parameters. The DAIDS grades are utilized for measuring the severity of AEs. Grade 1, mild; Grade 2, moderate; Grade 3, severe; Grade 4, potentially life threatening.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Particpants Who Initiated Antiviral TherapyFrom the start of the investigational product up to 9 weeks (median of 21 days)The number of participants who completed the Pre-antiviral Phase (Part 1) and proceeded to the Antiviral Phase (Part 2) are summarized.
Number of Participants Achieving Antiviral Treatment Milestones of Sustained Virological Response (SVR), Rapid Virological Response (RVR), Early Virological Response (EVR), and End of Treatment Response (ETR)From the start of investigational product in Part 2 up to the 24-week follow-up visit after the last dose in Part 2 or early withdrawal (up to 96 weeks)SVR is defined as non-detectable Hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) at 24 weeks post-completion of the planned treatment period (i.e., Week 48 or 72 for genotype 2/3 or Week 72 for non-genotype 2/3). RVR is defined as undetectable HCV RNA after 4 weeks of antiviral treatment. EVR is defined as clinically significant reduction in HCV RNA (\>=2 log10 drop or undetectable) after 12 weeks of antiviral treatment. ETR is defined as undetectable HCV RNA at the end of antiviral treatment.
Platelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsFrom the start of investigational product up to the 24-week follow-up visit after the last dose in Part 2 or early withdrawal (up to 96 weeks)Blood samples were collected for the measurement of platelet count. For each participant, the duration of Part 1 treatment varies between 2 and 9 weeks.

Countries

Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Pakistan, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

10\^9 cells (Giga) per liter=Gi/L; participants=par.; polyethylene glycol=Peg; interferon=INF.

Pre-assignment details

In Part (P) 1, the treatment goal was to increase the platelet count to \>=90 Gi/L. In P 2, par. continued on the selected P 1 dose of eltrombopag (dose effectively raising platelets to \>=90 or \>=100 Gi/L). Eltrombopag was given in combination with antiviral therapy (Peg INF alfa-2a or Peg INF alfa-2b and ribavirin) for the duration of treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Eltrombopag
In the Pre-antiviral Treatment Phase, participants (par.) with a platelet count of \<75000/microliter (µL) received eltrombopag once daily for a minimum of 2 weeks and a maximum of 9 weeks in sequential dose escalations (25 milligrams \[mg\] for a minimum of 2 weeks, 50 mg for 1-2 weeks, 75 mg for 1-2 weeks, and 100 mg for 1-3 weeks) until platelet counts reached either \>=90000/µL or 100000/µL. Par. who achieved the desired platelet count continued with eltrombopag in Part 2 along with antiviral treatment. Par. who did not achieve the desired platelet count completed the follow-up visits and were withdrawn from the study. Once the desired platelet counts were reached in Part 1 (\>=90 Gi/L or \>=100 Gi/L), par. continued to receive the dose of eltrombopag from Part 1 and polyethylene glycol (Peg) interferon (INF) alfa-2a (\>=90 Gi/L) or Peg IFN alfa-2b (\>=100 Gi/L) plus ribavirin. Dose adjustments of eltrombopag were permitted to achieve and maintain an appropriate platelet count.
27
Total27

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Part 1 (Pre-Antiviral Treatment Phase)Withdrawal by Subject1
Part 2 (Antiviral Treatment Phase)Lost to Follow-up3
Part 2 (Antiviral Treatment Phase)Withdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEltrombopag
Age Continuous51.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Central/South Asian Heritage
2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
25 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 2725 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 275 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With a Decrease in Visual Acuity During Parts 1 and 2

Visual acuity (VA) is defined as acuteness or clearness of vision.

Time frame: From the start of investigational product up to the 24-week follow-up visit after the last dose in Part 2 or early withdrawal (up to 96 weeks)

Population: Entire Safety Population: all participants in the Pre-antiviral Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With a Decrease in Visual Acuity During Parts 1 and 2Decrease in Visual Acuity, Yes10 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With a Decrease in Visual Acuity During Parts 1 and 2Decrease in Visual Acuity, No15 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With a Decrease in Visual Acuity During Parts 1 and 2Decrease in Visual Acuity, Missing or Unknown2 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With a logMAR Change >=0.15 During Parts 1 and 2

LogMAR (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) charts are used to measure an individual's visual acuity. LogMAR, expressed as the (decadic) logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (range from +1.00 to -0.30), converts the geometric sequence of a traditional chart to a linear scale. As there are 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the LogMAR chart represents a change of 0.1 log units.

Time frame: From the start of investigational product up to the 24-week follow-up visit after the last dose in Part 2 or early withdrawal (up to 96 weeks)

Population: Entire Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With a logMAR Change >=0.15 During Parts 1 and 2logMAR change, Yes4 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With a logMAR Change >=0.15 During Parts 1 and 2logMAR change, No21 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With a logMAR Change >=0.15 During Parts 1 and 2logMAR change, Missing or Unknown2 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) and Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE) in Part 1

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, may jeopardize the participant or require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Refer to the general AE/SAE module for a list of AEs and SAEs.

Time frame: From the start of investigational product up to the start of antiviral therapy (up to 9 weeks; median of 21 days)

Population: Pre-antiviral Safety Population: all participants who received study drug in the Pre-antiviral Treatment Phase (Part 1) of the study

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) and Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE) in Part 1Any SAE0 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) and Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE) in Part 1Any AE9 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Any AE and Any SAE in Part 2

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, may jeopardize the participant or require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Refer to the general AE/SAE module for a list of AEs and SAEs.

Time frame: From the date of initiation of antiviral therapy (Antiviral Baseline Visit [between Study Day 14 and Study Day 65]) to the completion of the follow-up period (up to Week 96/WD)

Population: Antiviral Safety Population: all participants who entered the Antiviral Treatment Phase (Part 2) of the study and who received at least one dose of antiviral therapy

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Any AE and Any SAE in Part 2Any SAE5 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With Any AE and Any SAE in Part 2Any AE25 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Change in logMAR Scale Values During Parts 1 and 2

LogMAR (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) charts are used to measure an individual's visual acuity. LogMAR, expressed as the (decadic) logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (range from +1.00 to -0.30), converts the geometric sequence of a traditional chart to a linear scale. As there are 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the LogMAR chart represents a change of 0.1 log units.

Time frame: From the start of investigational product up to the 24-week follow-up visit after the last dose in Part 2 or early withdrawal (up to 96 weeks)

Population: Entire Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Change in logMAR Scale Values During Parts 1 and 2logMAR Changes, >=0.10 to <0.20 (Loss of 1 Line)6 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Change in logMAR Scale Values During Parts 1 and 2logMAR Changes, >=0.20 to <0.30 (Loss of 2 Lines)3 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Change in logMAR Scale Values During Parts 1 and 2logMAR Changes, >=0.30 (Loss of 3 Lines or more)1 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Change in logMAR Scale Values During Parts 1 and 2logMAR Changes, <0.10 (No Change or Improvement)15 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Change in logMAR Scale Values During Parts 1 and 2logMAR Changes, Missing or Unknown2 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 1

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hematology parameters. The DAIDS grades are utilized for measuring the severity of AEs. Grade 1, mild; Grade 2, moderate; Grade 3, severe; Grade 4, potentially life threatening.

Time frame: From Screening up to the start of antiviral therapy (up to 9 weeks; median of 21 days)

Population: Pre-antiviral Safety Population. Only participants with data available at the specified time point were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 1Total neutrophils, Any Increase3 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 1Total neutrophils, Increase to Grade 13 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 1White Blood cell count, Increase to Grade 40 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 1Hemoglobin, Any Increase2 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 1Hemoglobin, Increase to Grade 12 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 1Hemoglobin, Increase to Grade 20 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 1Hemoglobin, Increase to Grade 30 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 1Hemoglobin, Increase to Grade 40 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 1Lymphocytes, Any Increase3 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 1Lymphocytes, Increase to Grade 11 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 1Lymphocytes, Increase to Grade 21 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 1Lymphocytes, Increase to Grade 31 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 1Lymphocytes, Increase to Grade 40 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 1Total neutrophils, Increase to Grade 20 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 1Total neutrophils, Increase to Grade 30 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 1Total neutrophils, Increase to Grade 40 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 1White Blood cell count, Any Increase2 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 1White Blood cell count, Increase to Grade 10 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 1White Blood cell count, Increase to Grade 22 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 1White Blood cell count, Increase to Grade 30 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of clinical chemistry parameters. The DAIDS grades are utilized for measuring the severity of AEs. Grade 1, mild; Grade 2, moderate; Grade 3, severe; Grade 4, potentially life threatening.

Time frame: From Day 0 of Part 2 (Antiviral Baseline Visit [between Study Day 14 and Study Day 65) to the completion of the follow-up period (up to Week 96/WD)

Population: Antiviral Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Total bilirubin, Increase to Grade 40 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Alanine amino transferase, Any Increase4 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Alanine amino transferase, Increase to Grade 13 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Alanine amino transferase, Increase to Grade 20 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Alanine amino transferase, Increase to Grade 31 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Alanine amino transferase, Increase to Grade 40 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Albumin, Any Increase9 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Albumin, Increase to Grade 14 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Albumin, Increase to Grade 25 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Albumin, Increase to Grade 30 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Albumin, Increase to Grade 40 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Alkaline phosphatase, Any Increase7 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Alkaline phosphatase, Increase to Grade 17 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Alkaline phosphatase, Increase to Grade 20 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Alkaline phosphatase, Increase to Grade 30 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Alkaline phosphatase, Increase to Grade 40 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Aspartate amino transferase, Any Increase9 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Aspartate amino transferase, Increase to Grade 11 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Aspartate amino transferase, Increase to Grade 28 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Aspartate amino transferase, Increase to Grade 30 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Aspartate amino transferase, Increase to Grade 40 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Creatinine, Any Increase1 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Creatinine, Increase to Grade 10 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Creatinine, Increase to Grade 20 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Creatinine, Increase to Grade 31 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Creatinine, Increase to Grade 40 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Total bilirubin, Any Increase16 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Total bilirubin, Increase to Grade 11 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Total bilirubin, Increase to Grade 25 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Total bilirubin, Increase to Grade 310 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Uric acid, Any Increase5 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Uric acid, Increase to Grade 14 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Uric acid, Increase to Grade 21 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Uric acid, Increase to Grade 30 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameter During Part 2Uric acid, Increase to Grade 40 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 2

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hematology chemistry parameters. The DAIDS grades are utilized for measuring the severity of AEs. Grade 1, mild; Grade 2, moderate; Grade 3, severe; Grade 4, potentially life threatening.

Time frame: From Day 0 of Part 2 (Antiviral Baseline Visit [between Study Day 14 and Study Day 65) to the completion of the follow-up period (up to Week 96/WD)

Population: Antiviral Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 2Hemoglobin, Any Increase12 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 2Hemoglobin, Increase to Grade 11 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 2Hemoglobin, Increase to Grade 25 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 2Hemoglobin, Increase to Grade 35 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 2Hemoglobin, Increase to Grade 41 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 2Lymphocytes, Any Increase15 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 2Lymphocytes, Increase to Grade 11 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 2Lymphocytes, Increase to Grade 23 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 2Lymphocytes, Increase to Grade 33 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 2Lymphocytes, Increase to Grade 48 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 2Total neutrophils, Any Increase23 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 2Total neutrophils, Increase to Grade 14 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 2Total neutrophils, Increase to Grade 210 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 2Total neutrophils, Increase to Grade 38 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 2Total neutrophils, Increase to Grade 41 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 2White Blood Cell count, Any Increase20 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 2White Blood Cell count, Increase to Grade 15 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 2White Blood Cell count, Increase to Grade 27 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 2White Blood Cell count, Increase to Grade 37 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case DAIDS Grade Increases From the Antiviral Baseline Visit for the Indicated Hematology Parameters During Part 2White Blood Cell count, Increase to Grade 41 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of clinical chemistry parameters. The DAIDS grades are utilized for measuring the severity of AEs. Grade 1, mild; Grade 2, moderate; Grade 3, severe; Grade 4, potentially life threatening.

Time frame: From Screening up to the start of antiviral therapy (up to 9 weeks; median of 21 days)

Population: Pre-antiviral Safety Population. Only participants with data available at the specified time point were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Alanine amino transferase, Any Increase2 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Alanine amino transferase, Increase to Grade 11 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Alanine amino transferase, Increase to Grade 20 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Alanine amino transferase, Increase to Grade 31 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Alanine amino transferase, Increase to Grade 40 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Albumin, Any Increase1 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Albumin, Increase to Grade 11 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Albumin, Increase to Grade 20 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Albumin, Increase to Grade 30 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Albumin, Increase to Grade 40 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Alkaline phosphatase, Any Increase1 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Alkaline phosphatase, Increase to Grade 11 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Alkaline phosphatase, Increase to Grade 20 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Alkaline phosphatase, Increase to Grade 30 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Alkaline phosphatase, Increase to Grade 40 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Aspartate amino transferase, Any Increase2 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Aspartate amino transferase, Increase to Grade 12 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Aspartate amino transferase, Increase to Grade 20 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Aspartate amino transferase, Increase to Grade 30 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Aspartate amino transferase, Increase to Grade 40 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Creatinine, Any Increase0 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Creatinine, Increase to Grade 10 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Creatinine, Increase to Grade 20 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Creatinine, Increase to Grade 30 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Creatinine, Increase to Grade 40 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Total bilirubin, Any Increase10 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Total bilirubin, Increase to Grade 16 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Total bilirubin, Increase to Grade 24 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Total bilirubin, Increase to Grade 30 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Total bilirubin, Increase to Grade 40 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Uric acid, Any Increase3 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Uric acid, Increase to Grade 13 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Uric acid, Increase to Grade 20 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Uric acid, Increase to Grade 30 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Division of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade Increases From Screening for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters During Part 1Uric acid, Increase to Grade 40 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Achieving Antiviral Treatment Milestones of Sustained Virological Response (SVR), Rapid Virological Response (RVR), Early Virological Response (EVR), and End of Treatment Response (ETR)

SVR is defined as non-detectable Hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) at 24 weeks post-completion of the planned treatment period (i.e., Week 48 or 72 for genotype 2/3 or Week 72 for non-genotype 2/3). RVR is defined as undetectable HCV RNA after 4 weeks of antiviral treatment. EVR is defined as clinically significant reduction in HCV RNA (\>=2 log10 drop or undetectable) after 12 weeks of antiviral treatment. ETR is defined as undetectable HCV RNA at the end of antiviral treatment.

Time frame: From the start of investigational product in Part 2 up to the 24-week follow-up visit after the last dose in Part 2 or early withdrawal (up to 96 weeks)

Population: Antiviral Safety Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different parameters, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the Antiviral Safety Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EltrombopagNumber of Participants Achieving Antiviral Treatment Milestones of Sustained Virological Response (SVR), Rapid Virological Response (RVR), Early Virological Response (EVR), and End of Treatment Response (ETR)SVR, Yes, n=174 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants Achieving Antiviral Treatment Milestones of Sustained Virological Response (SVR), Rapid Virological Response (RVR), Early Virological Response (EVR), and End of Treatment Response (ETR)SVR, No, n=1713 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants Achieving Antiviral Treatment Milestones of Sustained Virological Response (SVR), Rapid Virological Response (RVR), Early Virological Response (EVR), and End of Treatment Response (ETR)RVR, Yes, n=123 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants Achieving Antiviral Treatment Milestones of Sustained Virological Response (SVR), Rapid Virological Response (RVR), Early Virological Response (EVR), and End of Treatment Response (ETR)RVR, No, n=129 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants Achieving Antiviral Treatment Milestones of Sustained Virological Response (SVR), Rapid Virological Response (RVR), Early Virological Response (EVR), and End of Treatment Response (ETR)EVR, Yes, n=1515 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants Achieving Antiviral Treatment Milestones of Sustained Virological Response (SVR), Rapid Virological Response (RVR), Early Virological Response (EVR), and End of Treatment Response (ETR)EVR, No, n=150 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants Achieving Antiviral Treatment Milestones of Sustained Virological Response (SVR), Rapid Virological Response (RVR), Early Virological Response (EVR), and End of Treatment Response (ETR)ETR, Yes, n=219 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Participants Achieving Antiviral Treatment Milestones of Sustained Virological Response (SVR), Rapid Virological Response (RVR), Early Virological Response (EVR), and End of Treatment Response (ETR)ETR, No, n=2112 Participants
Secondary

Number of Particpants Who Initiated Antiviral Therapy

The number of participants who completed the Pre-antiviral Phase (Part 1) and proceeded to the Antiviral Phase (Part 2) are summarized.

Time frame: From the start of the investigational product up to 9 weeks (median of 21 days)

Population: Pre-antiviral Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EltrombopagNumber of Particpants Who Initiated Antiviral TherapyYes25 Participants
EltrombopagNumber of Particpants Who Initiated Antiviral TherapyNo2 Participants
Secondary

Platelet Counts at the Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected for the measurement of platelet count. For each participant, the duration of Part 1 treatment varies between 2 and 9 weeks.

Time frame: From the start of investigational product up to the 24-week follow-up visit after the last dose in Part 2 or early withdrawal (up to 96 weeks)

Population: Pre-antiviral Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsPart 2/Week 56, n=147.0 Gi/L
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsPart 2/Week 60, n=143.0 Gi/L
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsPart 1/Week 7, n=576.2 Gi/LStandard Deviation 19.88
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsScreening, n=2753.1 Gi/LStandard Deviation 12.9
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsPart 1/Day 1, n=2755.9 Gi/LStandard Deviation 18.69
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsPart 1/Week 1, n=2573.3 Gi/LStandard Deviation 29.27
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsPart 1/Week 2, n=1683.2 Gi/LStandard Deviation 27.9
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsPart 1/Week 3, n=873.4 Gi/LStandard Deviation 26.53
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsPart 1/Week 4, n=775.6 Gi/LStandard Deviation 19.95
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsPart 1/Week 5, n=572.2 Gi/LStandard Deviation 18.29
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsPart 1/Week 6, n=581.6 Gi/LStandard Deviation 14.45
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsPart 1/Week 8, n=391.7 Gi/LStandard Deviation 22.81
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsPart 2/Antiviral Baseline, n=25132.9 Gi/LStandard Deviation 33.72
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsPart 2/Week 1, n=25106.7 Gi/LStandard Deviation 37.8
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsPart 2/Week 2, n=2593.2 Gi/LStandard Deviation 42.98
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsPart 2/Week 4, n=2380.5 Gi/LStandard Deviation 30.64
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsPart 2/Week 8, n=2180.3 Gi/LStandard Deviation 24.4
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsPart 2/Week 12, n=2083.1 Gi/LStandard Deviation 31.72
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsPart 2/Week 16, n=1685.8 Gi/LStandard Deviation 27.61
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsPart 2/Week 20, n=1475.3 Gi/LStandard Deviation 22.54
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsPart 2/Week 24, n=1178.6 Gi/LStandard Deviation 30.63
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsPart 2/Week 28, n=990.3 Gi/LStandard Deviation 50.09
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsPart 2/Week 32, n=786.1 Gi/LStandard Deviation 72.12
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsPart 2/Week 36, n=676.8 Gi/LStandard Deviation 53.77
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsPart 2/Week 40, n=555.8 Gi/LStandard Deviation 27.65
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsPart 2/Week 44, n=554.4 Gi/LStandard Deviation 29.18
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsPart 2/Week 48, n=268.0 Gi/LStandard Deviation 29.7
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsPart 2/Week 52, n=149.0 Gi/L
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsPart 2/Week 64, n=143.0 Gi/L
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsPart 2/Week 68, n=144.0 Gi/L
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsPost-treatment/4 Week Follow-up, n=2377.8 Gi/LStandard Deviation 33.48
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsPost-treatment/24 Week Follow-up, n=2252.5 Gi/LStandard Deviation 17.91
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsInvestigational product discontinuation, n=2691.3 Gi/LStandard Deviation 38.78
EltrombopagPlatelet Counts at the Indicated Time PointsMaximum value post-Baseline, n=26145.5 Gi/LStandard Deviation 43.68

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026