Skip to content

Bendamustine Plus Rituximab Versus CHOP Plus Rituximab

Prospective Randomised Multicenter Study for Therapy Optimization (First Line) of Advanced Progredient, Low Malignant Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas and Mantle Cell Lymphomas

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00991211
Enrollment
549
Registered
2009-10-07
Start date
2004-01-31
Completion date
2009-08-31
Last updated
2024-08-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Follicular Lymphomas, Immunocytomas, Lymphocytic Lymphomas, Marginal Zone Lymphomas, Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas

Keywords

Comparison, Bendamustine + Rituximab, CHOP + Rituximab, Progression free survival, Overall survival, Toxicity, Safety

Brief summary

The study addresses the question if the first line therapy of low malignant and mantle cell lymphomas with bendamustine plus rituximab is comparable (non inferior) with CHOP plus rituximab with regard to progression free survival (PFS).

Detailed description

The 4 agent chemotherapy (CTX) CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine prednisone) in combination with the monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody rituximab (CHOP-R) represents a standard CTX for the treatment of lymphomas of high or low malignancy. The combination of bendamustine and rituximab (B-R) is also highly effective with a more advantageous toxicity profile. If B-R could be shown to be non inferior to CHOP-R, this could improve the quality of life of the patient and possibly also the prognosis.

Interventions

DRUGBendamustine

Comparison of Bendamustine + Rituximab with CHOP + Rituximab

DRUGStandard chemotherapy CHOP + Ritiximab

Cyclophosphamid 750 mg/m² d 1 + Doxorubicin 50 mg/m² d 1 + Vincristin 1,4 mg/m² max. 2 mg d 1 + Prednison 100 mg absolute p.o. d 1-5 + Rituximab 375 mg/m² d 1 q3w as standard Chemotherapy

Sponsors

University of Giessen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with histological verified CD20-positive B-Cell-Lymphomas of the following entities: * Follicular lymphoma grade 1 and 2 * Immunocytoma and lymphoplasmocytic lymphoma * Marginal zone lymphoma, nodal and generalised * Mantle cell lymphoma * lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL without leucaemic characteristics) * non-specified/classified lymphomas of low malignancy * No prior therapy with cytotoxics,interferon or monoclonal antibodies * Need for therapy, except mantle cell lymphomas * Stadium III or IV * Written informed consent * Performance status WHO 0-2 * Histology not older than 6 months

Exclusion criteria

* Patients not establishing all above mentioned prerequisites * Option of a primary, potential curative radiation therapy * Pretreatment except a unique local delimited radiation (radiation fiel not expanding two adjacent lymph node regions * Comorbidities excluding a study conform therapy: * heart attack during the last 6 months * severe, medicinal not adjustable hypertonia * severe functional defects of the heart (NYHA III or IV) * lung (WHO grade III or IV), liver or kidney (creatinine \> 2 mg/dl, GOT + GPT or bilirubin 3 x ULN, except caused by lymphoma.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Progression free survivalobservation 3 years or significant differences between two arms

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Determination and comparison of remission rates, of toxicity, infectious complications, overall survival, EFS, TTNT, capacity of peripheral blood stem cell mobilizationongoing

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 24, 2026