Skip to content

Long Term Safety and Efficacy Trial of Beclomethasone Dipropionate - Hydrofluoroalkane (BDP-HFA) 320 mcg in Allergic Rhinitis

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Phase 3 Clinical Study to Assess the Long-term Efficacy and Safety of BDP HFA Nasal Aerosol (320 mcg, Once Daily) in Adult and Adolescent Subjects (12 Years of Age and Older) With Perennial Allergic Rhinitis (PAR)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00988247
Enrollment
529
Registered
2009-10-02
Start date
2009-10-31
Completion date
2011-02-28
Last updated
2021-12-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial

Keywords

Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial, BDP-HFA, Hay fever, Allergic rhinitis

Brief summary

Subjects with perennial allergic rhinitis will be randomized to 320 mcg of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) using a hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) propellant or placebo as a nasal aerosol. The subjects will be followed for safety and efficacy for a period of 30 or 52 weeks. BDP HFA is a steroid which is currently FDA approved for the treatment of asthma. BDP-HFA should be safe and effective as a dry nasal aerosol which may be preferred by some patients.

Interventions

DRUGBeclomethasone dipropionate

Total daily dose of 320 micrograms per day of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) applied as a nasal aerosol each morning for 30-weeks (or 52-weeks, depending upon investigator site).

Placebo nasal aerosol administered daily for 30-weeks (or 52-weeks, depending upon investigator site).

Sponsors

Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female subjects, 12 years of age or older as of the Screening Visit (SV) * General good health, and free of any concomitant conditions or treatment that could interfere with study conduct, influence the interpretation of study observations/results, or put the subject at increased risk during the study * A history of PAR to a relevant perennial allergen for a minimum of two years immediately preceding the study Screening Visit (SV). The PAR must have been of sufficient severity to have required treatment (either continuous or intermittent) in the past, and in the investigator's judgment is expected to require treatment throughout the entire study * A demonstrated sensitivity to at least one allergen known to induce PAR through a standard skin prick test. A positive test is defined as a wheal diameter at least 3 mm larger than the diluent control wheal for the skin prick test. Documentation of a positive result 12 months prior to Screening Visit (SV) is acceptable * Other criteria apply

Exclusion criteria

* History of physical findings of nasal pathology, including nasal polyps or other clinically significant respiratory tract malformations, recent nasal biopsy, nasal trauma, including nasal piercing, or surgery and atrophic rhinitis or rhinitis medicamentosa (all within the last 60 days prior to Screening Visit \[SV\]) * Participation in any investigational drug study within the 30 days preceding the Screening Visit (SV) or planned participation in another investigational drug study at any time during this study * History of a respiratory infection or disorder (including, but not limited to bronchitis, pneumonia, chronic sinusitis, or influenza within the 14 days preceding the Screening Visit (SV) or development of a respiratory infection during the Run-In Period * Active asthma requiring treatment with inhaled or systemic corticosteroids and/or routine use of β-agonists and any controller drugs (e.g., theophylline, leukotriene antagonists). History of intermittent use (less than or equal to 3 uses per week) of inhaled short acting beta-agonists prior to the Screening Visit (SV) is acceptable. * Other criteria apply Randomization Criteria * Subject continues to be in general good health, meeting the selection criteria * Subject has a minimum subject-reported reflective TNSS of an average of 5 (out of a possible 12) on the last 7 days during the Run-In Period * The subject-reported scores for rhinorrhea or nasal congestion must be an average of 2 or greater during the last 7 days of the Run-In Period * Each subject must have adequately completed the electronic AR Assessment Diary (failure is defined as missing the diary entry on more than 2 calendar days during the last 7 days of the Run-In Period) * Other criteria apply

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Average Subject-Assessed 24-Hour Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) up to 30 WeeksBaseline (Days -6 to 0), Day 1 to Week 30Participants recorded the severity of their nasal symptoms (sneezing, runny nose, itchy nose and nasal congestion) in the past 24-hours (prior to the assessment) daily using the following scale: 0=absent (no sign/symptom); 1=mild (sign/symptom present, easily tolerated); 2=moderate (bothersome but tolerable); 3=severe (hard to tolerate, interfere with daily activities). The total nasal symptom score (sum of 4 symptom scores) ranges from 0 to 12 (worst symptoms). A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Average Subject-Assessed 24-Hour Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) up to 30 WeeksBaseline (Days -6 to 0), Day 1 to Week 30Participants recorded the severity of their nasal symptoms (sneezing, runny nose, itchy nose and nasal congestion) in the past 10 minutes (prior to the assessment) daily using the following scale: 0=absent (no sign/symptom); 1=mild (sign/symptom present, easily tolerated); 2=moderate (bothersome but tolerable); 3=severe (hard to tolerate, interfere with daily activities). The total nasal symptom score (sum of 4 symptom scores) ranges from 0 to 12 (worst symptoms). A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Average Subject-Assessed 24-Hour Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) up to 52 WeeksBaseline (Days -6 to 0), Day 1 to Week 52Participants recorded the severity of their nasal symptoms (sneezing, runny nose, itchy nose and nasal congestion) in the past 24-hours (prior to the assessment) daily using the following scale: 0=absent (no sign/symptom); 1=mild (sign/symptom present, easily tolerated); 2=moderate (bothersome but tolerable); 3=severe (hard to tolerate, interfere with daily activities). The total nasal symptom score (sum of 4 symptom scores) ranges from 0 to 12 (worst symptoms). A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Average Subject-Assessed 24-Hour Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) up to 52 WeeksBaseline (Days -6 to 0), Day 1 to Week 52Participants recorded the severity of their nasal symptoms (sneezing, runny nose, itchy nose and nasal congestion) in the past 10 minutes (prior to the assessment) daily using the following scale: 0=absent (no sign/symptom); 1=mild (sign/symptom present, easily tolerated); 2=moderate (bothersome but tolerable); 3=severe (hard to tolerate, interfere with daily activities). The total nasal symptom score (sum of 4 symptom scores) ranges from 0 to 12 (worst symptoms). A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline to Week 30 in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) in Participants With Impaired Quality of Life at BaselineDay 0 (Baseline) and Week 30The adult RQLQ has 28 questions in 7 domains (activities, sleep, non-nose/eye symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, and emotional). Participants were asked to recall their experiences during the previous week and to give their responses on a 7-point scale (0 = Least severe to 6 = Extremely severe). The overall RQLQ score is the mean of all 28 responses, and ranges from 0 to 7. Week 30 scores were compared to baseline scores. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) in Participants With Impaired Quality of Life at BaselineDay 0 (Baseline) and Week 52The adult RQLQ has 28 questions in 7 domains (activities, sleep, non-nose/eye symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, and emotional). Participants were asked to recall their experiences during the previous week and to give their responses on a 7-point scale (0 = Least severe to 6 = Extremely severe). The overall RQLQ score is the mean of all 28 responses, and ranges from 0 to 7. Week 52 scores were compared to baseline scores. A negative change score indicates improvement.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 857 patients were screened and 775 patients were enrolled in the study and participated in the Run-in Period. Of the 775 enrolled patients, 529 were randomized to study treatment.

Pre-assignment details

During the 7 to 21 day Run-in Period, participants self-administered a single-blind placebo nasal aerosol once daily in the morning and assessed and recorded their daily seasonal rhinitis symptoms to determine eligibility for randomization.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
BDP HFA 320 µg/Day
During the 30-week (or 52-week, depending upon investigator site) double-blind Treatment Period participants self-administered 4 actuations (two per nostril) of 80 µg beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) once daily each morning.
414
Placebo
During the 30-week (or 52-week, depending upon investigator site) double-blind Treatment Period participants self-administered four actuations (two per nostril) of placebo HFA once daily each morning.
110
Total524

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event173
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up112
Overall StudyOther30
Overall StudyPregnancy12
Overall StudyProtocol Violation45
Overall StudySponsor requested withdrawal31
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject4413

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBDP HFA 320 µg/DayPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous37.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
35.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
37.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
Body mass index28.8 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
28.4 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
28.7 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
45 Participants12 Participants57 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
369 Participants98 Participants467 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
7 participants2 participants9 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
13 participants1 participants14 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
63 participants14 participants77 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
3 participants0 participants3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown or Not Reported
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
341 participants97 participants438 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
286 Participants66 Participants352 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
128 Participants44 Participants172 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
216 / 41537 / 111
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 4153 / 111

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Average Subject-Assessed 24-Hour Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) up to 30 Weeks

Participants recorded the severity of their nasal symptoms (sneezing, runny nose, itchy nose and nasal congestion) in the past 24-hours (prior to the assessment) daily using the following scale: 0=absent (no sign/symptom); 1=mild (sign/symptom present, easily tolerated); 2=moderate (bothersome but tolerable); 3=severe (hard to tolerate, interfere with daily activities). The total nasal symptom score (sum of 4 symptom scores) ranges from 0 to 12 (worst symptoms). A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Days -6 to 0), Day 1 to Week 30

Population: Intent to treat population

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BDP HFA 320 µg/DayChange From Baseline in Average Subject-Assessed 24-Hour Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) up to 30 Weeks-3.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average Subject-Assessed 24-Hour Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) up to 30 Weeks-2.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.5, -0.5]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Average Subject-Assessed 24-Hour Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) up to 30 Weeks

Participants recorded the severity of their nasal symptoms (sneezing, runny nose, itchy nose and nasal congestion) in the past 10 minutes (prior to the assessment) daily using the following scale: 0=absent (no sign/symptom); 1=mild (sign/symptom present, easily tolerated); 2=moderate (bothersome but tolerable); 3=severe (hard to tolerate, interfere with daily activities). The total nasal symptom score (sum of 4 symptom scores) ranges from 0 to 12 (worst symptoms). A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Days -6 to 0), Day 1 to Week 30

Population: Intent to treat population

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BDP HFA 320 µg/DayChange From Baseline in Average Subject-Assessed 24-Hour Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) up to 30 Weeks-2.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average Subject-Assessed 24-Hour Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) up to 30 Weeks-2.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.4, -0.5]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Average Subject-Assessed 24-Hour Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) up to 52 Weeks

Participants recorded the severity of their nasal symptoms (sneezing, runny nose, itchy nose and nasal congestion) in the past 10 minutes (prior to the assessment) daily using the following scale: 0=absent (no sign/symptom); 1=mild (sign/symptom present, easily tolerated); 2=moderate (bothersome but tolerable); 3=severe (hard to tolerate, interfere with daily activities). The total nasal symptom score (sum of 4 symptom scores) ranges from 0 to 12 (worst symptoms). A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Days -6 to 0), Day 1 to Week 52

Population: Intent to treat population

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BDP HFA 320 µg/DayChange From Baseline in Average Subject-Assessed 24-Hour Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) up to 52 Weeks-3.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average Subject-Assessed 24-Hour Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) up to 52 Weeks-2.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.6, -0.6]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Average Subject-Assessed 24-Hour Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) up to 52 Weeks

Participants recorded the severity of their nasal symptoms (sneezing, runny nose, itchy nose and nasal congestion) in the past 24-hours (prior to the assessment) daily using the following scale: 0=absent (no sign/symptom); 1=mild (sign/symptom present, easily tolerated); 2=moderate (bothersome but tolerable); 3=severe (hard to tolerate, interfere with daily activities). The total nasal symptom score (sum of 4 symptom scores) ranges from 0 to 12 (worst symptoms). A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Days -6 to 0), Day 1 to Week 52

Population: Intent to treat population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BDP HFA 320 µg/DayChange From Baseline in Average Subject-Assessed 24-Hour Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) up to 52 Weeks-3.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average Subject-Assessed 24-Hour Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) up to 52 Weeks-2.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.6, -0.6]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 30 in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) in Participants With Impaired Quality of Life at Baseline

The adult RQLQ has 28 questions in 7 domains (activities, sleep, non-nose/eye symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, and emotional). Participants were asked to recall their experiences during the previous week and to give their responses on a 7-point scale (0 = Least severe to 6 = Extremely severe). The overall RQLQ score is the mean of all 28 responses, and ranges from 0 to 7. Week 30 scores were compared to baseline scores. A negative change score indicates improvement.

Time frame: Day 0 (Baseline) and Week 30

Population: The RQLQ population included only those participants over the age of 18 years with an impaired quality of life at Baseline as defined by a RQLQ score at Day 0 of 3.0 or greater.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BDP HFA 320 µg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 30 in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) in Participants With Impaired Quality of Life at Baseline-2.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 30 in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) in Participants With Impaired Quality of Life at Baseline-1.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
p-value: 0.14395% CI: [-0.7, 0.1]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) in Participants With Impaired Quality of Life at Baseline

The adult RQLQ has 28 questions in 7 domains (activities, sleep, non-nose/eye symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, and emotional). Participants were asked to recall their experiences during the previous week and to give their responses on a 7-point scale (0 = Least severe to 6 = Extremely severe). The overall RQLQ score is the mean of all 28 responses, and ranges from 0 to 7. Week 52 scores were compared to baseline scores. A negative change score indicates improvement.

Time frame: Day 0 (Baseline) and Week 52

Population: The RQLQ population included only those participants over the age of 18 years with an impaired quality of life at Baseline as defined by a RQLQ score at Day 0 of 3.0 or greater.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BDP HFA 320 µg/DayChange From Baseline to Week 52 in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) in Participants With Impaired Quality of Life at Baseline-2.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 52 in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) in Participants With Impaired Quality of Life at Baseline-1.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
p-value: 0.1395% CI: [-1.1, 0.1]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026