Skip to content

Systematic Clonidine for Epidural Analgesia in Labour

Effects of a Systematic Addition of Clonidine in the Local Anaesthetic and Opiate Solution for Epidural Patient Controlled Analgesia in Labour (Levobupivacaine 0.568 mg.mLl-1 + Sufentanil 0.45 µg.mL-1)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00983125
Enrollment
124
Registered
2009-09-23
Start date
2009-08-31
Completion date
2010-03-31
Last updated
2013-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Labour

Keywords

Labour, Epidural analgesia, Clonidine, Levobupivacaine, Opiates, Patient-controlled, Active spontaneous labour requiring epidural analgesia

Brief summary

In a prospective randomised study involving primiparous women in spontaneous uncomplicated labour with cervical dilatation \< 5 cm, epidural analgesia will be given with an initial volume of 20 mL anaesthetic solution, followed by a standardised algorithm of top-up manual injections to achieve analgesia, then by a patient-controlled regimen with 5-mL self-administered boli in addition to a continuous infusion of 5 mL.hr-1. The anaesthetic solution will be levobupivacaine presented in 100-mL bags from the market (0.0625%), in which 10 mL (50 g) of sufentanil will be added, as well as clonidine (150 µg) in one arm. The final concentration of clonidine in this arm will be 1.35 mg.mL-1. Parturients and midwifes assessing pain during labour will be blinded to the design.

Detailed description

We recently compared the analgesic effects of the two presentations of levobupivacaine available on the French market, (0.625 and 1.25 mg.mL-1 in pre-filled bags), both with sufentanil. It appeared that the high concentration was more powerful, however leading in some cases to give doses of levobupivacaine superior to the label's recommendations. This indicates to use the low concentration, with a risk of a poorer efficacy. Our aim is to show that efficacy can be restored with a systematic addition of clonidine, which has documented analgesic properties when administered perispinally.

Interventions

DRUGClonidine

Addition of a non-labeled drug (clonidine) in one of the two arm of the study, with randomisation. To compare the effects of a systematic addition of clonidine (150 µg added in the solution bag) in the local anesthetic solution), versus no addition, on the quality of analgesia for labour.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Parturient is 18 years old * ASA physical status 1 or 2 * Primiparity * Singleton * Gestational age is 36 weeks * Spontaneous labour with cervical dilatation of 5 cm

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of required additional epidural boluses, either self-administered or medically given as a rescueduring labour

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Pain at deliveryat delivery
Pain at post-delivery suturesat post-delivery sutures
Spontaneous pain during labour (on VAS)during labour
Duration of labourduring labour
Obstetrical events (caesarean section, instrumental delivery)after delivery
Motor blockduring labour

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026