Skip to content

Hyperthermia As A Conservative Treatment For Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. A Randomized Sham Controlled Trial

Hyperthermia As A Conservative Treatment For Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. A Randomized Sham Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00988923
Enrollment
34
Registered
2009-10-02
Start date
2007-10-31
Completion date
2008-09-30
Last updated
2009-10-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to verify the short-term effects of hyperthermia (HT) in pain relief and in functional impairment in patients affected by mild to moderate idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. A single blind randomized sham-controlled trial was performed. A 23 patients were affected by idiopathic CTS, 11 of them were affected by bilateral CTS. the intervention consists of Hyperthermia device treatment, treated for 20 minutes per session, a total of 8 sessions. Primary outcome is pain (Visual analogic scale).

Detailed description

Background: Non-surgical treatment is generally administered to patients with mild to moderate symptoms. Many of these treatments used heat modality. Hyperthermia is a relative recent device which produces deep heating. Objective: The purpose of this study is to verify the short-term effects of hyperthermia (HT) in pain relief and in functional impairment in patients affected by mild to moderate idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Design: A double blind randomized sham-controlled trial. Setting: Outpatient physical therapy, institutional clinic. Participants: 23 patients were affected by idiopathic CTS, 11 of them were affected by bilateral CTS. Intervention: Hyperthermia (HT) device treatment, treated for 20 minutes per session, a total of 8 sessions. Measurement: Primary outcome is pain (Visual analogic scale). Secondary outcomes were self-reported pain intensity and physical functioning questionnaire (Levine/Boston), ultrasonographic (median nerve cross sectional area mnCSA) and neurophysiological data.

Interventions

OTHERgroup A: HYPERTHERMIA

All patients were treated for 8 sessions, twice a week, for a total of 4 weeks of treatment. All patients were evaluated at baseline (T0) and after 4 weeks (T1). The first two sessions were sham-treatment for both groups

OTHERNo intervention

the intervention tool was switched in off, only bolus was activated

Sponsors

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Bilateral or unilateral mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome confirmed by clinical and neurophysiological tests, with no indication to surgical intervention. * All patients were grouped into first, second and third classes according to Historic and Objective (Hi-Ob)15 scale of CTS and minimum, mild CTS according to the neurophysiological classification of Padua1

Exclusion criteria

* Secondary entrapment neuropathies (diabetes, systemic disease) * Cancer, pregnancy * Electroneurographic and clinical signs of axonal degeneration of the median nerve.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary outcome is visual analogic scale for pain (VAS)4 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcomes were self-reported pain intensity and physical functioning questionnaire (Levine/Boston), ultrasonographic (median nerve cross sectional area (mnCSA) and neurophysiological data4 weeks

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026