Skip to content

Exposure Chamber Trial With Cat Immunotherapy

A Phase II Trial Assessing the Tolerability and Pharmacodynamic Effect of US SLIT Cat Hair in Subject With Cat Allergy and Investigating Efficacy Variables in an Environmental Exposure Chamber Model

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00987909
Enrollment
60
Registered
2009-10-01
Start date
2009-09-30
Completion date
2010-05-31
Last updated
2010-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cat Allergy

Keywords

Cat, Allergy, Immunotherapy, Sublingual, Exposure chamber, Safety, Rhinoconjunctivitis

Brief summary

The main purpose of this trial is to investigate if any of three different doses of cat hair immunotherapy is safe for treatment of cat allergic patients.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALSpecific allergen immunotherapy (placebo)

Drops for sublingual administration, 0 mcg (placebo), once daily administration for 16 weeks

BIOLOGICALSpecific allergen immunotherapy

Drops for sublingual administration, 4.5 mcg Fel d1/day, once daily administration for 16 weeks.

Sponsors

Cetero Research, San Antonio
CollaboratorNETWORK
ALK-Abelló A/S
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* A history of rhinoconjunctivitis on exposure to cats * Positive Skin Prick Test response (wheal diameter at least 3 mm larger than the negative control * Positive specific IgE against Fel d1 (at least IgE Class 2) * Minimum qualifying rhinoconjunctivitis symptom score during EEC exposure at Visit 2

Exclusion criteria

* Uncontrolled asthma within the past 12 months, or asthma requiring regular use of inhaled corticosteroids * FEV1 less than 80% of predicted * Subjects who suffer from significant seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and cannot complete the clinical trial outside the local pollen season, or who have significant allergy to other allergens (e.g. other animals or house dust mites) that cannot be avoided during the trial period * Subjects who cannot tolerate baseline challenge in the Environmental Exposure Chamber * History of anaphylaxis with cardio/respiratory symptoms * A medical history of severe drug or food allergy with symptoms such as difficulty breathing, swelling of the face or a feeling of severe dizziness or increased heart rate * Chronic urticaria * History of severe cardiac disease * Treatment with immunosuppressives, anti-IgE monoclonal antibodies, tricyclic antidepressants or MAOIs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Adverse EventsDuring 16 weeks of treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Overall rhinoconjunctivitis symptom scoreAfter 0, 8, and 16 weeks of treatment
Acoustic RhinometryAfter 0, 8, and 16 weeks of treatment
Environmental Exposure Chamber Quality of LifeAfter 0, 8, and 16 weeks of treatment
Rhinoconjunctivitis symptom scoreAfter 0, 8, and 16 weeks of treatment
Nasal secretion immunologyAfter 0 and 16 weeks of treatment
Safety lab testing (clinical chemistry, haematology, urinalysis)After 0 and 16 weeks of treatment
Serum immunologyAfter 0, 8, and 16 weeks of treatment

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026