Skip to content

Medial Versus Lateral Approach in Ultrasound (US)-Guided Supraclavicular Block

Medial vs. Lateral Approach to Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Block: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00992810
Enrollment
78
Registered
2009-10-09
Start date
2009-08-31
Completion date
2010-09-30
Last updated
2017-12-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hand or Arm Surgery

Keywords

upper limb, hand, arm, surgery, supraclavicular nerve block, brachial plexus nerve block, ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia

Brief summary

The ultrasound guided supraclavicular block is a peripheral nerve block which is considered safe, has a fast onset, is dense and provides complete block of the nerves supplying the hand, forearm and arm. However retrospective studies done at Toronto Western Hospital have highlighted the fact that most commonly the ulnar nerve fibres (responsible for sensations in the ring finger, little finger and the corresponding part of hand), sometimes escape this block and need additional supplementary block at a distal peripheral nerve site. It is a confusing fact since all nerve fibres are compactly arranged in a sheath at the supraclavicular level. The local anaesthetic agent at this level should be equally distributed among all nerve fibres. The purpose of this study is to compare two different approaches (medial and lateral) adopted by our clinicians to perform this block and to test the effectiveness of each approach for successful ulnar nerve fibre blockade.

Interventions

PROCEDURELateral-to-Medial Approach

Approach of the needle to administer the brachial plexus nerve block will be done in a lateral-to-medial direction.

PROCEDUREMedia-to-Lateral Approach

Approach of the needle to administer the brachial plexus nerve block will be done in a medial-to-lateral direction.

Sponsors

University Health Network, Toronto
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients presenting for upper limb surgery, excluding shoulder surgery * Age 18-80 yrs * BMI \< 35 * ASA I - III * Consent for the study

Exclusion criteria

* Pre-existing sensory or motor neurodeficit. * Sensitivity to local anaesthetic agents. * Patients on anticoagulants or antiplatelet medications (Minidose Aspirin is acceptable) with abnormal coagulation profile. * Compromised pulmonary reserve due to COPD, Kypho-scoliosis or Restricted lung disease. * Infection or any obvious pathology at the site of block performance * History of drug abuse. * Psychiatric disease or any condition that precludes an informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Successful block of the Ulnar nerve (C8,T1) fibres. Sensory block with a score of '1' at 30 minutes (loss of sensation to pin prick) is considered successful.1 hour prior to surgery

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026