Skip to content

Tanezumab In Osteoarthritis Of The Hip Or Knee

A PHASE 3 RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO AND OXYCODONE CONTROLLED MULTI-CENTER STUDY OF THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TANEZUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE OR HIP

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00985621
Enrollment
614
Registered
2009-09-28
Start date
2009-10-30
Completion date
2011-02-04
Last updated
2021-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis

Keywords

monoclonal antibody, RN624, PF-04383119, nerve growth factor, OA, pain, arthritis

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to test the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of tanezumab compared to oxycodone CR and placebo in patients with osteoarthritis

Detailed description

This study was terminated on 13 Dec 2010 following a US FDA clinical hold for tanezumab osteoarthritis clinical studies which halted dosing and enrollment of patients on 23 June 2010 for potential safety issues.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALtanezumab 10 mg

tanezumab 10 mg one dose at weeks 0 and 8

BIOLOGICALtanezumab 5 mg

tanezumab 5 mg one dose at weeks 0 and 8

DRUGoxycodone

oxycodone CR, 10-40 mg q12h

OTHERplacebo

placebo

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* osteoarthritis of the knee or hip according to Kellgren-Lawrence x-ray grade of 2

Exclusion criteria

* pregnancy or intent to become pregnant * BMI greater than 39 * other severe pain, significant cardiac, neurological or psychiatric disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) PopulationBaseline, Week 8The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to OA in the index joint (knee/hip) during past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on an NRS of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 8The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis (OA) in the index joint (knee/hip) during past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to OA in the index joint (knee/hip) during past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on an NRS of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to OA in the index joint (knee/hip) during past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 17 individual questions scored on an NRS of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate worse function. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate worse function. Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living.
Number of Days With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16In the event of inadequate pain relief for OA during the double-blind treatment period, participants were allowed to take up to 3000 mg of acetaminophen (tablet/capsule/caplets) per day up to 3 days per week as a rescue medication. Results are shown in number of days of rescue medication usage per week.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to OA in the index joint (knee/hip) during past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 17 individual questions scored on an NRS of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate worse function. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate worse function. Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living.
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16PGA: Participants answered the following question: Considering all the ways the OA in your index (knee/hip) affects you, how are you doing today? Participants rated their condition by using a 5-point Likert scale: 1) very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities); 2) good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities); 3) fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities); 4) poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities); and 5) very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher score indicated severe condition.
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16PGA: Participants answered the following question: Considering all the ways the OA in your index (knee/hip) affects you, how are you doing today? Participants rated their condition by using a 5-point Likert scale: 1) very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities); 2) good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities); 3) fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities); 4) poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities); and 5) very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher score indicated severe condition.
Number of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16OMERACT-OARSI response: greater than or equal to (\>=) 50 percent (%) improvement from baseline and absolute change from baseline of \>=2 units at Week of interest in WOMAC pain or physical function subscales, or at least 2 of the following 3 being true: \>=20% improvement from baseline and absolute change from baseline of \>=1 unit at Week of interest in 1) WOMAC pain subscale, 2) WOMAC physical function subscale, 3) PGA of osteoarthritis (score: 1-5, higher score=more affected). WOMAC pain, physical function subscales assess amount of pain/difficulty experienced (score: 0-10, higher score=higher pain/difficulty).
Number of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationWeeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16OMERACT-OARSI response: \>=50 percent (%) improvement from baseline and absolute change from baseline of \>=2 units at Week of interest in WOMAC pain or physical function subscales, or at least 2 of the following 3 being true: \>=20% improvement from baseline and absolute change from baseline of \>=1 unit at Week of interest in 1) WOMAC pain subscale, 2) WOMAC physical function subscale, 3) PGA of osteoarthritis (score: 1-5, higher score=more affected). WOMAC pain, physical function subscales assess amount of pain/difficulty experienced (score: 0-10, higher score=higher pain/difficulty).
Number of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to OA in the index joint (knee/hip) during past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on an NRS of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain.
Number of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to OA in the index joint (knee/hip) during past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on an NRS of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain.
Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT PopulationWeek 8The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to OA in the index joint (knee/hip) during the past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on an NRS of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain. Participants with specified reduction (as percent) from baseline at Week 8 are reported.
Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT PopulationWeek 8The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to OA in the index joint (knee/hip) during past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on an NRS of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain.
Number of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: ITT PopulationWeeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16PGA: Participants answered the following question: Considering all the ways the OA in your index (knee/hip) affects you, how are you doing today? Participants rated their condition by using a 5-point Likert scale: 1) very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities); 2) good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities); 3) fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities); 4) poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities); and 5) very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher score indicated severe condition.
Number of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16PGA: Participants answered the following question: Considering all the ways the OA in your index (knee/hip) affects you, how are you doing today? Participants rated their condition by using a 5-point Likert scale: 1) very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities); 2) good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities); 3) fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities); 4) poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities); and 5) very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher score indicated severe condition.
Change From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16Participants assessed daily average pain in the index joint (knee/hip) during the past 24 hours on an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Higher score indicated greater pain. The baseline mean was calculated using the daily pain scores in the index joint (knee/hip) over the 3 days in the initial pain assessment period and the weekly mean was calculated using the daily pain scores in the index joint (knee/hip) within each assessment week.
Change From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16Participants assessed daily average pain in the index joint (knee/hip) during the past 24 hours on an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Higher score indicated greater pain. The baseline mean was calculated using the daily pain scores in the index joint (knee/hip) over the 3 days in the initial pain assessment period and the weekly mean was calculated using the daily pain scores in the index joint (knee/hip) within each assessment week.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16The WOMAC stiffness subscale is a 2-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of stiffness experienced due to OA in the index joint (knee/hip) during past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 2 individual questions scored on NRS of 0 to 10; with higher scores indicating more stiffness. Total score range for WOMAC stiffness subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate more stiffness. Stiffness is defined as a sensation of decreased ease in moving the index joint (knee/hip).
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16The WOMAC stiffness subscale is a 2-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of stiffness experienced due to OA in the index joint (knee/hip) during past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 2 individual questions scored on NRS of 0 to 10; with higher scores indicating more stiffness. Total score range for WOMAC stiffness subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate more stiffness. Stiffness is defined as a sensation of decreased ease in moving the index joint (knee/hip).
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items) and physical function (17 items) in participants with OA of the index knee or index hip. WOMAC average score is the mean of WOMAC pain, physical function and stiffness subscale scores and ranges from 0 to 10, where higher score indicates worse response.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items) and physical function (17 items) in participants with OA of the index knee or index hip. WOMAC average score is the mean of WOMAC pain, physical function and stiffness subscale scores and ranges from 0 to 10, where higher score indicates worse response.
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Participants answered: How much pain have you had when walking on a flat surface? Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain. Higher score indicated greater pain.
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Participants answered: How much pain have you had when walking on a flat surface? Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain. Higher score indicated greater pain.
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Participants answered: How much pain have you had when going up or down stairs? Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain. Higher score indicated greater pain.
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Participants answered: How much pain have you had when going up or down stairs? Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain. Higher score indicated greater pain.
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12SF-36v2: standardized survey evaluating 8 health concepts (physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health). Total score for each health concept was scaled 0-100 (100 = highest level of functioning).
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12SF-36v2: standardized survey evaluating 8 health concepts (physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health). Total score for each health concept was scaled 0-100 (100 = highest level of functioning).
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12SF-36v2: standardized survey evaluating 8 health concepts (physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health). Total score for each health concept was scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). For obtaining physical and mental component scores, z-score for each scale = (observed score - mean score for general 1990 United States \[US\] population)/corresponding standard deviation. The 2 component scores were obtained by multiplying each aspect z-score by physical or mental factor score coefficient (1990 general US population) and summing the eight products. Component scores indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive z-score \[better functioning\])/lower (in case of negative z-score \[worse functioning\]) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population. Change from baseline \>0 indicates an improvement.
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12SF-36v2: standardized survey evaluating 8 health concepts (physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health). Total score for each health concept was scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). For obtaining physical and mental component scores, z-score for each scale = (observed score - mean score for general 1990 United States \[US\] population)/corresponding standard deviation. The 2 component scores were obtained by multiplying each aspect z-score by physical or mental factor score coefficient (1990 general US population) and summing the eight products. Component scores indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive z-score \[better functioning\])/lower (in case of negative z-score \[worse functioning\]) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population. Change from baseline \>0 indicates an improvement.
Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains/items: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each item has 3 possible responses: no problems (level 1), some problems (level 2), and extreme problems (level 3). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.
Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score at Week 12: mITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains/items: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each item has 3 possible responses: no problems (level 1), some problems (level 2), and extreme problems (level 3). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 dimensions/domains/items: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each item has 3 possible responses: no dysfunction (level 1), moderate/some dysfunction (level 2), and extreme dysfunction (level 3). Change from baseline at Week 12 is defined as: Improved (positive change), No change, and Worsened (negative change). Number of participants with response is reported.
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationBaseline, Week 12EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 dimensions/domains/items: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each item has 3 possible responses: no dysfunction (level 1), moderate/some dysfunction (level 2), and extreme dysfunction (level 3). Change from baseline at Week 12 is defined as: Improved (positive change), No change, and Worsened (negative change). Number of participants with response is reported.
Number of Participants Who Discontinued From Study Due to Lack of EfficacyBaseline up to Week 24
Time to Discontinuation From Study Due to Lack of EfficacyBaseline up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16In the event of inadequate pain relief for OA during the double-blind treatment period, participants were allowed to take up to 3000 mg of acetaminophen (tablet/capsule/caplets) per day up to 3 days per week as a rescue medication.
Amount of Rescue Medication UsedWeeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16In the event of inadequate pain relief for OA during the double-blind treatment period, participants were allowed to take up to 3000 mg of acetaminophen (tablet/capsule/caplets) per day up to 3 days per week as a rescue medication. Results are presented as total dose of acetaminophen (in mg) per week.
Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness are 24 items and scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes and sensation are 13 items and scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total NIS score is the sum of the left and right limb scores. Total possible NIS score range 0 to 244, higher score=greater impairment.
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug (Tanezumab) Antibody (ADA)Baseline, Week 8 and 18Human serum samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies by using the semi-quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Only participants receiving tanezumab were to be analyzed for this measure. A participant may be represented in more than 1 category.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline up to 112 days after last intravenous doseAn AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 112 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included SAEs as well as non-serious AEs which occurred during the trial.
Number of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityBaseline up to 112 days after last intravenous doseAdverse event of abnormal peripheral sensation: allodynia, burning sensation, decreased vibratory sense, dysaesthesia, hyperaesthesia, hyperpathia, hypoaesthesia, neuralgia, neuritis, neuropathy peripheral, pallanesthesia, paraesthesia, paraesthesia oral, peripheral sensory neuropathy, polyneuropathy, sensory disturbance, sensory loss and thermohypoaesthesia. Adverse event of abnormal peripheral sensation was assessed according to severity: mild (did not interfere with participant's usual function); moderate (interfered to some extent with participant's usual function); and severe (interfered significantly with participant's usual function).
Tanezumab Plasma ConcentrationPredose, 1 hour post-dose on Day 1, Week 8; Week 18Plasma concentration of tanezumab was measured using a validated, sensitive and specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Only participants receiving tanezumab were to be analyzed for this measure.
Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Serum ConcentrationPredose, 1 hour post-dose on Day 1, Week 8; Predose: Week 18Serum samples were analyzed for determining total NGF concentration. Total NGF was analyzed using a validated, sensitive, and specific immune-affinity enrichment liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometric (IA/LC/MS/MS) method.
Number of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityBaseline up to 112 days after last intravenous dosePre-specified opioid-related adverse events: fatigue, drowsiness, inability to concentrate, nausea, dizziness, constipation, itching, difficulty urinating, confusion and vomiting. Number of participants who experienced any of the pre-specified opioid-related adverse event are reported. Pre-specified opioid-related adverse events were assessed according to severity: mild (did not interfere with participant's usual function); moderate (interfered to some extent with participant's usual function); and severe (interfered significantly with participant's usual function).
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to OA in the index joint (knee/hip) during past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on an NRS of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Intravenous (IV) Doses of Study MedicationDay 1 up to Week 16Number of participants are reported based on the maximum number of IV doses of either tanezumab or placebo received.

Countries

Austria, Denmark, Germany, Poland, Spain, Sweden, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo matched to tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 minutes on Day 1 and Week 8, along with placebo matched to oxycodone controlled released (CR) tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16.
141
Tanezumab 5 mg
Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 milligram (mg) intravenous infusion over 5 minutes on Day 1 and Week 8, along with placebo matched to oxycodone CR tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16.
161
Tanezumab 10 mg
Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg intravenous infusion over 5 minutes on Day 1 and Week 8, along with placebo matched to oxycodone CR tablet orally twice daily up to Week 16.
150
Oxycodone CR
Placebo matched to tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) intravenous infusion over 5 minutes on Day 1 and Week 8, along with oxycodone CR tablet at a starting dose of 10 mg orally twice daily up to Week 16. Oxycodone dose was adjusted according to the pain relief and tolerability up to a maximum of 40 mg orally twice daily.
158
Total610

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event23416
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy106512
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2344
Overall StudyOther1000
Overall StudyProtocol Violation1110
Overall StudyRandomized but not Treated1021
Overall StudyStudy Terminated by Sponsor891089992
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject810812

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTanezumab 5 mgTanezumab 10 mgOxycodone CRTotal
Age, Continuous57.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
57.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
57.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
57.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
57.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
Sex: Female, Male
Female
92 Participants96 Participants94 Participants99 Participants381 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
49 Participants65 Participants56 Participants59 Participants229 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
36 / 14143 / 16133 / 15082 / 158
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 1414 / 1613 / 1504 / 158

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population

The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis (OA) in the index joint (knee/hip) during past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized intravenous study medication (either tanezumab or placebo). Missing data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT PopulationBaseline7.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.21
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-2.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.26
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-3.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.49
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT PopulationBaseline7.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.27
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT PopulationBaseline7.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-3.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.62
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT PopulationBaseline7.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.27
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-2.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.36
Comparison: Analysis was performed using analysis of co-variance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as main effect, baseline value, index joint, previous opioid use as covariates, and study site as a random effect.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.49, -0.44]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis was performed using analysis of co-variance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as main effect, baseline value, index joint, previous opioid use as covariates, and study site as a random effect.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.5, -0.43]ANCOVA
Primary

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population

The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to OA in the index joint (knee/hip) during past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on an NRS of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

Population: Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis set included all participants in ITT analysis set who had Week 8 visit on or before 23 June 2010 (effective date of the United States Food and Drug Administration \[US FDA\] imposed clinical hold). Missing data were imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) PopulationBaseline7.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) PopulationChange at Week 8-2.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) PopulationChange at Week 8-3.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.64
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) PopulationBaseline7.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.26
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) PopulationBaseline7.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.31
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) PopulationChange at Week 8-3.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.69
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) PopulationBaseline7.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.27
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) PopulationChange at Week 8-2.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.29
Comparison: Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model with treatment as main effect, baseline value, index joint, previous opioid use as covariates, and study site as a random effect.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.49, -0.45]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model with treatment as main effect, baseline value, index joint, previous opioid use as covariates, and study site as a random effect.p-value: 0.01895% CI: [-1.16, -0.11]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model with treatment as main effect, baseline value, index joint, previous opioid use as covariates, and study site as a random effect.p-value: 0.795% CI: [-0.43, 0.65]ANCOVA
Secondary

Amount of Rescue Medication Used

In the event of inadequate pain relief for OA during the double-blind treatment period, participants were allowed to take up to 3000 mg of acetaminophen (tablet/capsule/caplets) per day up to 3 days per week as a rescue medication. Results are presented as total dose of acetaminophen (in mg) per week.

Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: ITT analysis set. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'number analyzed' signifies participants who were evaluable at specified time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAmount of Rescue Medication UsedWeek 122561.07 mg per weekStandard Deviation 3651.14
PlaceboAmount of Rescue Medication UsedWeek 24109.38 mg per weekStandard Deviation 5190.82
PlaceboAmount of Rescue Medication UsedWeek 43293.89 mg per weekStandard Deviation 4412.77
PlaceboAmount of Rescue Medication UsedWeek 162412.88 mg per weekStandard Deviation 3416.67
PlaceboAmount of Rescue Medication UsedWeek 83000.00 mg per weekStandard Deviation 4277.85
Tanezumab 5 mgAmount of Rescue Medication UsedWeek 161159.86 mg per weekStandard Deviation 2619.07
Tanezumab 5 mgAmount of Rescue Medication UsedWeek 81659.86 mg per weekStandard Deviation 3092.18
Tanezumab 5 mgAmount of Rescue Medication UsedWeek 42136.99 mg per weekStandard Deviation 3741.44
Tanezumab 5 mgAmount of Rescue Medication UsedWeek 121394.56 mg per weekStandard Deviation 2893.8
Tanezumab 5 mgAmount of Rescue Medication UsedWeek 22684.03 mg per weekStandard Deviation 4193.21
Tanezumab 10 mgAmount of Rescue Medication UsedWeek 82336.81 mg per weekStandard Deviation 4033.87
Tanezumab 10 mgAmount of Rescue Medication UsedWeek 23510.56 mg per weekStandard Deviation 4321.51
Tanezumab 10 mgAmount of Rescue Medication UsedWeek 161965.28 mg per weekStandard Deviation 3865.6
Tanezumab 10 mgAmount of Rescue Medication UsedWeek 122333.33 mg per weekStandard Deviation 4189.56
Tanezumab 10 mgAmount of Rescue Medication UsedWeek 42614.58 mg per weekStandard Deviation 4221.46
Oxycodone CRAmount of Rescue Medication UsedWeek 162420.53 mg per weekStandard Deviation 4121.12
Oxycodone CRAmount of Rescue Medication UsedWeek 23553.33 mg per weekStandard Deviation 5395.79
Oxycodone CRAmount of Rescue Medication UsedWeek 43373.33 mg per weekStandard Deviation 4886.01
Oxycodone CRAmount of Rescue Medication UsedWeek 82539.74 mg per weekStandard Deviation 4653.86
Oxycodone CRAmount of Rescue Medication UsedWeek 122360.93 mg per weekStandard Deviation 3786.45
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT Population

SF-36v2: standardized survey evaluating 8 health concepts (physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health). Total score for each health concept was scaled 0-100 (100 = highest level of functioning).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized intravenous study medication (either tanezumab or placebo). Missing data were imputed using baseline observation carried forward (BOCF).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationVitality: Baseline46.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationSocial Function: Change at Week 125.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.69
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationGeneral Health: Change at Week 121.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.11
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationBodily Pain: Change at Week 126.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.63
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationMental Health: Change at Week 121.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.77
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationSocial Function: Baseline57.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.18
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationPhysical Function: Baseline29.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationBodily Pain: Baseline28.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationRole Emotional: Change at Week 123.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.01
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationRole Physical: Change at Week 127.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.54
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationPhysical Function: Change at Week 126.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.83
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationGeneral Health: Baseline55.28 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.21
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationMental Health: Baseline68.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.39
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationVitality: Change at Week 123.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.58
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationRole Physical: Baseline37.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationRole Emotional: Baseline60.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.11
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationRole Physical: Baseline40.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.2
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationVitality: Baseline48.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.59
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationRole Physical: Change at Week 1210.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.26
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationBodily Pain: Baseline28.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.51
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationSocial Function: Change at Week 125.28 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.4
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationBodily Pain: Change at Week 1212.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.23
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationMental Health: Change at Week 121.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.61
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationRole Emotional: Baseline64.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.38
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationGeneral Health: Baseline58.35 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.26
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationSocial Function: Baseline62.34 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.42
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationGeneral Health: Change at Week 122.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.37
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationRole Emotional: Change at Week 124.92 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.58
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationPhysical Function: Baseline31.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.15
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationVitality: Change at Week 124.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.99
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationPhysical Function: Change at Week 1210.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.94
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationMental Health: Baseline69.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.6
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationGeneral Health: Baseline60.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.71
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationRole Emotional: Baseline63.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.48
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationMental Health: Baseline68.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.37
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationMental Health: Change at Week 122.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.61
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationVitality: Baseline47.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.03
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationGeneral Health: Change at Week 122.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.47
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationPhysical Function: Baseline32.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.61
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationPhysical Function: Change at Week 125.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.15
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationRole Physical: Baseline39.46 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.74
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationRole Physical: Change at Week 126.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.53
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationBodily Pain: Baseline29.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.48
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationBodily Pain: Change at Week 128.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.82
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationVitality: Change at Week 123.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.33
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationSocial Function: Baseline61.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.63
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationSocial Function: Change at Week 124.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.46
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationRole Emotional: Change at Week 122.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.09
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationVitality: Baseline45.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.61
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationPhysical Function: Change at Week 124.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.3
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationPhysical Function: Baseline28.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.7
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationRole Emotional: Baseline60.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.92
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationVitality: Change at Week 122.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.99
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationGeneral Health: Change at Week 121.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.66
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationMental Health: Change at Week 120.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationSocial Function: Baseline57.91 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.84
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationGeneral Health: Baseline55.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.53
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationMental Health: Baseline67.59 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.26
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationRole Emotional: Change at Week 120.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.19
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationBodily Pain: Baseline27.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.15
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationSocial Function: Change at Week 124.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.07
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationBodily Pain: Change at Week 126.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.92
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationRole Physical: Change at Week 125.62 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.36
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationRole Physical: Baseline36.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.53
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT Population

SF-36v2: standardized survey evaluating 8 health concepts (physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health). Total score for each health concept was scaled 0-100 (100 = highest level of functioning).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: mITT analysis set included all participants in ITT analysis set who had Week 8 visit on or before 23 June 2010 (effective date of the US FDA imposed clinical hold). Missing data were imputed using BOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationGeneral Health: Baseline55.61 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.01
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationGeneral Health: Change at Week 121.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.14
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationRole Physical: Baseline37.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.09
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationVitality: Baseline46.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.23
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationSocial Function: Baseline57.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.15
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationRole Emotional: Baseline60.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.35
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationRole Emotional: Change at Week 123.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.92
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationMental Health: Change at Week 120.62 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.44
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationPhysical Function: Baseline29.18 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.62
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationPhysical Function: Change at Week 125.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.35
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationRole Physical: Change at Week 126.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.27
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationBodily Pain: Baseline28.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.96
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationBodily Pain: Change at Week 125.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.93
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationVitality: Change at Week 122.97 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.14
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationSocial Function: Change at Week 124.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.08
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationMental Health: Baseline68.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.53
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationVitality: Change at Week 124.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.61
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationSocial Function: Baseline62.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.64
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationMental Health: Baseline69.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.57
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationMental Health: Change at Week 121.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.82
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationGeneral Health: Baseline59.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.43
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationSocial Function: Change at Week 125.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.47
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationPhysical Function: Change at Week 128.84 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.48
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationRole Emotional: Baseline64.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.1
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationRole Physical: Change at Week 129.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.2
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationBodily Pain: Change at Week 1210.53 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.14
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationVitality: Baseline48.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.58
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationGeneral Health: Change at Week 121.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.49
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationPhysical Function: Baseline31.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.35
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationRole Emotional: Change at Week 124.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.19
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationRole Physical: Baseline41.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.44
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationBodily Pain: Baseline29.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.52
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationGeneral Health: Change at Week 122.61 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationGeneral Health: Baseline60.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.64
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationSocial Function: Change at Week 125.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.38
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationVitality: Baseline47.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.09
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationPhysical Function: Change at Week 123.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.07
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationPhysical Function: Baseline32.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.59
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationBodily Pain: Baseline29.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.45
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationRole Physical: Change at Week 125.49 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.56
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationRole Emotional: Baseline63.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.58
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationBodily Pain: Change at Week 127.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.12
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationVitality: Change at Week 123.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.22
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationSocial Function: Baseline61.66 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.7
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationRole Physical: Baseline39.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.81
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationMental Health: Baseline68.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.41
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationRole Emotional: Change at Week 122.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationMental Health: Change at Week 122.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.09
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationMental Health: Change at Week 120.48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.06
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationVitality: Baseline45.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.54
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationGeneral Health: Change at Week 120.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.71
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationPhysical Function: Baseline28.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.75
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationVitality: Change at Week 121.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.4
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationRole Physical: Baseline36.66 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.07
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationGeneral Health: Baseline55.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.6
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationPhysical Function: Change at Week 122.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.81
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationSocial Function: Change at Week 123.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.43
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationMental Health: Baseline67.53 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.36
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationSocial Function: Baseline57.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.76
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationRole Physical: Change at Week 124.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.61
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationRole Emotional: Change at Week 12-0.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.86
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationBodily Pain: Baseline27.18 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.06
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationRole Emotional: Baseline60.68 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.92
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationBodily Pain: Change at Week 125.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.93
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: ITT Population

SF-36v2: standardized survey evaluating 8 health concepts (physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health). Total score for each health concept was scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). For obtaining physical and mental component scores, z-score for each scale = (observed score - mean score for general 1990 United States \[US\] population)/corresponding standard deviation. The 2 component scores were obtained by multiplying each aspect z-score by physical or mental factor score coefficient (1990 general US population) and summing the eight products. Component scores indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive z-score \[better functioning\])/lower (in case of negative z-score \[worse functioning\]) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population. Change from baseline \>0 indicates an improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized intravenous study medication (either tanezumab or placebo). Missing data were imputed using BOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationMental Component Aggregate: Baseline-0.28 z-scoreStandard Deviation 1.27
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationPhysical Component Aggregate: Baseline-1.99 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.72
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationPhysical Component Aggregate: Change at Week 120.26 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.63
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationMental Component Aggregate: Change at Week 120.08 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.53
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationMental Component Aggregate: Baseline-0.13 z-scoreStandard Deviation 1.27
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationMental Component Aggregate: Change at Week 120.04 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.65
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationPhysical Component Aggregate: Baseline-1.91 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.64
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationPhysical Component Aggregate: Change at Week 120.47 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.88
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationMental Component Aggregate: Change at Week 120.07 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.72
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationPhysical Component Aggregate: Baseline-1.88 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.69
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationMental Component Aggregate: Baseline-0.20 z-scoreStandard Deviation 1.28
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationPhysical Component Aggregate: Change at Week 120.28 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.57
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationMental Component Aggregate: Change at Week 120.01 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.67
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationPhysical Component Aggregate: Change at Week 120.23 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.57
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationPhysical Component Aggregate: Baseline-2.03 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.64
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: ITT PopulationMental Component Aggregate: Baseline-0.28 z-scoreStandard Deviation 1.27
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: mITT Population

SF-36v2: standardized survey evaluating 8 health concepts (physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health). Total score for each health concept was scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). For obtaining physical and mental component scores, z-score for each scale = (observed score - mean score for general 1990 United States \[US\] population)/corresponding standard deviation. The 2 component scores were obtained by multiplying each aspect z-score by physical or mental factor score coefficient (1990 general US population) and summing the eight products. Component scores indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive z-score \[better functioning\])/lower (in case of negative z-score \[worse functioning\]) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population. Change from baseline \>0 indicates an improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: mITT analysis set included all participants in ITT analysis set who had Week 8 visit on or before 23 June 2010 (effective date of the US FDA imposed clinical hold). Missing data were imputed using BOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationPhysical Component Aggregate: Change at Week 120.23 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationMental Component Aggregate: Change at Week 120.08 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.51
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationPhysical Component Aggregate: Baseline-1.98 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.72
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationMental Component Aggregate: Baseline-0.30 z-scoreStandard Deviation 1.27
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationMental Component Aggregate: Baseline-0.13 z-scoreStandard Deviation 1.26
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationPhysical Component Aggregate: Baseline-1.90 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.65
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationMental Component Aggregate: Change at Week 120.07 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.61
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationPhysical Component Aggregate: Change at Week 120.38 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.78
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationMental Component Aggregate: Change at Week 120.11 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.64
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationMental Component Aggregate: Baseline-0.19 z-scoreStandard Deviation 1.28
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationPhysical Component Aggregate: Change at Week 120.22 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.53
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationPhysical Component Aggregate: Baseline-1.88 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.69
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationMental Component Aggregate: Baseline-0.29 z-scoreStandard Deviation 1.27
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationMental Component Aggregate: Change at Week 12-0.00 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.56
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationPhysical Component Aggregate: Baseline-2.03 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.63
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Week 12: mITT PopulationPhysical Component Aggregate: Change at Week 120.18 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.51
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT Population

Participants assessed daily average pain in the index joint (knee/hip) during the past 24 hours on an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Higher score indicated greater pain. The baseline mean was calculated using the daily pain scores in the index joint (knee/hip) over the 3 days in the initial pain assessment period and the weekly mean was calculated using the daily pain scores in the index joint (knee/hip) within each assessment week.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16

Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized intravenous study medication (either tanezumab or placebo). Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline7.18 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 1-0.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-1.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.63
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 3-1.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.73
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-1.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.81
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 6-1.91 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.95
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-1.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.99
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 10-2.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.16
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-2.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.27
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-2.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.31
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-1.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.23
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-2.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 3-2.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.42
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-2.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.49
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 6-2.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.55
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-2.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.54
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-2.90 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.63
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 10-2.92 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.62
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline7.28 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.62
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 1-1.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.93
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 10-2.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.72
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-2.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.72
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-2.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.68
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline6.98 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.84
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 3-1.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.29
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 6-2.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.66
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-2.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.67
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 1-1.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.84
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-2.28 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-1.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.13
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-1.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 10-1.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.23
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 6-1.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.18
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-1.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.28
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-1.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.18
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 1-1.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.65
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-1.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.99
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 3-1.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.08
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline7.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.72
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-1.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.33
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT Population

Participants assessed daily average pain in the index joint (knee/hip) during the past 24 hours on an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Higher score indicated greater pain. The baseline mean was calculated using the daily pain scores in the index joint (knee/hip) over the 3 days in the initial pain assessment period and the weekly mean was calculated using the daily pain scores in the index joint (knee/hip) within each assessment week.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16

Population: mITT analysis set included all participants in ITT analysis set who had Week 8 visit on or before 23 June 2010 (effective date of the US FDA imposed clinical hold). Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline7.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.81
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 1-0.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.24
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-1.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.59
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 3-1.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.74
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-1.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.85
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 6-1.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.96
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 8-1.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 10-1.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.17
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-1.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.27
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-1.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.31
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-1.99 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.19
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-3.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.53
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 3-2.28 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.31
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-2.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.42
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 6-2.92 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.48
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 8-2.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-2.97 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.55
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 10-2.98 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.56
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline7.31 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.62
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 1-1.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.96
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 10-2.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.63
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 8-2.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.63
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-2.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.63
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline6.98 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.84
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 3-1.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 6-2.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.58
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-2.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.61
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 1-1.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.81
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-2.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.52
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-1.51 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-1.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 10-1.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 6-1.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.17
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-1.84 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.23
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 8-1.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.16
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 1-1.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.64
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-1.46 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.96
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 3-1.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.07
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline7.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.71
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Index Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-1.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.27
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score at Week 12: ITT Population

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains/items: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each item has 3 possible responses: no problems (level 1), some problems (level 2), and extreme problems (level 3). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: ITT analysis set. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'number analyzed' signifies participants who were evaluable at specified time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline0.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange at Week 120.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.36
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange at Week 120.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.34
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline0.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline0.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.29
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange at Week 120.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationBaseline0.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score at Week 12: ITT PopulationChange at Week 120.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.28
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score at Week 12: mITT Population

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains/items: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each item has 3 possible responses: no problems (level 1), some problems (level 2), and extreme problems (level 3). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: mITT analysis set. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'number analyzed' signifies participants who were evaluable at specified time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score at Week 12: mITT PopulationChange at Week 120.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.36
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score at Week 12: mITT PopulationBaseline0.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score at Week 12: mITT PopulationChange at Week 120.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.34
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score at Week 12: mITT PopulationBaseline0.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score at Week 12: mITT PopulationBaseline0.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score at Week 12: mITT PopulationChange at Week 120.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score at Week 12: mITT PopulationChange at Week 120.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.28
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score at Week 12: mITT PopulationBaseline0.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18

NIS: 74 items, assess muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness are 24 items and scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes and sensation are 13 items and scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total NIS score is the sum of the left and right limb scores. Total possible NIS score range 0 to 244, higher score=greater impairment.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18

Population: ITT analysis set. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Here 'number analyzed' signifies participants who were evaluable at specified time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18Change at Week 2-0.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.04
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18Change at Week 16-0.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.94
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18Change at Week 8-0.18 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.93
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18Change at Week 18-0.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.25
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18Change at Week 4-0.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.45
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18Baseline1.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.93
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18Change at Week 12-0.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.29
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18Baseline1.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.11
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18Change at Week 4-0.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18Change at Week 8-0.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.07
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18Change at Week 12-0.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.13
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18Change at Week 16-0.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.78
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18Change at Week 18-0.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.91
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18Change at Week 2-0.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18Change at Week 18-0.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.64
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18Baseline1.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.83
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18Change at Week 2-0.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18Change at Week 4-0.28 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.68
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18Change at Week 12-0.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.81
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18Change at Week 16-0.28 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.74
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18Change at Week 8-0.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.51
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18Change at Week 12-0.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.79
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18Change at Week 8-0.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.32
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18Baseline1.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18Change at Week 4-0.31 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.59
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18Change at Week 18-0.18 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.13
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18Change at Week 16-0.53 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.38
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 18Change at Week 2-0.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.09
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT Population

PGA: Participants answered the following question: Considering all the ways the OA in your index (knee/hip) affects you, how are you doing today? Participants rated their condition by using a 5-point Likert scale: 1) very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities); 2) good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities); 3) fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities); 4) poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities); and 5) very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher score indicated severe condition.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized intravenous study medication (either tanezumab or placebo). Missing data were imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline3.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.68
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.49 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.88
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.85
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-0.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.86
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-0.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.88
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-0.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-0.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-0.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline3.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.65
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.99 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-0.99 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.99 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-1.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-1.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.95
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-1.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline3.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.68
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-0.59 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.86
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-0.59 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.76
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-0.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline3.59 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT Population

PGA: Participants answered the following question: Considering all the ways the OA in your index (knee/hip) affects you, how are you doing today? Participants rated their condition by using a 5-point Likert scale: 1) very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities); 2) good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities); 3) fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities); 4) poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities); and 5) very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher score indicated severe condition.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: mITT analysis set included all participants in ITT analysis set who had Week 8 visit on or before 23 June 2010 (effective date of the US FDA imposed clinical hold). Missing data were imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline3.59 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.68
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.88
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.86
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 8-0.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-0.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.93
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-0.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.94
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-0.97 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 8-0.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.98
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline3.59 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.65
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.95
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-0.98 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.76
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.82
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 8-0.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-0.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-0.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline3.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.68
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-0.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.81
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-0.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-0.49 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.74
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 8-0.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.74
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline3.59 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-0.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT Population

WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items) and physical function (17 items) in participants with OA of the index knee or index hip. WOMAC average score is the mean of WOMAC pain, physical function and stiffness subscale scores and ranges from 0 to 10, where higher score indicates worse response.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized intravenous study medication (either tanezumab or placebo). Missing data were imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-2.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.33
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-2.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-1.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.67
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-2.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.88
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-2.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline7.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.32
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-3.49 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.55
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-3.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.53
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-2.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.21
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline7.48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.43
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-3.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.49
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-3.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline7.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-2.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.04
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-3.35 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.45
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-3.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.49
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-3.34 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.39
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-3.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.58
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-2.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline7.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.33
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-1.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.91
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-2.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.12
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-2.35 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.22
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-2.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.23
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT Population

WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items) and physical function (17 items) in participants with OA of the index knee or index hip. WOMAC average score is the mean of WOMAC pain, physical function and stiffness subscale scores and ranges from 0 to 10, where higher score indicates worse response.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: mITT analysis set included all participants in ITT analysis set who had Week 8 visit on or before 23 June 2010 (effective date of the US FDA imposed clinical hold). Missing data were imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-2.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.19
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-1.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline7.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.34
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-1.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.93
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 8-2.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.03
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-2.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.36
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-2.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.25
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 8-3.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.59
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-2.99 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.61
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-3.34 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.72
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-3.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.71
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline7.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.44
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline7.28 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-1.90 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.96
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-2.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 8-2.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-2.92 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.62
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-2.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.61
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-2.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.19
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline7.51 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.33
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-1.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.94
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-2.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.13
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 8-2.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.16
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-2.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.21
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: ITT Population

The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to OA in the index joint (knee/hip) during past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on an NRS of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16

Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized intravenous study medication (either tanezumab or placebo). Missing data were imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-2.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.91
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-2.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.09
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-2.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.37
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-2.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.46
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-3.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.54
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-3.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.62
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-3.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-2.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.23
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-3.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-3.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.62
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-3.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.51
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-2.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.25
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-2.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.39
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-2.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.25
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-2.31 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.09
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-2.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.41
Comparison: Change at Week 2: analysis was performed using ANCOVA model with treatment as main effect, baseline value, index joint, previous opioid use as covariates, and study site as a random effect.p-value: 0.17795% CI: [-0.78, 0.14]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 2: analysis was performed using ANCOVA model with treatment as main effect, baseline value, index joint, previous opioid use as covariates, and study site as a random effect.p-value: 0.41695% CI: [-0.66, 0.28]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 4: analysis was performed using ANCOVA model with treatment as main effect, baseline value, index joint, previous opioid use as covariates, and study site as a random effect.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.5, -0.46]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 4: analysis was performed using ANCOVA model with treatment as main effect, baseline value, index joint, previous opioid use as covariates, and study site as a random effect.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.48, -0.43]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: mITT Population

The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to OA in the index joint (knee/hip) during past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on an NRS of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16

Population: mITT analysis set included all participants in ITT analysis set who had Week 8 visit on or before 23 June 2010 (effective date of the US FDA imposed clinical hold). Missing data were imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-1.98 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.92
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-2.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.15
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-2.69 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.42
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-2.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.55
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-3.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.58
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-3.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.76
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-3.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.77
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-2.34 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.25
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-3.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.69
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-2.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.68
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-3.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.68
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-2.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.18
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-2.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.35
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-2.48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.29
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-2.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.17
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-2.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.37
Comparison: Change at Week 2: analysis was performed using ANCOVA model with treatment as main effect, baseline value, index joint, previous opioid use as covariates, and study site as a random effect.p-value: 0.31995% CI: [-0.69, 0.22]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 2: analysis was performed using ANCOVA model with treatment as main effect, baseline value, index joint, previous opioid use as covariates, and study site as a random effect.p-value: 0.91695% CI: [-0.43, 0.48]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 2: analysis was performed using ANCOVA model with treatment as main effect, baseline value, index joint, previous opioid use as covariates, and study site as a random effect.p-value: 0.52695% CI: [-0.63, 0.32]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 4: analysis was performed using ANCOVA model with treatment as main effect, baseline value, index joint, previous opioid use as covariates, and study site as a random effect.p-value: 0.00495% CI: [-1.26, -0.24]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 4: analysis was performed using ANCOVA model with treatment as main effect, baseline value, index joint, previous opioid use as covariates, and study site as a random effect.p-value: 0.13495% CI: [-0.9, 0.12]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 4: analysis was performed using ANCOVA model with treatment as main effect, baseline value, index joint, previous opioid use as covariates, and study site as a random effect.p-value: 0.49795% CI: [-0.71, 0.35]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT Population

The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to OA in the index joint (knee/hip) during past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 17 individual questions scored on an NRS of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate worse function. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate worse function. Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized intravenous study medication (either tanezumab or placebo). Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline7.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-1.51 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.73
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-1.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.96
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-2.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.09
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-2.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.26
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-2.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.37
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-3.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.61
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-3.18 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.49
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline7.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.58
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-3.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.59
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-2.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-3.34 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.62
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-1.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.08
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-2.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.61
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-3.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-3.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.42
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-3.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.45
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline7.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.54
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-2.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.28
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-2.18 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.26
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-1.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.94
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-2.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline7.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.53
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-2.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT Population

The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to OA in the index joint (knee/hip) during past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 17 individual questions scored on an NRS of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate worse function. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate worse function. Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: mITT analysis set included all participants in ITT analysis set who had Week 8 visit on or before 23 June 2010 (effective date of the US FDA imposed clinical hold). Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline7.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.51
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-1.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.73
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-1.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 8-1.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.03
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-2.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.21
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-2.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.38
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-3.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.78
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 8-3.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.68
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline7.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.59
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-2.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.69
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-2.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.32
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-3.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.78
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-1.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.99
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-2.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.59
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 8-2.62 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.58
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-2.77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.64
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-2.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline7.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.54
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-1.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.24
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-1.97 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.21
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-1.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.94
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 8-1.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.24
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline7.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.53
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-1.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.16
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT Population

The WOMAC stiffness subscale is a 2-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of stiffness experienced due to OA in the index joint (knee/hip) during past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 2 individual questions scored on NRS of 0 to 10; with higher scores indicating more stiffness. Total score range for WOMAC stiffness subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate more stiffness. Stiffness is defined as a sensation of decreased ease in moving the index joint (knee/hip).

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized intravenous study medication (either tanezumab or placebo). Missing data were imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-2.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-1.92 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.17
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-1.49 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.83
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-1.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.95
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-2.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.35
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline7.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.67
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-3.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.75
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-3.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.73
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-2.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline7.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.92
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-3.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-3.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline7.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.82
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-2.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.41
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-3.28 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.77
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-3.31 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.72
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-3.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.66
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-3.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.91
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-2.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline7.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.72
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-1.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.16
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-2.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.35
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-2.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.43
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-2.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.45
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT Population

The WOMAC stiffness subscale is a 2-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of stiffness experienced due to OA in the index joint (knee/hip) during past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 2 individual questions scored on NRS of 0 to 10; with higher scores indicating more stiffness. Total score range for WOMAC stiffness subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate more stiffness. Stiffness is defined as a sensation of decreased ease in moving the index joint (knee/hip).

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: mITT analysis set included all participants in ITT analysis set who had Week 8 visit on or before 23 June 2010 (effective date of the US FDA imposed clinical hold). Missing data were imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline7.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.69
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-1.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.87
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-1.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.02
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 8-1.77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.14
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-2.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.32
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-2.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.47
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-3.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.83
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 8-2.97 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.74
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline7.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.93
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-2.91 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.82
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-2.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.53
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-3.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.88
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-1.90 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.26
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-2.61 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 8-2.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.88
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-2.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.87
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-2.77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.85
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline7.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.82
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-2.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-2.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.37
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-1.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.13
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 8-1.92 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.34
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline7.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.72
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-1.92 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.36
Secondary

Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT Population

Participants answered: How much pain have you had when going up or down stairs? Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain. Higher score indicated greater pain.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized intravenous study medication (either tanezumab or placebo). Missing data were imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline8.59 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-2.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.99
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-2.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.12
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-2.77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.34
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-2.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.38
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-3.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.55
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-3.61 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.86
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-3.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.81
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline8.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.29
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-3.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.78
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-2.34 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.45
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-3.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.98
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-2.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-3.48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.84
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-3.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.86
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-3.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-3.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.87
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline8.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.42
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-2.68 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.48
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-2.66 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.45
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-2.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-2.51 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.37
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline8.53 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.37
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-2.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.31
Secondary

Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT Population

Participants answered: How much pain have you had when going up or down stairs? Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain. Higher score indicated greater pain.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: mITT analysis set included all participants in ITT analysis set who had Week 8 visit on or before 23 June 2010 (effective date of the US FDA imposed clinical hold). Missing data were imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline8.59 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-1.90 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.98
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-2.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.19
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 8-2.62 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.36
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-2.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.45
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-2.91 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.64
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-3.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.92
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 8-3.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.86
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline8.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.27
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-3.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.82
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-2.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.45
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-3.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.99
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-2.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.26
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-2.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.79
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 8-3.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.86
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-3.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.89
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-3.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.88
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline8.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.42
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-2.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.44
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-2.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.42
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-1.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.16
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 8-2.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.29
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline8.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.35
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-2.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.28
Secondary

Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT Population

Participants answered: How much pain have you had when walking on a flat surface? Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain. Higher score indicated greater pain.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized intravenous study medication (either tanezumab or placebo). Missing data were imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-2.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.72
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-2.46 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline7.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.57
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-2.91 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.73
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-2.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.17
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-2.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.63
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-3.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.72
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-2.61 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.53
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-3.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.64
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-3.84 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-3.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.75
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline7.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.45
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-3.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.86
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-2.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.39
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-3.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline7.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.54
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-3.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.86
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-3.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.76
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationBaseline7.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.66
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 8-2.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 4-2.91 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.42
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 16-2.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.48
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 2-2.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.17
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationChange at Week 12-2.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.58
Secondary

Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT Population

Participants answered: How much pain have you had when walking on a flat surface? Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain. Higher score indicated greater pain.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: mITT analysis set included all participants in ITT analysis set who had Week 8 visit on or before 23 June 2010 (effective date of the US FDA imposed clinical hold). Missing data were imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline7.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.56
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-1.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.15
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-2.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.34
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 8-2.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.59
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-2.66 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.75
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-2.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.81
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-3.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 8-3.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.77
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline7.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.46
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-3.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.73
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-2.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.55
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-3.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.92
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-2.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.28
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-2.98 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.84
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 8-3.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.92
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-3.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-3.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.88
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline7.68 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.54
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 12-2.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.44
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 16-2.51 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.37
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 2-1.99 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.15
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 8-2.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.33
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationBaseline7.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.62
Oxycodone CRChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationChange at Week 4-2.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.37
Secondary

Number of Days With Rescue Medication (RM) Usage

In the event of inadequate pain relief for OA during the double-blind treatment period, participants were allowed to take up to 3000 mg of acetaminophen (tablet/capsule/caplets) per day up to 3 days per week as a rescue medication. Results are shown in number of days of rescue medication usage per week.

Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: ITT analysis set. Missing data were imputed using LOCF. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'number analyzed' signifies participants who were evaluable at specified time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboNumber of Days With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 121.82 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.39
PlaceboNumber of Days With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 42.40 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.72
PlaceboNumber of Days With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 161.73 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.3
PlaceboNumber of Days With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 82.11 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.65
PlaceboNumber of Days With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 22.72 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.66
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Days With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 81.33 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.24
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Days With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 121.20 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.24
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Days With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 22.03 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.46
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Days With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 41.60 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.43
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Days With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 161.02 days per weekStandard Deviation 1.99
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Days With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 22.58 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.58
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Days With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 41.95 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.51
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Days With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 81.72 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.52
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Days With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 121.63 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.41
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Days With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 161.40 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.25
Oxycodone CRNumber of Days With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 121.74 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.37
Oxycodone CRNumber of Days With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 42.27 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.68
Oxycodone CRNumber of Days With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 22.35 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.69
Oxycodone CRNumber of Days With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 81.75 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.38
Oxycodone CRNumber of Days With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 161.67 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.39
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Discontinued From Study Due to Lack of Efficacy

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized intravenous study medication (either tanezumab or placebo).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Discontinued From Study Due to Lack of Efficacy10 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants Who Discontinued From Study Due to Lack of Efficacy6 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants Who Discontinued From Study Due to Lack of Efficacy5 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants Who Discontinued From Study Due to Lack of Efficacy12 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to Severity

Adverse event of abnormal peripheral sensation: allodynia, burning sensation, decreased vibratory sense, dysaesthesia, hyperaesthesia, hyperpathia, hypoaesthesia, neuralgia, neuritis, neuropathy peripheral, pallanesthesia, paraesthesia, paraesthesia oral, peripheral sensory neuropathy, polyneuropathy, sensory disturbance, sensory loss and thermohypoaesthesia. Adverse event of abnormal peripheral sensation was assessed according to severity: mild (did not interfere with participant's usual function); moderate (interfered to some extent with participant's usual function); and severe (interfered significantly with participant's usual function).

Time frame: Baseline up to 112 days after last intravenous dose

Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized intravenous study medication (either tanezumab or placebo).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityHypoaesthesia: Severe0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityDecreased Vibratory Sense: Mild0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityBurning Sensation: Mild0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityParaesthesia: Moderate1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityHyperaesthesia: Moderate0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityParaesthesia: Mild0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityHypoaesthesia: Moderate0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityHypoaesthesia: Mild0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityNeuropathy peripheral: Moderate0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityHyperaesthesia: Mild0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityDysaesthesia: Mild1 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityBurning Sensation: Mild0 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityHyperaesthesia: Moderate1 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityHypoaesthesia: Mild1 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityHypoaesthesia: Moderate2 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityParaesthesia: Mild4 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityParaesthesia: Moderate2 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityDecreased Vibratory Sense: Mild1 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityDysaesthesia: Mild0 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityHyperaesthesia: Mild0 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityHypoaesthesia: Severe1 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityNeuropathy peripheral: Moderate1 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityHypoaesthesia: Moderate0 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityBurning Sensation: Mild1 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityDysaesthesia: Mild0 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityHypoaesthesia: Mild3 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityHyperaesthesia: Mild2 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityHyperaesthesia: Moderate0 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityDecreased Vibratory Sense: Mild2 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityParaesthesia: Moderate0 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityHypoaesthesia: Severe0 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityParaesthesia: Mild3 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityNeuropathy peripheral: Moderate0 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityHypoaesthesia: Severe0 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityDecreased Vibratory Sense: Mild0 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityHypoaesthesia: Mild2 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityHypoaesthesia: Moderate0 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityParaesthesia: Moderate0 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityDysaesthesia: Mild1 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityBurning Sensation: Mild0 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityParaesthesia: Mild1 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityNeuropathy peripheral: Moderate0 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityHyperaesthesia: Mild0 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Adverse Event of Abnormal Peripheral Sensation According to SeverityHyperaesthesia: Moderate0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 112 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included SAEs as well as non-serious AEs which occurred during the trial.

Time frame: Baseline up to 112 days after last intravenous dose

Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized intravenous study medication (either tanezumab or placebo).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs50 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs72 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs4 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs61 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs3 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs100 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs4 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Anti-Drug (Tanezumab) Antibody (ADA)

Human serum samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies by using the semi-quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Only participants receiving tanezumab were to be analyzed for this measure. A participant may be represented in more than 1 category.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8 and 18

Population: ITT analysis set. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'number analyzed' signifies participants who were evaluable at specified time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug (Tanezumab) Antibody (ADA)Baseline0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug (Tanezumab) Antibody (ADA)Week 81 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug (Tanezumab) Antibody (ADA)Week 180 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug (Tanezumab) Antibody (ADA)Week 180 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug (Tanezumab) Antibody (ADA)Baseline1 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug (Tanezumab) Antibody (ADA)Week 82 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT Population

The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to OA in the index joint (knee/hip) during past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on an NRS of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain.

Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized intravenous study medication (either tanezumab or placebo). Missing data were imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 12: >=90% Reduction6 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 8: >=90% Reduction5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 2: >=90% Reduction1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 12: >=70% Reduction26 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 12: >=30% Reduction80 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 12: >=50% Reduction44 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 2: >=30% Reduction59 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 16: >=70% Reduction29 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 4: >=30% Reduction72 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 4: >=50% Reduction44 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 2: >=50% Reduction30 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 16: >=50% Reduction47 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 4: >=70% Reduction15 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 16: >=90% Reduction8 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 4: >=90% Reduction3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 2: >=70% Reduction10 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 16: >=30% Reduction78 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 8: >=30% Reduction78 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 8: >=50% Reduction47 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 8: >=70% Reduction21 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 4: >=90% Reduction20 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 8: >=70% Reduction44 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 16: >=70% Reduction47 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 12: >=70% Reduction48 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 4: >=50% Reduction72 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 8: >=90% Reduction20 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 12: >=90% Reduction25 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 2: >=30% Reduction75 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 8: >=50% Reduction71 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 12: >=30% Reduction107 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 2: >=50% Reduction46 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 12: >=50% Reduction75 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 4: >=70% Reduction48 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 2: >=90% Reduction5 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 8: >=30% Reduction109 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 16: >=30% Reduction107 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 2: >=70% Reduction23 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 4: >=30% Reduction98 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 16: >=90% Reduction24 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 16: >=50% Reduction76 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 12: >=30% Reduction102 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 2: >=50% Reduction42 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 2: >=30% Reduction66 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 2: >=70% Reduction15 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 2: >=90% Reduction4 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 4: >=30% Reduction97 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 4: >=50% Reduction68 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 4: >=70% Reduction47 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 4: >=90% Reduction14 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 8: >=30% Reduction99 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 8: >=50% Reduction73 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 8: >=70% Reduction47 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 8: >=90% Reduction16 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 12: >=50% Reduction77 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 12: >=70% Reduction44 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 12: >=90% Reduction18 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 16: >=30% Reduction103 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 16: >=50% Reduction75 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 16: >=70% Reduction43 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 16: >=90% Reduction19 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 8: >=50% Reduction47 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 8: >=30% Reduction75 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 16: >=70% Reduction28 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 12: >=90% Reduction6 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 4: >=90% Reduction7 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 4: >=70% Reduction25 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 2: >=50% Reduction33 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 16: >=30% Reduction78 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 4: >=50% Reduction48 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 4: >=30% Reduction86 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 2: >=30% Reduction71 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 16: >=50% Reduction51 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 2: >=90% Reduction5 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 12: >=30% Reduction81 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 2: >=70% Reduction13 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 12: >=50% Reduction51 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 8: >=90% Reduction4 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 8: >=70% Reduction27 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 16: >=90% Reduction3 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 12: >=70% Reduction26 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT Population

The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to OA in the index joint (knee/hip) during past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on an NRS of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain.

Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: mITT analysis set included all participants in ITT analysis set who had Week 8 visit on or before 23 June 2010 (effective date of the US FDA imposed clinical hold). Missing data were imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 12: >=70% Reduction21 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 16: >=90% Reduction8 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 12: >=30% Reduction76 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 4: >=30% Reduction62 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 16: >=30% Reduction78 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 4: >=90% Reduction3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 2: >=30% Reduction54 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 4: >=50% Reduction39 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 12: >=90% Reduction6 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 4: >=70% Reduction13 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 8: >=90% Reduction5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 8: >=70% Reduction16 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 16: >=50% Reduction44 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 2: >=70% Reduction9 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 8: >=50% Reduction43 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 2: >=90% Reduction1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 16: >=70% Reduction25 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 12: >=50% Reduction41 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 2: >=50% Reduction28 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 8: >=30% Reduction73 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 8: >=90% Reduction19 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 12: >=70% Reduction45 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 2: >=70% Reduction21 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 12: >=90% Reduction24 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 16: >=30% Reduction97 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 16: >=50% Reduction71 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 16: >=70% Reduction47 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 2: >=90% Reduction4 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 4: >=30% Reduction88 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 4: >=50% Reduction61 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 2: >=30% Reduction67 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 4: >=70% Reduction40 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 4: >=90% Reduction17 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 8: >=30% Reduction94 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 8: >=50% Reduction63 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 2: >=50% Reduction41 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 8: >=70% Reduction43 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 12: >=30% Reduction97 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 16: >=90% Reduction23 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 12: >=50% Reduction68 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 12: >=70% Reduction38 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 8: >=30% Reduction81 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 16: >=70% Reduction40 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 16: >=50% Reduction63 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 12: >=30% Reduction83 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 8: >=50% Reduction57 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 12: >=50% Reduction61 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 16: >=90% Reduction10 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 12: >=90% Reduction9 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 8: >=70% Reduction39 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 2: >=50% Reduction37 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 4: >=50% Reduction55 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 16: >=30% Reduction87 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 4: >=70% Reduction37 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 2: >=30% Reduction58 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 4: >=30% Reduction78 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 2: >=70% Reduction12 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 4: >=90% Reduction9 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 2: >=90% Reduction2 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 8: >=90% Reduction8 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 16: >=70% Reduction21 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 8: >=90% Reduction4 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 16: >=90% Reduction5 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 2: >=30% Reduction63 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 2: >=50% Reduction31 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 2: >=70% Reduction13 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 2: >=90% Reduction5 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 4: >=30% Reduction74 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 4: >=50% Reduction40 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 4: >=70% Reduction22 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 4: >=90% Reduction6 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 8: >=30% Reduction69 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 8: >=50% Reduction38 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 8: >=70% Reduction22 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 12: >=30% Reduction76 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 12: >=50% Reduction43 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 12: >=70% Reduction21 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 12: >=90% Reduction7 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 16: >=30% Reduction75 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With At Least (>=) 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 16: >=50% Reduction44 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT Population

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 dimensions/domains/items: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each item has 3 possible responses: no dysfunction (level 1), moderate/some dysfunction (level 2), and extreme dysfunction (level 3). Change from baseline at Week 12 is defined as: Improved (positive change), No change, and Worsened (negative change). Number of participants with response is reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: ITT analysis set. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'number analyzed' signifies participants who were evaluable at specified time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationMobility, Baseline: Level 18 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Baseline: Level 252 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Baseline: Level 12 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Change at Week 12: No Change35 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationSelf-care, Baseline: Level 193 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationUsual Activities, Change at Week 12: No Change36 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationUsual Activities, Change at Week 12: Worsened5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Change at Week 12: Worsened3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationSelf-care, Baseline: Level 245 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Change at Week 12: No Change29 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationUsual Activities, Baseline: Level 115 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationSelf-care, Change at Week 12: No Change39 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationSelf-care, Baseline: Level 32 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationMobility, Change at Wk 12: Worsened1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Change at Week 12: Worsened5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationMobility, Baseline: Level 30 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationSelf-care, Change at Week 12: Improved15 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationSelf-care, Change at Week 12: Worsened2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Change at Week 12: Improved16 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationMobility, Change at Wk 12: No Change43 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Baseline: Level 179 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationMobility, Baseline: Level 2132 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationMobility, Change at Wk 12: Improved12 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationUsual Activities, Baseline: Level 2123 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Baseline: Level 39 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Change at Week 12: Improved23 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Baseline: Level 360 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationUsual Activities, Baseline: Level 32 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationUsual Activities, Change at Week 12: Improved15 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Baseline: Level 277 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Baseline: Level 292 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationMobility, Change at Wk 12: Improved29 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationMobility, Baseline: Level 115 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationMobility, Baseline: Level 30 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Baseline: Level 37 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationSelf-care, Change at Week 12: Worsened3 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationUsual Activities, Baseline: Level 121 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationMobility, Change at Wk 12: No Change31 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationUsual Activities, Baseline: Level 2134 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationUsual Activities, Baseline: Level 36 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Change at Week 12: Improved16 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationMobility, Change at Wk 12: Worsened1 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationSelf-care, Baseline: Level 1122 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Change at Week 12: No Change40 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationSelf-care, Baseline: Level 238 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationSelf-care, Baseline: Level 31 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Baseline: Level 268 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationSelf-care, Change at Week 12: Improved12 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationSelf-care, Change at Week 12: No Change46 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationUsual Activities, Change at Week 12: No Change32 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Change at Week 12: Worsened5 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationUsual Activities, Change at Week 12: Worsened2 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Baseline: Level 11 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationUsual Activities, Change at Week 12: Improved27 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Baseline: Level 368 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Baseline: Level 186 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Change at Week 12: Improved32 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Change at Week 12: No Change28 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationMobility, Baseline: Level 2146 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Change at Week 12: Worsened1 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationUsual Activities, Change at Week 12: Worsened1 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Change at Week 12: Worsened8 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationMobility, Change at Wk 12: Worsened1 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Change at Week 12: No Change35 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Baseline: Level 10 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Baseline: Level 252 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationUsual Activities, Baseline: Level 36 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Baseline: Level 192 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Baseline: Level 294 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationMobility, Baseline: Level 110 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationMobility, Change at Wk 12: No Change39 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Change at Week 12: Improved12 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationUsual Activities, Change at Week 12: Improved15 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationMobility, Baseline: Level 30 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Baseline: Level 355 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Baseline: Level 35 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationUsual Activities, Baseline: Level 2125 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Change at Week 12: Worsened1 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationSelf-care, Change at Week 12: Improved17 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationSelf-care, Baseline: Level 31 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Change at Week 12: No Change37 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Change at Week 12: Improved21 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationSelf-care, Change at Week 12: No Change38 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationSelf-care, Change at Week 12: Worsened2 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationSelf-care, Baseline: Level 250 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationUsual Activities, Baseline: Level 119 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationUsual Activities, Change at Week 12: No Change41 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationMobility, Change at Wk 12: Improved17 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationSelf-care, Baseline: Level 199 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationMobility, Baseline: Level 2140 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Baseline: Level 372 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Baseline: Level 268 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Change at Week 12: No Change42 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Change at Week 12: Worsened8 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationMobility, Baseline: Level 17 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationMobility, Baseline: Level 2148 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationMobility, Change at Wk 12: Improved4 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationMobility, Change at Wk 12: No Change53 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationMobility, Change at Wk 12: Worsened2 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationSelf-care, Baseline: Level 1108 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationSelf-care, Baseline: Level 248 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationSelf-care, Baseline: Level 30 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationSelf-care, Change at Week 12: Improved10 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationUsual Activities, Change at Week 12: No Change36 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationUsual Activities, Change at Week 12: Worsened2 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Baseline: Level 11 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Baseline: Level 283 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationUsual Activities, Change at Week 12: Improved21 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Change at Week 12: Improved17 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Change at Week 12: No Change39 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Change at Week 12: Worsened3 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Baseline: Level 184 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Baseline: Level 34 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Change at Week 12: Improved9 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationUsual Activities, Baseline: Level 35 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationMobility, Baseline: Level 31 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationSelf-care, Change at Week 12: No Change44 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationSelf-care, Change at Week 12: Worsened5 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationUsual Activities, Baseline: Level 115 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: ITT PopulationUsual Activities, Baseline: Level 2136 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT Population

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 dimensions/domains/items: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each item has 3 possible responses: no dysfunction (level 1), moderate/some dysfunction (level 2), and extreme dysfunction (level 3). Change from baseline at Week 12 is defined as: Improved (positive change), No change, and Worsened (negative change). Number of participants with response is reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: mITT analysis set. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'number anlayzed' signifies participants who were evaluable at specified time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Change at Week 12: No Change29 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationSelf-care, Change at Week 12: Worsened2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationMobility, Change at Week 12: No Change43 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationMobility, Baseline: Level 2128 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Baseline: Level 176 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationUsual Activities, Baseline: Level 115 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationSelf-care, Change at Week 12: Improved15 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Change at Week 12: Improved16 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Baseline: Level 251 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Baseline: Level 277 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Baseline: Level 39 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationSelf-care, Baseline: Level 32 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationUsual Activities, Change at Week 12: Worsened5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationUsual Activities, Baseline: Level 32 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Change at Week 12: Improved23 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationMobility, Baseline: Level 30 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationMobility, Change at Week 12: Improved12 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Change at Week 12: Worsened3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationUsual Activities, Change at Week 12: Improved15 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Baseline: Level 356 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationUsual Activities, Change at Week 12: No Change36 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationSelf-care, Change at Week 12: No Change39 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationSC, Baseline: Level 191 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Change at Week 12: No Change35 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Baseline: Level 12 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationMobility, Change at Week 12: Worsened1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationSelf-care, Baseline: Level 243 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Change at Week 12: Worsened5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationUsual Activities, Baseline: Level 2119 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationMobility, Baseline: Level 18 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationSelf-care, Change at Week 12: Worsened3 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationUsual Activities, Change at Week 12: Worsened2 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Baseline: Level 11 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Baseline: Level 287 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Change at Week 12: Improved32 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Change at Week 12: Worsened1 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationMobility, Baseline: Level 2139 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Change at Week 12: No Change40 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Change at Week 12: Worsened5 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Change at Week 12: No Change28 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Baseline: Level 182 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Baseline: Level 264 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Baseline: Level 37 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationSelf-care, Baseline: Level 31 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Change at Week 12: Improved16 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationMobility, Change at Week 12: Improved29 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationMobility, Change at Week 12: No Change31 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationMobility, Change at Week 12: Worsened1 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationSC, Baseline: Level 1118 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationSelf-care, Baseline: Level 234 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationSelf-care, Change at Week 12: No Change46 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationMobility, Baseline: Level 30 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationMobility, Baseline: Level 114 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationSelf-care, Change at Week 12: Improved12 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationUsual Activities, Change at Week 12: No Change32 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationUsual Activities, Baseline: Level 120 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationUsual Activities, Baseline: Level 2128 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationUsual Activities, Baseline: Level 35 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Baseline: Level 365 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationUsual Activities, Change at Week 12: Improved27 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationMobility, Baseline: Level 2139 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Baseline: Level 355 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationUsual Activities, Baseline: Level 36 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationSC, Baseline: Level 199 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Change at Week 12: Improved12 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationSelf-care, Change at Week 12: Worsened2 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationUsual Activities, Change at Week 12: Improved15 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationUsual Activities, Baseline: Level 2124 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationMobility, Baseline: Level 30 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Change at Week 12: Improved21 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Baseline: Level 293 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationUsual Activities, Change at Week 12: Worsened1 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Baseline: Level 251 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationSelf-care, Baseline: Level 31 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Baseline: Level 35 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationMobility, Baseline: Level 110 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationSelf-care, Baseline: Level 249 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationUsual Activities, Change at Week 12: No Change41 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Change at Week 12: Worsened8 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationSelf-care, Change at Week 12: No Change38 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Baseline: Level 192 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Change at Week 12: Worsened1 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationMobility, Change at Week 12: Improved17 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationSelf-care, Change at Week 12: Improved17 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Change at Week 12: No Change35 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationUsual Activities, Baseline: Level 119 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationMobility, Change at Week 12: No Change39 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Change at Week 12: No Change37 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Baseline: Level 10 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationMobility, Change at Week 12: Worsened1 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Change at Week 12: Worsened8 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationMobility, Baseline: Level 2146 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationMobility, Baseline: Level 31 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationMobility, Change at Week 12: No Change53 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationSelf-care, Change at Week 12: Improved10 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationSelf-care, Change at Week 12: Worsened5 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationUsual Activities, Baseline: Level 115 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationUsual Activities, Baseline: Level 2134 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationUsual Activities, Baseline: Level 35 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Change at Week 12: Improved17 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Baseline: Level 183 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Baseline: Level 267 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Baseline: Level 34 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationMobility, Baseline: Level 17 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationMobility, Change at Week 12: Improved4 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationMobility, Change at Week 12: Worsened2 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationSC, Baseline: Level 1108 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationSelf-care, Baseline: Level 246 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Baseline: Level 282 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationSelf-care, Baseline: Level 30 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationSelf-care, Change at Week 12: No Change44 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationUsual Activities, Change at Week 12: Improved21 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationUsual Activities, Change at Week 12: No Change36 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationUsual Activities, Change at Week 12: Worsened2 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Baseline: Level 11 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Baseline: Level 371 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Change at Week 12: No Change39 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationPain and Discomfort, Change at Week 12: Worsened3 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Change at Week 12: Improved9 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) - Individual Dimensions at Week 12: mITT PopulationAnxiety and Depression, Change at Week 12: No Change42 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population

The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to OA in the index joint (knee/hip) during the past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on an NRS of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain. Participants with specified reduction (as percent) from baseline at Week 8 are reported.

Time frame: Week 8

Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized intravenous study medication (either tanezumab or placebo). Missing data were imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT PopulationGreater than (>) 0% Reduction121 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=50% Reduction47 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=30% Reduction78 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=70% Reduction21 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=60% Reduction31 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population100% Reduction0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=40% Reduction54 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=20% Reduction91 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=10% Reduction109 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=90% Reduction5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=80% Reduction11 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=50% Reduction71 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=80% Reduction30 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=60% Reduction62 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT PopulationGreater than (>) 0% Reduction149 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=70% Reduction44 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=20% Reduction125 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=30% Reduction109 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population100% Reduction12 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=90% Reduction20 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=40% Reduction93 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=10% Reduction138 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=90% Reduction16 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT PopulationGreater than (>) 0% Reduction134 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=10% Reduction127 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=20% Reduction110 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=30% Reduction99 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=40% Reduction86 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=50% Reduction73 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=60% Reduction61 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=70% Reduction47 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=80% Reduction28 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population100% Reduction5 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=50% Reduction47 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population100% Reduction2 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=80% Reduction10 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=40% Reduction57 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=30% Reduction75 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=20% Reduction101 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=90% Reduction4 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=10% Reduction125 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT PopulationGreater than (>) 0% Reduction139 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=70% Reduction27 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: ITT Population>=60% Reduction38 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population

The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to OA in the index joint (knee/hip) during past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on an NRS of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain.

Time frame: Week 8

Population: mITT analysis set included all participants in ITT analysis set who had Week 8 visit on or before 23 June 2010 (effective date of the US FDA imposed clinical hold). Missing data were imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=60% Reduction29 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=80% Reduction14 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=10% Reduction94 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=30% Reduction73 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>0% Reduction108 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=70% Reduction16 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=40% Reduction51 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population100% Reduction1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=20% Reduction83 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=90% Reduction5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=50% Reduction43 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=20% Reduction106 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=80% Reduction26 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=60% Reduction54 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=10% Reduction119 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=70% Reduction43 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=50% Reduction63 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>0% Reduction127 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=90% Reduction19 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=30% Reduction94 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=40% Reduction80 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population100% Reduction11 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=90% Reduction8 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>0% Reduction115 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=10% Reduction111 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=20% Reduction92 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=30% Reduction81 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=40% Reduction67 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=50% Reduction57 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=60% Reduction47 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=70% Reduction39 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=80% Reduction22 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population100% Reduction3 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=50% Reduction38 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population100% Reduction1 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=80% Reduction11 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=40% Reduction51 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=20% Reduction92 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=30% Reduction69 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=90% Reduction4 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=10% Reduction105 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>0% Reduction119 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=70% Reduction22 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 8: mITT Population>=60% Reduction31 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: ITT Population

PGA: Participants answered the following question: Considering all the ways the OA in your index (knee/hip) affects you, how are you doing today? Participants rated their condition by using a 5-point Likert scale: 1) very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities); 2) good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities); 3) fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities); 4) poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities); and 5) very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher score indicated severe condition.

Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized intravenous study medication (either tanezumab or placebo). Missing data were imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 417 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 216 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 813 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 1618 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 1217 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 836 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 224 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 445 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 1240 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 1638 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 842 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 219 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 1644 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 1247 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 437 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 1223 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 817 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 217 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 1618 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 419 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 12 and 16: mITT Population

PGA: Participants answered the following question: Considering all the ways the OA in your index (knee/hip) affects you, how are you doing today? Participants rated their condition by using a 5-point Likert scale: 1) very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities); 2) good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities); 3) fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities); 4) poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities); and 5) very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher score indicated severe condition.

Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: mITT analysis set included all participants in ITT analysis set who had Week 8 visit on or before 23 June 2010 (effective date of the US FDA imposed clinical hold). Missing data were imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 1218 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 416 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 1621 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 814 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 215 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 838 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 1239 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 1639 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 439 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 223 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 831 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 217 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 432 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 1233 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 1635 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 1219 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 415 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 216 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 814 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Points From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 12 and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 1616 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT Population

OMERACT-OARSI response: greater than or equal to (\>=) 50 percent (%) improvement from baseline and absolute change from baseline of \>=2 units at Week of interest in WOMAC pain or physical function subscales, or at least 2 of the following 3 being true: \>=20% improvement from baseline and absolute change from baseline of \>=1 unit at Week of interest in 1) WOMAC pain subscale, 2) WOMAC physical function subscale, 3) PGA of osteoarthritis (score: 1-5, higher score=more affected). WOMAC pain, physical function subscales assess amount of pain/difficulty experienced (score: 0-10, higher score=higher pain/difficulty).

Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized intravenous study medication (either tanezumab or placebo). Missing data were imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 1283 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 487 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 1684 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 881 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 270 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 8120 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 12120 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 16120 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 4117 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 289 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 8105 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 282 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 4107 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 12110 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 16112 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 12100 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 497 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 281 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 893 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: ITT PopulationWeek 1695 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT Population

OMERACT-OARSI response: \>=50 percent (%) improvement from baseline and absolute change from baseline of \>=2 units at Week of interest in WOMAC pain or physical function subscales, or at least 2 of the following 3 being true: \>=20% improvement from baseline and absolute change from baseline of \>=1 unit at Week of interest in 1) WOMAC pain subscale, 2) WOMAC physical function subscale, 3) PGA of osteoarthritis (score: 1-5, higher score=more affected). WOMAC pain, physical function subscales assess amount of pain/difficulty experienced (score: 0-10, higher score=higher pain/difficulty).

Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: mITT analysis set included all participants in ITT analysis set who had Week 8 visit on or before 23 June 2010 (effective date of the US FDA imposed clinical hold). Missing data were imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 1280 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 476 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 1684 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 878 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 264 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 8108 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 12110 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 16111 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 4105 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 279 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 886 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 274 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 487 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 1289 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 1693 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 1287 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 483 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 270 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 880 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: mITT PopulationWeek 1687 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to Severity

Pre-specified opioid-related adverse events: fatigue, drowsiness, inability to concentrate, nausea, dizziness, constipation, itching, difficulty urinating, confusion and vomiting. Number of participants who experienced any of the pre-specified opioid-related adverse event are reported. Pre-specified opioid-related adverse events were assessed according to severity: mild (did not interfere with participant's usual function); moderate (interfered to some extent with participant's usual function); and severe (interfered significantly with participant's usual function).

Time frame: Baseline up to 112 days after last intravenous dose

Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized intravenous study medication (either tanezumab or placebo).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityVomiting: Mild1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityNausea: Moderate0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityNausea: Mild0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityConstipation: Mild1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityVomiting: Moderate0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityDizziness: Mild2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityFatigue: Mild0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityFatigue: Moderate1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityConstipation: Moderate1 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityFatigue: Moderate0 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityDizziness: Mild2 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityConstipation: Moderate1 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityConstipation: Mild1 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityNausea: Mild5 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityVomiting: Mild0 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityNausea: Moderate1 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityVomiting: Moderate1 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityFatigue: Mild2 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityFatigue: Moderate0 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityFatigue: Mild1 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityNausea: Moderate0 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityConstipation: Mild1 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityVomiting: Mild0 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityNausea: Mild3 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityDizziness: Mild3 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityConstipation: Moderate0 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityVomiting: Moderate0 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityDizziness: Mild10 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityVomiting: Mild10 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityNausea: Moderate11 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityConstipation: Mild16 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityFatigue: Mild6 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityVomiting: Moderate5 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityNausea: Mild14 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityFatigue: Moderate1 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Pre-Specified Opioid-Related Adverse Events According to SeverityConstipation: Moderate8 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Rescue Medication (RM) Usage

In the event of inadequate pain relief for OA during the double-blind treatment period, participants were allowed to take up to 3000 mg of acetaminophen (tablet/capsule/caplets) per day up to 3 days per week as a rescue medication.

Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized intravenous study medication (either tanezumab or placebo). Missing data were imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 476 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 1668 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 867 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 1268 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 290 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 863 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 285 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 465 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 1252 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 1650 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 479 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 865 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 1659 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 1261 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 299 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 485 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 290 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 877 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 1278 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Rescue Medication (RM) UsageWeek 1672 Participants
Secondary

Tanezumab Plasma Concentration

Plasma concentration of tanezumab was measured using a validated, sensitive and specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Only participants receiving tanezumab were to be analyzed for this measure.

Time frame: Predose, 1 hour post-dose on Day 1, Week 8; Week 18

Population: ITT analysis set. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'number analyzed' signifies participants who were evaluable at specified time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboTanezumab Plasma ConcentrationPredose, Day 136.96 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 160.1
PlaceboTanezumab Plasma Concentration1 hour post-dose, Day 14192 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 11266
PlaceboTanezumab Plasma ConcentrationWeek 1887.05 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 135.3
PlaceboTanezumab Plasma ConcentrationPredose, Week 8207.0 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 288.96
PlaceboTanezumab Plasma Concentration1 hour post-dose, Week 82259 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 2349.1
Tanezumab 5 mgTanezumab Plasma ConcentrationWeek 18240.2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 386.98
Tanezumab 5 mgTanezumab Plasma ConcentrationPredose, Day 1124.1 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 601.8
Tanezumab 5 mgTanezumab Plasma Concentration1 hour post-dose, Day 15690 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 10616
Tanezumab 5 mgTanezumab Plasma Concentration1 hour post-dose, Week 83583 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 1754.7
Tanezumab 5 mgTanezumab Plasma ConcentrationPredose, Week 8402.6 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 257.29
Secondary

Time to Discontinuation From Study Due to Lack of Efficacy

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: Analysis set included participants from ITT analysis set who discontinued study due to lack of efficacy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboTime to Discontinuation From Study Due to Lack of Efficacy29.0 days
Tanezumab 5 mgTime to Discontinuation From Study Due to Lack of Efficacy43.0 days
Tanezumab 10 mgTime to Discontinuation From Study Due to Lack of Efficacy56.0 days
Oxycodone CRTime to Discontinuation From Study Due to Lack of Efficacy30.0 days
Secondary

Total Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Serum Concentration

Serum samples were analyzed for determining total NGF concentration. Total NGF was analyzed using a validated, sensitive, and specific immune-affinity enrichment liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometric (IA/LC/MS/MS) method.

Time frame: Predose, 1 hour post-dose on Day 1, Week 8; Predose: Week 18

Population: ITT analysis set. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'number analyzed' signifies participants who were evaluable at specified time-point for each treatment arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboTotal Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Serum ConcentrationPredose, Day 158.1 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 205.1
PlaceboTotal Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Serum ConcentrationPredose, Week 892.6 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 384.2
PlaceboTotal Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Serum Concentration1 hour post-dose, Week 839.8 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 9.9
PlaceboTotal Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Serum ConcentrationPredose, Week 1841.0 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 15.2
PlaceboTotal Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Serum Concentration1 hour post-dose, Day 155.8 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 172.9
Tanezumab 5 mgTotal Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Serum ConcentrationPredose, Day 189.3 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 538.1
Tanezumab 5 mgTotal Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Serum ConcentrationPredose, Week 82152.2 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 1040.8
Tanezumab 5 mgTotal Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Serum ConcentrationPredose, Week 181437.1 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 1296
Tanezumab 5 mgTotal Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Serum Concentration1 hour post-dose, Day 1133.9 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 483.5
Tanezumab 5 mgTotal Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Serum Concentration1 hour post-dose, Week 82181.2 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 1070.5
Tanezumab 10 mgTotal Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Serum Concentration1 hour post-dose, Day 1163.8 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 565.2
Tanezumab 10 mgTotal Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Serum Concentration1 hour post-dose, Week 83026.0 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 976.1
Tanezumab 10 mgTotal Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Serum ConcentrationPredose, Day 1138.2 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 770.7
Tanezumab 10 mgTotal Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Serum ConcentrationPredose, Week 83160.6 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 1183.4
Tanezumab 10 mgTotal Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Serum ConcentrationPredose, Week 182365.4 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 1402.4
Oxycodone CRTotal Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Serum ConcentrationPredose, Week 845.5 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 13.2
Oxycodone CRTotal Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Serum Concentration1 hour post-dose, Week 844.0 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 22
Oxycodone CRTotal Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Serum ConcentrationPredose, Day 138.5 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 10.8
Oxycodone CRTotal Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Serum Concentration1 hour post-dose, Day 139.0 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 16.7
Oxycodone CRTotal Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Serum ConcentrationPredose, Week 1848.7 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)Standard Deviation 25.3
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Intravenous (IV) Doses of Study Medication

Number of participants are reported based on the maximum number of IV doses of either tanezumab or placebo received.

Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 16

Population: ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized intravenous study medication (either tanezumab or placebo).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Intravenous (IV) Doses of Study MedicationNumber of IV Doses: 179 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Intravenous (IV) Doses of Study MedicationNumber of IV Doses: 262 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Intravenous (IV) Doses of Study MedicationNumber of IV Doses: 272 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Intravenous (IV) Doses of Study MedicationNumber of IV Doses: 189 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Intravenous (IV) Doses of Study MedicationNumber of IV Doses: 185 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Intravenous (IV) Doses of Study MedicationNumber of IV Doses: 265 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Intravenous (IV) Doses of Study MedicationNumber of IV Doses: 197 Participants
Oxycodone CRNumber of Participants With Intravenous (IV) Doses of Study MedicationNumber of IV Doses: 261 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026