Skip to content

Performance Evaluation of Contact Lenses Among a Population of Adapted Contact Lens Wearers

Performance Evaluation of Contact Lenses Among a Population of Adapted Contact Lens Wearers

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00985231
Enrollment
272
Registered
2009-09-28
Start date
2009-09-30
Completion date
2009-12-31
Last updated
2015-03-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vision Disorders

Brief summary

This study is being conducted to evaluate Bausch & Lomb PureVision Multi-Focal contact lenses compared to the Bausch & Lomb SofLens59 contact lens when worn by adapted soft contact lens wearers on a daily wear basis.

Interventions

DEVICEPureVision Multi-Focal contact lenses

Contact lenses to be worn on a daily wear basis for 2 weeks.

DEVICESofLens59 contact lens

Contact lenses to be worn on a daily wear basis for 2 weeks.

Sponsors

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects must have clear central corneas and be free of any anterior segment disorders. * Subjects must be adapted soft contact lens wearers and agree to wear the study lenses on a daily wear basis for at least eight hours a day for approximately two weeks. * Subjects must wear a lens in each eye and each lens must be of the same manufacture and brand.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects participating in any drug or device clinical investigation within two weeks prior to entry into this study and/or during the period of study participation. * Subjects with any systemic disease affecting ocular health * Subjects with an active ocular disease or using any ocular medication. * Subjects who have had any corneal surgery (eg, refractive surgery).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Distance Visual Acuity (VA) Between Test and Control Lenses Worse Than 20/40.2 weeksEyes with distance lens VA of 20/40 or worse at study exit between test and control lenses.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjective Ratings of Eye Strain2 week visitConvergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS), was used to assess eye strain symptoms measured on a scale of 1-4. 0 score=never, 4 score=always

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 25 sites, by 25 Investigators in the United States (US). First participant enrollment was 09/28/2009 and last participant exited the study 11/09/2009

Pre-assignment details

272 participants (544 eyes) were enrolled in the study, 7 participants were ineligible at baseline, 265 participants were eligible. 259 participants (518 eyes) completed the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PureVision Multi-Focal Contact Lenses133
SofLens59 Contact Lens132
Total265

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall Studyineligible10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10
Overall StudyStudy related symptoms & complaints02
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPureVision Multi-Focal Contact LensesSofLens59 Contact LensTotal
Age, Customized
30-35 years of age
68 participants67 participants135 participants
Age, Customized
36 -40 years of age
65 participants65 participants130 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
7 Participants11 Participants18 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
15 Participants14 Participants29 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
110 Participants104 Participants214 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
114 Participants97 Participants211 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants35 Participants54 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2700 / 274
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 2700 / 274

Outcome results

Primary

Distance Visual Acuity (VA) Between Test and Control Lenses Worse Than 20/40.

Eyes with distance lens VA of 20/40 or worse at study exit between test and control lenses.

Time frame: 2 weeks

Population: All Eligible, Dispensed Eyes with non-missing scores

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PureVision Multi-Focal Contact LensesDistance Visual Acuity (VA) Between Test and Control Lenses Worse Than 20/40.2 eyes
SofLens59 Contact LensDistance Visual Acuity (VA) Between Test and Control Lenses Worse Than 20/40.0 eyes
Secondary

Subjective Ratings of Eye Strain

Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS), was used to assess eye strain symptoms measured on a scale of 1-4. 0 score=never, 4 score=always

Time frame: 2 week visit

Population: All Eligible, Dispensed Eyes, CISS Composite Score

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PureVision Multi-Focal Contact LensesSubjective Ratings of Eye Strain9.9 CISS Composite ScoreStandard Deviation 9.6
SofLens59 Contact LensSubjective Ratings of Eye Strain9.0 CISS Composite ScoreStandard Deviation 9.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026