Skip to content

Endoscopy Every 2 Years or Only as Needed in Monitoring Patients With Barrett Esophagus

Barrett's Oesophagus Two Yearly Surveillance Versus Endoscopy at Need: a Randomised Controlled Trial to Estimate Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness Study (BOSS)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00987857
Enrollment
3400
Registered
2009-10-01
Start date
2009-03-31
Completion date
2022-05-31
Last updated
2017-08-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Esophageal Cancer, Precancerous Condition

Keywords

esophageal cancer, adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, Barrett esophagus

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Screening tests may help doctors find cancer cells early and plan better treatment. It is not yet known whether endoscopy every 2 years is more effective than endoscopy only as needed in finding esophageal cancer in patients with Barrett esophagus. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying endoscopy every 2 years to see how well it works compared with endoscopy only as needed in monitoring patients with Barrett esophagus.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: Primary * To establish whether endoscopic surveillance every 2 years or endoscopy at need only is superior in terms of overall survival and, if neither is superior, whether endoscopy at need only is non-inferior to surveillance every 2 years in patients with Barrett esophagus. Secondary * To estimate the cost-effectiveness of endoscopic surveillance every 2 years as compared to endoscopy at need only. * To establish whether there is a significant difference between endoscopic surveillance every 2 years or endoscopy at need only in terms of the incidence of esophageal cancer, gastric or esophageal cancer, or all cancers. * To establish whether there is a significant difference between endoscopic surveillance every 2 years or endoscopy at need only in terms of the time to diagnosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma. * To establish whether there is a significant difference between endoscopic surveillance every 2 years or endoscopy at need only in terms of the stage of esophageal adenocarcinoma at diagnosis using TNM staging. * To establish whether there is a significant difference between endoscopic surveillance every 2 years or endoscopy at need only in terms of morbidity and mortality related to endoscopy, esophageal surgery, and other endoscopy-related interventions (e.g., ablation). * To establish whether there is a significant difference between endoscopic surveillance every 2 years or endoscopy at need only in terms of the frequency of endoscopy. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to age at diagnosis (\< 65 years vs ≥ 65 years), length of Barrett metaplasia segment including tongues (\< 2 cm vs ≥ 2 cm and ≤ 3 cm vs \> 3 cm and ≤ 8 cm vs \> 8 cm), and newly diagnosed disease (defined as the date of endoscopy confirming Barrett metaplasia was within the past 4 months) (yes vs no). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 intervention arms. * Arm I: Patients undergo surveillance endoscopy with quadrantic biopsies taken every 2 cm. Patients undergo endoscopy every 2 years for a total of 6 endoscopies over 10 years. * Arm II: Patients undergo endoscopy as needed over 10 years. All patients may undergo urgent endoscopy if they develop dysphagia, unexplained weight loss of \> 7 lb, iron-deficiency anemia, recurrent vomiting, or worsening upper gastrointestinal symptoms. All patients complete a questionnaire that includes a quality-of-life measure and questions about medication at baseline, every 2 years, and following key events (e.g., diagnosis of any cancer or high-grade dysplasia).

Interventions

PROCEDURE2 yearly endoscopy

2 yearly endoscopy versus endoscopy at need

2 yearly endoscopy versus endoscopy at need

2 yearly endoscopy versus endoscopy at need

PROCEDUREendoscopic biopsy

2 yearly endoscopy versus endoscopy at need

2 yearly endoscopy versus endoscopy at need

PROCEDUREquality-of-life assessment

QOL aims to elicit any differences in QOL between 2 yearly endoscopy versus endoscopy at need

All Barretts patients to be screened

Sponsors

Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 120 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Histologically confirmed circumferential Barrett metaplasia meeting 1 of the following criteria: * At least 1 cm from the gastro-esophageal junction * At least a 2 cm non-circumferential tongue of Barrett metaplasia * Undergone endoscopy within the last 2 years to confirm Barrett metaplasia and exclude high-grade dysplasia and carcinoma * No known high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: * Resident of the United Kingdom * Informed of the risk of Barrett esophagus developing into esophageal cancer, either at the visit when the invitation letter is issued or on a documented previous occasion * Able to undergo endoscopy * No medical conditions that would make endoscopy difficult or hazardous PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: * See Disease Characteristics

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Overall survival

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence of esophageal cancer, gastric or esophageal cancer, or all cancers
Time to diagnosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma
Cost-effectiveness
Morbidity and mortality related to endoscopy, esophageal surgery, and other endoscopy-related interventions
Frequency of endoscopy
Stage of esophageal adenocarcinoma at diagnosis using TNM staging

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026