Skip to content

Assessing the Impact of Two Methods of Continuous Veno-venous Hemodiafiltration on Time Nursing Work in Intensive Care

Assessing the Impact of Two Methods of Continuous Veno-venous Hemodiafiltration on Time Nursing Work in Intensive Care

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00993733
Enrollment
0
Registered
2009-10-12
Start date
2010-09-30
Completion date
2011-09-30
Last updated
2016-03-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Renal Failure

Keywords

hemodiafiltration, cost, dialysis solution, acute renal failure, intensive care unit

Brief summary

The prevalence of acute renal failure in intensive care is estimated at between 5 and 20% depending on diagnostic criteria retained. And half of patients require the use of hemodialysis. Continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) is one of the hemodialysis technique widely used in intensive care unit. The CVVHDF is performed at the bedside, by a mobile generator with a semi permeable membrane, a blood circuit, a dialysate circuit and a feedback circuit. The implementation of a CVVHDF requires the use of large amounts of biological liquid essential to enable the purification of blood during its passage through the artificial kidney. The objective of this study is to assess time nursing work and the costs of each method.

Detailed description

The prevalence of acute renal failure in intensive care is estimated at between 5 and 20% depending on diagnostic criteria retained. And half of patients require the use of hemodialysis. Continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) is one of the hemodialysis technique widely used in intensive care unit. The CVVHDF is performed at the bedside, by a mobile generator with a semi permeable membrane, a blood circuit, a dialysate circuit and a feedback circuit. The implementation of a CVVHDF requires the use of large amounts of biological liquid essential to enable the purification of blood during its passage through the artificial kidney. The biological fluid may be supplied to the generator of CVVHDF in 2 ways: * The conventional method, the most used: the generator operates with pockets containing dialysis fluid, these pockets to be changed regularly by nurses * The on-line method: the generator operates with a specific water system supplying the dialysis fluid available in every room of the unit The objective of this study is to assess time nursing work and the costs of each method. For this, 15 patients will be included in this study. Each patient performs 12 hours of each method (conventional and online), whose order will be randomized.

Interventions

PROCEDUREContinuous veno-venous haemodiafiltration

Dialysis procedure administrated to the patients with acute renal failure

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient affiliated with or beneficiary of a social security category * Patient with a renal failure requiring a CVVHDF for at least 2 cycles of 12 hours

Exclusion criteria

* N/A

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
time of nursing work required to realised a CVVHDF as a conventional and on line methods modality of supply compared to a method on-lineDay 1The end of the study for the patient corresponds to the end of CVVHDF conventional and on line.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
costs of CVVHDF performed using a conventional and on-line methodsDay 1The end of the study for the patient corresponds to the end of CVVHDF conventional and on line.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026