Skip to content

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) Titration and Treatment Versus Auto-adjusting PAP Treatment for Sleep Apnea

Portable Monitoring and APAP Treatment for Diagnosis and Treatment of OSA

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00988351
Enrollment
156
Registered
2009-10-02
Start date
2010-02-28
Completion date
2012-12-31
Last updated
2014-11-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Keywords

sleep apnea, positive airway pressure, portable monitoring, auto positive airway pressure

Brief summary

The purpose of this randomized prospective study is to compare the efficacy of two approaches to initiate Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) treatment in patients diagnosed as having obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) by portable monitoring (PM) (limited sleep study). One pathway involves attended Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) titration by PSG (full attended sleep study) followed by CPAP treatment. The other pathway involves treatment with auto-adjusting positive airway pressure (APAP)(without a titration). Study Aims: Compare PAP adherence, improvement in subjective sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale), reaction time (Psychomotor vigilance test), quality of life by the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ), and PAP satisfaction (PAP satisfaction questionnaire) between the two study arms.

Detailed description

RESEARCH PLAN: All patients being evaluated for possible OSA are required to attend a Sleep Education and Evaluation Class before having a sleep study. At this class they receive information on sleep apnea, PAP treatment, and the types of sleep studies. They also complete a sleep questionnaire to identify co-existing sleep disorders and important co-morbid medical conditions. Screening of the sleep questionnaire and the patient's medical record is part of routine care to identify patients needing a diagnostic PSG and/or an attended titration. At the end of the class, participation in the current study will be offered the patients. Those signifying interest in being part of the research study and meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria will be contacted to participate in the study. Once they sign an informed consent they will be randomized to one of the two clinical pathways. METHODS: Study visits: Before informed consent (routine clinical care) 1. Sleep Education and Evaluation Class (education about OSA, sleep studies, and OSA treatment). Patients complete screening sleep and medical history questionnaires. 2. Determination of patient interest in participating in the current study and review of inclusion/exclusion criteria After informed consent 1. PM study 2. Randomization if the Portable monitoring (PM) study is diagnostic of OSA. If not, the patient will be offered a diagnostic PSG. If this is positive, they will have APAP treatment. If both the PM and PSG are negative for OSA the patient exits the study but will be followed in sleep clinic. 3. PSG for CPAP titration (PSG arm only). 4. CPAP/APAP setup - patient fills out Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ). The same Research coordinator/Respiratory therapist will setup the units, fit masks, and instruct the patients on the use of their device. Patients being treated with CPAP or APAP will be in separate classes. 5. Telephone contact within 7 days of setup with early intervention for PAP problems if needed. 6. Clinic visit 6 weeks after starting treatment: download objective adherence, ESS, FOSQ, and PAP satisfaction questionnaire.

Interventions

DEVICEContinuous positive airway pressure

continuous positive airway pressure determined by polysomnography titration

DEVICEAuto-adjusting positive airway pressure treatment

Pressure range 4-18 centimeters of water (cm H2O)

Sponsors

North Florida Foundation for Research and Education
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 89 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* OSA, Apnea-hypopnea index \> 5/hour

Exclusion criteria

* Prior CPAP * Uncontrolled Depression * Moderate to Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) * Hypoventilation * Average estimated nightly total sleep time \< 4 hours * Shift work * Unstable depression * Upper airway surgery * Uncontrolled Restless legs syndrome (RLS), narcolepsy * Use of supplemental oxygen * Severe congestive heart failure * Use of nightly potent narcotics * Severe obesity (BMI \> 40)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Positive Airway Pressure Adherence (Nightly Use of Treatment)6 weeks after starting treatmentaverage nightly hours of using positive airway pressure (including 0 for nights not used)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale6 weeks after starting treatmentEpworth sleepiness scale (ESS) is measure of subjective sleepiness. Tendency to fall asleep in 8 situations. Total varies from zero to 24. A ESS of 10 or less is considered normal. The change in the ESS = post-treatment value - pre-treatment value. A decrease in the ESS (negative change) is consistent with less sleepiness.
Change in Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire6 weeks at clinicThe functional outcomes of sleep questionnaire (FOSQ) is a standard quality of life measure used to assess improvement in quality of life after treatment for sleep disorders. The total FOSQ score was analyzed. The range if 5 to 20. A higher score is a better quality of life. This analysis compares the change after treatment (post treatment FOSQ - pretreatment FOSQ). A positive difference indicates an improve in the quality of life.
Residual Apnea-hypopnea Indexover first 6 weeks of treatmentThe PAP device estimate of residual apnea-hypopnea index (AHI, number of apneas and hypopneas per hour of patient use) an estimate of effectiveness of treatment. An AHI \< 10 is considered adequate treatment and \<5/hour ideal treatment.
Treatment Pressure (Level of CPAP or 90th Percentile APAP)6 weeks clinicThe level of CPAP used for treatment versus the 90th percentile pressure used during APAP. The 90th percentile pressure is the value that is used if one converts a patient from APAP to CPAP.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PSG CPAP Titration Then CPAP Treatment
Patients diagnosed with sleep apnea will have a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration with polysomnography (PSG) followed by continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) Treatment Continuous positive airway pressure: continuous positive airway pressure determined by polysomnography titration
78
Auto-Adjusting Positive Airway Pressure
Following diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea patients will be have auto-adjusting positive airway pressure treatment without a titration. Auto-adjusting positive airway pressure treatment: Pressure range 4-18 centimeters of water (cm H2O)
78
Total156

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up69
Overall Studynot using CPAP53
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject80

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPSG CPAP Titration Then CPAP TreatmentAuto-Adjusting Positive Airway PressureTotal
Age, Continuous61.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
58.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
58.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
apnea+hypopnea index31.0 number of apneas and hypopneas /hour
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.1
28.6 number of apneas and hypopneas /hour
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.2
29.8 number of apneas and hypopneas /hour
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.6
Body mass index34.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
34.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8
34.6 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
19 Participants22 Participants41 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
59 Participants56 Participants115 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
78 participants78 participants156 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants5 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
72 Participants73 Participants145 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
19 / 7812 / 78
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 780 / 78

Outcome results

Primary

Positive Airway Pressure Adherence (Nightly Use of Treatment)

average nightly hours of using positive airway pressure (including 0 for nights not used)

Time frame: 6 weeks after starting treatment

Population: patients using cpap or apap at clinic visit

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PSG CPAP Titration Then CPAP TreatmentPositive Airway Pressure Adherence (Nightly Use of Treatment)3.99 hoursStandard Deviation 2.3
Auto-Adjusting Positive Airway PressurePositive Airway Pressure Adherence (Nightly Use of Treatment)4.45 hoursStandard Deviation 2.3
p-value: =0.2795% CI: [-0.35, 1.26]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale

Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) is measure of subjective sleepiness. Tendency to fall asleep in 8 situations. Total varies from zero to 24. A ESS of 10 or less is considered normal. The change in the ESS = post-treatment value - pre-treatment value. A decrease in the ESS (negative change) is consistent with less sleepiness.

Time frame: 6 weeks after starting treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PSG CPAP Titration Then CPAP TreatmentChange in Epworth Sleepiness Scale-3.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.8
Auto-Adjusting Positive Airway PressureChange in Epworth Sleepiness Scale-4.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.7
Comparison: Patients using PAP (average of \>=1/2 hour per night) at 6 weeks clinic visitp-value: =0.6595% CI: [-1.3, 2.1]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire

The functional outcomes of sleep questionnaire (FOSQ) is a standard quality of life measure used to assess improvement in quality of life after treatment for sleep disorders. The total FOSQ score was analyzed. The range if 5 to 20. A higher score is a better quality of life. This analysis compares the change after treatment (post treatment FOSQ - pretreatment FOSQ). A positive difference indicates an improve in the quality of life.

Time frame: 6 weeks at clinic

Population: Using PAP 1/2 hour or more nightly

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PSG CPAP Titration Then CPAP TreatmentChange in Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire2.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
Auto-Adjusting Positive Airway PressureChange in Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire2.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Comparison: Patients using PAP (average \>=1/2 hour per nightly use) at 6 weeks clinic visitp-value: =0.3395% CI: [-0.73, 2.1]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Residual Apnea-hypopnea Index

The PAP device estimate of residual apnea-hypopnea index (AHI, number of apneas and hypopneas per hour of patient use) an estimate of effectiveness of treatment. An AHI \< 10 is considered adequate treatment and \<5/hour ideal treatment.

Time frame: over first 6 weeks of treatment

Population: participants using PAP at clinic visit (\>= 1/2 hour of nightly use)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PSG CPAP Titration Then CPAP TreatmentResidual Apnea-hypopnea Index4.9 events (apneas+hypopneas)/hourStandard Deviation 4.9
Auto-Adjusting Positive Airway PressureResidual Apnea-hypopnea Index5.5 events (apneas+hypopneas)/hourStandard Deviation 4.7
Comparison: Patients using PAP (average \>= 1/2 hour of nightly use) at 6 weeks clinic visitp-value: =0.4995% CI: [-1.12, 2.29]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Treatment Pressure (Level of CPAP or 90th Percentile APAP)

The level of CPAP used for treatment versus the 90th percentile pressure used during APAP. The 90th percentile pressure is the value that is used if one converts a patient from APAP to CPAP.

Time frame: 6 weeks clinic

Population: participants using PAP at the 6 weeks clinic visit

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PSG CPAP Titration Then CPAP TreatmentTreatment Pressure (Level of CPAP or 90th Percentile APAP)11.7 cm H2OStandard Deviation 2.5
Auto-Adjusting Positive Airway PressureTreatment Pressure (Level of CPAP or 90th Percentile APAP)10.8 cm H2OStandard Deviation 3.1
Comparison: participants using PAP (average \>=1/2 hour of use) at 6 weeks clinic visitp-value: =0.0795% CI: [-1.92, 0.09]t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026