Skip to content

Safety & Effectiveness on Vascular Structure and Function of ACZ885 in Atherosclerosis and Either T2DM or IGT Patients

A Multi-center, Randomized , Double Blind, Placebo-controlled, Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Effects on Arterial Structure and Function of ACZ885 in Patients With Clinically Evident Atherosclerosis and Either T2DM or IGT

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00995930
Enrollment
189
Registered
2009-10-16
Start date
2009-12-31
Completion date
2014-02-28
Last updated
2015-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atherosclerosis, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Prediabetic State

Keywords

Atherosclerosis,, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, T2DM,, Cardiovascular Diseases, ACZ885, impaired glucose tolerance, IGT, Canakinumab

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the effect of ACZ885 on vascular function in patients with documented atherosclerotic disease and T2DM or IGT.

Interventions

DRUGACZ885

ACZ885 150 mg was administered subcutaneously once a month for 12 months.

DRUGPlacebo

Matching placebo to ACZ885 was administered subcutaneously once a month for 12 months.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 74 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with known atherosclerotic disease and documented diagnosis of T2DM for ≤ 14 years OR IGT * HbA1c between 6.0% and 10.0% * On stable statin therapy or statin intolerant * Patients who are eligible and able to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications to MRI * NYHA class IV Heart Failure * NYHA class I - III heart failure with acute exacerbation in 3 months prior to screening * Patients with type 1 diabetes * Acute infections * HsCRP \> 30 mg/dL * Aortic aneurysm ≥5cm Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Death12 monthsParticipants were monitored for adverse events, serious adverse events and death throughout the study.
Change From Baseline in Aortic Distensibilitybaseline, 3 months, 12 monthsTwo axial, ECG-gated, steady state free precession (SSFP) 'cine' images were acquired during breath-hold to determine aortic distensibility. The first image was obtained at the level of the right pulmonary artery through the ascending and proximal descending aorta and the second through the distal aorta below the diaphragm. Imaging of the aorta also enabled evaluation of the plaque burden and additional vascular function measures.
Change From Baseline in Plaque Burden (Aortic Vessel Wall Area and Carotid Vessel Wall Area)baseline, 3 months, 12 monthsFor assessment of atherosclerotic plaque burden of the aorta, vessel wall images of the aorta were acquired with an ECG gated double-inversion recovery (black blood) fast spin echo sequence applied breath-holding. Using an oblique sagittal image of the aorta as a pilot, serial axial images were acquired to cover a section of the descending thoracic aorta. The midpoint of the right pulmonary artery in cross section was used as the anatomical reference for the first slice in baseline and follow-up scans. For assessment of the atherosclerotic plaque burden in the carotids, vessel wall images were acquired with an axial ECG gated PD (proton density) weighted black blood sequence. The carotid bifurcation was used as the anatomical reference for all three imaging time points (baseline, 12 weeks, 48 weeks) with axial slice planes acquired below the bifurcation region. The mean values reported here for the carotid are reported for the proximal common carotid region.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)baseline, 3 months, 12 monthsBlood samples were collected to analyze hsCRP.
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucosebaseline, 3 months, 12 monthsBlood samples were collected to analyze fasting plasma glucose.
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)baseline, 3 months, 12 monthsBlood samples were collected to analyze HbA1c.
Change From Baseline in Pulse Wave Velocity and Pulse Wave Velocity Errorbaseline, 3 months, 12 monthsUtilizing the SphygmoCor Device, ECG leads placed at the carotid and femoral arteries provided the measure of the pulse wave at that particular arterial location. The distance between the two vascular beds divided by the pulse wave time shift provided a measure of the pulse wave velocity.
Change From Baseline in Beta Cell Function (HOMA-B)baseline, 3 months, 12 monthsBlood samples were collected to analyze beta cell function. Beta cell function was calculated by the Homeostasis Model Assessments (of beta cell function (HOMA-B) as follows: HOMA-B: The product of 20 and basal insulin (µU/mL) levels divided by the value of basal glucose (mmol/L) concentrations minus 3.5 \[i.e., HOMA-B = 20\*basal insulin/(basal glucose-3.5)\].
Change From Baseline Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)baseline, 3 months, 12 monthsBlood samples were collected to analyze insulin resistance. Insulin resistance was calculated by the Homeostasis Model Assessments of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)) as follows: HOMA-IR: The product of basal glucose (mmol/L) and insulin (µU/mL) levels divided by 22.5 \[i.e., HOMA-IR = basal glucose\*basal insulin/22.5\].
Pharmacokinetics: ACZ885 Serum Concentrationspre-dose, 0.167 day post dose 1, 7 days post dose 1, 14 days post dose 1, every 30 days post each dose from doses 1 through 12, 60 days post dose 12, 90 days post dose 12Blood samples were collected to analyze the ACZ885 serum concentrations.
Change From Baseline in 2 Hour Glucose Post Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT)baseline, 3 months, 12 monthsBlood samples were collected to analyze the 2 hour glucose post OGTT.
Change From Baseline in Plaque Compositionbaseline, 3 months, 12 monthsDuring the carotid MRI acquisition, in addition to the PD weighted ECG gated double inversion fast spin echo sequences T1 and T2 weighted sequences were acquired. In combination with the PD weighted images, the multi-contrast images were analyzed to determine regions of interest with contrast patterns consistent with the presence of necrotic lipid core, calcification and fibrous tissue in participants who had complex carotid plaque present in the bifurcation region.
Change From Baseline in Aortic Strainbaseline, 3 months, 12 monthsArterial strain was computed directly from the cine SSFP images and the change in lumen diameters over the cardiac cycle. The value was independent of pulse pressure and is unitless ratio derived from the maximum to minimum lumen diameters diastole and systole, respectively..

Countries

Canada, Germany, Israel, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to each treatment arm.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
SQ monthly
94
ACZ885
150 mg SQ monthly
95
Total189

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdministrative problems42
Overall StudyAdverse Event1114
Overall StudyDeath01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up12
Overall StudyProtocol deviation25
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject34

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboACZ885Total
Age, Continuous61.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.92
61.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.85
61.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.38
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants13 Participants27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
80 Participants82 Participants162 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
46 / 9565 / 94
serious
Total, serious adverse events
25 / 9514 / 94

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Aortic Distensibility

Two axial, ECG-gated, steady state free precession (SSFP) 'cine' images were acquired during breath-hold to determine aortic distensibility. The first image was obtained at the level of the right pulmonary artery through the ascending and proximal descending aorta and the second through the distal aorta below the diaphragm. Imaging of the aorta also enabled evaluation of the plaque burden and additional vascular function measures.

Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 12 months

Population: Only participants from the imaging analysis set, who had evaluable data at both baseline and the given post-baseline time point, were included in the analysis for that post baseline time point. The imaging analysis set included randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Aortic Distensibility3 months, proximal ascending region (n=61,63)-0.0001 mmHg^-1Standard Error 0.0001
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Aortic Distensibility12 months, proximal ascending region (n=56,55)-0.0001 mmHg^-1Standard Error 0.0001
ACZ885Change From Baseline in Aortic Distensibility12 months, proximal ascending region (n=56,55)-0.0001 mmHg^-1Standard Error 0.0001
ACZ885Change From Baseline in Aortic Distensibility3 months, proximal ascending region (n=61,63)0.0001 mmHg^-1Standard Error 0.0001
Primary

Change From Baseline in Plaque Burden (Aortic Vessel Wall Area and Carotid Vessel Wall Area)

For assessment of atherosclerotic plaque burden of the aorta, vessel wall images of the aorta were acquired with an ECG gated double-inversion recovery (black blood) fast spin echo sequence applied breath-holding. Using an oblique sagittal image of the aorta as a pilot, serial axial images were acquired to cover a section of the descending thoracic aorta. The midpoint of the right pulmonary artery in cross section was used as the anatomical reference for the first slice in baseline and follow-up scans. For assessment of the atherosclerotic plaque burden in the carotids, vessel wall images were acquired with an axial ECG gated PD (proton density) weighted black blood sequence. The carotid bifurcation was used as the anatomical reference for all three imaging time points (baseline, 12 weeks, 48 weeks) with axial slice planes acquired below the bifurcation region. The mean values reported here for the carotid are reported for the proximal common carotid region.

Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 12 months

Population: Only participants from the imaging analysis set, who had evaluable data at both baseline and the given post-baseline time point, were included in the analysis for that post baseline time point. The imaging analysis set included randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Plaque Burden (Aortic Vessel Wall Area and Carotid Vessel Wall Area)aortic, proximal ascending, 3 months (n=69,62)14.80 mm^2Standard Error 6.86
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Plaque Burden (Aortic Vessel Wall Area and Carotid Vessel Wall Area)aortic, proximal ascending, 12 months (n=61,53)30.58 mm^2Standard Error 10.46
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Plaque Burden (Aortic Vessel Wall Area and Carotid Vessel Wall Area)carotid, mean (right and left), 3 months (n=66,59)1.41 mm^2Standard Error 1.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Plaque Burden (Aortic Vessel Wall Area and Carotid Vessel Wall Area)carotid, mean (right and left), 12 mos. (n=55,48)3.50 mm^2Standard Error 1.51
ACZ885Change From Baseline in Plaque Burden (Aortic Vessel Wall Area and Carotid Vessel Wall Area)carotid, mean (right and left), 12 mos. (n=55,48)0.73 mm^2Standard Error 1.48
ACZ885Change From Baseline in Plaque Burden (Aortic Vessel Wall Area and Carotid Vessel Wall Area)aortic, proximal ascending, 3 months (n=69,62)-0.51 mm^2Standard Error 6.62
ACZ885Change From Baseline in Plaque Burden (Aortic Vessel Wall Area and Carotid Vessel Wall Area)carotid, mean (right and left), 3 months (n=66,59)-0.29 mm^2Standard Error 1.12
ACZ885Change From Baseline in Plaque Burden (Aortic Vessel Wall Area and Carotid Vessel Wall Area)aortic, proximal ascending, 12 months (n=61,53)8.71 mm^2Standard Error 10.49
Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Death

Participants were monitored for adverse events, serious adverse events and death throughout the study.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Safety analysis set: The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and DeathAdverse events (serious and non-serious)80 Number of participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and DeathSerious adverse events14 Number of participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and DeathDeaths0 Number of participants
ACZ885Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and DeathAdverse events (serious and non-serious)77 Number of participants
ACZ885Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and DeathSerious adverse events25 Number of participants
ACZ885Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and DeathDeaths1 Number of participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 2 Hour Glucose Post Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT)

Blood samples were collected to analyze the 2 hour glucose post OGTT.

Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 12 months

Population: Only participants from the PD analysis set, who had evaluable data at both baseline and the given post-baseline time point, were included in the analysis for that post baseline time point. The PD analysis set included randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 2 Hour Glucose Post Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT)3 months (n=79,74)0.92 mmol/L
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 2 Hour Glucose Post Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT)12 months (n=71,62)0.93 mmol/L
ACZ885Change From Baseline in 2 Hour Glucose Post Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT)3 months (n=79,74)0.98 mmol/L
ACZ885Change From Baseline in 2 Hour Glucose Post Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT)12 months (n=71,62)0.95 mmol/L
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Aortic Strain

Arterial strain was computed directly from the cine SSFP images and the change in lumen diameters over the cardiac cycle. The value was independent of pulse pressure and is unitless ratio derived from the maximum to minimum lumen diameters diastole and systole, respectively..

Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 12 months

Population: Only participants from the imaging analysis set, who had evaluable data at both baseline and the given post-baseline time point, were included in the analysis for that post baseline time point. The imaging analysis set included randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Aortic Strainproximal ascending, 3 months(n=67,64)-0.005 ratioStandard Error 0.005
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Aortic Strainproximal ascending, 12 months(n=59,59)0.001 ratioStandard Error 0.005
ACZ885Change From Baseline in Aortic Strainproximal ascending, 3 months(n=67,64)0.002 ratioStandard Error 0.005
ACZ885Change From Baseline in Aortic Strainproximal ascending, 12 months(n=59,59)-0.002 ratioStandard Error 0.005
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Beta Cell Function (HOMA-B)

Blood samples were collected to analyze beta cell function. Beta cell function was calculated by the Homeostasis Model Assessments (of beta cell function (HOMA-B) as follows: HOMA-B: The product of 20 and basal insulin (µU/mL) levels divided by the value of basal glucose (mmol/L) concentrations minus 3.5 \[i.e., HOMA-B = 20\*basal insulin/(basal glucose-3.5)\].

Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 12 months

Population: Only participants from the PD analysis set, who had evaluable data at both baseline and the given post-baseline time point, were included in the analysis for that post baseline time point. The PD analysis set included randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Beta Cell Function (HOMA-B)HOMA-B, 3 months (n=77,70)1.11 percentage of beta cell function
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Beta Cell Function (HOMA-B)HOMA-B, 12 months (n=71,60)1.03 percentage of beta cell function
ACZ885Change From Baseline in Beta Cell Function (HOMA-B)HOMA-B, 3 months (n=77,70)0.99 percentage of beta cell function
ACZ885Change From Baseline in Beta Cell Function (HOMA-B)HOMA-B, 12 months (n=71,60)0.91 percentage of beta cell function
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose

Blood samples were collected to analyze fasting plasma glucose.

Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 12 months

Population: Only participants from the PD analysis set, who had evaluable data at both baseline and the given post-baseline time point, were included in the analysis for that post baseline time point. The PD analysis set included randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose3 months (n=79,75)0.95 mmol/L
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose12 months (n=71,62)0.95 mmol/L
ACZ885Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose3 months (n=79,75)1.00 mmol/L
ACZ885Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose12 months (n=71,62)0.99 mmol/L
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)

Blood samples were collected to analyze HbA1c.

Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 12 months

Population: Only participants from the PD analysis set, who had evaluable data at both baseline and the given post-baseline time point, were included in the analysis for that post baseline time point. The PD analysis set included randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)3 months (n=81,77)1.00 percentage
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)12 months (n=72,65)1.00 percentage
ACZ885Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)3 months (n=81,77)0.99 percentage
ACZ885Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)12 months (n=72,65)0.96 percentage
Secondary

Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)

Blood samples were collected to analyze hsCRP.

Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 12 months

Population: Only participants from the PD analysis set, who had evaluable data at both baseline and the given post-baseline time point, were included in the analysis for that post baseline time point. The PD analysis set included randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)3 months (n=82,79)0.93 mg/L
PlaceboChange From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)12 months (n=73,68)1.04 mg/L
ACZ885Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)3 months (n=82,79)0.48 mg/L
ACZ885Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)12 months (n=73,68)0.51 mg/L
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Plaque Composition

During the carotid MRI acquisition, in addition to the PD weighted ECG gated double inversion fast spin echo sequences T1 and T2 weighted sequences were acquired. In combination with the PD weighted images, the multi-contrast images were analyzed to determine regions of interest with contrast patterns consistent with the presence of necrotic lipid core, calcification and fibrous tissue in participants who had complex carotid plaque present in the bifurcation region.

Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 12 months

Population: Only participants from the imaging analysis set, who had evaluable data at both baseline and the given post-baseline time point, were included in the analysis for that post baseline time point. The imaging analysis set included randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Plaque Compositioncalcium composition, left carotid, 3 months0.002 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.0045
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Plaque Compositioncalcium composition, left carotid, 12 months0.002 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.0045
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Plaque Compositionhemorrhage area, left carotid, 3 months0.006 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.0114
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Plaque Compositionhemorrhage area, left carotid, 12 months0.018 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.0205
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Plaque Compositionlipid composition, left carotid, 3 months0.000 mm^2Standard Deviation 0
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Plaque Compositionlipid composition, left carotid, 12 months-0.000 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.0122
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Plaque Compositioncalcium composition,right carotid, 3 mos.(n=4,3)-0.005 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.0058
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Plaque Compositioncalcium composition,right carotid, 12 mos.(n=4,3)0.000 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.0082
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Plaque Compositionhemorrhage area,right carotid, 3 months (n=4,3)0.003 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.0096
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Plaque Compositionhemorrhage area, right carotid, 12 months (n=4,3)0.008 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.033
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Plaque Compositionlipid composition, right carotid, 3 months (n=4,3)-0.005 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.0058
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Plaque Compositionlipid composition, right carotid, 12 mos.(n=4,3)0.008 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.0171
ACZ885Change From Baseline in Plaque Compositionlipid composition, right carotid, 3 months (n=4,3)0.003 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.0058
ACZ885Change From Baseline in Plaque Compositioncalcium composition, left carotid, 3 months0.003 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.0058
ACZ885Change From Baseline in Plaque Compositioncalcium composition,right carotid, 3 mos.(n=4,3)-0.003 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.0058
ACZ885Change From Baseline in Plaque Compositioncalcium composition, left carotid, 12 months0.003 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.0058
ACZ885Change From Baseline in Plaque Compositionhemorrhage area, right carotid, 12 months (n=4,3)0.003 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.0208
ACZ885Change From Baseline in Plaque Compositionhemorrhage area, left carotid, 3 months-0.000 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.02
ACZ885Change From Baseline in Plaque Compositioncalcium composition,right carotid, 12 mos.(n=4,3)0.000 mm^2Standard Deviation 0
ACZ885Change From Baseline in Plaque Compositionhemorrhage area, left carotid, 12 months0.007 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.0115
ACZ885Change From Baseline in Plaque Compositionlipid composition, right carotid, 12 mos.(n=4,3)0.017 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.0115
ACZ885Change From Baseline in Plaque Compositionlipid composition, left carotid, 3 months0.003 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.0115
ACZ885Change From Baseline in Plaque Compositionhemorrhage area,right carotid, 3 months (n=4,3)-0.000 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.01
ACZ885Change From Baseline in Plaque Compositionlipid composition, left carotid, 12 months0.007 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.0058
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Pulse Wave Velocity and Pulse Wave Velocity Error

Utilizing the SphygmoCor Device, ECG leads placed at the carotid and femoral arteries provided the measure of the pulse wave at that particular arterial location. The distance between the two vascular beds divided by the pulse wave time shift provided a measure of the pulse wave velocity.

Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 12 months

Population: Only participants from the imaging analysis set, who had evaluable data at both baseline and the given post-baseline time point, were included in the analysis for that post baseline time point. The imaging analysis set included randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pulse Wave Velocity and Pulse Wave Velocity Errorpulse wave velocity, 3 months(n=45,38)-0.39 ms^-1Standard Error 0.39
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pulse Wave Velocity and Pulse Wave Velocity Errorpulse wave velocity error, 3 months (n=45,38)-0.01 ms^-1Standard Error 0.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pulse Wave Velocity and Pulse Wave Velocity Errorpulse wave velocity, 12 months(n=35,31)-0.36 ms^-1Standard Error 0.35
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pulse Wave Velocity and Pulse Wave Velocity Errorpulse wave velocity error, 12 months (n=35,31)-0.01 ms^-1Standard Error 0.06
ACZ885Change From Baseline in Pulse Wave Velocity and Pulse Wave Velocity Errorpulse wave velocity error, 12 months (n=35,31)0.06 ms^-1Standard Error 0.06
ACZ885Change From Baseline in Pulse Wave Velocity and Pulse Wave Velocity Errorpulse wave velocity, 3 months(n=45,38)-0.03 ms^-1Standard Error 0.39
ACZ885Change From Baseline in Pulse Wave Velocity and Pulse Wave Velocity Errorpulse wave velocity, 12 months(n=35,31)-0.26 ms^-1Standard Error 0.35
ACZ885Change From Baseline in Pulse Wave Velocity and Pulse Wave Velocity Errorpulse wave velocity error, 3 months (n=45,38)-0.03 ms^-1Standard Error 0.05
Secondary

Change From Baseline Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)

Blood samples were collected to analyze insulin resistance. Insulin resistance was calculated by the Homeostasis Model Assessments of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)) as follows: HOMA-IR: The product of basal glucose (mmol/L) and insulin (µU/mL) levels divided by 22.5 \[i.e., HOMA-IR = basal glucose\*basal insulin/22.5\].

Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 12 months

Population: Only participants from the PD analysis set, who had evaluable data at both baseline and the given post-baseline time point, were included in the analysis for that post baseline time point. The PD analysis set included randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)HOMA-R, 3 months (n=77,70)1.00 IR score
PlaceboChange From Baseline Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)HOMA-R, 12 months (n=71,60)0.93 IR score
ACZ885Change From Baseline Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)HOMA-R, 3 months (n=77,70)1.09 IR score
ACZ885Change From Baseline Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)HOMA-R, 12 months (n=71,60)0.97 IR score
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics: ACZ885 Serum Concentrations

Blood samples were collected to analyze the ACZ885 serum concentrations.

Time frame: pre-dose, 0.167 day post dose 1, 7 days post dose 1, 14 days post dose 1, every 30 days post each dose from doses 1 through 12, 60 days post dose 12, 90 days post dose 12

Population: Only participants from the PK analysis set, who had evaluable data at each time point, were included in the analysis for that time point. The PK analysis set included randomized participants from the ACZ885 arm who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPharmacokinetics: ACZ885 Serum Concentrationspre-dose (n=91)0 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboPharmacokinetics: ACZ885 Serum Concentrations0.167 day post dose 1 (n=94)480 ng/mLStandard Deviation 648
PlaceboPharmacokinetics: ACZ885 Serum Concentrations7 days post dose 1 (n=95)10107 ng/mLStandard Deviation 4369
PlaceboPharmacokinetics: ACZ885 Serum Concentrations14 days post dose 1 (n=93)9138 ng/mLStandard Deviation 3527
PlaceboPharmacokinetics: ACZ885 Serum Concentrations30 days post dose 1 (n=90)5936 ng/mLStandard Deviation 2281
PlaceboPharmacokinetics: ACZ885 Serum Concentrations30 days post dose 2 (n=86)8136 ng/mLStandard Deviation 3299
PlaceboPharmacokinetics: ACZ885 Serum Concentrations30 days post dose 3 (n=81)9278 ng/mLStandard Deviation 3795
PlaceboPharmacokinetics: ACZ885 Serum Concentrations30 days post dose 4 (n=78)10183 ng/mLStandard Deviation 4552
PlaceboPharmacokinetics: ACZ885 Serum Concentrations30 days post dose 5 (n=78)10164 ng/mLStandard Deviation 4209
PlaceboPharmacokinetics: ACZ885 Serum Concentrations30 days post dose 6 (n=77)10254 ng/mLStandard Deviation 3916
PlaceboPharmacokinetics: ACZ885 Serum Concentrations30 days post dose 7 (n=76)10368 ng/mLStandard Deviation 4840
PlaceboPharmacokinetics: ACZ885 Serum Concentrations30 days post dose 8 (n=71)9745 ng/mLStandard Deviation 4436
PlaceboPharmacokinetics: ACZ885 Serum Concentrations30 days post dose 9 (n=69)10407 ng/mLStandard Deviation 3967
PlaceboPharmacokinetics: ACZ885 Serum Concentrations30 days post dose 10 (n=71)10635 ng/mLStandard Deviation 4697
PlaceboPharmacokinetics: ACZ885 Serum Concentrations30 days post dose 11 (n=70)10612 ng/mLStandard Deviation 4434
PlaceboPharmacokinetics: ACZ885 Serum Concentrations30 days post dose 12 (n=66)10887 ng/mLStandard Deviation 4785
PlaceboPharmacokinetics: ACZ885 Serum Concentrations60 days post dose 12 (n=66)4575 ng/mLStandard Deviation 2362
PlaceboPharmacokinetics: ACZ885 Serum Concentrations90 days post dose 12 (n=88)3241 ng/mLStandard Deviation 2883

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026