Skip to content

Drain After Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Drain After Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00986544
Enrollment
106
Registered
2009-09-30
Start date
2009-12-31
Completion date
2011-02-28
Last updated
2012-03-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cholelithiasis

Keywords

Laparoscopy, cholecystectomy, drainage

Brief summary

The trial aims to assess the value of drains in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Detailed description

After laparoscopic gallbladder removal patients are randomized to have a suction drain positioned in the subhepatic space or to have a sham drain in the subhepatic space. The primary outcome measure will be the presence of subhepatic fluid collection at ultrasonographic examination on the first postoperative day. Secondary outcome measures will be postoperative abdominal and shoulder tip pain, use of analgesics, nausea, vomiting and morbidity

Interventions

PROCEDUREno drain

drain positioned on the skin

PROCEDUREdrain positioned

drain positioned in the subhepatic space

PROCEDUREdrain not positioned

Drain positioned in the abdominal wall

Sponsors

University of Roma La Sapienza
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Exclusion criteria

* acute cholecystitis, cholangitis, or pancreatitis * no contraindication for the laparoscopic * no other additional procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Subhepatic Collection at Ultrasonographic Examinationfirst postoperative dayAn abdominal ultrasonography was routinely performed on the first postoperative day with the aim to detect any fluid collection. If present, the volume in ml of subhepatic collection was calculated.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Number of Participants With Postoperative Complications1 month

Countries

Italy

Participant flow

Recruitment details

From December 1, 2009 to December 31, 2010 patients were submitted to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Hospital P.Colombo, Velletri, Italy; University of Rome La Sapienza- Polo Pontino, Terracina, Italy; Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.

Pre-assignment details

Patients with acute cholecystitis, cholangitis, or pancreatitis were excluded. If intraoperative common bile duct exploration or any other additional procedure were performed, patients were also excluded

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Absence of Drain
After laparoscopic gallbladder removal no suction drain positioned in the subhepatic space.
53
Drain
drain positioned in the subhepatic space after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
53
Total106

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDrainTotalAbsence of Drain
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
19 Participants34 Participants15 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
34 Participants72 Participants38 Participants
Age Continuous48.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2
47.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.4
47.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.7
Region of Enrollment
Italy
53 participants106 participants53 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
42 Participants82 Participants40 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants24 Participants13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 530 / 53
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 530 / 53

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Subhepatic Collection at Ultrasonographic Examination

An abdominal ultrasonography was routinely performed on the first postoperative day with the aim to detect any fluid collection. If present, the volume in ml of subhepatic collection was calculated.

Time frame: first postoperative day

Population: An intention to treat (ITT) analysis was performed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absence of DrainNumber of Participants With Subhepatic Collection at Ultrasonographic Examination45 Participants
DrainNumber of Participants With Subhepatic Collection at Ultrasonographic Examination46 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Postoperative Complications

Time frame: 1 month

Population: Intention to treat analysis

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absence of DrainNumber of Participants With Postoperative Complications3 participants
DrainNumber of Participants With Postoperative Complications4 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026