Skip to content

A Clinical Comparison of Three Contact Lens Care Systems and Their Effect on Contact Lenses

A Clinical Comparison of Three Contact Lens Care Systems and Their Effect on Contact Lenses

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00982046
Enrollment
75
Registered
2009-09-22
Start date
2009-04-30
Completion date
2010-05-31
Last updated
2016-11-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Contact Lenses

Keywords

contact lenses, disinfection solutions, contact lens care

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of three differing contact lens care solutions when used in conjunction with three contact lenses.

Detailed description

This study was conducted as three separate studies based on the contact lens brand dispensed. In each study, the contact lens was evaluated in conjunction with three solutions: Opti-Free Replenish, ReNu MultiPlus, and Clear Care. The total enrollment number of 75 represents a combined enrollment of the three studies, with some subjects participating in more than one study.

Interventions

DEVICEOpti-Free RepleniSH multi-purpose disinfecting solution

Contact lens solution CE-marked for intended use.

Contact lens solution CE-marked for intended use.

DEVICEClear Care cleaning and disinfecting system

Contact lens care system CE-marked for intended use.

Silicone hydrogel contact lens worn for two weeks on a daily wear basis and cleaned nightly with one of three contact lens care solutions. The order of solutions was randomized, and a fresh pair of lenses was dispensed with each solution.

DEVICELotrafilcon B contact lens (AIR OPTIX AQUA)

Silicone hydrogel contact lens worn for two weeks on a daily wear basis and cleaned nightly with one of three contact lens care solutions. The order of solutions was randomized, and a fresh pair of lenses was dispensed with each solution.

Silicone hydrogel contact lens worn for two weeks on a daily wear basis and cleaned nightly with one of three contact lens care solutions. The order of solutions was randomized, and a fresh pair of lenses was dispensed with each solution.

Sponsors

Alcon Research
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Signed informed consent. * Adapted contact lens wearer for at least one month. * Spherical prescription range between +6.00 to -8.00 diopters. * Astigmatism of less than or equal to 1.00 diopter in at least one eye. * Normal eyes with no evidence of abnormality or disease. * Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion criteria

* Rigid Gas Permeable (RGP) contact lens wear in last 30 days. * Concurrent ocular medication, systemic illness, or medical treatment that will affect ocular physiology, lens performance, or vision. * Corneal infiltrates, scarring, or neovascularization within central 4 millimeters of cornea. * Eye injury or surgery within 8 weeks prior to study. * Aphakia, amblyopia, abnormal lacrimal secretions, ocular irritation, keratoconus, corneal irregularity, pregnancy, lactating, planning to become pregnant during the study, and participation in a concurrent clinical trial. * Other protocol-defined

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Modulus2 weeksModulus is a measure of the stiffness of a contact lens material. Modulus is determined from the slope of the stress-strain curve created during tensile tests conducted on a sample of the material. Modulus is measured in mega Pascals (MPa). A higher modulus indicates a stiffer contact lens.
Bulbar hyperemia2 weeksBulbar hyperemia is the injection (or redness) of the blood vessels in the tissues overlaying the white of the eye. Bulbar hyperemia is measured on a 0-4 scale, with 0=none, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, and 4=severe. Half-grades are allowed.
Corneal staining type2 weeksAn ophthalmic dye is used to highlight dead or degenerated corneal epithelial cells. The type of staining is measured over the five sectors of the cornea on a 0-4 scale, where 0=none, 1=micropunctate, 2=macropunctate, 3=coalesced macropunctate, and 4=patch (1mm). The five sectors are averaged to give a single score.
Upper palpebral roughness2 weeksThe roughness of the inner lining of the upper eyelid is measured on a 0-4 scale, where 0=uniform appearance, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, and 4=severe. Half grades are allowed.
High contrast visual acuity2 weeksHigh contrast visual acuity is a measure of the clearness of vision with full room illumination. Visual acuity is measured with a computer-generated, high contrast logMAR (logarithm minimum angle of resolution) chart.
End of day comfort2 weeksAs assessed by the subject as a measure of the comfort of the contact lenses at the end of an average day. End of day comfort is recorded on an 11-point scale where 0=poor and 10=excellent.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026