Skip to content

SPD489 in Adults With Persistent Executive Function Impairments (EFI) and Partial or Full Remission of Recurrent Major Depressive Disorder

Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of SPD489 in Adults With Clinically Significant, Persistent Executive Function Impairments (EFI) and Partial or Full Remission of Recurrent Major Depressive Disorder

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00985725
Enrollment
143
Registered
2009-09-28
Start date
2009-10-29
Completion date
2011-04-18
Last updated
2021-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder

Keywords

Major Depressive Disorder

Brief summary

To evaluate the efficacy of SPD489 for the treatment of executive function impairments (EFI) when used as an adjunct to stable, standard therapy in the setting of partial or full remission from recurrent Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) as measured by the Global Executive Composite (GEC) T-score of the Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning - Adult Version (BRIEF-A).

Interventions

Oral, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, and 70mg capsules, once daily

DRUGMatching placebo

oral, once daily

Sponsors

Shire
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged 18-55 with a primary diagnosis of nonpsychotic uni-polar depression

Exclusion criteria

* Current co-morbid psychiatric disorder

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult Version Global Executive Composite T-score (BRIEF-A GEC T) at Week 9, Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)Baseline and week 9BRIEF-A Global Executive Composite assesses behavioral aspects of executive function. Items are rated 1 (never), 2 (sometimes), and 3 (often). There is no range for a total score. Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in BRIEF-A T-scores at Week 9, LOCFBaseline and week 9BRIEF-A is a validated 75-item questionnaire. Items are rated 1 (never), 2 (sometimes), and 3 (often). There is no range for a total score. Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.
Change From Baseline in Central Nervous System Vital Signs Computerized Cognitive Testing Battery Neurocognitive Domain and Index Scores at up to 9 Weeks/EndpointBaseline and up to 9 weeks/EndpointThis measures the speed and accuracy of basic mental functions. Scores are normalized from raw scores and present an age matched score relative to other people in a normative sample. Scores are normalized with a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15. Scores \< 70 indicate likely deficit and impairment, and scores \> 110 indicate high function and capacity. Higher scores are better.
Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at BaselineBaselineCGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill)
Percent of Participants With CGI-S at up to 9 Weeks/EndpointUp to 9 weeks/EndpointCGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill)
Percentage of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 9, LOCFWeek 9Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale.
Change From Baseline in Endicott Work Productivity Scale (EWPS) Total Score at up to 9 Weeks/EndpointBaseline and up to 9 weeks/EndpointThe EWPS quantifies work performance, productivity attitudes and behaviors assessing 25 items on a scale ranging from 0 (high performance) to 4 (lowest performance). Scores range from 0 to 100 with 100 representing lowest productivity.
Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Ǻsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Week 9 - (LOCF)Baseline and week 9MADRS is a validated, 10-item rating scale with each item being scored on a scale from 0-6 with a total score ranging from 0-60. Lower scores indicate a decreased severity of depression.
Change From Baseline in CSFQ-14 Total Scores for Females at Week 9, LOCFBaseline and week 9This is a 14 item self-report tool that evaluates sexual functioning. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always) with total scores ranging from 14 to 70. Higher scores reflect better sexual functioning.
Change From Baseline in Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12) Scale Total Scores at Week 9Baseline and week 9The SF-12 is a 12-item self-report questionnaire that is a subset of the SF-36 Health Survey. The survey captures physical and mental health. Each of the 12 items is scored using various scales with a total score ranging from 0 (lowest level of health) to 100 (highest level of health).
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) Total Scores at up to 9 Weeks/EndpointBaseline and up to 9 weeks/EndpointThe Q-LES-Q is a 93-item self-report questionnaire on quality of life and health. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good) with a total score ranging from 93 to 465. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.
Change From Baseline in Amphetamine Cessation Symptom Assessment (ACSA) Total Score at Week 11Baseline and week 11ACSA scale has 16 symptom items rated on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) with a possible total score range of 0 to 64. Higher scores indicate greater withdrawal symptom severity.
Change From Baseline in the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item (GAD-7) Total Score at Week 9, LOCFBaseline and week 9The GAD-7 is a 7-item self-report questionnaire for assessing anxiety severity. Each item is scored using a scale that ranges from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) with total scores ranging from 0 to 21. Lower scores indicate a reduction in anxiety.
Change From Baseline in Sheehan Suicidality Tracking Scale (STS) Total Score at Week 9Baseline and week 9The STS is an 8-question clinician-rated assessment of suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, and accidents. The items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) and summed to produce a total score ranging from 0 to 32. Lower scores indicate reduced suicidal tendencies.
Change From Baseline in Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ-14) Total Scores for Males at Week 9, LOCFBaseline and week 9This is a 14 item self-report tool that evaluates sexual functioning. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always) with total scores ranging from 14 to 70. Higher scores reflect better sexual functioning.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Subjects clinically stable on an anti-depressant were randomized (1:1) to LDX or placebo augmentation for 9 weeks. Double-blind LDX or placebo was administered orally as adjunctive therapy (20 to 70 mg per day, titrated over the initial 6 weeks), with the optimal individual dose being continued during a 3-week dose maintenance period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX, SPD489) is administered orally once-daily at doses of either 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, or 70 mg for 9 weeks.
71
Placebo
Administered orally once-daily for 9 weeks.
72
Total143

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event41
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up11
Overall StudyNon-compliance12
Overall StudyOut-of-window visits01
Overall StudyProtocol Violation13
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject44

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous41.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.79
39.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.59
40.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.23
Age, Customized
18 to 39 years
28 Participants34 Participants62 Participants
Age, Customized
40 to 55 years
43 Participants38 Participants81 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
71 Participants72 Participants143 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
51 Participants48 Participants99 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants24 Participants44 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
56 / 7153 / 72
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 714 / 72

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult Version Global Executive Composite T-score (BRIEF-A GEC T) at Week 9, Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

BRIEF-A Global Executive Composite assesses behavioral aspects of executive function. Items are rated 1 (never), 2 (sometimes), and 3 (often). There is no range for a total score. Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.

Time frame: Baseline and week 9

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) defined as all randomized subjects who took at least 1 dose of randomized investigational product and had at least 1 primary efficacy assessment after baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Change From Baseline in Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult Version Global Executive Composite T-score (BRIEF-A GEC T) at Week 9, Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)-21.2 T-scoresStandard Error 1.67
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult Version Global Executive Composite T-score (BRIEF-A GEC T) at Week 9, Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)-13.2 T-scoresStandard Error 1.66
p-value: 0.000995% CI: [-12.7, -3.3]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Amphetamine Cessation Symptom Assessment (ACSA) Total Score at Week 11

ACSA scale has 16 symptom items rated on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) with a possible total score range of 0 to 64. Higher scores indicate greater withdrawal symptom severity.

Time frame: Baseline and week 11

Population: SAS population was used for this assessment. However, not all subjects from the SAS completed this assessment, therefore the total number of subjects analyzed for this outcome is less than the total number of subjects that comprise the SAS population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Change From Baseline in Amphetamine Cessation Symptom Assessment (ACSA) Total Score at Week 11-9.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.43
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Amphetamine Cessation Symptom Assessment (ACSA) Total Score at Week 11-5.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.86
Secondary

Change From Baseline in BRIEF-A T-scores at Week 9, LOCF

BRIEF-A is a validated 75-item questionnaire. Items are rated 1 (never), 2 (sometimes), and 3 (often). There is no range for a total score. Raw scale scores are used to generate T-scores. A reduction in score indicates less impairment.

Time frame: Baseline and week 9

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Change From Baseline in BRIEF-A T-scores at Week 9, LOCFEmotional control subscale-13.8 T-scoresStandard Error 1.48
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Change From Baseline in BRIEF-A T-scores at Week 9, LOCFInitiate subscale-19.4 T-scoresStandard Error 1.57
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Change From Baseline in BRIEF-A T-scores at Week 9, LOCFShift subscale-16.2 T-scoresStandard Error 1.51
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Change From Baseline in BRIEF-A T-scores at Week 9, LOCFWorking memory subscale-20.1 T-scoresStandard Error 1.65
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Change From Baseline in BRIEF-A T-scores at Week 9, LOCFSelf-monitor subscale-13.8 T-scoresStandard Error 1.36
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Change From Baseline in BRIEF-A T-scores at Week 9, LOCFPlan/Organize subscale-18.7 T-scoresStandard Error 1.58
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Change From Baseline in BRIEF-A T-scores at Week 9, LOCFInhibit subscale-13.5 T-scoresStandard Error 1.26
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Change From Baseline in BRIEF-A T-scores at Week 9, LOCFTask monitor subscale-16.8 T-scoresStandard Error 1.63
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Change From Baseline in BRIEF-A T-scores at Week 9, LOCFMetacognition index-21.1 T-scoresStandard Error 1.67
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Change From Baseline in BRIEF-A T-scores at Week 9, LOCFOrganization of materials subscale-15.2 T-scoresStandard Error 1.49
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Change From Baseline in BRIEF-A T-scores at Week 9, LOCFBehavioral recognition index-17.4 T-scoresStandard Error 1.51
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BRIEF-A T-scores at Week 9, LOCFOrganization of materials subscale-8.2 T-scoresStandard Error 1.48
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BRIEF-A T-scores at Week 9, LOCFBehavioral recognition index-12.3 T-scoresStandard Error 1.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BRIEF-A T-scores at Week 9, LOCFInhibit subscale-9.3 T-scoresStandard Error 1.25
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BRIEF-A T-scores at Week 9, LOCFShift subscale-10.6 T-scoresStandard Error 1.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BRIEF-A T-scores at Week 9, LOCFEmotional control subscale-10.1 T-scoresStandard Error 1.47
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BRIEF-A T-scores at Week 9, LOCFSelf-monitor subscale-10.7 T-scoresStandard Error 1.35
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BRIEF-A T-scores at Week 9, LOCFMetacognition index-12.2 T-scoresStandard Error 1.66
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BRIEF-A T-scores at Week 9, LOCFInitiate subscale-10.8 T-scoresStandard Error 1.56
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BRIEF-A T-scores at Week 9, LOCFWorking memory subscale-11.0 T-scoresStandard Error 1.64
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BRIEF-A T-scores at Week 9, LOCFPlan/Organize subscale-11.3 T-scoresStandard Error 1.57
PlaceboChange From Baseline in BRIEF-A T-scores at Week 9, LOCFTask monitor subscale-11.9 T-scoresStandard Error 1.62
Comparison: Behavioral recognition indexp-value: 0.018195% CI: [-9.4, -0.9]ANCOVA
Comparison: Inhibit subscalep-value: 0.020495% CI: [-7.7, -0.7]ANCOVA
Comparison: Shift subscalep-value: 0.00995% CI: [-9.8, -1.4]ANCOVA
Comparison: Emotional control subscalep-value: 0.079395% CI: [-7.9, 0.4]ANCOVA
Comparison: Self-monitor subscalep-value: 0.101495% CI: [-7, 0.6]ANCOVA
Comparison: Metacognition indexp-value: 0.000295% CI: [-13.7, -4.3]ANCOVA
Comparison: Initiate subscalep-value: 0.000295% CI: [-12.9, -4.2]ANCOVA
Comparison: Working memory subscalep-value: 0.000195% CI: [-13.7, -4.5]ANCOVA
Comparison: Plan/Organize subscalep-value: 0.00195% CI: [-11.9, -3.1]ANCOVA
Comparison: Task monitor subscalep-value: 0.035795% CI: [-9.4, -0.3]ANCOVA
Comparison: Organization of materials subscalep-value: 0.001295% CI: [-11.1, -2.8]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Central Nervous System Vital Signs Computerized Cognitive Testing Battery Neurocognitive Domain and Index Scores at up to 9 Weeks/Endpoint

This measures the speed and accuracy of basic mental functions. Scores are normalized from raw scores and present an age matched score relative to other people in a normative sample. Scores are normalized with a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15. Scores \< 70 indicate likely deficit and impairment, and scores \> 110 indicate high function and capacity. Higher scores are better.

Time frame: Baseline and up to 9 weeks/Endpoint

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Change From Baseline in Central Nervous System Vital Signs Computerized Cognitive Testing Battery Neurocognitive Domain and Index Scores at up to 9 Weeks/EndpointComplex information speed processing index8.7 Response scoresStandard Deviation 10.13
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Change From Baseline in Central Nervous System Vital Signs Computerized Cognitive Testing Battery Neurocognitive Domain and Index Scores at up to 9 Weeks/EndpointExecutive function index11.0 Response scoresStandard Deviation 14.8
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Change From Baseline in Central Nervous System Vital Signs Computerized Cognitive Testing Battery Neurocognitive Domain and Index Scores at up to 9 Weeks/EndpointNeurocognitive index11.5 Response scoresStandard Deviation 17.14
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Central Nervous System Vital Signs Computerized Cognitive Testing Battery Neurocognitive Domain and Index Scores at up to 9 Weeks/EndpointComplex information speed processing index3.7 Response scoresStandard Deviation 9.02
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Central Nervous System Vital Signs Computerized Cognitive Testing Battery Neurocognitive Domain and Index Scores at up to 9 Weeks/EndpointExecutive function index6.0 Response scoresStandard Deviation 14.43
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Central Nervous System Vital Signs Computerized Cognitive Testing Battery Neurocognitive Domain and Index Scores at up to 9 Weeks/EndpointNeurocognitive index2.5 Response scoresStandard Deviation 13.74
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ-14) Total Scores for Males at Week 9, LOCF

This is a 14 item self-report tool that evaluates sexual functioning. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always) with total scores ranging from 14 to 70. Higher scores reflect better sexual functioning.

Time frame: Baseline and week 9

Population: The Safety Analysis Set (SAS) defined as all randomized subjects who took at least 1 dose of investigational product and for whom at least 1 follow-up safety assessment was completed. Only the males from the SAS population were used and not all of them completed this outcome assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Change From Baseline in Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ-14) Total Scores for Males at Week 9, LOCF2.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.61
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ-14) Total Scores for Males at Week 9, LOCF2.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.34
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CSFQ-14 Total Scores for Females at Week 9, LOCF

This is a 14 item self-report tool that evaluates sexual functioning. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always) with total scores ranging from 14 to 70. Higher scores reflect better sexual functioning.

Time frame: Baseline and week 9

Population: Only the females from the SAS population were used and not all of them completed this outcome assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Change From Baseline in CSFQ-14 Total Scores for Females at Week 9, LOCF2.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.47
PlaceboChange From Baseline in CSFQ-14 Total Scores for Females at Week 9, LOCF1.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.6
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Endicott Work Productivity Scale (EWPS) Total Score at up to 9 Weeks/Endpoint

The EWPS quantifies work performance, productivity attitudes and behaviors assessing 25 items on a scale ranging from 0 (high performance) to 4 (lowest performance). Scores range from 0 to 100 with 100 representing lowest productivity.

Time frame: Baseline and up to 9 weeks/Endpoint

Population: FAS population was used for this assessment. However, not all subjects from the FAS completed this assessment, therefore the total number of subjects analyzed for this outcome is less than the total number of subjects that comprise the FAS population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Change From Baseline in Endicott Work Productivity Scale (EWPS) Total Score at up to 9 Weeks/Endpoint-20.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.24
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Endicott Work Productivity Scale (EWPS) Total Score at up to 9 Weeks/Endpoint-15.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.32
p-value: 0.173195% CI: [-10.9, 2]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Ǻsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Week 9 - (LOCF)

MADRS is a validated, 10-item rating scale with each item being scored on a scale from 0-6 with a total score ranging from 0-60. Lower scores indicate a decreased severity of depression.

Time frame: Baseline and week 9

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Change From Baseline in Montgomery-Ǻsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Week 9 - (LOCF)-5.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.66
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Montgomery-Ǻsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Week 9 - (LOCF)-3.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.66
p-value: 0.046595% CI: [-3.7, 0]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) Total Scores at up to 9 Weeks/Endpoint

The Q-LES-Q is a 93-item self-report questionnaire on quality of life and health. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good) with a total score ranging from 93 to 465. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.

Time frame: Baseline and up to 9 weeks/Endpoint

Population: FAS population was used for this assessment. However, not all subjects from the FAS completed this assessment, therefore the total number of subjects analyzed for this outcome is less than the total number of subjects that comprise the FAS population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) Total Scores at up to 9 Weeks/EndpointPhysical health activities17.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.03
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) Total Scores at up to 9 Weeks/EndpointOverall life satisfaction12.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.37
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) Total Scores at up to 9 Weeks/EndpointPhysical health activities8.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.82
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) Total Scores at up to 9 Weeks/EndpointOverall life satisfaction9.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.27
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sheehan Suicidality Tracking Scale (STS) Total Score at Week 9

The STS is an 8-question clinician-rated assessment of suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, and accidents. The items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) and summed to produce a total score ranging from 0 to 32. Lower scores indicate reduced suicidal tendencies.

Time frame: Baseline and week 9

Population: SAS population was used for this assessment. However, not all subjects from the SAS completed this assessment, therefore the total number of subjects analyzed for this outcome is less than the total number of subjects that comprise the SAS population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Change From Baseline in Sheehan Suicidality Tracking Scale (STS) Total Score at Week 9-0.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Sheehan Suicidality Tracking Scale (STS) Total Score at Week 90.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.13
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12) Scale Total Scores at Week 9

The SF-12 is a 12-item self-report questionnaire that is a subset of the SF-36 Health Survey. The survey captures physical and mental health. Each of the 12 items is scored using various scales with a total score ranging from 0 (lowest level of health) to 100 (highest level of health).

Time frame: Baseline and week 9

Population: FAS population was used for this assessment. However, not all subjects from the FAS completed this assessment, therefore the total number of subjects analyzed for this outcome is less than the total number of subjects that comprise the FAS population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Change From Baseline in Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12) Scale Total Scores at Week 9Aggregate physical-0.10 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.461
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Change From Baseline in Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12) Scale Total Scores at Week 9Aggregate mental0.69 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.987
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12) Scale Total Scores at Week 9Aggregate physical-0.23 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.473
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12) Scale Total Scores at Week 9Aggregate mental0.63 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.807
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item (GAD-7) Total Score at Week 9, LOCF

The GAD-7 is a 7-item self-report questionnaire for assessing anxiety severity. Each item is scored using a scale that ranges from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) with total scores ranging from 0 to 21. Lower scores indicate a reduction in anxiety.

Time frame: Baseline and week 9

Population: SAS

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Change From Baseline in the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item (GAD-7) Total Score at Week 9, LOCF-4.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.81
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item (GAD-7) Total Score at Week 9, LOCF-3.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.43
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 9, LOCF

Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale.

Time frame: Week 9

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Percentage of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 9, LOCF60.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 9, LOCF38.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent of Participants With CGI-S at up to 9 Weeks/Endpoint

CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill)

Time frame: Up to 9 weeks/Endpoint

Population: FAS population was used for this assessment. However, not all subjects from the FAS completed this assessment, therefore the total number of subjects analyzed for this outcome is less than the total number of subjects that comprise the FAS population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Percent of Participants With CGI-S at up to 9 Weeks/EndpointSeverely ill0.0 percentage of participants
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Percent of Participants With CGI-S at up to 9 Weeks/EndpointNormal, not at all ill21.7 percentage of participants
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Percent of Participants With CGI-S at up to 9 Weeks/EndpointBorderline mentally ill40.6 percentage of participants
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Percent of Participants With CGI-S at up to 9 Weeks/EndpointMildly ill20.3 percentage of participants
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Percent of Participants With CGI-S at up to 9 Weeks/EndpointModerately ill14.5 percentage of participants
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Percent of Participants With CGI-S at up to 9 Weeks/EndpointMarkedly ill2.9 percentage of participants
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Percent of Participants With CGI-S at up to 9 Weeks/EndpointAmong the most extremely ill0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercent of Participants With CGI-S at up to 9 Weeks/EndpointSeverely ill0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercent of Participants With CGI-S at up to 9 Weeks/EndpointModerately ill34.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercent of Participants With CGI-S at up to 9 Weeks/EndpointNormal, not at all ill15.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercent of Participants With CGI-S at up to 9 Weeks/EndpointAmong the most extremely ill0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercent of Participants With CGI-S at up to 9 Weeks/EndpointBorderline mentally ill23.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercent of Participants With CGI-S at up to 9 Weeks/EndpointMarkedly ill1.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercent of Participants With CGI-S at up to 9 Weeks/EndpointMildly ill24.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Baseline

CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill)

Time frame: Baseline

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at BaselineMildly ill42.3 percentage of participants
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at BaselineMarkedly ill4.2 percentage of participants
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at BaselineBorderline mentally ill7.0 percentage of participants
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at BaselineSeverely ill1.4 percentage of participants
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at BaselineModerately ill45.1 percentage of participants
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at BaselineAmong the most extremely ill0.0 percentage of participants
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate (LDX)Percent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at BaselineNormal, not at all ill0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at BaselineAmong the most extremely ill0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at BaselineNormal, not at all ill2.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at BaselineBorderline mentally ill8.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at BaselineMildly ill36.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at BaselineModerately ill48.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at BaselineMarkedly ill4.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercent of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at BaselineSeverely ill0.0 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 22, 2026