Skip to content

PEAK PlasmaBlade 4.0 in Bilateral Breast Reduction

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate Use of the PEAK PlasmaBlade 4.0 in Bilateral Breast Reduction

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00986453
Acronym
PRECISE
Enrollment
45
Registered
2009-09-30
Start date
2010-01-31
Completion date
2011-09-30
Last updated
2013-01-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Macromastia

Keywords

Breast Reduction, PlasmaBlade, Electrosurgery, PEAK Surgical, Medtronic Advanced Energy, Medtronic

Brief summary

The objective of this clinical study is to evaluate the operative performance of the PEAK PlasmaBlade 4.0 during bilateral breast reduction; to monitor and record post-operative pain, adverse events and skin scarring following surgery; and compare these outcomes to the current standard of care (SOC).

Detailed description

Bilateral breast reduction is a surgical procedure performed to remove excess breast tissue from both female breasts for therapeutic or cosmetic indications. The purpose of the breast reduction is to decrease the weight of the breasts and restructure the breast tissue for a more favorable appearance. Typically, a scalpel is used for the skin incision and a traditional electrosurgical device is used to cut away any excess tissue. The PEAK PlasmaBlade™ uses pulsed radiofrequency (RF) energy and a highly-insulated handpiece design to enable precision cutting and coagulation at the point of application. The PlasmaBlade has received FDA clearance for use in plastic, general, and ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgery, and has demonstrated a significantly reduced thermal injury profile in incised tissue compared to traditional electrosurgical devices. It is hypothesized that this benefit may improve the post-operative outcome of patients undergoing bilateral breast reduction. A total of forty-five (45) subjects were enrolled into the study. Forty-three (43) underwent bilateral breast reduction, and two (2) subjects were withdrawn prior to surgery. Enrollment and surgeries took place between 18 September 2009 and 12 August 2011. Potential subjects were screened against the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study protocol and were required to provide informed consent prior to enrollment. Following enrollment, subject operative sites were prospectively randomized to the SOC or PlasmaBlade (PB or PEAK) study groups and scheduled for bilateral breast reduction. Subjects were unaware of which device was used on which breast. Subjects were required to attend two follow-up visits after surgery, approximately one and six weeks following surgery.

Interventions

The PEAK PlasmaBlade will be used for the entirety of the breast reduction, including the skin incision.

Scalpel will be used for the skin incision and traditional electrosurgery for the subcutaneous dissection.

Sponsors

Medtronic Surgical Technologies
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Age between 20 and 60 2. Physically healthy, stable weight, non-smoker 3. Desiring bilateral breast reduction 4. Subject must understand the nature of the procedure and provide written informed consent prior to the procedure. 5. Subject must be willing and able to comply with specified follow-up evaluations. 6. Female subjects must either be no longer capable of reproduction, or taking acceptable measures to prevent pregnancy during the study, and have a negative pregnancy test prior to participation in the study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Age younger than 20 or greater than 60 years old 2. Anticoagulation therapy which cannot be discontinued 3. Smoking (any kind) 4. Infection (local or systemic) 5. Cognitive impairment or mental illness 6. Severe cardiopulmonary deficiencies 7. Known coagulopathy 8. Immunocompromised 9. Prior history of breast cancer 10. Kidney disease (any type) 11. Currently taking any medication known to affect healing 12. Subjects who are status-post gastric banding or gastric bypass 13. Currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug trial 14. Unable to follow instructions or complete follow-up

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative Pain0 to 10 days postoperativeThe difference in pain was measured by visual analog scale for 24 hours post-operatively and for 10 post-operative days twice daily between the SOC and PlasmaBlade operative sites. Wong-Baker FACES Visual Analog Scale, 0 (no hurt) to 10 (hurts worst). The results represent the mean of each subject's mean pain scores over 10 days.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Estimated Blood LossIntraoperative
Operative TimeIntraoperative
Amount of Tissue RemovedIntraoperative
Dissection PerformanceIntraoperativeAmount of tissue (g) removed over time (min)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects' individual breasts were prospectively randomized to the standard of care or PEAK PlasmaBlade.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Total Study Population
Subjects' individual breasts were prospectively randomized to the standard of care or PEAK PlasmaBlade.
45
Total45

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotal Study Population
Age Continuous41.12 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2
Region of Enrollment
United States
45 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
45 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 434 / 43
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 430 / 43

Outcome results

Primary

Postoperative Pain

The difference in pain was measured by visual analog scale for 24 hours post-operatively and for 10 post-operative days twice daily between the SOC and PlasmaBlade operative sites. Wong-Baker FACES Visual Analog Scale, 0 (no hurt) to 10 (hurts worst). The results represent the mean of each subject's mean pain scores over 10 days.

Time frame: 0 to 10 days postoperative

Population: Two subjects were removed from the analysis of secondary variables owing to protocol deviations.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PEAK PlasmaBladePostoperative Pain4.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.05
Standard of Care (SOC)Postoperative Pain4.66 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.08
p-value: 0.4697t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Amount of Tissue Removed

Time frame: Intraoperative

Population: Two subjects were removed from the analysis of secondary variables owing to protocol deviations.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PEAK PlasmaBladeAmount of Tissue Removed685.92 gStandard Deviation 347.08
Standard of Care (SOC)Amount of Tissue Removed649.18 gStandard Deviation 322.07
p-value: 0.0776t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Dissection Performance

Amount of tissue (g) removed over time (min)

Time frame: Intraoperative

Population: Two subjects were removed from the analysis of secondary variables owing to protocol deviations.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PEAK PlasmaBladeDissection Performance19.81 g/minStandard Deviation 10.65
Standard of Care (SOC)Dissection Performance15.99 g/minStandard Deviation 7.8
p-value: 0.0002t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Estimated Blood Loss

Time frame: Intraoperative

Population: Two subjects were removed from the analysis of secondary variables owing to protocol deviations.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PEAK PlasmaBladeEstimated Blood Loss56.59 mLStandard Deviation 48.44
Standard of Care (SOC)Estimated Blood Loss64.27 mLStandard Deviation 34.23
p-value: 0.147t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Operative Time

Time frame: Intraoperative

Population: Two subjects were removed from the analysis of secondary variables owing to protocol deviations.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PEAK PlasmaBladeOperative Time37.40 minutesStandard Deviation 15.52
Standard of Care (SOC)Operative Time41.55 minutesStandard Deviation 11.61
p-value: 0.0428t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026